Afterthought: John Halliday outed as Paul, updated

I am using the original blog post posted in June of 2016 in order to bring it forward with all of the comments below intact. But I want to make some additions, and do some speculation. The first post was very short.

From this point forward I refer to the original Paul McCartney as Paul, and his replacement as Faul. I do not know their real names, so that will have to do.

First, I want to go back to the original photo that started me on the McCartney twins hunt. I call it the “Boat Photo.”

Boat photo with arrows

The arrows point to two McCartney’s as I see them, Paul (left), and Faul (right). Keep in mind that they stepped in and out of each other’s shoes frequently, in the early days especially when they were not so easy to tell apart. If you have time and like Beatles’ music, take time to watch A Hard Day’s Night, which has more of Paul, and Help!, which has more of Faul. If you are alert and attune to trickery, you will see how camera work in Help! separates faces and hands playing instruments, so that we never see the face of the man playing left-handed base, just the left hand.

Below are the two brothers, side by side. It is easiest to tell the difference by the eyebrows, original Paul with his wraparounds, and Faul’s flatter.

 

But something else is going on here … I was just watching parts of HDN again, and I had a real problem deciding which Paul I was looking at. McCartney is not in many of the scenes, and we often see him with his grandfather and wearing a mustache.

McCartney Mustache

The left eyebrow seems to say Faul, and the right is obscured by hair. I remember reading that when they shot the movie, Jane Asher was coaching Paul in acting and he was taking it too seriously. So his scenes were not very good. Could it be that they looked so different that they had to limit their camera time? Jane Asher, after all, was, no pun intended, a beard, not that either Paul or Faul were gay, but that she dated both in public, adding to the illusion that two were one.

And I love herThere is stuff in HDN like the left shot here, where we don’t get a good look at all. I am thinking Faul, just going on left eyebrow. But I was surprised on viewing parts of it again how often his face is either obscured or quickly in motion.

Hair part 2Eyebrows are not the only ‘tell.’ Another is hair part. Paul parted his on his  left, and Faul on the right. Further, Faul’s part was so wild that my wife called it a cowlick. It is apparent in his childhood and in most photos of him over the years unless he is wearing a wig, as he does these days.

The monkey business with Paul and Faul has been going  on from the beginning, and the the people around the Beatles were challenged to hide it with disguises, lighting and camera angles. If I did not know to look for twins, I never would have seen that there were two of them. Even when I first looked at the boat photo above, I did not know what to make of it. I just scratched my head.

Above is a 2013 video of Dhanny Harrison singing For You Blue, and I think it was Richard Juckes who supplied it to us. His performance is interspersed with photos of him with Paul and Faul. At :41 we see the Paul:

Paul from Dhani song

He is wearing a wig of course, as in 2013 he would be 69 or 71, depending on which birthday you use. Note the eyebrows.He is easy to distinguish from the Faul in a 2013 photo:

McCartney 2013

The left eyebrow does not wrap. In the photo above from the Dhanny video, Paul is also cheekier, pudgier, jowlier. And notice how Faul is still feigning a left-handed bass, which he may indeed have learned to play over the years. It is one of the easier instruments to learn, I am told. (In the early days after they stopped live performances, they usually put Faul behind a piano, never showing his hands and face in the same shot.)

Epstein orig PaulEpstein Repl PaulAbove is a video supplied by Tyrone concerning their original manager, Brian Epstein (fake death, August 27, 1967, just short of his 33rd birthday). Here they pull a switch right before our eyes, using film of Paul at 1:27, and Faul at 1:49. Paul stops at 1:48 and Faul starts at 1:49, so they might have felt it necessary to use makeup or darkroom to supply the wraparound eyebrows and the left hair part. But that looks like Faul to me. Everything I have learned thus far says so. [By the way, if these two photos leave you in uncertainty, you are not alone. It is like they are messing with us … it looks like Paul with Faul’s eyebrows and visa versa. I put nothing past them nor do I assume I always get it right. This could be Faul on the left and a later-year Paul on the right, but it looks more like Faul with Paul’s eyebrows. The handlers are aware of their differences.]

Which reminds me of the photo collage that I used previously, from the book Face to Face by Joelle Steele:

Page 118

Paul appears in 1959, 1964 and 1985. All but one of the others are Faul – 1995 on the lower left could be a blend of the two faces. Notice that in that photo he has the wraparounds, but it looks like Faul from the nose down. Compare the eyebrows in that photo with the one directly above, 1975. Tell me these are the same man.

I regard the Paul is Dead psyop as a work of genius, giving us a small inkling of the kind of power we are up against. Since it is readily apparent on close examination that we are dealing with two separate men, they used misdirection. I will show just one clue of hundreds littered through the album covers, this one my favorite. Take the drum from the Sgt. Pepper album cover and place a mirror halfway up so that the top half reflects on it. Here is what you get:

Drum

Good lord! Who would find that without knowing to look for it? “Lonely Hearts” becomes “I ONEIX HE DIE”. Keep in mind that the European convention with dates is to put the day first and the month second, so that I ONEIX would read as we write it … 911 HE DIE.

I stand and salute. I am in awe.

Below is the original post from 2016, which includes a face chop, and after that 84 comments from that time. New comments will begin with number 85.




I did this just to satisfy my curiosity. Shortly after the Mathis “Paul McCartney is Twins” paper came out, a reader approached him with the video below:

The man there claims to be John Halliday, caretaker of the childhood home of the McCartney family. Passersby take more than one look, as he looks an awful lot like Paul.

I am forced, however, to do screen grabs of this grainy film to make a facial comparison. Nonetheless I did my best, and am 94% sure that this man is Paul McCartney, the retired McCartney, living a quiet life in Liverpool while his brother is out setting the world on fire with music. Sort of.

Paul Jim

Paul 3

145 thoughts on “Afterthought: John Halliday outed as Paul, updated

  1. WOW, that certainly appears to be an appropriately aged Paul McCartney and he seems happy and relaxed having a bit of fun as the “caretaker” of Paul’s childhood home.

    Like

  2. I had done a comparable comparison a few weeks ago using actual video screen grabs and reached the exact same conclusion. You will also discover that since the above vid was posted on youtube and this was ‘outed’ – by an amazing set of coincidences, Jerry had to be let go from that job as caretaker of the McMansion for his drinking problem and disappeared. Mm-hmm…
    I’m just pleased the original Paul wasn’t dead in the 60s after all.

    Like

    1. WHAT YOU GUYS didnt catch was the scar from the mophead on PAULS upper left lip , John Halliday also has this scar , he also had a mole on his left cheek (Paul did) , John Haliday also has this mole on his left cheek, lastly, their was rumour this accident did something to Paul’s legs & John Halliday walks with a limp , i am almost convinced he may have artificial leg or legs , but people, take a a good long look at these features & you will see this is the real deal, 100% this is James Paul McCartney !! He’s not dead, very much alive just like John Lennon is who is now Colin Unwig .

      Like

    2. I, too, was distressed that Paul could in fact be dead for 50 years. Twins would explain a lot and could be what Heather Mills was talking about. But regarding the children Paul fathered in the 60’s ( at least 3 we know about) how to explain the blood test did not match? I thought twins share DNA? That he kept this house and the one at 7 Cavindish all these years makes me think you could be on to something.

      Liked by 1 person

      1. A few problems … first, we don’t know if they are identical or fraternal, though some aspects, right-handed versus left-handed, hair parts, suggest identical. But if fraternal, different DNA. identical woukd be same DNA.

        Bt that could all be part of the psyop. Do we know he fathered a daughter? Do we know her name? Have we seen her photo? Someone as powerful as him hauled into court by a woman of no importance? It could happen, but I doubt it. These matters are settled privately, no publicity. A simple payment of cash.

        Anyway, Google Paul McCartney childhood photos. If you don’t see twins, I cannot help you. Then ask, why are the photos even available? How deep does this go? Do they assume we are too stupid to figure it out, or is it just another layer?

        Like

        1. Without the internet and blogs like this could such an analysis have been done?

          I suspect that they never thought of what the internet could do (i.e., allowing the wide access and dissemination of information and allowing curious awakened normies to do their investigations and talk amongst themselves). The internet is a dual-edged sword – The TPTB could use it as a tool and it can also could be a monkey-wrench thrown into their plans.

          Like

  3. Jerry, John, what’s in a name… 🙂 I mean, JOHN was let go.

    Same mannerisms too.

    I’d sure like to see John H. and Faul M. perform live. They could sing harmony on Yesterday.

    You don’t know how my world has been rocked the past few months – can’t believe in anything anymore. Who knew george martin was really “Q” ? I guess Yoko is miss moneypenny.

    Like

  4. Yup Paul was replaced in 1966 with the current Paul aka Faul. Lennon was replaced the following year in 1967 as well. He now assumes the identity of Colin Unwin also a caretaker of you guessed it John Lennons boyhood home. Go to youtube for facial comparisons.

    Like

    1. I believe he is the Beatlemania Paul, whom I adored and I’d still lick his face, my bad. He looks nothing like his brother Mike so how could he “fill in for him?”.

      Liked by 1 person

      1. I am beginning to develop a sense, and could surely be wrong, that our Pauly developed a drinking problem, which necessitates the more or less permananet replacement by Mike, more dependable. Mike is a clunky musician. If you appreciate piano, then you can easily see his ham-handed banging on chords as he sings those catchy melodies is merely the result of intense practice and repetition, but not true talent.

        Like

  5. Read on Icke’s site that there was a birth certificate for a John Paul McCartney, rather than a James. So, if you have twins John and Mike, John will go as Paul to avoid having 2 Johns. Then, when Mike takes over, he has to keep the Paul name, and John goes back to John. Worth a think.

    Like

    1. We really have no way of knowing who is who, so we use “Paul” and “Mike” as those were the two brothers given to us, Paul McC and the guy who became Mike McGear. We don’t even know if the name is McCartney, much less first names.

      It keeps it simple. A rose by any other name …

      PS: Ickes strikes me as a black frosting guy with his lizard people and all. I avoid him.

      Like

      1. Hear! Hear! re Icke. All that reptilian business to take our eye off the ball. Can’t stand it or him! You are spot on, as always.

        Like

        1. It is not commonly used, but means that someone is dishonestly engaged in research for the purpose of making other people honestly engaged in that research look bad. The best example is Dallas Goldbug, who makes ridiculous assertions (JFK became Jimmy Carter) to discredit honest assertions (Bill Hicks became Alex Jones, Janis Joplin became Amy Goodman). His only purpose is to make the whole area of research look bad, or to blackwash it, or spread black frosting on it. In so doing he is protecting some if the most dishonest people alive, lifetime actors.

          Like

          1. He is a FB friend and there is something up with him. I know. Also his comparison that HRC is Mrs. Partridge. Hysterical

            Like

    2. It is worth noting that in the first edition book by Hunter Davies, The Beatles, the authorized biography, he states that Paul McCartney was born, “John Paul McCartney.” The later revisions of the book, originally published in 1968, reads, “James Paul McCartney.” I had an original copy, but it was destroyed in Hurricane Katrina. I have a later revision, and have looked for an original. Nowhere to be found.

      Like

      1. I have a 1968 first edition and Page 23 reads: Paul was born James Paul McCartney on 18 June 1942, in a private ward of Walton Hospital, Liverpool…” I’ll scan it for you, if you like.

        Like

        1. On Genes Reunion (UK) we have as you say , James Paul McCartney born in North Liverpool in 1942 but gives the ‘event quarter’ as 3 ( July – Sept) when it should be 2 ( April _ June)
          Michael E McCartney was born in North Liverpool in 1944 and gives the event quarter as 4 ( Oct – Dec ) when it should have been 1 ( Jan – March )
          Strange really that there should be these anomalies in the one family when Genes Reunion is a straight copy from original birth records.

          Like

          1. And they both appear to have different mothers?????? ( Michael ) ) Kelly and ( James P. ) Mahon as maiden names for their mothers.

            Like

          2. I think Mike McCartney must have been born PETER M MCCARTNEY. He is listed as being born in North Liverpool in the first quarter of 1944. His mother’s maiden name is listed as MOHIN ( very similar to Paul’s entry MAHON ………….could be a spelling error)
            MICHAEL MCCARTNEY born 1944 in North Liverpool is listed as being born in the 4th quarter but HIS mother’s maiden name was KELLY.

            Like

    3. Anything is possible, but I would like to know one day the truth but the truth of all this mich mach. One thing is certain. Real Paul is not the actual Faul. What happened has been well concealed. Will it be revealed one day? Are consciences going to speak. Sofar two of the four have taken their ‘secret’ to the grave, will Faul reveal it after his death in the form of a letter to his fans whom he has duped for 50 years?

      Like

      1. There is nothing complicated about it. Paul and Mike are both alive and well, Paul for some reason had to step back while Mike became the public figure known as Paul. While both are mediocre at best, Mike was the better musician. They are part of a much larger operation, so speaking out is unheard of, never done. They are lifetime actors, and there is a code of silence that appears, outside looking in, to be vigorously enforced, though not by violence. So they all have offspring, they all share the secrets, and all know to take them to the grave.

        On a lower level, these are not inspiring or important people. Left to their own devices, they would not have met with the success that being inside the circle brought them. Their fame was manufactured, their music written for them, even the performances done my means of illusion (rooftop concert). When they stopped performing in public, the music got better for a good reason: real, professional musicians did the instrumentation. They were left to do the voices, with intense training and supervision.

        Like

        1. They were left to do the voices, with intense training and supervision.

          Rejoice, this last hurdle dropped as well.
          With last recent software and computing power, even a pig can sing operatic arias. No need to name names here, pick any from the recent pop music charts …

          Liked by 1 person

        2. Mark, please help me understand what you mean by “even their performances done by means of illusion”…are you saying lip synching ?
          Remember what ‘John’ said at the end of that ‘performance ‘? Haha!! (We have ears and we do not hear—-yer darn tootin we don’t)…He said, and I quote, “thank you and on behalf of OURSELVES AND the group I hope we passed the audition”…

          Like

          1. After they quit performing in public, the only time we saw them perform was to introduce various songs (Hey Jude, Revolution, All you Need is Love), and the Rooftop Concert. We have no way of knowing if any of these performances were real. (Putting “Paul” behind the piano hid the fact that he was right-handed, and since we did not see fingers on teh keyboard, we have now way of knowing if it was him playing.)

            Also, I wonder if they seeded crowds with paid screamers in the early days, which would spread throughout the crowd in the same way as panic does, making them all scream, and by that means hide the fact that they were not very good musicians or singers.

            Like

        3. I think current performing Paul should stop. He sounds bad but I lost it for him at SPLHCB. I thought they were on drugs and I was turned off. I never saw him in concert, it never occurred to me. I am a fan of the early Beatles and I also think original, John or one of them is still alive. I enjoy your blog.

          Like

  6. I have no sympathy for either/any of the Pauls or Johns. The whole thing was a project to undermine society and turn it into the stinking mess we currently see around us. All those who participated in that should be hanged.

    Like

      1. I sincerely agree….and it should be public. If you haven’t read Tyrone’s JFK TV, I highly recommend it….it can be found on this blog. The psyop is huge in more ways than one. The Beatles were introduced to the American public on the ABC Morning show on Nov 22, 1963 (the title has 1964 written in error)

        Like

  7. John Halliday has never said he is Paul. My theory might be that Paul indeed had an accident in 1966. The injuries he got may have not only left scars on his face and body but could have effected his memory or thinking ability. If the would have wanted him to perform he might not have been able to remember the lyrics or even play his bass. I just find it strange that he worked there for 11 years and all of a sudden he gets canned for drinking. I call BS. Heather Mills and Ringo Starr are coming out with some truths that might just blow the lid off Faul McCartney. At any rate I wish the best for John Halliday, I think he has been caught up in something he has no control over.

    Like

    1. My evidence here is stronger than your suspicions. The resemblance is dead-on. The whole PID psyop was crafted as misdirection to conceal the fact that two men, twins, were slipping in and out of the role of Paul. The man in this video, who apparently deliberately outed himself, was the Ed Sullivan/Hard Day’s Night Paul who was retired in 1990 or so. It has been Mike ever since. Who knows why he did this. Taunting us?

      Like

  8. Has anyone else seen the picture of Paul McCartney’s Grandfather (Great)? His name was Halliday McCartney. Coincidence? I don’t think so. Has anyone heard of what happened to John Halliday when he was let go as caretaker of The McCartney home? I can’t help but worry about him 😦

    Like

        1. Didn’t Miles Mathis write that Macartney is the correct spelling, incidentally I have seen McCartney, McArtney on various 45s.

          Like

  9. I took the tour of Paul’s boyhood home in 2010, and John was the guide at that time. I actually met this guy in person. He is not Paul. Also, shortly after my visit he was fired because people were complaining he was drunk during the tours, which I didnt notice myself, he seemed nice enough. Anyway, not Paul. I saw the real Paula year later in Vegas.

    Like

      1. Ahem, the whole point of this piece: There were two McCartney’s, Paul and Mike, a set of twins. They each played the part of “Paul” on and off until about 1990, when the orignal Paul whom we saw in the movie Hard Day’s Night retired. It was probably due to the effects of plastic surgery wearing off. The one you now call “Faul,” is the one we call “Mike,” is indeed a talented performer, as far as I can tell. He also starred in the movie Help! after the opening dartboard scene. That is when the big switch was made.

        https://pieceofmindful.com/2016/04/23/sir-faul/

        Like

  10. I’ve watched the video over and over. He never moves his left hand off that cup. He even shakes with his right hand. The left hand is a prosthesis. Paul was a left handed. Kinda hard to play a guitar without your hand.

    Like

    1. Not seeing that, and anyway, people normally shake hands with their right hand.

      There is a name for the thought process you are going through, I think called “denial.” You are averting your eyes form the overwhelming body of evidence here, and looking for any tiny scrap that supports your preexisting thesis that Paul is dead, or whatever.

      Like

      1. I’m left handed and always shake hands with my right hand…shaking with the left, when most people put out their right hand, just doesn’t work.

        Like

  11. Can’t resist commenting again! Of COURSE John Holliday is Paul! Facial comparison is right on. But what I notice, with a background in psych, is his personality when he relaxes, the jovial Paul is still there! Actually -in the group photos of the Beatles post 1966, u can tell just by the body language of ALL involved – NO ONE likes “Faul”- and Faul is very defensive about it. I could go on, but suffice to say (and I paraphrase), “By the time the truth is revealed, it’s almost all over).

    Like

    1. Beatles were such a psyop … we have since discovered that Lennon was a twin and his name is surely not Lennon. Another of our writers here tells me to look into Ringo, that there have been several over time. I have not done that. This means the knife attack on George was fake, meant to enhance the PID stuff, though George is really dead I assume.

      Like

  12. Please don’t print this, Mark, just a quick comment. You have really opened my eyes about this kind of stuff. Christ-the Illuminati, Paul/Faul-+ now I’ll be up till dawn reading about J.Lennon!
    Seems people are afraid of having their illusions shattered, +who can blame them? It’s frightening enuf to be 57 yrs old and realizing nothing is what it seems..but I applaud u, + those like u,(as I’ve said before). G.H.Bush is wrong – I WANT to know the truth. Gnite.

    Like

    1. You want me to delete this comment? Of course I will, but I don’t see why. Those are kind words, you have a curious nature … enjoy! You are on the path to discovery – you will find that life is beautiful, and not at all the ugly violent mess we are led to believe by our overlords, who are a bunch of schmucks.

      Like

    2. JoAnn, Congratulations to you for being open and receptive to information that completely upsets your world view. I am currently 65 and wasn’t awake and aware until I was 60. My journey started with 9/11 shortly after the 10th anniversary…once you start down the rabbit hole you continue finding new and unexpected subjects to research. Welcome to the real world of knowledge and learning.

      Like

  13. Dear Mark + annspinwall4- I thank u both for ur encouraging words. Guess I was in shock last night – I had suspicions about these psyop things -but was floored by how deep they go. And here I am, thinking I knew so much about psychology…
    But I’m glad plp like u two are out there to open my eyes. No need to delete my comment, Mark, I’m in it till the end now! Just glad it’s a holiday weekend, I made a commitment to read ur whole blog, + I’m exhausted already. To the oars, mateys…

    Like

  14. After he was fired as caretaker at Macca’s childhood home, he was last known living in Australia. He also insinuated that he worked as double for Paul & posed for pix w/Linda

    Like

  15. Just hit me after watching the Halliday video how “posh” his accent is compared to the typical Scouse accent of Liverpudlians. That belies a “working class” upbringing and would take a lot of effort to break later in life.

    Here’s a typical example of Scouse

    Like

  16. To me (as an outsider) it sounds a bit like irish.
    Anyway, I could never understand that fuss about the Beatles, even less those hysterically screeming fan-girls. Nor the hype about the Stones or any other pop band (a.k.a intel project). Thanks to MM, Mark and Co., I begin to understand why… 😉

    Like

    1. Scouse is a mix of English, Dublin Irish, and North Welsh, but there is more than one scouse accent, listen to Ken Dodd’s. Rex Harrison was a scouser as well.

      Like

  17. Been searching for any trace of Halliday since he was outed and fired. He has disappeared off the internet with no trace whatsoever. Yeah, yeah, yeah, I believe he isbthe 1964 and prior Paul. Not convinced about the twins thing, but the photographer claiming to be his blood related brother, I believe is NOT a real McCartney.

    Like

  18. There is a video from 1966 of the 4 Beatles, sitting on high chairs in a hotel meeting room, being interviewed before a show. In the video, a very young baby faced David Crosby can be seen to be hanging out to the extreme left of the screen, standing next to a curtain that’s behind the 4 lads. When one of the reporters in the audience asks “who is the man standing behind you next to the curtain”, John answers “oh, that’s Davey, one of our mates”. At that point, Crosby tries and succeeds in taking a step backwards and hiding behind the curtain, so he actually disappears for a few seconds right after the reporter asks this question. But he comes back out from behind the curtain after the interview moves forward and away from the topic of who is the guy standing behind George Harrison next to the curtain.
    It’s during this interview that in answering one of the reporters’ questions, Paul refers to John by the name ‘Biles’. I found this very telling, but I can’t find any reference anywhere to how or what this name or nickname Biles is actually referring to. I just thought it was very, very strange.
    During the course of the ‘original’ (1964 – 1966) four lads’ time giving interviews, the four of them would sometimes reinvent the English language, especially John. But when Paul addresses or refers to John as ‘Biles’ I thought it was really weird. John was the one who’d say strange things when referring to things or other people. He’d invent new words of ‘handles’ for them. But hearing Paul call John ‘Biles’ just seemed to be out of character for Paul. Could it be that the name Biles is short for what may be ‘John Lennon’s’ real first or last name ?

    Also, this site is great. And Mark–have yourself a great vacation !

    Like

  19. Hi Mark, a couple of questions if I may please ?

    #1 You said above on Nov. 12, 2016 at 5:10 A. M.:

    “The man in this video, who apparently deliberately outed himself, was the Ed Sullivan/Hard Day’s Night Paul who was retired in 1990 or so.”

    Which video are you talking about ? And does he really out himself in the video ?

    #2: OldeVirginian says above, on June 22, 2016 at 10:46 P. M.:

    “Who knew george martin was really “Q” ?

    While I know you can’t really speak for OldeVirginian, do you have any idea what he was talking about with that comment ?

    #3 (not really a question though): In ‘Hunter Davies, The Beatles’, Hunter included a photo at a racetrack that showed ‘Mike” Mac, Paul, Paul’s father’s new wife (can’t remember her name) and Paul’s father Jim. The four of them are walking amongst others at what appears to be an area where horses and jockeys hang out before/after a horse race. There’s also a nice looking race horse in the middle of the photo that’s walking along with the four two legged variety. Hunter dated the photo in the first edition of the book as 1968. The Paul in the photo is what we seem to all agree is the real ‘Paul’. I don’t know if I can send the photo or post it here, but maybe you have the book or maybe someone else that stops here at POM has the edition of the book that I’m talking about and maybe they can post the photo. Pretty strange, I’ve never seen a pic of the real Paul from Sept. of ’66 onward. Pretty interesting.

    Like

    1. There are other photos around, even blog posts here, that show original Paul in 1985 or so, and another featuring Dhani Harrison that has both Paul’s in it though not together. I don’t have time or energy to find them. Someday we will have a useable search function here. The Haliday video is so obviously original Paul that they “fired” him shortly after, that is, he would not be seen again.

      The racetrack photos that include “Mike McGear” and Paul and the dad, I think if you check out Mathis’s work there he pretty well outs those photos as fake.

      [If you are implying by not having seen original Paul after 1966 or so that he died, you’re wrong. He’s alive and well to this day. It was a pasyop.]

      Like

  20. At the link below, John Halliday is referred to as ‘Josh Halliday 300’ for the picture, then John in the article. He’s listed as 62 in 2013, and the spokesman for National Trust who sacked him said:
    “John held the post of custodian for 11 years at Forthlin Road during which time he carried out his role with great enthusiasm, knowledge and dedication, bringing the story of Sir Paul McCartney’s childhood home and the Beatles to life for thousands of visitors. We would like to thank John for his work as custodian, and wish him well in the future.”

    http://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/news/liverpool-news/ex-beatle-paul-mccartneys-house-custodian-3391689

    Like

  21. I’m currently trying to trace John Halliday down, I’ve emailed the Liverpool Echo who done interview with John re his sacking! I emailed Nat trust and got a rather rude short sharp reply..hi, I can’t help re Mr.Halliday, kind regards .Simon Osborne ..so our next step was checking phone book…strangely we found a Halliday living in QUARRY rd down street from strawberry fields up the road from Eleanor Rigby gravesite…not far from Paul’s home too! And not far from the church John and Paul met each other in! Need to do some more research on this particular Halliday though! Hopefully as we live in Liverpool were going to travel up to quarry rd and see what we find! Be interested to know how the poster who said John moved to Australia knows this please! Thanks for your time.

    Like

    1. Mark…The Beatles have been haunting my friend and me for awhile now. Oh the wild goose chases we’ve been on. Anyways, I was just doing a search to see if anyone had any new info when I came across your post wondering where John Halliday is. Just yesterday I was on youtube, the name of the video is Paul mccartney is dead…John Halliday my love forever by JP Lemccharristarr. I went to the comments and a guy named Steve Green said he found John Halliday. He is well and full of himself, as usual. He lives in Aigburth in Liverpool. The comment was left a year ago. I don’t know if this helps, but who knows. Don’t take this the wrong way, and I’m not being fresh, but, if I could meet john, I would ask him if I could see his boobs because Paul has a mole above his right nipple and a little over, like towards armpit, but not that far over. I’ve seen many pics of him in his bathing suit and have seen that mole. Faul definitely does not have that mole.

      Like

      1. Thanks Tracey, being a scouser myself I’m sure John won’t mind when I say”eh John show us ya tit la” hahahahaha if I ever find him…so I’ll keep ya up to date! Thanks again.

        Like

  22. Just discovered more on John Holliday…his son is called….yep you guessed it Paul…also don’t know how much relevance this holds but his fav album was Abbey Road..got my friend who’s a huge huge Beatles fan himself re listening to the album just to see if anything jumps out! Thanks again for reading.

    Like

  23. Another comment from John Halliday living in “Paul’s” house..his own house I believe!
    During the 1960s, I was rhythm guitarist in a local Liverpool band called The Potions. We played a lot of pubs and weddings, and my brother and I were quite good on the vocal harmonies, but we never really made it. It’s ironic, then, that I should end up living in a pop star’s house.”

    Like

    1. Brits say ‘going on holiday’ the way we ‘muricans say ‘going on a vacation’- This is one long vacation he’s on-

      Like

        1. Wow, this is a Beatles song that I have never heard…I was never a huge Beatles fan and at the age of 12 in 1963 I could not understand why all the screaming and shouting about these guys. Of course, today, I understand so much more about the cause of their popularity. Thanks for sharing this interesting, well-produced video by Beatles “tribute band” Alvarortega + Escarabajos…snicker, snicker

          Like

          1. ‘Music was my first love
            And it’ll be my last
            Music of the future
            And music of the past.
            To live without my music
            Would be impossible to do
            In this world of troubles
            my music pulls me through.’ (John Mills)

            ‘Music is your special friend’ (The Doors)

            Liked by 1 person

          2. For music that is a special friend, please check out some of the most beautiful music I have heard…a recent find. William Joseph, piano virtuoso extraordinaire. His talent is amazing and his videos are visually stunning. I listen before bed at night so this beautiful music soothes my brain before heading off to bed. I am adding a couple of links. I hope you enjoy!

            Like

  24. if you like good piano music, check Keith Jarrett’S The Köln Concert. There are two parts on Youtube. Only music, no pics. He improvised the entire concert live 1975. No tricks, no editing, just simple music in perfection played by one musician.

    Like

    1. Thanks, will do.

      When I am in vegetative state, I lay back in my chair listening to Yeol Eum Son doing Mozart’s 21st Piano Concerto. It is 31 minutes and never fails to hold me throughout. The contrast between someone like her and McCartney is stark, as his only skill at piano is chord banging. You can tell they schooled him hard so that he could pull off a live performance, not to diminish his talent. But the difference between a classical pianist and a rocker is like that of a professional baseball player versus sandlot whiffle ball.

      Liked by 2 people

      1. reminds me of a quote from Eddie Murphy: “Actor? I’m not an actor, Robert de Niro is an actor. I’m a star”. He is a quite good actor nonetheless. Lady Gaga also plays only a few accords but acts occasionally as a piano player. It’s embarrassing. They created their music and film stars from their own. Some of them have some talent, others have to pretend. It’s ok for me if they work hard and do their best. Madonna for instance. Today’s stars need even less skills. All those supposedly famous youtubers are being promoted in the same way.

        Liked by 1 person

      2. For some impressive piano playing check out William Joseph’s YouTube channel. He is extremely talented. He was a child prodigy. I love Radioactive, Nothing Else Matters, Unchained Melody…to name a few. He was featured on Dr Phil early in his career…what are the odds of that…Lol Typing this from my tablet so I can’t link, or at least don’t know how.

        Like

  25. I’m convinced this John Halliday is one of the McCartneys also that Mark Stycer is John Lennon and that Alex Jones is Bill Hicks, of whom I didn’t know until recently. Those people are supposed to be very rich in the league of several hundreds of millions. Why do they have such a boring life? Can’t they do anything better with their spare time than to pretend to be John Halliday or Mark Stycer? Only Alex Jones from the three mentioned seems to be doing something more exciting than Bill Hicks did. At least in my opinion. That supports what I’m always saying. There are no billionaires, no extremely rich people. Some people can make a few millions within few years but such time is more or less limited. A few millions can be easily wasted if you’re not careful. They all need fresh money, that’s why they do what they do.

    Like

    1. I have here the film Let Him Be which stars Lennon. I take it one step further (and am in no man’s land) in saying that the man we knew as Lennon is there and performs at the end, and that Mark Staycer is his twin brother. I’d be glad to ship the CD to you if you are interested, as I will never watch it again. Other than technically interesting to see how they pulled it off, it is a very boring movie. Contact me privately if you want it, no return needed, postage my problem and I know you are overseas.

      The Hicks thing was jaded from the beginning by Dallas Goldbug, that guy who claimed to see canals on Mars and that JFK became Jimmy Carter. It was a professional blackwashing affair done right so that those of us who can see through the fog are ridiculed. He was right about Bill Hicks/Alex Jones, and maybe that was his job, to hide something so obvious in broad daylight. These hidden people, the craftsmen who are masters of deceit, also pulled off the Paul is Dead psyop, and are very, very good. Jones, I think, when on air runs his voice through some kind of distortion program to give it that gravelly tone. He has also had plastic surgery. He was an extensive and expensive project, but the teeth do not lie. He is Hicks. (Regarding the voice, if they can run Brittney Spears’ singing through a computer to make her sound good, they can alter Hicks’ voice as well.)

      Like

      1. thx for the kind offer but I would not waste time for this. I read about the movie and that’s all I need to know. Alex Jones looks like Bill Hicks to me even without any surgery. And he has his voice and his manners. That’s to much to be a coincidence. I don’t need any proof those people are what we suspect. I need a proof they aren’t which could be difficult. Liars once discovered will always have problems proving they don’t lie.

        Like

          1. if they are going to lie about it,at least make it plausible by saying Halliday is a McCartney relative instead of trying to pawn him off as a caretaker. Look at the distinctive,downward eye slantand wingnut ears. My God,This Halliday Character could pass as a young McCartney’s GRANDFATHER.

            Like

      2. Lots of family in Let Him Be. The little girl, who is now an adult. The young filmmaker; and, I believe that the “cousin”, the late Graham Wignall, looks like a relative as well, if not a sub for John in his early days. It’s not just money…the folks who like to work as talent likely miss the narcissistic rewards, as well.

        Like

      3. People (most) would just not believe the wondrous things that the scientists at the alphabet agencies are capable of. Seriously. One of the problems of having intelligent conversations about how far ahead these people are in the field of science, is how far fetched it would seem. The voice altering equipment that is surely used on many ‘celebs’ like AJ ? I don’t doubt it. However, it’s even light years ahead of that. ‘They’ have the ability now to install into living beings/androids voice boxes that will allow a replica/clone/android/double to hit the precise sound of an original’s voice so undetectable that they’ve been doing it for years. There’s a short vid that was found by a researcher that shows the 4 lads from Liverpool singing one of their early hits, from the early 60’s when they wore those collarless suit jackets–probably 1963 or 1964 ? In the vid (I may have it saved somewhere, I have to look) ‘John Lennon’ is singing (you’d swear it’s JL) lead vocals. As he opens his mouth to sing, if you look closely you can see that there is a piece of shiny metal that runs horizontally across the back of his mouth/throat. You can only se it when he opens his mouth fully to hit certain notes. The point is, this ‘thing’ that is singing is not human. Yes, I know, it’s now time for some to call me ‘idiot’ or worse because how can this be ?? Well it goes right back to how far ahead of the exoteric science is as compared to the esoteric (the known to the hidden). When you look at this abomination that’s supposed to be John Lennon (if he ever really existed) and see it’s half closed eyes, you can sense that something’s not right with it. Especially when you see that shiny piece of metal in the back of it’s throat. I’ll post the gif if anyone has any interest in seeing this thing.

        Like

        1. My point that I missed (!!) was, Alex had his voice tweaked. ‘Hillary’ (one of her clones) had her voice box ‘adjusted to sound like the Hillary we’re used to. Look at some of her photos from a few years back, the scars are clearly visible on the front of her throat. Last, did anyone see the ‘Hillary’ that sat next to Bill Clinton at the fake John McCain funeral ? That was not Hillary. I think Hillary in is Gitmo. We’ll see.

          Like

      1. “Chance and Law: An Epistemological Analysis of the Roles of Probability and Induction in the Natural Sciences.” Herbert Feigl, doctorate essay, 1927. What are the odds?

        Like

      1. Whoa ,Ma…Let’s slow “er down and put the square wheels on. The Brady Minor Leaguer clones? Now The T.S.A. is monitoring us on Flights ,what type of food we eat,how many times we use the shithouse .if we’re Fidgeting with our hands ,so as to detect early signs of terrorism ,to thwart early plots. WHAT Next? is* RINGO STARRR* gonna be the big dipper and DRUM the truth into us once and for all?

        Like

        1. We saw this on a British Airline a few years back, two identical and unrelated guys. The problem is that there are not enough people on the planet to justify two matches like this. The odds are beyond astronomical, and that they have the same name … bullshit. Someone is having a laugh here.

          So first, we need to kmow for sure there are two separate men, and then that they are unrelated. Anybody got bus fare?

          Like

        2. I don’t know about that. I think most of that “the TSA/CIA/any TLA is spying on us” is a meme, a self fullshilling prophecy. Same as with the Nuke Hoax and hoaxing in wars (no, I am not claiming war is a hoax, but there is hoaxing in wars); what better strategy is there to convey the illusion of spying on us, rather than doing it for real?

          There is monitoring going on without a doubt (webpages, YT channels etc. being pulled), but the proportions that “alternative” media boost it up to are imho exaggerated and part of the self fulshilling prophecy. Yes, my neologism, but I think it explains it well.

          Look at all those MGTOW dupes, mostly they roam around online, but still. They really believe women (as in 3.5 billion people generalized just because of biological features) are somehow “the enemy”. Of course they are not, just like any invariable characteristic of mankind is not. Racialism, sexism, they are all part of the same strategy; Keep the livestock fighting, so they won’t point their critical thinking skills towards us.

          I received the link from a friend, started listening to it, but still have to finish, but it’s laid out in the open here, hundreds of years ago:

          I think “The Prince”, “The Protocols of the Elders of Zion” and “The Grand Chessboard” are jewbris (another neologism) insights into the plans and strategies, straight in the open.

          Like

          1. Not saying they’re doing anything for real,Gaia. What is really realanymore? That is the real question. we know one thing for certain,though…There is always some real shit being thrown into their fake games,and it is up to someone smarter than them to throw some shit back at their facade wall…and see what sticks !!

            Like

          2. The problem with Machiavelli, as explained to me anyway, was that he was “pure means to ends” without any injection of moral considerations. It is kind of like Ayn Rand in that regard, just a sociopathic outlook on life and politics.

            Like

          3. I don’t want to be disagreeable, and so accept your opinion, as I know she is very popular. My take on her personal life was that she was certainly devoid of emotion, and had a group of people around her I would call cult members more than devotees. She had a love affair with a much younger man, Nathaniel Branden (he changed his name to have “Rand” in it), and did this right in front of her husband. In Atlas Shrugged she describes a sexual relationship in mere contractual form, leaving out entirely any notion of romance or physical attraction.

            One of the most commented-upon articles I ever wrote was called “Was Ayn Rand a Sociopath?”, but it is long gone now. I must have deleted it. It kept getting comments long after I wrote it, much like this thread we are in now.

            Here is another I wrote, however, that has a different take on her economic philosophy, this notion that people have that they are great cogs in the wheel and can do immense harm to us by “going Galt,” that is, leaving society and watching us perish without them.

            https://pieceofmindful.com/2016/03/31/john-galt-exited-and-the-world-shrugged/

            It is from march of 2016.

            Like

    1. I must attest. I have reviewed countless blogs.* CLOGSof bullshit.with conspiracy theorist who jump on band-wagons with the wheels already collapsed. it takes a lot to convince me,and i mean far beyond public opinion and popular belief. But I must say,Mr. Tokarski has shone,Not only does he disagree,until it is proven otherwise/ He takes the wheels off until it is worthy to roll on! Like the old *Zenith Television Slogan, “The quality goes in,Before the name goes on”. Exceptional research,Mark. You should end the”TWILIGHT ZONE”,and start a new blog….The Tokarski Zone.

      Like

  26. Mark, you continue to shine a bright light into the darkness in places we weren’t meant to see or know about. I’m thankful to you and the others for your efforts in exposing so many lies. I’ve learned over the years that nothing is what it seems.

    There are none so blind as those who will not see.

    I’ve been a Beatles and Elvis fan since I was old enough to hum a tune. Are you familiar with Mickey Moran and his research (thepresleyassignment) into Elvis Presley? He’s uncovered a lot of gems.

    Do you remember the gifted singer/songwriter Harry Chapin from the 1970s? I started listening to his music again recently and was curious about what happened to him? We’re told he attended the Air Force Academy but dropped out. And attended Cornell University but dropped out too. His music became very popular and we’re told he was the highest paid singer-songwriter/performer at the time earning USD 2 Mil per year. We’re told he died in 1981 in a fiery car crash on the Long Island Expressway on his way to a free concert he was giving. Supposedly he slowed down to 15 MPH and changed lanes many times. He was driving a six year old car (1975 VW Rabbit) and was allegedly hit from behind by a tractor trailer traveling at 65 MPH. The truck driver that hit Chapin’s car and a passerby pulled him from his car that was completely engulfed in flames, but not before they cut off his seatbelt! Allegedly he was so badly burned the authorities couldn’t identify the body except for a gold pocket watch in his pocket. And after running the license plate. I’m only surprised they didn’t find his wallet outside of his car on the pavement in pristine condition. We’re also told that 10 people at the hospital Emergency Room worked on him to save his life but couldn’t.

    None of this story is believable. Would you please work your magic on this story?

    Like

    1. The Chapin thing sounds like a worthy pursuit. Died at age 38. Are you up to it? What I have learned over time is that we all have it in us to stop letting others supply our opinions and evidence. I discovered this one night as I decided to look into this McCartney business … all by myself, without anything more than an offhand suggestion from an odd duck character initialed MM, I realized that I had discovered the key to the riddle.

      Which is interesting, since the other lead you provide takes us to another MM, Mr. Moran, who has devoted his life to all things Elvis, but is apparently yet to discover what the other MM supposedly stumbled on one night, two live birth certificates, one for Elvis, one for Aron. Mr. Burrows, grab your pipe and deerstalker! The rabbit’s afoot! Don’t wait for me. I am mildly mesmerized.

      Liked by 1 person

  27. Thanks for the encouragement and the push out of the nest. Your work here is inspiring and has opened my mind and deepened my curiosity. I’ll definitely venture deeper into the rabbit hole and open the Harry Chapin door and see where it leads?Eight years ago I didn’t take a red pill: I took a handful.

    Btw, I know Moran uncovered 2 SS#s for Elvis (1 retired & 1 still active) but find it curious he never mentions 2 live birth certificates? I read MM paper on Elvis some time ago and the discussion of twins but don’t recall the live birth certificates?

    Keep up the great work!

    Like

    1. I’d be glad to publish it as a guest piece if it passes muster. What I’ve found is that Wikipedia, which is not a reliable source, does have within it spook markers to let insiders know that an event was fake, the first with HC being age 38, which is an expression of ’11.’ Also, if the event was fake, there will be inconsistencies and illogical events. Also, be patient with yourself, allow yourself to make mistakes, as mistakes are the best teacher around. Don’t be afraid to jump to a wrong conclusion or over-analyze a photo or take a wrong turn. Mistakes can always be corrected. God knows we all make them, twice before breakfast.

      Like

      1. Love that TWICE before breakfast line…They say ,Repetition is the Motherhood of Learning ! Live Fully While You May, And Reckon Not The Cost..Deny Yourself Nothing..Flame And Blaze Like A Torch…And Toss The Fire About You. * Make The Most of What We Yet May Spend….Before We Too….Into The Dust Descend.*

        Like

  28. Just a couple of days ago I turned on the TV a d heard a news story that Paul McCartney gave a surprise co concert at Union station in New York. No footage just the announcement. Yeah right. Have to wonder which Paul.

    Like

  29. Harry Chapin factoid: Paul Schrader claimed, while in rehab, that he got the inspiration for Taxi Driver while listening to HC’s song ‘Taxi’ from his hospital bed. What a cluster of psy-ops that seed has sown. Bremmer/Wallace was also fertilizer used by Schrader that led eventually to the Reagan/Hinckley/Foster pile up.
    Not saying this was all planned in advance, but where certain concepts are sanctioned and herded in one particular direction, these apparently independent forces congeal by their shared attitude. Another downer of a song allowed on the airwaves inspires a demoralized character awash in the open sewer of 70’s NYC, followed by a psy-op dipping from this noxious stew to appear somewhat inevitable.
    Since Intel owns all of the mixed media used in these seeming coincidences, they can pick and choose material to create a collage of seeming reality.
    Fiction begets ‘fact’- (That’s two comments today concluding with begetting- Coffee break-)

    Like

  30. Mark; in the Joelle Steele collage, the 1959 Paul has a slightly pointed chin tip; the 1964 Paul as well as the 1985 Paul do not have this characteristic. The woman who owned the The Beatles Never Existed web site/forum taught me (and others) how to focus and isolate chins/ears/nostrils etc in order to really compare. The work you’re doing here is very good and this is not me knocking you or your work.

    Like

    1. I accept all criticism … is it not interesting that Joelle Steele does not see (at least) two people in these photos? She is the facial ID expert, testifies in court, and thinks those photos are all the same man.

      Like

      1. Yes,That’s the same man alright/Beyond a shadow of a doubt. That’s what Joelle Steele testifies to when the crime was committed by TWO people and they only have ONE suspect…She’s probably the one who taught him how to spot that shiny Franklin Half Dollar in the back of his throat…to sound like Benjamin.

        Like

          1. Don’t be alarmed by the HANDLE. Not meant to be threatening,nor offensive. it just simply means to TRIGGER a response,or to pull the trigger on a comment. To elaborate, I suppose the best way to approach is, proceed with caution,put the saftey on and eject the clip from the bag-a-guns.

            Like

  31. Mark; I wanted to mention something else but forgot to. In the ‘Boat Photo’, the guy holding a bottle in his left hand that’s talking to the Paul on port (left) side of the boat, has a Facebook page. I found the link to it a while back, I think it was on the NIR forum. I can’t remember the man’s name but he tells us, “yes, that’s me in the Beatles boat photo, taken on the East River in NYC, and the guy who I was standing there talking with was not Paul McCartney”. So again, more confusion. Truthfully, if all these players are Club Guys (Men’s Club with Secrets) then I do not believe the guy. They’re all a bunch of liars, every one of the guys and the few gals that are enmeshed in the PID/PWR phenomena. If I can find the guy’s FB page I’ll post it. Since I live a mile or so from the bridge in the background in the photo I’d love to find the boat, if it’s still available in New York Harbor for rent. I’m going to look into this, I’ll report any findings. Time for sleuthing !

    Like

    1. Have fun! I would say good luck on a boat that would be over fifty years old, but I suppose it is possible.

      The boat photo was not conclusive by any means. Some people saw another Paul in the far right, but that was someone else. However, that photo did introduce into my mind the possibility that we were dealing with more than one Paul. The childhood photos sealed that deal, and the hair parts, teeth and eyebrows told the rest of the story.

      Like

  32. Hey Mark can you do face chops on Paul Stanley and Gene Simmons of Kiss? I feel at least those two used dopplegangers through the years including the early and then later reunion make-up years. During non-makeup years I have seen video footage where Paul Stanley’s left eye is higher than his right whereby a years prior it had been lower in video footage. For awhile ‘Gene Simmons’ looked quite different almost every few years.

    Like

  33. The boat picture does not even look real. Unless Paul in middle of boat has the mumps. I assume middle Paul is sitting at a….. table? mump smiling while talking to…..who? The far away guy next to his paying no attention chick? Middle of boat Paul must also be mump smiling how excellent his hearing is then. And what in the world is his buddy sitting to his right sitting next to? Weird looking stuff right there. And what is protruding out the right knee of the Navy dude chatting up the leaning back Paul on left of boat? Almost looks like large worm-like parasite slithering out the dudes knee. There’s all kinds of stuff all over this picture that looks questionable. Like the dude wearing the…..black shades? His left hand looks like a lobster claw. There’s a dude farther back from that looks like his face is whited out. Then there’s a ………to infinity

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s