I’ve read quite a few of these. But first, people, please: Shake your heads, get rid of the cobwebs. There’s no “Osama,” he wasn’t killed, there was no library. They just make this shit up. The question is, why?
My first thought, given the range of work covered here, that some are thrown in for believability sake – some of the Arab titles, Bob Woodward, hardly a threat to anyone in power. But the intended audience is English-speaking, and the message appears to me to be sinister. This is after all, CIA, our mind masters, our Murder, Inc., the people who wander the landscape killing off people who might disrupt the orderly flow of lies. They are thought police, Gestapo, image masters, a lie factory, and the murderer of presidents. (Their Motto: No Person, No Problem.)
What’s the point of the list? Scorcisi’s Last Temptation of Christ was going nowhere until Christians picketed it. He might have hired them. Putting these books on the list draws attention when our dreamweavers would much rather the norm, that people just don’t know about these books.
But then, this is The United States. People don’t read.
OK, I’m confused. It will clear up over time, I hope. But now, I merely pose the question: WTF?
This passage is taken from the opening passages (page vii) of the introduction to Chomsky’s Necessary Illusions, referred to in the post below. The book is indeed subversive. I can see why Langley wanted to poison the well by associating it with their long-dead employee/patsy, Osama bin Laden.
In the advanced industrial societies the problem is typically approached by a variety of measures to deprive democratic political structures of substantial content, while leaving them formally intact. A large part of this task is assumed by ideological institutions that channel thought and attitudes within acceptable bounds, deflecting any potential challenge to established privilege and authority before it can take form and gather strength.
Chomsky here is talking about how, in fake democracies such as ours, private power eliminates interference with its rule. The key to success of American facism is to leave form intact, allowing the outer shell of democratic governance – voting, news, education, and political discourse – intact, while robbing them of real substance.
There is no need for jackbooted thugs when people have their minds right.
I was going through books yesterday, getting rid of them. Some are a little hard to part with and I hung on to one even as I knew I would not look at it again. Just by coincidence JC posted below that when they “killed” “Osama” they “found” his “last will and testament.” It was probably next to an airline ticket and “confession.” And among “his” books was Chomsky’s Necessary Illusions, an early 90s collection of lectures he gave in Canada.
I did not know it was printed in a large print terrorist edition. Langley must be the publisher.
Man, this is funny, sort of. They are just taunting us now. There is only a small segment of the public, maybe one percent of the U.S., who would even know about that book or Chomsky for that matter. The message is aimed at us? What? Quit reading? Quit thinking? Go flowwise?
It’s amusing too as Chomsky, knowingly or ceding to intimidation, is a gatekeeper. He ridicules those of us who are incredulous of official truth about JFK and 9/11. So I wonder if “Osama” believed the official story of 9/11? Hard to know. His last known public utterance he said it was news to him too. That was late 2001.
Anyway, we are flying today, and yes, I brought my copy of NI along, and yes I’ll read it on the plane. It’s been over twenty years since I glanced at it.
Along with his terrorist war [on Cuba], Kennedy imposed a trade embargo of unprecedented severity, barring any transaction involving merchandise “of Cuban origin” or that “has been located or transported from or through Cuba [or] is made or derived in whole or in part of any article which is the growth, produce, or manufacture of Cuba.” In the years that followed, huge resources have been devoted to monitor international commerce to ensure that the strictures are upheld …
On illustration has been provided by the treasury Department, reporting to Congress in April 2004 on the activities of its Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC), responsible for investigating suspicious financial transfers, a central component of the “war on terror.” OFAC informed Congress that of its 120 employees, four were assigned to tracking the finances of Osama bin Laden and Saddam Hussein, while almost two dozen were occupied with enforcing the embargo against Cuba. From 1990 to 2003, OFAC reported 93 terrorism-related investigations with $9,000 in fines; and 11,000 Cuba-related investigations with $8 million in fines. (Chomsky, introduction to Voices From the Other Side, by Keith Bolender)
In fairness to OFAC, they might well have known what the rest of us came to understand later, that by 2004 both Osama bin Laden and Saddam Hussein were dead.
Even so, it is interesting to note the vigor with which our government fights to withhold basic freedoms from little Cuba while virtually ignoring its own self-proclaimed War on Terror.
I was raised to believe in a man named “Jesus” who lived in my mind and monitored my thoughts and behaviors. Most importantly, he loved me. I was special to him.
Such thought control devices are common. When implanted in the mind of young children, they often last a lifetime. My mother, deeply lost in Alzheimer’s, still bowed her head in deep devotion as my brother invoked the name before slipping her a wafer.
Murdock
DM Murdock, author of The Christ Conspiracy and a bunch of other stuff, relieved me of much of the mystery. I had long been set free from Jesus before reading her, but she explained the origin of the symbols of Christianity – sun worship.
As with so much of mythology, the explanation is hidden in plain sight. Even so, transcending generations and language development, to this day most Americans believe in and worship the “Son.” Cue the Twilight Zone theme!
Murdock now suffers from a very aggressive cancer. She’ll soon be gone, but her body of work will long outlive her. Because this is the United States, aggressive health care to treat her aggressive cancer is unaffordable, and her friends and supporters are crowd-sourcing to finance her treatment. Good luck with that, and thanks Acharya S for living a good and useful life.
________________________
Asch
Solomon Asch was a social psychologist who dreamed up an experiment in thought control, usually done in a classroom. Students, most in on the trick, are shown a set of lines and asked which one is longest. When those not in on the game identify the obvious choice, the group responds negatively, and later still, by group consensus, a shorter line is “voted” to be the longest.
The question is whether the subjects rebel, go along, or really get their minds right. Judging from my experience with 9/11 and other mass illusion phenomena, I am guessing that most students truly believe their perceptions are wrong and the crowd is right. We are but children, after all, and I was 38 years old before I disabused myself of that Jesus guy.
________________________
People react to the word “propaganda” just as they do to “shit” or “thought control.” The word causes a blockage of cognitive thought processes. Propagandists know this, and so have changed their names to “public relations” and “information” agents. That’s too bad, because the field is rich with explanatory power about all that goes on around us, just as Murdock’s revelations so easily exposed the Jesus scam.
I won’t go into detail on Patrick’s work, as people who saw the fright words in the above paragraph have already quit reading. He invoked Jacques Ellul, and offers a much more refined reading of the man than I could muster.
Ellul reminded us that propaganda gives meaning to an otherwise meaningless existence. It is not something done to us as much as something we deeply need. It validates us, makes us morally and intellectually superior to our peers and to people in other lands. It is our raison d’être.
I have come recently to understand that voting is a scam – that is, public opinion is herd management and nothing more. Actually counting votes would be an absurd practice. We have thousands of people who think they are part of the process every election day. With patriotic music in the background, public officials pretend that voting matters and that votes are actually counted.
Voting gives us meaning. It is the government telling each of us, individually, in a cubicle with a curtain drawn, that we matter, that our opinion counts.
________________________
Anyway, thank you D.M. Murdock, Solomon Asch, Brian Patrick Anse, Jacques Ellul, my mother and most of all, Jesus, for helping me through this crazy fucking life. It just keeps getting more interesting.
A little thought experiment: imagine two men dropped from a helicopter into the wilderness, and left to their own devices to survive.
One man is given a saw and shovel and a pack of seeds.
The the other is given a box of $100 bills, and is a millionaire.
Who survives?
Money does not produce, think, invent, or work. Having a pile of money does not make a person smart or useful. If it did, trust babies would be our most, rather than least, important citizens.
The notion that the wealthy are necessary to our survival is nonsense. They do not create wealth. They merely harvest it from others. They can be useful in the allocation and investment process, but should be our servants and not our masters.
…no nation in the history of battle ever suffered more than the Soviet Union in the Second World War. At least 20 million lost their lives. Countless millions of homes and families were burned or sacked. A third of the nation’s territory, including two thirds of its industrial base, was turned into a wasteland — a loss equivalent to the destruction of this country east of Chicago. (John F. Kennedy, American University Speech, June 10, 1963)
In writing a piece yesterday on my search for meaninglessness, I reflexively apologized for invocation of a Nazi analogy, saying “Not to go all Godwin on you.” I’ve been wondering why I did that. Analogies are sometimes appropriate, often not. As a class of analogy, Nazism compared to modern day United States often works.
“Godwin’s Law” is as follows:
As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches.
Mike Godwin says he came up with the concept because Nazi analogies trivialize the holocaust.
No event, historical or allegorical, has penetrated the American consciousness more than the Holocaust. Seventy years later our movies and bookshelves are still obsessed with Nazis.
Few of us know that over twenty-four million Russians died in that war, ten million Chinese, almost six million Poles. The group that stepped forward and siezed the official mantle of victimhood is the Jews, most of whom did not fight.
Such is the power of Jewish propaganda that we are forced to step back in reverence when mention of their war deaths is raised, and this is reinforced by Mike Godwin.
Most people had to rebuild, reconstruct their lives and move forward as best they could. Jews were given Palestine, much to the chagrin of Palestinians. I had something to do with a bogus historical claim on land. So please, it was a really nice reward. Shut up now.
The object of that war was to allow the rise of post-Versailles Germany. It was rearmed, all its aggression leading up to Barbarossa forgiven. Ultimately Germany was to bring down Mother Russia. That objective was shared by Germans, certain powerful British and American factions, and Japanese. It failed.
The Russians gave the most, lost the most, and were the primary victims of fascism. A neo-Nazi government installed now on their western border naturally concerns them. This particular aspect of history, western encroachment and aggression against Russia, is ripe for analogy. I propose we dispense with Godwin and talk about it.
Jews suffered immensely and are worthy of official victim status, but please, step back, let the other far more worthy victims enjoy a little sunlight. Let’s start with the Russian people, as it appears that fire of aggressive war is relit and growing.
*I understand that the reader will be naturally suspicious of Russian sources, and only wish that in a rational world, such skepticism would be leveled at all sources of news and information.
Maybe I am at a crossroads or in a lull. All these years of reading have left me empty. This country, full of good but very dumbed down people, is run by a fascist shadow government. My questions now are merely how and when it came about. Bigger yet, is it the normal state of affairs throughout history? I suspect so.
Not to go all Godwin on the matter, but the Nazis came to power by deft criminal maneuvering. The primary tool at their disposal was murder. Once an important person is killed, and the crime goes down uninvestigated and unpunished, a cloud of intimidation sets in. All throughout the legitimate power centers there evolves unvoiced but well-understood fear. Smart and brave people who confront the hidden power source are murdered, threatened, scandalized … eventually smart and brave people exit the system, and we are left with thugs, cowards, sociopaths, and cynical manipulators. (Which reminds me, the 2016 election will be a “choice” … Clinton v Bush.) Continue reading “In search of meaninglessness”→
A certain commenter who makes the rounds is product of the age. No depth, no reading, a diet of Google and talk radio. He feigns, as most do, a deep knowledge of “current events,” whatever that means. Terms like “confirmation bias” and “anecdotal evidence” yield a revealing silence.
I’m frustrated today. I’m going to my garage. Thought control is deep and pervasive in this country. Our public dialogue is sometimes fresh and witty, and certainly strident. That it makes no difference, that we are just blowing in the wind … is lost on all.
Liberals (and “progressives”) push for their R-Democrats. Hillary Clinton, for example, is just another Neocon, but these insulated morons will support her over some other Neocon as a better “choice.” The worst part is the arrogance, the presumption of moral superiority. After all, these bastions of deep thought elected a mixed race president. Now they are going to give s a woman!
Right wingers (“conservatives”) push their openly stupid (or incredibly devious) macaroons. Who cannot look at former Texas governor Rick Perry, for instance, or former Texas governor George W. Bush or Ted Cruz (what’s wrong with Texas anyway?), and not see deeply stupid men? If it’s an act, I tip my hat. An interesting phenomenon: Saying they are stupid jacks up their vote tally. Stupid likes stupid, and defends it with vigor.
Some years back a certain very dumb but very pretty actress, I’ll not name her, decided to use her fame to serve public good, and went on a “vote” campaign … “vote, vote vote, exercise your freedom” she told us all on every forum available to her. Vote for what? That was above her pay grade. It was somewhat a relief that certain people who interviewed her, like Letterman, were only mildly amused rather than enthralled.
I am often told that since I don’t vote, I have no role to play in our fake democracy. The idea that we given no choices and cannot rely on the counting system anyway … doesn’t fly. Vote, dammit.
I have long enjoyed Jon Stewart but not taken him seriously. He is a court jester – such people are important in oppressive environments. They serve as a tension relief valve and foster the illusion of free exchange of ideas.
Stewart has always stayed in bounds, pushing the line, but only so far, never really hitting home with a point. He once took it the point of absurdity. He organized the “Rally to Restore Sanity”, a go-nowhere event with no forward motion, no insight, no ground-level organization or purpose. It was just a rock concert for half-baked ideas.
But what the hell – he’s a comedian. In our country, he’s doing more journalism than our journalists can muster. So I have watched him over the years, and will miss his presence on the air.
And I watched last night as he interviewed CIA mole journalist Judith Miller.
Miller was on the front page of the New York Times during the propaganda run-up to the attack on Iraq in March of 2003. Her stories were littered with lies and agitprop. It’s common behavior for people of her ilk and the Times and other major media outlets. When the military-industrial-intelligence complex wants a war, the media falls in line. (To this day, the New York Times has not admitted that the Gulf of Tonkin was a false-flag attack. You’d think that after 51 years they could let a little honest reporting slip through, but no.)
Last night Stewart was confrontational and well-prepared. He had read both her NYT writings and her new book. He did not let her slip off the hook. He did not allow her to insult his intelligence*. He tried to paint a big picture of an administration that was intent on making a war on an innocent country against her bullshit fear-mongering techniques. He held up a photo of a New York Times front page that had Miller’s article opposite a 9/11 tribute.
Maybe he’s feeling freedom, since he’s leaving soon. He cannot be fired. Whatever it is, my hat is off to him. That was a courageous performance.
____________
*Said Miller, “The intelligence sources we were talking to had never really been wrong before.”
Piece of Mindful 