A glitch

The blog was down this morning – a computer at WordPress identified it as a source of spam or some such thing.  Having been raised Catholic, my first move was to examine my conscience – have I used copyrighted photos? Offended people? And second thoughts – blogging is such a merry-go-round, nothing ever changes, hardly anyone reads or thinks independently, and those who do know who they are.

And, of course, I was frustrated that some unknown person somewhere had such power over me. I hate it when people have power over me!!! I pay $99 a year for a domain name and was under the impression I owned my content here. Apparently not.

Anyway, all’s well, but I will be more careful about copyrights and stuff. That was a jolt. And I will be nicer. Starting now.

Ah, screw that.

Taxidermy

This passage is taken from the opening passages (page vii) of the introduction to Chomsky’s Necessary Illusions, referred to in the post below. The book is indeed subversive. I can see why Langley wanted to poison the well by associating it with their long-dead employee/patsy, Osama bin Laden.

In the advanced industrial societies the problem is typically approached by a variety of measures to deprive democratic political structures of substantial content, while leaving them formally intact. A large part of this task is assumed by ideological institutions that channel thought and attitudes within acceptable bounds, deflecting any potential challenge to  established privilege and authority before it can take form and gather strength.

Chomsky here is talking about how, in fake democracies such as ours, private power eliminates interference with its rule. The key to success of American facism is to leave form intact, allowing the outer shell of democratic governance – voting, news, education, and political discourse – intact, while robbing them of real substance.

There is no need for jackbooted thugs when people have their minds right.

Risky business

imageI was going through books yesterday, getting rid of them. Some are a little hard to part with and I hung on to one even as I knew I would not look at it again. Just by coincidence JC posted below that when they “killed” “Osama” they “found” his “last will and testament.” It was probably next to an airline ticket and “confession.” And among “his” books was Chomsky’s Necessary Illusions, an early 90s collection of lectures he gave in Canada.

I did not know it was printed in a large print terrorist edition. Langley must be the publisher.

Man, this is funny, sort of. They are just taunting us now. There is only a small segment of the public, maybe one percent of the U.S., who would even know about that book or Chomsky for that matter. The message is aimed at us? What? Quit reading? Quit thinking? Go flowwise?

It’s amusing too as Chomsky, knowingly or ceding to intimidation, is a gatekeeper. He ridicules those of us who are incredulous of official truth about JFK and 9/11. So I wonder if “Osama” believed the official story of 9/11? Hard to know. His last known public utterance he said it was news to him too. That was late 2001.

Anyway, we are flying today, and yes, I brought my copy of NI along, and yes I’ll read it on the plane. It’s been over twenty years since I glanced at it.

Wish me luck. That could be a terrorist offense.

Passing thought

A little thought experiment: imagine two men dropped from a helicopter into the wilderness, and left to their own devices to survive.

One man is given a saw and shovel and a pack of seeds.

The the other is  given a box of $100 bills, and is a millionaire.

Who survives?

Money does not produce, think, invent, or work. Having a pile of money does not make a person smart or useful. If it did, trust babies would be our most, rather than least, important citizens.

The notion that the wealthy are necessary to our survival is nonsense. They do not create wealth. They merely harvest it from others. They can be useful in the allocation and investment process, but should be our servants and not our masters.

A courageous performance

I have long enjoyed Jon Stewart but not taken him seriously. He is a court jester – such people are important in oppressive environments. They serve as a tension relief valve and foster the illusion of free exchange of ideas.

Stewart has always stayed in bounds, pushing the line, but only so far, never really hitting home with a point. He once took it the point of absurdity. He organized the “Rally to Restore Sanity”, a go-nowhere event with no forward motion, no insight, no ground-level organization or purpose. It was just a rock concert for half-baked ideas.

But what the hell – he’s a comedian. In our country, he’s doing more journalism than our journalists can muster. So I have watched him over the years, and will miss his presence on the air.

And I watched last night as he interviewed CIA mole journalist Judith Miller.

Miller was on the front page of the New York Times during the propaganda run-up to the attack on Iraq in March of 2003. Her stories were littered with lies and agitprop. It’s common behavior for people of her ilk and the Times and other major media outlets. When the military-industrial-intelligence complex wants a war, the media falls in line. (To this day, the New York Times has not admitted that the Gulf of Tonkin was a false-flag attack. You’d think that after 51 years they could let a little honest reporting slip through, but no.)

Last night Stewart was confrontational and well-prepared. He had read both her NYT writings and her new book. He did not let her slip off the hook. He did not allow her to insult his intelligence*. He tried to paint a big picture of an administration that was intent on making a war on an innocent country against her bullshit fear-mongering techniques. He held up a photo of a New York Times front page that had Miller’s article opposite a 9/11 tribute.

Maybe he’s feeling freedom, since he’s leaving soon. He cannot be fired. Whatever it is, my hat is off to him. That was a courageous performance.
____________
*Said Miller, “The intelligence sources we were talking to had never really been wrong before.”

How big is this thing anyway?

ITAI’ve been trying to come up with a metaphor for Life in These United States, but am not creative enough to do it really well. The TV series Mad Men’s lead character, Don Draper, was raised in a whore house and is running from his true identity. The series is built around the advertising business, and this makes me wonder just how good this Mathew Weiner, the creator of the series, might be. He seems to be a conscious smuggler.

My search for a metaphor circles around the question “just how big is this thing anyway?” Way back when, watching the movie JFK in the early 90’s, Kevin Costner’s Jim Garrison hits hard on two words – fascism, and coup d’état. What happened on 11/22/63 was a military takeover of our government. But the words did not sink in.

My best effort at a metaphor follows. Please supply a better one if you got it, pronto.

Imagine you are walking along one day, and trip and fall on a small hole in the ground. You pick yourself up and move on, but later go back and take a closer look. The small hole that you stumbled up is very deep, so deep, in fact, that you cannot see the bottom. You keep going back, as curiosity drives you, till eventually you put your whole body in, and look around and learn that not only is the hole very big, but that there is a whole city functioning down below us, hidden just below the surface of the ground.

I keep stumbling on things, and these are only a few ‘things:’

  • Anthony Weiner was scandalized out of office after raising a ruckus over health effects of 9/11.
  • Charlie Sheen doubted the official 9/11 story on a TV show, and lost his job on his hit TV series. Later he woke up in a hotel closet alongside a hooker, covered in cocaine.
  • Wendy Burlingame, daughter of the pilot of the plane that supposedly hit the Pentagon, died in a fire, trapped in an apartment.

But it did not start with 9/11.

  • Dorothy Kilgallen, TV personality and journalist, interviewed Jack Ruby and swore publicly she would blow the lid off the JFK conspiracy. Drug overdose.
  • prinzeFreddy Prinze was a popular star in the 1970’s, and wanted to do a Hollywood benefit to raise public awareness about the JFK murder. Suicide.
  • Bill Hicks was an up-and-coming comic who used to make fun of the Warren Commission and offical truth in his act. Galloping cancer, age 32.

Those damned independent thought alarms. We’re taught to ignore them.

I’m slowly reading the book Votescam, written in the early 1990’s, about Florida elections in the early 1970’s, specifically Dade County, where Janet Reno was the State Attorney. The Collier brothers, Ken and Jim, stumbled on an oddity, that local TV stations in Florida “called” all of the elections when all they had in their possession was a readout from one voting machine.

They are persistent. I am at a point now they have learned that in “training” election volunteers, officials got their signatures and later used them to “certify” results without volunteer knowledge. The boys have assembled an impressive pile of evidence, and are taking it to major newspapers and the FBI. That’s a huge mistake, but they are not yet deep enough in the hole to see that. They find that the FBI is indifferent. The media is actually hostile.

The book opened with an odd passage that caught my eye:

This book also contends that the theft of your vote, or Votescam, is part of a supposedly patriotic “collaboration” between federal officials and the news media that began shortly after the assassination of John F. Kennedy in 1963, when “responsible” American press was persuaded by American intelligence services to hide from the American people the actual implications of the Kennedy murder.”

Implications of the Kennedy assassination? The two words from that movie come to mind.

It’s not a few. I have seen hundreds of suspicious deaths, and a news media that is either forcefully silenced or peopled by automatons. I see people who use their minds properly silenced by intense ridicule by their peers. I see people with deadened brains imagining that lack of curiosity is a smart thing about them.

I know the power of suggestion. I know the power of group think.

Anyway, Happy Monday to you too.

Very tough people

Demar
Demar
Pramod
Pramod

We spent time in Nepal in 2013, right in that area that is close to the epicenter of the earthquake. That is no big deal, of course. Right now, with disaster in chaos everywhere, there are 300,000 tourists there. That we were in a place that is now in a disaster … it just brings it closer to our hearts.

We tried to contact our guides, Pramod and Demar, but of course there is no electricity. Both live in Kathmandu, but odds are this time of year they are out doing their jobs. We can only hope they and their loved ones are survivors.

DSCN4114We caught a bus ride in Kathmandu to Pokhora, where we started our trek through the Annapurna massif. The road was terrible, and every other vehicle was a bus. On the trip we had three flat tires. The passengers, mostly locals, laughed. This is just part of their routine.

Ombry
Ombry

The people … I tell my wife that we are seeing the “tourist interface,” and the friendliness is part of their need to bring in money. I don’t believe that people are much different anywhere we go. But the smiles register with us, and are are part of our permanent memory.

IMG_0020Kathmandu – we only saw a little of it. Poverty is extreme, roads are dirt, traffic is chaos. Streets are lined with buildings and dark doorways and people sitting minding stores. Plumbing is scant, odors abound. There are no “lanes” on roads and vehicles form clusters, and passing is routine. Cows, sacred in parts of this world, wander the roads. Beggars are common, and we are told to ignore them, as most are paid by entrepreneurs, a form of chattel slavery. The free market works!

DSCN4155

We lived mostly without hot showers and with holes in the ground as toilets. I stopped drinking coffee and learned to eat sparsely, having lemon tea and porridge for breakfast, Ramen noodles for lunch and the same for dinner with a slice of bread. It’s really all I needed. I lost five pounds, and felt good.

DSCN4102So now that chaos has had disaster visited on it. What to do to salve our consciences? Life is so good for us, less so for them. The Nepalese government is cash-strapped and not much good most of the time. I don’t trust the Red Cross. I don’t trust the United States or its military to truly want to do anything worthwhile [unless cameras are present].  The Indian government is very good with disasters, highly efficient. I suppose we could send $$$ that way, but it for us to feel good more than anything we could possible do for them. It is not enough.

So we are just like everyone else, watching in dismay and hoping these very tough people can pull together once again and make their lives livable. The smiles are real.

Wisdom after-the-fact

imageI’ve been puttering in my garage lately while listening to radio programs from the early 70s by Mae Brussell. I am getting a sense of her intelligence, and perhaps some brashness and youthful enthusiasm. She has figured most things out.

In the current programs the Watergate breakin has occurred. She is trying to understand motive and ramifications. She knows the parties involved, and that “burglar” James McCord never truly “resigned” from the CIA. Her co-host has easily figured out that the burglars wanted to be caught. Mae is not up to speed on this.

She is convinced that Richard Nixon will be murdered. Indeed there were attempts on his life during this time, but his security was always top notch. Richard Nixon will be removed from power via the Watergate affair. She’s got motive right, but not means. There were so many public murders during that time that she assumed he’d be done in that way. It makes sense.

Nixon was a right-winger, but as his record indicated, not right wing enough.

Reinhard Gehlen
Reinhard Gehlen

Mae is sure that the United States is heading into fascism. Her interest was triggered by the JFK murder and cover-up, and the other public murders that ensued. She knows about Operation Paperclip, and the importation of Nazi scientists and generals by the Dulles brothers, including the infamous General Reinhard Gehlen, who was integral in the newly formed CIA.  She draws a parallel to 1930’s Germany as Nazis murdered their way to power, throwing a wet blanket on opposition and rendering opponents and critics silent by fear and intimidation.

She came from an era when there was still limited access to public airwaves. People then and now are mostly clueless, fed shit and kept in the dark. They imagine fascism to be movie-style blunt intimidation. It is far more subtle than that. While ordinary citizens walk around imagining free speech to matter,  votes counted, choices real, those in power know better.

There is a blanket of fear over government. People are afraid to speak up. Those who do are murdered, imprisoned, or hounded out of office by fake scandals. Everyone is under surveillance. The public is distracted by dumbed-down schooling, entertainment and sports, wedge politics and phony elections.

We attended a town meeting last week here in Conifer/Aspen Park. The subjects discussed were a local highway intersection where accidents are too frequent, fire danger in the forest interface. Such issues are important and our opinions and actions matter. The problem is that people imagine such control exists beyond our townships. That part is a grand illusion.

Mae Brussell died in 1988. I’ve hours of listening to go, years in fact. I’ll be full of wisdom after the fact, but will never lose sight of her foresight, insight, courage and persistence. I hope she someday has her face on a postage stamp along with other patriotic people like Bradley Manning, Ralph Nader, Rachel Corrie, Paul Wellstone, Anthony Weiner, Gary Webb, Dr. Judy Wood.

Never lose faith. That day will come.

Hope for an Apple

“Trotter and LeBon concluded that the group mind does not think in the strict sense of the word. In place of thought it has impulses, habits and emotions. In making up its mind, its first impulse is usually to follow the example of a trusted leader. This is one of the most firmly established principles of mass psychology.” (Edward Bernays, Propaganda* (1928)

Wilfred Trotter (1872-1939) was a British surgeon who dabbled in social psychology and studied the herd instinct of crowds. Gustave LeBon (1841-1931) was a French psychologist who did the same. Trotter fed on LeBon, and Bernays fed on both. Together, they pioneered the field of modern advertising and propaganda.

Advertising is merely getting people to change their behavior. But honesty does not work in advertising. People do not change their minds based on reason – in fact, are more often reinforced in their beliefs when confronted with evidence they are wrong.

Realizing this, Bernays, nephew of Sigmund Freud, spent his career looking for ways to manipulate and undermine public opinion. He was an extremely clever and dishonest man.

Bernays realized that people are one thing on the surface, and something quite different underneath. Advertising, and all effective mass persuasion, deals with the our subconscious being.

So ads approach us with surface phenomena, usually sex and humor. But the real ad message is first developed by behavioral psychologists. Every ad campaign has artists and copywriters doing overlays on the central theme.

Im a macTake Apple: The theme: Apple is a cool product to own. Apple users are more sophisticated than PC people. In what was one of the most effective ad campaigns of all time, Apple computer owners became annoying preachers for the company’s product. PC’s and Macs are virtually identical, differing only in muscle memory for keystrokes. Advertising works.**

Or Obama: The “Hope and Change” campaign won the coveted prize for best marketing campaign in 2008. Barack_Obama_Hope_posterIt was a subtle undermining of the will, allowing viewers to participate by filling in their own aspirations and ideals. I fell for it, reading into Obama what I wanted from politics. He delivered the Neocon Republican agenda, yet still has strong support from Democrats.

Which is Bernays’ most important finding. People don’t think. They follow trusted leaders. They cannot be persuaded on reason. Advertisers and politicians merely supply leaders, undermine our identities, supply their desires for our own.

It does not always work, of course. But it works often enough.
______________
*Bernays book, Propaganda, is short and accessible, easily read and understood.

** Please note placement of Cool Guy’s thumbs.

Cuba: Watch yer back

Item: U.S. Removes Cuba from list of states that sponsor terrorism.

Operation Mongoose was a terrorist offensive by the U.S. against Cuba begun in the 1960s. Operation Northwoods, nixed by President Kennedy, was to be a false flag attack on the U.S. which included the shooting down of civilian airliners. Cuba would have been blamed and the island bombed, invaded, and restored to control.

In 1976 a Cuban airliner was blown up in midair, and all 73 aboard, including a young Cuban fencing team, died. The man responsible for the bombing, Orlando Bosch, was later pardoned by George H.W. Bush, and he was harbored in the U.S.

Most Americans don’t know about any of this, of course, because our information system is designed to keep Americans in the dark.

Cubans, far better informed that Americans, know all about Mongoose and American terrorism throughout the 60s and 70s.

It’s odd. The United States is the largest source and sponsor of state terrorism in the world. Books have been written on the subject. In this country, that’s a good way to hide it.

The State-Sponsored Terrorism List is a weapon used to bludgeon states that are charting courses independent of large banks and corporations. These powerful imperialist forces want to control the world’s resources. They try to isolate countries not under corporate control, like Iran, Cuba, Venezuela, and to bring in terror regimes, as happened to Chile under Pinochet.

The hypocrisy is simply stunning.

Take one country, just one of scores: Iraq. It was brutally attacked, invaded, bombed in 1991. Sanctions in the 90s killed a half million of its precious youth. An attack in 2003 followed by a brutal occupation, complete with torture facilities like Abu Ghraib, killed hundreds of thousands and caused millions to flee the country. The U.S. lied about its reason for the attack, and by power of suggestion used its own 911 false flag operation as justification.

Americans ate it up. Has there ever been a more deeply clueless people? Perhaps the Germans in the post-World War One era, so angry at their mangling by Britain and company and about Versailles … perhaps they were done in by their own anger and so were easily manipulated as the Nazis rose to power.

But the people of the U.S. have no reason to be angry at any other country or force on the planet, so the attitude of the American public can only be attributed to deep manipulation by agitation propaganda.

The U.S. is removing Cuba from its naughty list. Watch yer back, Cuba. World wide, American embassies operate as CIA stations and portals though which our terrorists enter and operate in  other countries. By allowing an American embassy, Cuba is inviting terrorists in its front door. (The illegal Cuban embargo, which is the reason why Cubans drive old cars, has been carried on since the Eisenhower regime, and is an important incentive for Cuba to take this chance.)

Watch yer back, Cuba. This can only be the old Mongoose wine in new bottles.