We gather here today to mourn the fake passing of fake San Bernardino victim Sierra Clayborn

The San Bernardino mass shooting event was faked, of course.

I know that most who read that sentence will think I am nuts, but I assure you, it is not me, but you who has the problem. I am one of the few sane ones left in this country.

Stop and think: Have you even looked at the evidence? Of course not. You assume that with all the hoopla and those very pretty and trustworthy television people and the and crying actors on TV that it must be real. Right? And you’re wondering what is going wrong with this country. You’re certain there is insanity in the air, and that the next mass shooting might be in your town. It’s got you in a state of anxiety, right? We gotta get ISIS! Right?

Fake mass shootings require fake victims. So I took a list of the list of victims, and since I don’t want to spend a lot of time on this (the next “event” is in planning stages already), picked just one. I chose “Sierra Clayborn.”

They have to make up the names and supply identities, but use real people as models. Here is a photo of “Sierra:”

sierra-clayborn-600
She’s a pretty girl, whoever this model is. She looks to be a mixture of Asian and African descent, but with a name like “Clayborn” it is hard to know. This is a well-lit photo, no shadows, indicating a light screen used by professionals. It could be a family portrait, or she could be a model. The face is very narrow. The head is too big for the body, however. It is so big that if you turned it sideways, it would extend shoulder-tip to shoulder-tip.  Either it has been superimposed, or this girl is a circus freak.

A web search for her yields a person by that name, age 27, living in Rialto, California, and another in Illinois. As a possible relative of the California Sierra we find “Jacinto Alonso,” but no one with the name Clayborn. Huh? Modern families, I suppose.

That’s it. But “Clayborn” is a bastardized spelling of “Claiborne,” a European name made famous by the fashion line sold at JC Penney. There are lots people by that name, famous people including Lindy Claiborne Boggs, the widow of Hale Boggs, a member of the House of Representatives from Louisiana and of the Warren Commission, who disappeared in a small plane over in Alaska in 1972 after having been driven to the airport that day by none other than a certain young man named Bill Clinton. For all we know, he died, fake-died, or was murdered. That’s an aside … just rambling.

Moving on: Assume she is a real person, then I am disrespecting the dead, right? Let’s find her parents … it does not say. Two obituaries do not list her parents.

Odd, but let it go. They might be in seclusion. She has a sister, Tamishia, we are told, who is in charge of her memorial fund. Here’s a photo of the two of them together, a selfie, with Tamishia doing the selfie squint and Sierra looking again like a model.

sisters

There is, of course, a slight problem here: They don’t look at all like sisters. But modern times, and all, perhaps one was adopted, or they share one parent, but since we don’t yet know the parents, it’s hard to guess. They are of different races, and other than the shape of the mouths, seem to share no physical characteristics. Tamashia’s hair … odd. But that could be camera angles and all that. I know I hate selfies – no way could I put up a photo like Sierra here in a selfie.

The photograph is fake. Both images have been pasted in from some other source. You can tell because of the sharp, sharp lines, but more importantly, the shadows don’t match. Also, while the angle is up at up at Tamashia, it is straight on at Sierra, even as she appears to be the taller of the two.  Tamishia’s face is lit by light from her left and above, while Sierra is lit from the right and above, while the phone used for the photo cast a shadow from behind.  That’s three separate light sources. There is a hand [with fingers Photoshopped off] or something under Sierra’ dangling ear piece too, holding it in place? It looks to be six or seven feet behind her. Who knows. Fake photo.

Here is a photo of Tamishia from “Sierra’s” Facebook link:

Tamashia

Yikes! Worst Photoshop job ever! The left eye has been superimposed, and does not line up with the right eye. They are not even looking the same direction. The top half of the face is one person, the bottom a another, or she has five o’clock shadow. It has been blurred down below and above in the hairline while well defined about the cheeks and eyes.  And this is not the Tamishia in the photo with her model sister above. The nose says it all.

Take a look at your own collection of photos some time, and notice the consistency of light and lines and shadings. These sort of problems only occur with photo fakery. The people at Langley who do this stuff are busy these days what with fake events every month or so. They are also bored, as Americans are so easy to fool that they don’t have to try very hard.

Anyway, I’ll stop, and I will do no more with the so-called San Bernardino victims. If one is so obviously a paste up, the others will deconstruct as easily too.

Induced hatred

I have a three-part writing mission, and get sidetracked. Part one is to merely establish that the American people are not capable of self-governance* – not now, anyway. Time might heal us, make us sane again, but agitation propaganda destroys intellectual abilities, permanently, so that it takes new people with fresh brains to lead us out of our current mess.

But each new generation is put through the same grinder of mass media, thought control and education that produces these empty-headed robots who pass for responsible citizens.

I suppose out of that attitude comes the haughty notion that some of us are smarter than most of us, creating resentment. “Are you calling me stupid?” Even stupid people resent that. However, we are talking about a particular kind of insight, the understanding of politics and psychological manipulation that only a few people possess.

This country, since the end of World War II, has been deeply brainwashed, boiled in agitprop all the way from having kids duck and cover and do air raid drills in the 1950s to the current military flyovers at sporting events and the onslaught of fake shootings. These events are designed to keep us in a high state of tension. In that state of mind, we cannot reason properly, and are susceptible to suggestion and manipulation.

Those of us who can see through this nonsense simply have the ability to relax. There ain’t no boogeymen out there, ain’t no terrorists knocking on our doors, ain’t no reason to walk around in fear. If you know that, you can sit quietly and read a book or contemplate a sunrise.

Events like 9/11, Boston, Paris and now San Bernardino (which, until proven otherwise I assume to be just another planned tragedy) are “agitation propaganda.” (A quick tour of Wikipedia and other sources will tell you that Lenin, Hitler and Mao practiced it, but will offer no suggestion that it is going on here this very moment.)

But classical study in propaganda teaches that people cannot live in such a high-wire state for long, and need intervals of relaxation in between agitations. In the United States these days we are not getting any time off. The agitation is unrelenting.

The results of unabated agitprop are resignation of the intellect (the stupidity we see about us now) and insanity. The underlying goal, support for more wars, is what drives the masters of deceit, but in the end they are left with a population that cannot think and only knows how to hate on command.

They seem to want that. So it is that otherwise capable people have been reduced to snarling wolves wanting revenge against the latest target for the United States military. Right now it is Syria. Next week it could be Tonga.

If we stop and think about it, we have no more reason to attack Syria than we did Vietnam, Iraq, Serbia, Libya or Afghanistan. But who has time to “stop and think?” The current ongoing mass shootings are serving the purpose of Orwell’s Two-Minute Hate, to remove thinking from our daily lives and replace it with a cause for action.

I wish they would let up. I wish they would let us relax. I am tired of the stupidity, tension, hatred, and insanity that is the United States today. But all of this reinforces the idea that causes me to write these words: We are not a people capable of self-governance. Not now, anyway.

Maybe for a brief interval after World War II, before the decision was made that we would be a National Security State in search of enemies, that we would be propagandized, we were a sane people. But that ship sailed in 1947.

Until we are given a decent interval of relaxation, a time to recover our senses and learn to reason again, we will not have the intellectual capacity needed to make wise choices or form sane popular movements for peace and human decency.

Oh, wait – what’s that I see? Another mass shooting? Where this time? Let’s go check it out! Gotta go! New reason for hatred! See ya!
________________
*Part two is to analyze our political class and voting system, part three, the hardest part, is to describe what is behind the curtain, how our system of governance really functions, in concrete terms. I hope to get to that point someday.

San Bernardino

Just a word to the wise here, as there are a few such people in our country still. The event in San Bernardino again has markings of a false flag provocation. The first clue is that the supposed shooters are dead. That means no trial. The patsies in false flag events are always either killed, fake-killed, or disappeared in some other fashion.

These events happen on a regular basis now. Why? The American public is so dumbed down that Langley* hardly has to try – I am wondering now if one of the supposed “gunmen” left a driver’s license or other piece of incriminating evidence around – a diary? A flight manual in a car in a parking lot? That too is a clue – stupidly-easily-seen-to-be-faked evidence.

Please just wait for real evidence from independent investigators. I know it is hard to comprehend, but mainstream news reporters either lie themselves, as the media is loaded with CIA moles (Anderson Cooper the most prominent), or they are fooled like everyone else. CIA admitted in the late 70s to congressional committees that it controlled the major news organs, including Washington Post and New York Times. Since TV is the mostly widely used news outlet, it is also the most infiltrated and controlled. Truth only gets through if it is truth that doesn’t matter, like some prominent person having a sex change.

Just because you saw it on TV does not mean it really happened. It is a two-dimensional screen and all manner of trickery can be used to fool you. I mean, honest to god, there were no planes on 9/11 – the power of suggestion is a marvelous tool in the hands of the state and its controlled media.

So don’t be scared, don’t buy everything you’re being told. Wait for independent evidence – better yet, look for it. Do not wait for it to fall into your lap. This is our biggest problem – people do not use their heads. They wait for things to be explained to them.

My bet … by the time this event unravels, another will take its place. It is probably in the planning stages right now. If you hear of civil defense, medical response and police or military drills in your areas, get in touch with your local authorities, and demand they be cancelled. These drills are the basis for false flag events, the means by which Langley ropes ordinary people into unwitting participation.

And again , don’t be afraid. The only terrorists out there wanting to harm Americans reside in Langley, Virginia, and lately they have taken to making stage plays rather than actually killing people. They must have realized how pathetically easy it is to fool Americans.
______________
*I use the word “Langley,” supposed location of CIA headquarters, here, in the same manner as we say “The White House” when we mean the executive branch. “Langley” is mere shorthand for the military/intelligence community, a vast unaccountable apparatus.

The gentle art of lying

I had occasion this morning to visit both the Billings Gazette and Missoulian websites. Both are owned by Lee, both are busy-busy, full of links, and annoying. If you think newspapers exist to deliver news, I’ve got a bridge to sell you. Newspapers are in the business of collecting audiences to sell to advertisers, their true customers. News is a secondary pursuit.

Their latest endeavor in the annals of annoyance is to block access to a story* until we answer some advertising questions.

I have said for years the best way to fight intrusive advertising is to lie. If you have qualms about that, remember that they don’t have a right to your information, and you have no obligation to give it to them. Lying in that situation is a venial sin, three Hail Mary’s at most, if even that.

The Gazette asked me if I had been to Sam’s Club (no, but said yes) and if I had a small child (ditto). I fed them useless data. If enough people do that, we will screw up their database. (They asked me what my favorite grocer is and I said Pain & Diaz. That they will probably spot.)

It astounds me to know that most people treat advertisers with respect. The job of the advertiser is to get your attention by any means possible; to market to you in a subliminal and underhanded manner; and to make you unhappy. Happy people, after all, don’t need to buy stuff.

*Some will say that we should not get a news story for free, so that answering their stupid questions is a small price of admission. After all, they have bills to pay. I’ve been in business for myself for decades, and not once has anyone ever expressed concern that I might not make it. My answer to this concern is “I don’t care.”

Is Langley messaging Russia to leave our terrorists alone?

As I read more of the Turkish shoot down of the Russian jet over Syria on Tuesday, it is easily seen as a deliberate provocation. To what end? By whom? Who are the actors in this play? As with all of warfare, public events are merely a smoke screen. Most of the action is hidden from view.

Let’s go back a couple of weeks to Paris, the false flag attack.

If you do not realize that to be the case, that Paris was false flag, then read no further. Your ability to sift through evidence is in need of work. It’s painfully obvious false flaggery. Otherwise we are asked to believe that a country already under attack by outside forces, Syria, deliberately provoked NATO into an even more deadly attack. Remember Libya, 2011 – NATO obviously has the firepower to destroy a country and bring down its government, and is itching to take down Syria. The key for NATO is to appear justified in its aggression, and the Paris attack was meant for that purpose.

It did not work. The Russians are in the way.

The Russians have been cleaning up in Syria, and it’s been fun to watch. The Americans and its NATO puppets are involved in high-level duplicity, at once arming, training and funding the terrorists who are attacking Syria while pretending to be opposed to them. The Russians are merely using that public duplicity as their card for entry into the game. Since everyone professes to be against terrorism, actually attacking  terrorists is a smart move. Behind the scenes, I gather, U.S. Intelligence, along with NATO, Brits, Israelis, Saudis, must be seething. The plan was to bring down the Assad regime by means of these terrorist forces that the Russians are now pulverizing.

I would then gather that the shoot down is then a message to the Russians. But what is that message, and who is sending it?

It is not the Turks. Grant it, Turkey has been essential in aiding the terrorists, as their supply lines runs through Turkey. But just as Syria would have been crazy to provoke NATO by staging the attacks in Paris, so too would Turkey be crazy to attack Russia. It’s not just a matter of military power, but also economic ties. Turkey will now lose tourism and joint ventures in nuclear power along with gas supplies.

So even though it was supposedly a Turkish F-16 jet that shot down the Russian Sukhoi-24 jet, I  doubt the orders came from the Turkish government. This smells more of an intelligence operation. The F16 was likely a cloaked bird supplied by the U.S., France or Israel. So it is NATO sending the message, and since NATO is but a U.S. puppet, it is the U.S. sending a warning to the Russians. Turkey, subordinate to all, has to shut up.

The message is obvious:

“Stand down! Leave our terrorists alone.”

But just as Syria would not attack innocent civilians in Paris without a better plan than merely enraging NATO, so too would the U.S. not order a Russian jet brought down without a deeper message. One plane, one dead pilot, broken relations between Turkey and Russia are small potatoes. Obviously U.S. intelligence is sending a deeper, more sinister message. It has to be something like …

“This, and more.”

In late October a Russian charter flight went down over Egypt, killing all 224 aboard. My immediate suspicion was again one of those coded messages telling the Russians to stand down in Syria. This sort of communication appears in public just to be happenstance occurrences, but is well understood behind the smoke screen. So there too I suspected American, Israeli or British intelligence (but I repeat myself) of causing that bird to go down. But it did not hinder Russian efforts to end the war in Syria and stem the flow of refugees into Europe. Russia continues to misbehave.

So we had first an attack on Russian civilians, then a false flag attack in Paris to engage NATO, and now an attack on a Russian military jet.

What next? I don’t know. This much I do know – the people behind these incidents are cold, calculating, ruthless and smart. They will not let up. More surprises are in store.

And oh, yeah, before I forget, I was reminded yesterday that the Assad government aided our CIA in its illegal rendition program, allowing itself to be used as a base for torture. There are no good guys about. But something much larger is at stake, something to have caused Langley to turn agaist Damascus. And that has to have something to do with resources, natural gas, pipelines. CIA is a tool of the oligarchy, not the government.

Russia plays this game too, and thus far, plays it better.

More in store, however,

A game of chicken?

We are swimming in fake events – the US campaign over who gets to be our next fake president is in full swing. Except for Bernie Sanders, these people are all serious about wanting the job. Bernie is fake, however, working for Hillary. This is quite obvious now.

The attacks in Paris were fake as well, false flag all the way. Anyone with a brain and paying close attention can figure that out. They had their intended effect, I suppose, as most Americans (and apparently French) are not terribly sophisticated about these things.

Meanwhile, there was an incident that is apparently real – Turkey’s military shot down a Russian fighter jet. According to Russian sources, the pilot safely ejected, but other sources say they are dead, possibly murdered on the ground.

Like the Paris attacks, this is a provocation, and a serious one. While Russia and the U.S. were once secretly allied behind the façade of the Cold War, they are now seriously at odds. (Or so it appears. We never can know for sure.)

But Turkish aggression fits – if indeed you know how to read news. The terrorist forces in Syria are a Western creation*, financed by CIA, trained in Saudi Arabia, and supplied by the Americans and French. The Turks maintain the corridor that keeps their supply lines open.

The Russians have launched a military campaign to do something that others only claimed to want to do – put the terrorist forces in the ground. They have succeeded, and in so doing are infuriating the West. Worse yet, Russians have demonstrated military sophistication and might that Langley did not know it possessed.

It only takes a short leap, and not an illogical one, to suggest that Turkey was not acting on its own, but rather on orders from terror central, either NATO headquarters or Langley (perhaps a redundancy). The ultimate objective? Possibly a game of chicken to get the Russians to back down.

There is good reporting going on here and possibly here.
__________________
*This does not mean that the individual fighters for the various false-front groups are aware of the level of deceit. Just as American soldiers imagine they know why they are in Afghanistan, but don’t really, so too would I expect low levels of awareness among fighter for ISIS, al Nusra, al Qaeda, etc.

Daddy dearest?

imageNot too many people know or remember, but Jacqueline Bouvier Kennedy became Jackie Onassis in October of 1968. She married Aristotle Socrates Onassis, one of the wealthiest men in the world. He died in 1975. In a lifestyles-of-the-rich-and-famous world, the two shared six residences, including a private island in the Ionian Sea called Skorpios. Jackie would inherit only a paltry $26 million on his death, however. Ari’s daughter, Cristina, battled her for the family fortune,

John_F_KennedyHer first husband, John F. Kennedy was a well-known womanizer – that marriage in retrospect appears arranged. Joe Kennedy, Sr., whose mob influence played a large part in securing his son’s election in 1960, realized that a bachelor had scant chance of being elected president in this land, then as now. He convinced Jackie to marry Jack. He was known to be a persuasive man.

image Here’s what is interesting … take a look at the two photos – John F. Kennedy, Jr., above, and a young Aristotle Onassis, to the left here. They appear to me far more likely to be father and son than John Jr. to have been sired by John Sr. The hairline, the lips and eyes seem far more a match.

British royalty is a rich well of fascinating debauchery and intrigue for some, but I find our own royal families to be as interesting. Here we have a Bouvier mating with a Kennedy, supposedly, but more likely with an Onassis to produce a young Adonis. And who could blame her – Ari probably offered her far more comfort than the promiscuous Jack. Her humiliations at his hands were legendary. Jr. near water

I’m not gay or anything, by the way, but John Jr. had to be among the most strikingly good-looking men ever to live. It’s a bloodline thing, I suppose.

What will happen when a trust baby runs a baseball team?

Billings_07006_DxOweb
Cobb Field, Billings, Montana (since replaced by Dehler Park)

I enjoy baseball, though my interest was waned in recent years. I far more enjoy a spring training game, passing time with the fans. The games themselves are ho-hum, lacking adrenalin and the latter innings reserved to rookies to showcase their skills. The overall experience of a spring training game is, however, very enjoyable.

The Cincinnati Reds had (and have) a farm team in Billings, Montana, where I lived until 2001. Consequently, I “branded” with that team, and indeed they put up some powerhouse teams, winning the World Series in 75, 76 and 90, and dominating the 1970’s.

The team fell on hard times, but has been re-emergent of late. Their general manager, Walt Jocketty, brought important changes to the franchise, changing the emphasis from high-risk run-scoring slugging teams to pitching. That brought them into contention recently, though they are now in a rebuilding phase again.

They have a new GM, Dick Williams, and Jocketty is being squeezed out the top. Williams will guide the team in the future. He will not be fired, ever, as his name is “Williams,” and that oligarchical family has a major ownership share in the team.

Here are some frightening snippets from a recent interview with Williams, a former investment banker:

“I got into baseball a little later in life. I was in my mid 30s. I had close to a 15-year business career in investment banking and private equity. My background isn’t totally unique in baseball front offices, but it’s somewhat unique, and it’s shaped a lot of who I am and how I think about problems. …”

“The exercise of building a projection model has you asking questions like, ‘What are the important variables?’ Then, over time, you go back and analyze why they maybe deviated from reality. Is there a deviation that can be explained by a flaw in the model? Is there a deviation that can be explained by some experience that a player had? It’s an iterative process over time.

“Whether you’re using aging curves or historical injury experience, your projections should, at a macro level, take into account the possibilities of injuries. If you’re talking about team performance, when you aggregate those player stats for next year – when we’re looking at our projected means – there’s a component that accounts for injuries.

“For one player, it’s a binary… he may miss most of the season, which makes my projections way off for that player. But when taken into context of the team, the fact that I’ve weighted these guys based on their age, based on their positions, based on their injury history – what I think might happen – as a team, those projections should be close to accounting for what happens.”

Are you reading what I am reading here? Yep. We’re screwed for a good and long, long haul*.

But there is always spring training!
__________________
*Born on third base, he obviously thinks he hit a triple. (h/t, Barry Switzer)

Set anyone free lately?

image
The above photo is of Paul Simon and a singer named Dion, who had a minor career for a few years in the 1960’s. His big hit was a schmaltzy pop song called “Abraham, Martin and John” wherein he claimed that Lincoln, Martin Luther King, and John Kennedy “freed a lot of people.” At least King tried.

A Facebook friend put up this photo, and it just jumped out at me. The two did some work together in 2009, and I would guess Dion’s people were anxious to latch on to Simon’s justly earned fame. Simon agreed to allow him to share a track.

But the interesting thing, if you can spot it, is that the photo is faked. Look at Simon’s head for a second, and you’ll see that it is out-of-place. The neck is a different skin tone. The head is oddly placed atop the neck, and the face is too large. Paul is not the best looking man, short and squat (truly talented however), but his chin does not hang down on his neck. And look where the brim of his hat meets Dion’s glasses – they had a problem with it, and so just blurred that area. I do not understand why people cannot see this stuff!

But that is just show business, and done all the time. It is also done in news reporting. Under the fold, because at first glance it appears quite gruesome, is a photo of the so-called “Bataclan Massacre” in Paris. I would not put it up if I thought it was real.
Continue reading “Set anyone free lately?” →

Russia babysitting the French?

From Vineyard of the Saker this morning, Russia dramatically increases her anti-Daesh operations:

Finally, Putin has declared that he has ordered the Russian naval task force to ‘cooperate’ with the French naval task force lead by the aircraft carrier, the Charles de Gaulle.  What better way to make sure that he French don’t “accidentally” strike the “wrong” targets than to fully “cooperate” with them?

Smart move!

I have to say I had a similar thought, as the Russians know how to play these games.