The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) recently announced that 2024 was the warmest year on record, the key being “on record.” When IPCC speaks it is treated in the media as an ex cathedra source (a Catholic expression meaning “from the chair”, or infallible). There are several reasons for this:
- IPCC was set up on the founding principle that greenhouse gases were heating up our climate, a finalistic principle that has led to circular thinking from the beginning.
- IPCC relies on 30 or so climate models coming from around the world, each starting with the assumption that the Earth’s climate is in equilibrium, and that only human activity will change that. All of these climate models drift off into catastrophic warming except one, the Russians, who have always produced better scientists than here in the West. Save that, none of the climate models are in sync with real climate data, and yet are followed with rigor by governments all over the planet. Hence, windmills littering the landscapes along with solar panels, and countries like Germany and Great Britain drifting into perilous shortages, blackouts, and rationing. One can infer from this, as during Covid, that all the governments on the planet (save perhaps Tanzania) march lockstep to an undisclosed higher power. We were once told that we should fear a “one world government”, but I am here to tell you that while we were barring our doors against it, it came in through the bathroom window.
- All news agencies everywhere treat the IPCC as the man behind the green curtain, and none will dare pull back that curtain to reveal the Oscar Zoroaster Phadrig Isaac Norman Henkle Emmannuel Ambroise Diggs – like character who is governing our perceptions. This gives IPCC an entrenched aura of (unearned) authority, as in essence it is a propaganda body, and follows the principles of propaganda far more faithfully than those of science.
Piece of Mindful 