Nuremberg Schpuremberg

The Nuremberg Code, a part of which is listed listed at the end of this post (concerning informed consent), came about in the wake of World War II, the result of a public trial of Nazi leadership figures in the Nuremberg Trials, lasting from 1946-49. These days we call such public displays “virtue signalling,” as in the wake of the war the Allies were much in need of a public face lift. Crimes against humanity knew no nationality, and my own country, The United States, was sorely in need of a public trial and a few ritual hangings. But victor’s justice prevailed. The Nuremberg Code led to the subsequent 1975 Helsinki Accords, designed to ease the stalemate between the West and the USSR that existed at that time. Article VII of the Helsinki Accords reads as follows, promoting

Respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms, including the freedom of thought, conscience, religion or belief.

This was apparently intended as a slap in the face to the USSR, again, virtual signalling and nothing more. Neither the Nuremberg Code nor the Helsinki Accords have force of law or treaty behind them, and as such are merely window dressing. In fact, during the current “pandemic,” they’ve been ignored in total. It’s a good thing for leadership, as if these enunciated principles carried with them force of law, our prisons would be over-populated and thousands of white lab coats would be hanging in the closets. The medical and scientific professions are as corrupt as anything that might have existed in Nazi Germany or the Soviet Union that led to this massive display of false righteousness called Nuremberg.

Another interesting facet of the Nuremberg Trials is what is known now known as the “Nuremberg Defense” wherein various Nazi officers claimed innocence from any of their crimes due to the fact that they were just following orders. True culpability for the horrors of that regime, we were told, lay with higher figures. This was a quandary for the court, as it is a true and unfortunate facet of human nature, and especially of military personnel – that trust in command relieves them of moral responsibility for their actions. There is no need to think when one’s job is as a subordinate to higher authority. Punishment follows failure to follow orders, and not for crimes embedded in the orders themselves.

Eventually it was decided that while the Nuremberg Defense had some merit, there could be no public whitewash, so that inferior officers were indeed found culpable for their actions, and only subject to lesser punishment. This applies, then, to every “Health” agency in the United States, all culpable for crimes against humanity, their only defense, extreme ignorance of real science coupled with complete subordination to agencies like WHO and CDC, neither a paragon of virtue.

In 1960 Nazi officer Adolph Eichmann was captured in Argentina and brought to Israel for another virtue-signalling charade and extravaganza. Political theorist Hannah Arendt sat through the trial, and later reported in her 1963 book, Eichmann in Jerusalem,  on the apparent indifference of Eichmann to his horrible crimes. She called his attitude the “banality of evil,” that is, the mere fact of carrying out orders relieved Eichmann, in his mind, of guilt. Arendt later crystalized this line of thought, tracing such indifference and blind reliance on authority in a book called The Origins of Totalitarianism. In short, she learned that people are slaves because they allow themselves to be enslaved. There is not enough resistance in the general population in any country, least of all the United States, to overcome the “…vast networks of corrupted people with an interest in maintaining tyranny.” (Étienne de La Boétie, 16th century French political theorist).

I think Arendt missed entirely something much bigger, either by design or tunnel vision, that being that Eichmann was knowingly in a show trial, and after would escape unharmed, perhaps even returning to Argentina and the good life. Over time this has been a growing suspicion within me, that Nuremberg, Helsinki, and Eichmann are so easily ignored because it is known within the tight cluster of people (La Boétie’s “vast network” of corruption) behind these public showcase’s that the world needed heroes and villains, and that it was important to get out in front and make sure that the world “correctly” perceived that the Germans were the villains, and that Allied forces were heroes.

We are currently involved in a mass experiment called “Covid-19” which carries with it an experimental vaccine. No one taking the vaccine is being made aware of its experimental nature, or the true devastation being left in its wake.

Please note that there are apparently two streams of information coming out of CDC regarding Covid-19 vaccine deaths, and that this website, called OpenVAERS, shows 5,165 deaths and 56,740 serious events. I do not know which data source is more accurate, but conservatism would dictate use of the OpenVAERS numbers, which would yield, according the the Harvard Pilgrim Study, 39,731 to 172,167 deaths, midpoint 105,149. That’s not as holocaustic in nature as the figures I draw down by accessing VAERS directly.

Further, in accessing VAERS directly, a second source of information, I find that today (6/5/21) it is reporting 15,496 deaths, 2,187 more than just yesterday. Normally, VAERS is updated every Friday, so this is unusual. Further, I took a sample of states, two of our most populous being New York and California, reporting 193 and 312 deaths respectively. Those would not begin to add up to the 15,496 even with addition of the other 48 states. In fact, if proportionate to all of the US population, those two states would have 1,865 deaths in total. Something is fishy.

Which data sources is accurate? I will from this point forward rely on OpenVAERS, knowing that all data handed us by CDC is suspect, and that all of our questions are relegated to “unknown unknowns.” There is nothing in our public officials, especially medical, that we can rely on.


The Nuremberg Code regarding use of humans in medical experiments:

  1. The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential.
  2. The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature.
  3. The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem under study that the anticipated results will justify the performance of the experiment.
  4. The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.
  5. No experiment should be conducted where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects.
  6. The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.
  7. Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability, or death.
  8. The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment.
  9. During the course of the experiment the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end if he has reached the physical or mental state where continuation of the experiment seems to him to be impossible.
  10. During the course of the experiment the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill and careful judgment required of him that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.

66 thoughts on “Nuremberg Schpuremberg

      1. Utilizing the directions in a previous post by MT, https://pieceofmindful.com/2021/03/26/report-from-the-asylum-vaccine-deaths/, I got the same “result” as MT – that read as follows: “This request produces 13,309 rows, but 10,000 is the maximum allowed. Simplify this request, or send a series of smaller ones. For example, group results by race but limit each query to a single race. Send a request for each race group and then merge the results. Please contact user support for further assistance.” This data comes directly from VAERS at https://wonder.cdc.gov/vaers.html. I had notified MT before of OpenVAERS, but I have no way of substantiating their reported numbers.

        Like

        1. Stephers – As I see it, the 10,000 is a feature of the programming, an upper limit on the number of cases that it can report. It may be a remnant of times when 10,000 was so high a number that no one thought it would ever be breached. If you search for anything that produces a number of less than 10,000, you get a full report of the details. Right now, it is showing me in total 15,496 deaths, but when I limit it to states, for instance, New Jersey 71, New York 193, California 312, then it will give you all the details, but the numbers are not large enough in total that they would add up to 15,496. It is also rare for the numbers to change on Saturday. It appears incoherent. They could be messing with us.

          Like

  1. Speaking of VAERS data:

    LATEST UPDATE OF VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System) DATA:

    As of 28 May 2021 (the latest available) the number of deaths associated with the three vaccines given to Americans are:

    PFIZER 1881
    MODERNA 2145
    JANSSEN 373
    TOTAL 5165

    As to thrombocytopenia we have:

    PFIZER 228
    MODERNA 177
    JANSSEN 117

    Readable VAERS data can be downloaded from

    http://preearth.net/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=15&t=1184

    The VAERS people are throttling the data. For example, data from December last year is still being released. It is becoming more and more noticeable. I wonder what is really happening?

    Like

    1. The Amnesty International Reports: Covid-19 and Care Homes.

      The report on the United Kingdom. Some passages:

      Covid-19 has had a devastating impact on older persons living in care homes in England. 28,186 “excess deaths” were recorded in care homes in England between 2 March and 12 June, with over 18,500 care home residents confirmed to have died with Covid-19 during this period. UK government decisions and failures resulted in violations of the human rights of people living in care homes, notably the right to life, to health and to non-discrimination. From discharging 25,000 patients, including those infected, into care homes; to denying care homes residents admission to hospital and imposing “do not attempt resuscitation” orders on them without due process, to failing to provide PPE (personal protective equipment) and testing to care homes. Older persons living in care homes were abandoned to die.

      I guess; “people in care homes had their right to life violated”, sounds better than; “people in care homes were murdered,” but it is less accurate.

      The following was so deceptively worded that I have added explanation (in brackets).

      The Department of Health and Social Care…. adopted a policy,… that led to 25,000 patients, including those (known to be) infected (with Covid-19, and also those who were) possibly infected with Covid-19 (as they) had not been tested, being discharged from hospital into care homes between 17 March and 15 April—exponentially increasing the risk of transmission to the very population most at risk of severe illness and death from the disease. (This, while being denied) access to testing, (being denied) personal protective equipment, (while having) insufficient staff, and limited (and confusing) guidance. (As expected) care homes were overwhelmed.

      Like

      1. The world is inverted due to the utter darkness which has befallen mankind.

        I kindly urge everyone to take care of their own health. Because once one succumbs to “care facilities”, your end at the hands of darkness is assured.

        You’ve lived an entire lifetime in the swamp of filth and decay. But to depart this world in the very grip of those demons promoting this ” system” is failure.

        Don’t be a failure, please…Someone out there cares for you. Please.

        Like

          1. The Amnesty International Reports: Covid-19 and Care Homes, will provide evidence for any future Nuremberg type trials.

            They can be downloaded from the link to the (latest) VAERS data above.

            Like

          2. Rastus, Danke fuer deinen Post. You made me aware that my calmest moments in this last year have been quietly reflecting on the joy I will have if, in all of the remainder of my life, I refuse to participate in the conventional medical system, come what may. I’m of the opinion anyhow that for most things chronic rather than acute, a water fast first, is not a bad or dangerous idea

            Liked by 2 people

  2. Covid-19 vaccination “success” stories, as coming from the mainstream sources and reported by Health Impact News:

    Eudravigilance (Europe)
    12,184 dead as of May 22, 2021
    1,196,190 injuries

    Vaers (U.S.)
    4863 dead as of May 28, 2021
    262,521 injuries

    Gov. Uk
    1047 dead as of April 21, 2021
    725,079 injuries

    Like

  3. You know you’re in trouble when legal liability is limited or exempted. Since 1988!

    https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/300aa-22

    “42 U.S. Code § 300aa–22 – Standards of responsibility
    (a)General rule
    Except as provided in subsections (b), (c), and (e) State law shall apply to a civil action brought for damages for a vaccine-related injury or death.
    (b)Unavoidable adverse side effects; warnings
    (1)No vaccine manufacturer shall be liable in a civil action for damages arising from a vaccine-related injury or death associated with the administration of a vaccine after October 1, 1988, if the injury or death resulted from side effects that were unavoidable even though the vaccine was properly prepared and was accompanied by proper directions and warnings.
    (2)For purposes of paragraph (1), a vaccine shall be presumed to be accompanied by proper directions and warnings if the vaccine manufacturer shows that it complied in all material respects with all requirements under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act [21 U.S.C. 301 et seq.] and section 262 of this title (including regulations issued under such provisions) applicable to the vaccine and related to vaccine-related injury or death for which the civil action was brought unless the plaintiff shows—…”

    Like

  4. “The Nuremberg Trials” I’m looking at many of the photos and videos and it looks staged, like a movie set with all the defendants just casually sitting or standing like they are at a meeting. Even the death photos of the hanged National Socialists look fake if you have ever looked them over.

    Seems like they may have a few fall guys in the news next year for mistakes that was made during the scamdemic. Give something for people to cheer for. Maybe a fall guy trial could be a way out of the rumored vaccines passports or requirements.

    Like

    1. There is no possibility any of that was scripted or rehearsed.

      Pay no attention to the fact that several defendants arose to approach the microphone before their names were called. So says the great and powerful Oz.

      Like

    2. Greg, I cannot but hope for justice from which a societal transformation emerges. I guess I’ve read Aeschylus’ Eumenides too many times. But to the show trials question; it’s notable that it was Stalin, not Churchill or FDR, who pushed for the Nuremberg trials.

      Like

      1. Can you blame Uncle Joe for that? Everyone knows he was already the greatest show (trial) impresario among those three, by far.

        Liked by 1 person

    3. Yes, the showtrials were faked from all sides. The nazi lovers out there (“Dolfy was the greatest man who ever lived”) rightly recognize the show from the allied side, but they fail to acknowledge the show from the nazi side.

      Most of the nazis who were “hanged” were jewish, to keep the Tribe of Tricksters as close-nit as possible.

      I wrote this on Fakeopedia, on the vast Nazionism page:

      https://fakeologist.com/fakeopedia/index.php?title=Nazionism#The_post-war_period:_how_hard_were_the_Nazis_punished.3F

      This period is an interesting time to understand how the whole scam was done. Of course the Holocaust Story was pushed and polished after the war, but what actually happened to all those Nazis “responsible” for those “horrors”? They were en masse acquitted (Denazifizierung = “Denazification”) and many of them took office in influential positions in the West and East Germany governments. Famous is of course Project Paperclip, where thousands of Nazi scientists were imported into the United States to later work on the Space Hoax and other spooky projects, with of course Wernher von Braun as main actor for the Disney show of Space Travel.

      The main spindoctor of the fake Nuremberg Trials, only the most famous of many show trials held after the war, was a spook with the name John J. McCloy. He and Konrad Adenauer, West Germany’s Bundeskanzler actively made sure to reduce the sentences (like there were ones) for the main Nazis. Most of them were freed officially, even if they spent time in jail. Read his ultra spooky Wikipedia page:

      * American lawyer and banker
      * Served as Assistant Secretary of War during World War II
      * After the war he served as president of the World Bank
      * U.S. High Commissioner for Germany
      * Chairman of Chase Manhattan Bank
      * Chairman of the Council on Foreign Relations
      * He later became a prominent United States presidential adviser
      Served on the Warren Commission
      * Was a member of the foreign policy establishment group of elders called “The Wise Men”

      Gaia: “If this doesn’t convince you of the spooky nature of this creep, I don’t know what does…”

      Like

    4. During the “French Revolution”, they staged many public show trials like this, followed by equally farcical executions of “traitors” to the republican cause. Once such example is the “trial” of “Marie-Antoinette”, who was also accused of various hideous crimes against the First French Republic and humanity, including even incest with her second son. It was the perfect distraction for the French revolutionary public from the manufactured collapse of the social order in France.

      Like

        1. The trials were a charade, so that means the Nurmberg code would not have any weight? The voluntary consent of the human subject is not absolutely essential after all? Interesting that these historic fake events would actually spawn real laws and policies.

          Like

          1. I wouldn’t say that those ideas or suggestions don’t have any value whatsoever, though it can be better inferred that using a non-binding (that is – unenforceable) set of rules given to us by the very people who were behind the “bad guys” in the fake conflict as well as the “good guys” is not the most clever or effective way to defend ourselves from unwanted interference into our lives and bodies.

            Like

  5. It is all fake. All if it.

    I have archived on my backup HD somewhere on “the many faces of Hitler”.

    He was a “character”…no different from “Trump” or ‘Michael Obama”.

    Or perhaps “Biden” with green screen microphones on “lawn” on WH.

    It’s all fake. All of it.

    No need to repeat myself. You are here at POM, I think you have intellect to get it.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. “He was a “character”…no different from “Trump” or ‘Michael Obama”.”

      Or “Princess Diana”. Or “Michael Jackson”. Or the “Kennedys”. Or “Sharon Tate”. Or “Benito Mussolini”. History is nothing more than a story. Hence history.

      Like

      1. HPM, I’ve written about the fictitious nature of the Hitler persona on the blog before. They’re in my posts. I had an OF Course! How did I miss that? moment when Miles proposed that Riefenstahl came first and that the actor playing Hitler (Gustav Weler?) was her subordinate. Of course he was. Probably paid scale and was a wallflower at the wrap party, being of no real rank.

        Like

  6. Not to mention Jew-skin lampshades and Jew soap.

    All BS! The Germans are good people. Only too good if you catch my drift!!

    Like

  7. Well, people, no one loves “validation” of this nature, I promise you.

    Aunt, mid 70’s, falls and bangs herself up. “Doctor” patches her up and sends her to “nursing home care” facility to recover.

    Dead due to “Covid”.

    Learned just today!!

    Memorial service in Spokane next Tuesday…I $@#% you not!!

    Liked by 1 person

  8. I found this article thought provoking for a couple reasons. I’m an old Arendt scholar who has been rereading Origins of Totalitarianism and Eichmann in Jerusalem while attempting to think through our present situation. I’ve fleshed out a comparison of Eichmann and Fauci that I’m pleased with. The connection is closer than you might expect. Fauci came to the NIH in ’68, when they were still running Tuskegee. His mentors were Cold War researchers unbound by review boards, likely directly linked to Operation Paperclip. Arendt by the way, comments on the show trial aspect of Eichmann in Jerusalem. It’s a factor that shapes her own contribution to human rights law, specifically how we understand genocide as something different than a war crime, and as a weapon in hypocritical ideological wars.. Arendt I think would tell us that Nuremberg is not merely “virtue signaling,” although surely it was that. Now as then we don’t yet have the categories to precisely define the crimes before us. As then we must stretch our thinking to meet reality. Yes, hypocrisy is the compliment vice pays to virtue, and thus, even virtue signaling is part of creating our shared reality and future. Fauci, incidentally, maybe more like Himmler than Eichmann. According to Arendt in Origins of Totalitarianism, which she wrote more than a decade BEFORE Eichmann, the medical experiments in the camps were the most central institution in the Nazi’s totalitarian project. They were the training grounds in dehumanization exercises that cultivated the elite in the SS, who modeled for the party members and masses. Fauci, I would suggest, can be understood as having parallel experiences. He came of age as a medical researcher before supervision’; in his interviews he waxes poetic about “the cold logic of science,” and how he preferred experimenting on patients who were terminal. His record doesn’t show much concern for informed consent, as the foster kids who got the experimental AIDS drugs without consent perhaps know. I found his recent speech in Israel notable. Receiving an award for speaking truth to power from a Holocaust memorial group, he explains that “medicine is the path of healing;” and that he believes with Maimonides that he’s on the path of the good, the same path as his audience when they remember the voices of those who died in Auschwitz. I wonder though, is he hearing the voices of those who were experimented on before they died? It is his field. Fauci’s hagiography of James Kinyoun, the father of the NIH, is interesting for many reasons, not the least as Kinyoun, a noted eugenicist and accused bioterrorist, had some interesting relations with Robert Koch in Germany. Koch, we remember, set up the first concentration camps in which medical experiments were done. Western Africa has not forgotten Koch. In Origins, Arendt finds Koch’s insane colonial attitude the model for the Nazi elite. Hitler of course frequently likened himself to Koch, and viewed his eugenics project as directly related to Koch’s germ theory, a theory shared by Kinyoun and intertwined with racist pseudoscience. Fauci’s wife, the NIH bioethicist, is on record displeased with “the obsession with autonomy in US bioethics” and argues against emphasis on informed consent, reminding that it can be waived in emergencies anyhow. https://www.dartmouth.edu/cphs/docs/jama-article.pdf Because I’m scared to death of the NPR liberals in my own family who have morphed into totalitarianism libidinally invested in the public health measures, even as the 4IR predators are literally are turning the world into a (Nazi) biomedical experiment, I find the historical reference more compelling. As Arendt found the biomedical experiments central to the Nazis, so I find it so today. There is a lot at stake in COVAX, getting jabs in everyone on the planet. It sometimes feels like it’s a crazy irrational world, crazy like Hitler sending the trains to the death camps instead of the Russian front. I realize that my having any hope in international law or human rights discourse may be fatally naive, but I cannot help but hope that if we pursue justice we may meet the historical moment, as Arendt and others did before us. For surely we need to reaffirm our human rights, our political rights, our right to bodily and spiritual autonomy, our right to informed consent. Nuremberg is an opportunity to tell the truth, get justice and help shape the future humanity actually deserves.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Hang around, please, as your comment deserves a thoughtful response not just from me, but from our many intelligent readers. I will hang back as I am currently occupied, but appreciate the others who will engage you. Thank you for commenting.

      It has been many years since I read Arendt, and a whole range of political attitudes that I held then no longer apply. I only know that I want her to be an honest broker. So little of that goes on. I want to trust her to a large degree, withholding anymore than minimum natural skepticism.,

      Liked by 1 person

        1. Not much response, and no surprise, I suppose. But I was intrigued, years ago, by Arendt, and the notion of “banality of evil” never sat right, as I slowly, and I mean over twenty years, came to realize that Arendt was on to something much larger than even she realized.

          I had an opportunity this past week to speak with a local police officer, one smart enough to be promoted to the rank of “investigator.” As such, he thinks highly of himself, enough so that he tried to enlighten me on the “chain of command.” As a former military man, he said, he often was forced to follow orders he did not agree with, but nonetheless, that was his duty. He had no clue that he was merely regurgitating the Nuremberg defense, that the German officers on display in the show trials of that era said they were just following orders and so were not guilty.

          A much more nuanced meaning came out of those trials, one that has gone over the heads of succeeding generations. Nuremberg merely concluded that all were guilty, and that those giving the orders were merely more so, those following less so. Further, and this is totally lost in our Corona-intoxicated era, all in the military have the right to disobey illegal orders. But it does not happen. Orders are still sacrosanct, and military people have a religious zeal in following them. Not only do they obey, they believe. Before Nuremberg, after Nuremberg, nothing has changed.

          This is the force behind the “pandemic,” that people look upstream for guidance, and relegate reason and thought as too damned much trouble, leaving their actions to a mere following of orders, the true banality of evil. It wasn’t just Germans, good and bad, but everyone on both sides of that conflict, all following orders, all imagining themselves innocent of wrongdoing, all equally guilty, those giving and those following orders. Germans and Allies alike were guilty of horrible atrocities, but the Allies were let off the hook by what we call “victor’s justice.” Nothing more.

          Liked by 1 person

          1. Mark, I hate to do it, but I have to agree with you about not much changing overall, for all us good Germans/Nazis/Americans. I still do think though that justice is important, and especially the trial of the doctors at Nuremberg.

            There has forever been debate over Arendt’s notion of the banality of evil. In my experience, those sympathetic to Zionism are particularly intent to limit the significance of the thesis, a notable claim given that in Eichmann in Jerusalem Arendt makes several pointed comparisons between the Nazis and Israelis.

            I think its possible that she might actually have had a sense of the significance of her banality of evil thesis as she writes that her last book, The Life of the Mind, serves as a justification of the thesis in the form of a fairly comprehensive statement re the possibility of ethics-morality-conscience without foundations. In this sense she really took the problematic aspect of “following orders” seriously. She didn’t trust it at all.

            Ultimately, I think, the thesis re the banality of evil is that we are all little Eichmanns insofar as we fail to think what we are doing. Following commands, tradition or dogmas is one way to fail to think for oneself, but there all other forms of avoidance, denial and alienation. We are seeing many of them in the “corona intoxicated world,” as you put it. What I see around me looks very much like Arendt’s description a majority gone mad in the Nazi brand of totalitarianism: total immunity to factuality, assumptions of the infallibility of the leader (Pharma in the place of the Fuehrer) and then the application of whatever twisted argument affirms the infallibility.

            In contrast to the command followers, Arendt is really good on the faculty of judgment, which for her always begins from the particular, rather than straightaway applying the universal. It’s a high standard because, as I mentioned, she doesn’t intend to rely on the foundations of moral systems, traditional ethics or habits, insofar as they provide substitutes for independent thinking. She’s quite Nietzschean in that sense.

            I do appreciate what you’re saying about the crimes in WII being on all sides, everyone following commands, just like Eichmann and the Nazis, but only the Nazis being punished. I remember many conversations with my grandfather, who would always make the case that human beings are warlike, land-grabbing assholes, all around. I think Arendt would say that my grandfather failed to use his faculty of judgment. When you make everyone equally guilty, you fail to judge. And she might also add, that while much of history is written by the victors, the historian, critic or individual person doesn’t have to align with the victors. I forget which Roman she quotes, but in my own words; “the victor of this war may be pleasing to Zeus, but the conquered is to Rachael.”

            Of course I don’t make this judgment regarding the conquered Nazis. I do, however, have some sympathy with the later Heidegger’s comparison between the death camps and modern agriculture. The Nazis got much inspiration from the Americans. How does it go? Ford was inspired by the Chicago pork factories, and the Nazis by Ford’s assembly lines.

            Like

          2. i refer to bible passages as a foundational understanding. in this passage on the crucifixion of Jesus of Nazareth Pilate has Jesus ‘beaten up’ by his militia perhaps expecting that he(Jesus) would ‘cave in’ and plead for mercy; not the case – Jesus responds showing that Pilate has blame in this game but the Jews involved were ‘more guilty’ .
            Extract –
            John chapter 19 verse 9  And went again into the judgment hall, and saith unto Jesus, Whence art thou? But Jesus gave him no answer. 
            Joh 19:10  Then saith Pilate unto him, Speakest thou not unto me? knowest thou not that I have power to crucify thee, and have power to release thee? 
            Joh 19:11  Jesus answered, Thou couldest have no power at all against me, except it were given thee from above: therefore he that delivered me unto thee hath the greater sin. 
            Joh 19:12  And from thenceforth Pilate sought to release him: but the Jews cried out, saying, If thou let this man go, thou art not Caesar’s friend: whosoever maketh himself a king speaketh against Caesar. 

            Liked by 1 person

    2. Is this the same Koch of Koch’s Postulates? I had no idea that was his background, if so…

      This comment makes me wonder as ever about where the “act” or “front” ends, and the “reality” behind the scenes begins. Fascinating all the ties and connections you raise – certainly makes it seem as if there is some there there, even in these frontmen – like they at least know what the real score is, behind the scenes. Whether they run the show or not.

      Like

      1. Yes, Koch of Koch’s postulates. Something which Fauci, I’ve heard, doesn’t himself take too seriously. I found his treatment of KInyoun, available at the NIH website, interesting. There are also many articles and a couple books about Kinyoun, the Federal quarantine master, in SF in 1900. He, being internationally connected, “predicted” that the plague was going to hit San Francisco, He went there, and being a racist committed to a brand of germ theory that saw Asians, but not whites, as susceptible to plague, he, under orders from Pres. McKinley, planned to vaccinate only the Chinese. There were huge protests. Apparently he was a also a real jerk, and wouldn’t be near the Chinese. He was accused of planting the plague in test animals, the first US bioterrorism charge. He didn’t recover professionally right away, but went on to work at Merck, advocate for Progressive causes, including eugenics. . He mentored others, including the subsequent NIH head who ran Tuskegee, and was still there in 68, when Fauci arrived. It is interesting to see the euphemisms Fauci uses in his presentation. Makes me wonder what he really thinks. Thanks for reading my comment :)https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22736540/

        Like

        1. Indeed, Koch’s postulates have been from the beginning invalidated by the simple fact that the supposed pathogens that cause disease are in all of us, healthy and sick alike. A fellow named Thomas (?) Rivers, a Rockefeller Foundation protege, was tasked with revising Koch for the field of virology in the 1930s, and had to deal with the fact that supposed pathogens were in all of us. To reinforce Koch, he merely bypassed the first postulate, that the disease-causing germ must be found in the sick, but not in healthy people. Thus do we have the concept of the “asymptomatic carrier,” an absurdity beyond the bounds of reason, put in place for the sole purpose of keeping the pharmaceutical industry alive. Later, Enders would invent a fake laboratory experiment, be rewarded a Nobel, and “viruses,” which do not even exist, would be justification for fascism. Thus our pandemic, nothing more than a hoax in white lab coats instead of jackboots,

          Liked by 2 people

          1. “Asymptomatic”. This word has found new fame during the covid fraud, becoming one of the pillars of the “new normal” narrative. It’s current enhanced meaning turns everyone into a walking biohazard, as we are all dangerous to our fellow humans, all the time.

            “Immunity”. Is it “natural”, or is it “vaccine induced”? Can we turn either of them into “herd immunity”? And just why do we need it? To protect ourselves from invented, contagious, exogenous pathogens, of course; and as a herd must do in order to survive, all members join in cultivating obedience and group-think to this vital awareness.

            Immunity is invented, and it saves us from virus, of course, and then conveniently becomes part of the group chatter, supporting the narrative and (while seeming to be divisive) building herd cohesion in support of the central dogma (virus). Immunity is expanded to “natural”, “herd”, and “vaccine induced”, and leads to meaningless discussions like this one, “Why is there such reluctance to discuss natural immunity?” “https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/why-there-such-reluctance-discuss-natural-immunity”

            The list is long of words and phrases either invented or repurposed to bolster the invented virus. Let’s look at a few more.

            “Variants” (now superseding mutations) anyone? Delta variant? Variant number cov-33-1947, etc.?

            “New viral strains”, a variation on variants and mutations.

            “Tricks the cell”, always one of my favorites.

            “Antigenic drift”, a fictional but useful account of how the virus mutates over time, which explains why mother tells you that a new flu shot is needed each year.

            “Antigenic shift”, used to explain the dreadful scenario of “a pig flu virus and a human flu virus could combine in a bird, resulting in a radically different flu type. If the virus infects humans and is efficiently transmitted among them, a pandemic may occur.”

            “Viral evolution”, same as drift, shift, mutate, vary, etc….

            “Virulence”, how aggressive or deadly is that fictional bug?

            “Pathogenic variability”, same as virulence.

            “Immunocompromised individuals”, the poor ones who have no chance to fight off the virus, and can’t take the vaccine either!

            “Successful vaccine platform” and “implementation of nanotechnology” each bookend around Moderna’s boasting that “we set out to create an mRNA technology platform that functions very much like an operating system on a computer. It is designed so that it can plug and play interchangeably with different programs.”

            “Emerging infectious diseases”, similar to “viruses with pandemic potential”, make it imperative to stay close to mother for protection.

            “Latency” or “long incubation time”, both used to create confusion about how the fictional virus actually works in real time.

            “Novel virus”, a new virus created by computer simulation to supersede the older virus also created by computer simulation

            “Environmental niche”, a place where viruses hang out until ready to attack.

            “Spike protein”, a fearsome entity visualized and created entirely via simulation.

            “Viral affinities to receptors”, what makes a virus fall in love with a cell, otherwise known as Ace-2 copulation.

            “Portals of host entry”, places where the wily microbe can sneak inside.

            And so on…

            Feel free to add to the list, as it is now approaching infinity.

            Liked by 3 people

            1. Here’s one to add: Mother Nature is the greatest Bioterrorist.

              It’s not brand new; the bioweapons manufacturers, oh I mean the biotech-Pharma industry that is tasked with providing countermeasures, but is actually part of the MIC, has been throwing the zoonotic threat around for a couple decades. I’m noticing that the same people who make the vaccines also stockpile viruses. They seem to be the same ones who have never heard of Ivermectin and say that the whole world needs the vaccines before anyone is safe.

              The same ones with all the viruses and vaccines also sometimes have remarkable predictive powers regarding oncoming pandemics. One would think that the covid fraud would shame them, but no. On page 7 of this fresh report from Reuters’ Ethical Corporation we learn that,

              “In 2021, the threat of a major natural disaster has been displaced by the risk posed by infectious diseases.”

              The same ones planning to massively profit from the financialization of nature are raising the zoonotic specter. Given the remarkable predictive powers of some connected to the powers that be, should we take it as a promise or a threat?

              Liked by 1 person

                1. Thanks for the link. Too bad, isn’t it, that the climate change agenda has had to take a temporary back seat to the covid agenda. Oh wait, they’re the same.

                  This is from Fauci in August, it’s clear he knows about the viruses hiding out in those “environmental niches”, waiting to pounce.
                  “https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7428724/”

                  And Peter Daszak, elite virus hunter. “https://www.ecohealthalliance.org/personnel/dr-peter-daszak”

                  Like

        2. Fascinating historical context for these characters, thanks. I am aware that eugenics never went away, metely took a lower profile. I remember reading that their main journal simply changed its name to something more discreet. And who knows, if they have private publications to circulate the really controversial material? Unfortunately the general public seems to assume that THAT unfortunate little episode in the history of science was just a fluke detour – and we got things all straightened out decades ago.

          Like

          1. TIMR, Eugenics sure wasn’t on my radar. Given the rise of biotech, bioethics might now be more eugenics than ethics. Have you heard that major philanthropies have eugenics roots, that Silicon Valley is in deep? I fear our genetic information may be being collected for purposes beyond our personal well-being. Is race specific bioweaponry a known field?

            Researching Fauci I came across a recent paper by his NIH colleague and sometime cowriter David Morens. It reports on relative susceptibility to covid among different races in Hawaii. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33276110/

            The transhumanist Fourth Industrialization that Klaus Schwab and the WEF celebrate is an eugenics project. The 4IR promises to “evolve” humans into a new cyborg species. In his book on the 4IR, which is reviewed in this widely read essay from Winter Oak,

            https://winteroak.org.uk/2020/10/05/klaus-schwab-and-his-great-fascist-reset/amp/

            Schwab says that we are reaching a point in history of choice; we must choose a future of continual upgrades or the life of a natural human left behind. Schwab says the evolved cyborg species will soon be so genetically, biologically and technologically enhanced that those left behind will be “chimpanzees” in comparison. (key discussion of this transhumanism toward the end of Winter Oaks essay)

            As I noticed rereading Arendt’s Origins of Totalitarianism recently, there are direct parallels between the transhumanist plan of the 4IR and Nazi eugenics. In both cases a grand plan to create a super-being superseding humanity as given endorsed by experts wielding reckless and dodgy science: Hitler’s psychotic theory of racial superiority was “scientifically” supported by Darwin’s eugenicist cousin Dalton, as well the germ theory of the time, which was inseparable from “race theory” at the time. (And appears still connected for Fauci’s NIH colleague cited above.

            Arguably, Kurzweil’s claim that we’re destined to be uploaded is more insane than the Aryan quest for racial purity. One hears very little public questioning of our destined “evolution” merging with AI and the machine. If the powers that be are as committed as Peter Hotez, we can expect that the censorship of anyone and anything unorthodox to expand. https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-01084-x

            What the Nazi experience teaches, I think, is that crazy totalitarians don’t need science to prove the “truth;” they set about proving it themselves, as the Nazis did through genocide. As Arendt and others explain, their insane need to “accelerate” their destined “evolution” explains the Nazi’s suicidal incompetence at the end of the war, e,g. sending trains to the camps instead of the Russian front.

            How can we not compare the present? Let me just suggest that there is evidence that public health policy isn’t being conducted according to the highest standards of rationality.

            Like

    3. Rachel, super comment! Before I get into it, let me quote this: “Because I’m scared to death of the NPR liberals in my own family who have morphed into totalitarianism libidinally invested in the public health measures…” Too true, and so sad! I would surmise, based on my own interactions over the last month with this tribe, that the “libidinal” investment approach reflects on their own lack of libido, which of course, would be incidental and totally not related at all to their hysterical freedom-restricting reactions in this time of “crisis”. Correlation don’t equal causation and all that smart stuff.

      I like the parallels you make between the Toxic Midget and his hell-bound/hell-dwelling predecessors. I agree that he may be set up as the fall guy in this scenario, as well as those bat-loving, foot-binding, tiger-penis eating, junk-sailing exotics over there in the mysterious Orient where life has a lower value. How will it be spun? In a Greek tragedy sense of hubris, desire for fame, or simple megalomania? Maybe spice it up with him having an affair with a gender-conflicted Smurf?

      Thanks for the insights!

      Liked by 2 people

  9. In recent days, T(bone the)RUMP has been promoting the narrative that all debts owed to CHINA by every Country should be wiped off the books and that CHINA should pay a $10 Trillion Dollar fine to the WORLD for their role in “releasing the virus”.

    Every Country (CORPORATE GOVERNMENT) has always had its role players (ACTORS) promoting the idea that “The bad people are way over there” to deflect attention away from the CRIMINAL activities of “the bad people” right next door. During the “American Revolution” the “bad guy” was KING GEORGE with the AMERICAN SIDE hiring another “good” GEORGE (WASHINGTON) to save them from “bad GEORGE”.

    Lost in all of the history of that scheduled event is very much connected to what is going on today. Vacci-Nations began in 1722 (big push into yore assets coming up on the 300-year analversary) and in the years leading up to the “Revolution” people of all colors and creeds were dying from the “smallpox” (vaccine) and it was promoted in the exact same way as the current “Pandemic”.

    I only discovered this while researching my own Family History. Now back in the late 1960’s my Grandfather had a “Lesbian Niece” WHO stole the Family Bible that was never again seen by any other Family Member as far as I know. Now why would a Lesbian have any interest in a Family History? Also, to the best of my knowledge, that Lesbain Niece never had any contact with any extended Family. I certainly never met her ot know any other Family Members who have interacted with her. She is probably dead now, though i would have no way of knowing. All I know about her is that she was resident in Milwaukee in those days.

    We could deduce that she was probably a Card-carrying Member of the LGBT and was doing her part to conceal the true history.

    “Tyrian Purple” is the OFFICIAL color of the LGBT and that is the color seen worn by KAMALA HARRIS on inauguration day. If you look, even FOX NEWS has been using subtle “purple background” in NEWS casts and other players like “Creepy Sleepy JoB IDen” and “Charles “Les Char” (The King) Barkley have been sporting “purple ties”.

    Scroll through YouTube and just look for “purple” and you will start to connect the “purple dots”. BTW, KAMALA HARRIS has never had any children, hails from the San Francisco Bay area and never got married (age 49?) until a POLITICAL CAREER was in sight. Her father also has nothing to do with her, so what does that tell us?

    Like

      1. https://decodingsatan.blogspot.com/2016/04/purple.html

        This link herein above was the 1st thing that came up after searching for ‘purple is satan’s colour’.
        ‘Newton’s color circle, from Opticks of 1704, showing the colors correlated with musical notes.’ Devil’s music? In Thomas Mann’s ‘Dr Faustus’, fifth’s are dubbed satanic chords. E5, F5, G5, A5, B5, etc are common hard rock chords. Holy smoke on the water…..

        Like

      1. It’s another controlled media narrative, used to corrupt humanity to the detriment of everyone involved, including the LGBTQ+ community. They are the “useful idiots” in this psyop and are as much victims of this scam as the “rest of us” are. Just like how “black people” and “colored minorities” are the “useful idiots” of racially motivated political psyops like #BlackLivesMatter and how the conservatives were the “useful idiots” for the Trump and #QAnon psyops. Ultimately, they’re all expendable to the psychopaths.

        Like

    1. Wang, I read your post with delight. If Trump were in the colonies in the eighteenth century, he would have charged Cotton Mather with witchcraft and taken credit for the smallpox vaccine.

      I always wondered where the WHO came from. Milwaukee lesbians in the late sixties, that makes sense. Those card carrying LGBTQs might have worked in a brewery and we all know how Laverne and Shirley treated Lennie and Squiggy, those man haters. Given that women often had to quit work when pregnant, a Milwaukee brewery is the likely origin of the WHO, with their contraceptive vaccines and all.

      And of course it makes sense that the lesbian niece stole the Bible to cover up family history. Not as any of those “woke” people would say, that it likely was because she was molested. Clearly a woman with a personal identity opposed to the female obligation to biologically reproduce the patriarchal order would steal the family Bible! Because that is just what lesbianism is, a denial of patriarchal order. She made you all bastards! Why without the family records how do any of you even identify your gender?

      You don’t have to have read Alice Walker’s The Color Purple to know something is up. Prince’s Purple Rain! Barney is purple!

      It will be interesting to see what happens with President Kamala. Connecting the purple dots I see political drama ahead. We all know that if trends continue with the puberty blockers, there won’t be any lesbians left. We’ve already seen Caitlin Jenner’s political ambition.

      Purple is the color of royalty and lesbians and Queen Kamala is staking her claim as the child-killing truant officer who tells the brown people of the world, “don’t come.”

      The trans pride flag is pink, blue and white. This is the future with history forgotten. No more red, white and blue. No more red-blooded men, red meat. No more red states. No more reading, since “red” will be gone.

      What trans hero will arise in pink, white and blue to vanquish the hated, cackling, purple-robed Kamala, who appears every day more arrogant than Agamemnon back from Troy?

      My money is on the trans candidate who is also a “birthing parent.”

      And don’t worry about the family Bible; everything will be on Blockchain.

      Like

  10. Mark, your exposure of those trials is much-needed at this juncture. It is ironic that “smart” people are talking about a new Nuremburg for these current crimes. But what we really need is a real trial, not that dog-and-pony “look how we eliminated evil from Europe!” show. Of course, who is “we” and “who” would hold the trial? Aye, there’s the rub! So, rather than waiting for the impossible, being pro-human is the way, imho.

    I recall feeling a Cultural Revolution moment last summer over the peaceful protests, when the warm night air was bolstered by fires to ward off any possible chill, the broken glass glowing like stars on the asphalt to remind us that every life is sacred, and racism is bad. And we all know the stories of the lil’ Hitler Youth who turned in their own folks for wrong-think. The same is being engineered now, as kids learn their parents have over-heated the globe (note to self: close down my coal-fired widget factories and replace them with ones that run on butterfly farts), have always been incurable racists, and had only two(!) genders. This is why kids should have direct access to faux-cines, ’cause their parents are reactionary. This is generational divide, much like that of the 60s/70s which turned the nation into the fragmented wasteland we see in many places today.

    April 2020 or so, I found a videographer named Lincoln Karim on yt. He lives in NYC and has a worldview which would fit in here. He documented daily the advance of the psy-op, going to empty funeral homes, empty tent hospitals, empty hospitals, empty ambulances with their lights on, empty reefer trailers as temp morgues, and showed hordes of befuddled and facially-bundled human husks shuffling about in mortal fear. He also had great coverage of the giant three-lettered sign painted on the street in front of T Tower, and many lame, tiny SJW protests. It was obvious who the handlers were, and that most were paid. Lincoln rarely talks, as the images do the work, but he did ask polite questions of Murica’s front-lame zeroes, most of whom made it clear it was a hoax, or “can’t talk about it.” Of course, many of these videos have been removed, esp. those of the reefer-truck “morgues”. He now has some short vids focused on media dissembling, which are mostly spot-on.

    So, after watching months of mostly Manhattan montages, the other week I found some walking vids of Moscow and St. Petersburg, some of which are current or were made during the world hoax. The thing that struck me about one from October of last year was that appx 70% had no mask on, 25% on the chin, 5% “properly protected”, compared with 99% in NYC, down to 80% nowadays. It was like watching footage of another planet, never mind the contrast of the appalling physical state of most of the Yanks, vs. the mostly fit Muscovites. Are the Russians that much more resistant to the virus? Yes, they are resistant, to the “mind-virus” as you correctly noted ages ago. So I now see why the bad Rooskies must be destroyed. Too smart.

    Humans vs trans-humans. Seems simple enough.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s