A Bill Gates Wet Dream

I spoke to a friend this afternoon, or at least a long-time acquaintance. It was a long conversation, and late in Sharon told me that her brother was in a coma. I asked how old, and she said 69, that he had tested positive for Covid-19, and had been put on a respirator. I did not ask if he had been intubated. I assume so. He’ll die soon.

It has been bugging me since. Sharon is not exactly up to speed on the disease, but what I suspect is happening is that her brother is being murdered. She did not talk about any other symptoms or problems that he has, only that he “tested positive.” Because medical personnel are as clueless as the rest of the population, they are scared out of their minds about the virus, and so do intubation, respirator and coma matter-of-fact, routinely disposing of seniors.

Sharon’s brother is 69, I am 70. I am in perfect health, but if I test positive, they might kill me too. This is a Bill Gates wet dream. It is hard to grasp that I am living through it. They are murdering older people.

I want Bill Gates tested. The RT-PCR test is not 100% false positive or 100% false negative. It is simply undefined, like dividing by zero. There are no reliable outcomes. Testing Bill might put him on a respirator and then they might kill him. Then we could form a line of people who want to drive a stake through his heart, if we can find it, to be sure he stays dead.

My impulse is to tell Sharon to intervene, get her brother breathing normally again, get him away from doctors. I might risk the fragile friendship tomorrow and do that,  nothing lost if I fail.

 

30 thoughts on “A Bill Gates Wet Dream

  1. well it does not sound like a very strong “impulse” after all!!
    you “might risk the fragile friendship?” !!
    come on man, what are you waiting for?

    Like

      1. Be careful though. Approach it hastily and it will go badly. Be armed with data about iatrogenic deaths. Perhaps just SUGGEST that if things start to go south without explanation, that she considers getting him out of there.

        I also recommend that you watch the 1971 film The Hospital with George C. Scott.

        Like

  2. Misplaced faith in doctors and hospitals is a tough one, Mark. It’s not just Gates posing under a flattering title. Hope you’re able to get your friend out of that hospital before it’s too late.

    https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/
    “Yet in that flattering title the men who pretend legally to inhabit the title of “doctor”
    are publicly known to be the third leading causes of death in the United States, according to statistics tallied by the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) in consideration of death by iatrogenic (doctor/medicine-related) causes. But the privately held, actual statistics are much worse when considering the iatrogenic (doctor-related/spread) cause of some of those other leading causes of death, including cancers, unnaturally hardened cholesterol in strokes and heart attacks, and the spread of xenotransplanted, mis-folding prions through injectable so-called “medicines.” Sadly, most of these seemingly mysterious diseases, which are mislabeled as “dementias” like Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s, are in Reality caused by the direct injection (vaccination), surgical transplantation, and inoculation of human and animal proteins (prions) and
    DNA into the body, which by current estimates can lie dormant for up to fifty years before wreaking havoc upon the human and animal body infected by them. Often termed as “slowviruses,” these prion infections are only possible through a “doctor’s” legally licensed practice and prescription (ad-vice), a license to kill without repercussion..” Clint, Strawman, pps. 267, 268.

    https://incendar.com/baby_boomer_deathclock.php
    Almost 5,000 “baby boomers” will die today, each day. HOW we die is our choice. HOW we live is also our choice.

    Like

    1. I’m guessing the JAMA study only considers deaths iatrogenic if they’re some obvious error like giving the wrong dose or other clear mistakes. Much more serious is that the “standard of care” itself is often statistically not in the patient’s favor, if critics like Dr Jennifer Daniels are to be believed.

      The stats are sold to docs by a kind of sophistry where some small benefit is shown for the issue being treated. Meanwhile, the treatment will have a high risk of leading to other issues that may actually increase mortality risk. They misdirect from the actual question the patient has– will this treatment overall increase my odds of survival– and just focus on the one marginal benefit their treatment has allegedly been shown to provide.

      Thus even the JAMA study is probably being wildly generous to mainstream medicine.

      Like

  3. This is exactly what I believe is happening. Nobody is really dying of COVID. They are dying of unnecessarily aggressive medical treatment which does kill those who are already compromised.

    A couple of simple concepts:
    1) Those who are most frequently vaccinated are the most vulnerable, as the beautiful immune system which we were born with has received a “manual override” by arrogant ignorance;
    2) Medications, similar to vaccinations, do have side effects (i.e., consequences). Those consequences lead to disease and death.
    3) The (highly profitable) health industry has no interest in making sick people healthy, but rather benefits from making healthy people sick.

    It’s almost surprising it took this long to get to where we are today.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. You only have to look at the long list of side effects on the instructions for medication to wonder if it’s the cure or the poison…..

      I believe our immune systems are the only way to break up and destroy viral microbes, drugs inhibit this process.

      Like

  4. Follow the money.

    “Robert Kennedy Jr. and Harvard Attorney Alan Dershowitz debated on the topic of the coronavirus vaccine back in July.
    During the debate, Kennedy Jr. claimed that Dr. Anthony Fauci invested $500 million in the vaccine that is not safe by any means and Fauci owns half the patent so he’s due to make millions.”

    Liked by 1 person

    1. My understanding is that Fauci was responsible for “investing” $500M of U.S. taxpayer money in Moderna’s mRNA-1273 vaccine, which at the time this was done (back in January or February…I can’t remember) made shareholders of Moderna stock billions (one of whom was Bill Gates…surprise surprise) as this announcement sent the stock soaring. Another $500M of U.S. taxpayer money was recently given to Moderna to allow the company to develop this controversial vaccine.

      But here’s the concerning part…
      (1) Moderna has never ever in the history of the company been able to get one of their vaccines licensed. Here they have $1 Billion of revenue already this year (thank you U.S. taxpayers!) with nothing yet to show for it;
      (2) If the vaccine somehow does get licensed, the government might mandate that we buy Moderna’s vaccine giving the company untold billions more…with no out-of-cost investment of their own because we have already been financing this insane project from the start; and the coup de grâce…
      (3) If the vaccine backfires and causes harm, Moderna is exempt from all liability.

      WHAT A BUSINESS MODEL! Can it get any better? No investment…no risk…all reward.

      As for Fauci being on the patent, I don’t think that’s the case (as he has gotten in trouble for that before). However, I would be interested to see if he (or his partners) bought stock in the company back before the U.S. investment which made Moderna a household name.

      Like

      1. I just found a video of Stéphane Bancel, CEO of Moderna, giving a presentation at Davos for the World Economic Forum.[He’s funded by CEPI, i.e B&MGF] whose chief executive was sitting next to him….] recorded January 23 2020
        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BDQtXzu6z08 around 15:10 onwards

        “We have access to the sequence of er a virus…the US very quickly got access to a sequence”
        Notice how he never says THE sequence.

        The ‘whole sequence’ paper [Huihui Wang et al] appeared in print only on April 24 2020. Excerpt –
        Specific laboratory detection

        Airway epithelial cells from infected patients were used to isolate a novel coronavirus, temporarily named 2019-nCoV…..

        Isolation of the causal agent and determination of its partial genome sequence provided the basis for next-generation sequencing or real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) methods for the SARS-CoV-2 [14, 17]. After the SARS-CoV-2 was isolated from a lower respiratory tract specimen, a diagnostic RT-PCR test was developed…..

        Seems easy! Surely it can be replicated, the research that is?

        Elsewhere Bancel gives an interview to Jim Greenwood of Bio, a Biotech trade association, April 22 2020

        Would you talk about the historic speed with which you turned the viral sequence into a potential vaccine?

        Bancel: On January 11, the Chinese government put the genetic sequence of the virus online. Working with the National Institutes of Health (NIH), we worked to decide and design the vaccine on our computers. We did not need the access to the live virus, but instead, used the genetic makeup of a virus, its sequence, which is something that we believe is more important than the physical virus.

        Why does Bancel keep saying ‘a virus’? It all look very shaky.

        Like

  5. It does not make sense. I would ask for more details about his symptoms. You can test positive and have no symptoms and that does not require you to go to a hospital. My guess is he had some respiratory issues. Don’t get me wrong, I do not deny something else must be up with this guy but just testing positive does not send you to the ICU by default.

    Like

    1. It would be interesting to talk to frontline nurses and docs about their protocols for covid patients depending on their symptoms. For instance I wonder if they are more aggressive (more likely to intubate say) for covid patients, than for flu patients. Same respiratory problem, different treatment, possibly?

      Like

      1. Yeah, who knows… No doctor here but if I were one or a front-line nurse for that matter, I would attack the symptom (difficulty breathing) regardless of what is the name of the illness but I guess that is not how pros do it ijdk… Just an uneducated guess

        Like

  6. These text updates from the city make me wonder why I still live here. I’m seriously considering moving away. Not sure it’s perfect anywhere but LA county is getting more uncomfortable every day.

    https://evb.gg/m#Ul555sINz
    COVID-19 Santa Monica Update 8.4.2020
    SM will begin targeted enforcement for face coverings in business districts & parks this week. Save $100 & save your health by masking up

    Like

  7. Is everyone paying attention to how much your local town is getting from the Cares Act…With a little diggin you can find out the who and how much. Seems like towns that report higher positive cases and deaths, and businesses that shout down for “the good of the public”….get a few more cookies.

    Like

  8. never forget it’s global. It’s not about the US, or China, or Russia. It’s everywhere. It’s not about Trump or Gates or whoever. They are just faces selling the project in the media. Nothing more. Gates is not evil, he is a retired actor, who played a software guru for a while and who still has to play a role occasionally.
    Doctors are killing on purpose. Not only old people. When somebody comes with a cancer diagnosis and asks eagerly for Chemo believing it will heal him, they will even tell him that his chances of surviving it are dim. Yet still people tend to believe what they want to believe and will let doctors kill themselves even if the doctors tell them that. Sometime doctors offer new untested medication and people take it even if doctors tell them it may not help at all but will do some harm for sure. The main problem is the believe in mystery sicknesses and in magical cure. The truth, that every sickness is an individual damage within your body, that your body tries to fix which manifests itself in symptoms we call sickness. It is not transferable. There is no contagion. The same damage can happen to many people of course but it does not mean it transfers from one person to another. Everyone can break a leg. It does not mean you’re leg got broken because your neighbor broke his leg and infected you with it. If you avoid sun your skin will become sun-sensitive. If you them expose yourself to the sun you’ll get sunburn or may even get sunstroke with similar symptoms to that of a flu. But you won’t think of viruses or that your neighbor infected you with the sunburn, won’t you? You’ll think it is because of to much sun. In wintertime when you inner skin called mucous membrane gets sensitive because of all the central heating and dry air and you then expose yourself to the cold outdoor you’ll damage the inner skin in precisely the same way you do with your outer skin in the summer time. You’ll get almost the same symptoms. Then why in hell do you think it wasn’t you who damaged your mucous membrane but it was a virus and your neighbor who infected you with it? The same applies for any sickness and the majority of them today is caused by previous medication. It all starts the same way.

    Like

    1. I agree in total. Some time ago I wondered why we have an an annual cold and flue season, and looked it up at Wiki or some other official source. The answer was that it was “not well understood,” the standard medical response we get when they want to avoid saying “We have no clue.” There is much more to learn about this. At this point I am simply aghast at the corruption and ignorance that dominates modern medicine. We are still in the Dark Ages. Yet people worship those wearing white lab coats. This is religious in nature, and not based on any rational concept.

      Like

      1. If you pay attention to the hustle you’ll notice berkeley and Johns Hopkins a lot. There’s a reason for that. Its name is Daniel coit gilman. His buddy was Andrew Dickson white. He wrote a book about the conflict between religion and psience. It was all a cover story because all cosmological subjects are essentially religious in nature of course…

        “Daniel Coit Gilman (/ˈɡɪlmən/; July 6, 1831 – October 13, 1908) was an American educator and academic.[1] Gilman was instrumental in founding the Sheffield Scientific School at Yale College,[2] and subsequently served as the second president of the University of California, Berkeley, as the first president of Johns Hopkins University, and as founding president of the Carnegie Institution. He was also co-founder of the Russell Trust Association, which administers the business affairs of Yale’s Skull and Bones society. Gilman served for twenty five years as president of Johns Hopkins; his inauguration in 1876 has been said to mark “the starting point of postgraduate education in the U.S.”

        https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daniel_Coit_Gilman

        https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_History_of_the_Warfare_of_Science_with_Theology_in_Christendom

        Like

        1. Sounds fascinating. Corbett had that doc on the Rockefellers medical monopoly, vertically integrated with the med schools, but I never looked closely at its 19th C origins.

          SMJ, did you see my comment on Disciplined Minds book and author Jeff Schmidt in previous thread? Any thoughts on all that? Have you come across him, or how would you plave him? Real deal or some kind of front for a project?

          Like

          1. I’ve never come across the guy. I hold psience communicators in low regard so I ain’t giving dr. Schmidt the benefit of the doubt. And I don’t feel sorry for frustrated corporate minions longing for opportunities of self expression that they feel are commensurate with the career path they’ve found themselves on andwhatnot. Seems to me that he wants to create a more diverse set of hustlers with the same inclination to believe what they’ve been told.

            Now, if dr. Schmidt started calling out the particle chasers I might be inclined to listen to what he has to say.

            Bytheway, Gilman ran carnegie when it set up its experimental evolution lab at cold spring harbor. It would become the eugenics capitol of the us. Hershey and chase would go on to invent dna there with viruses and a feckin kitchen blender of course…

            “Hershey stayed at the Washington University School of Medicine until 1950. He then accepted a position from the Carnegie Institution of Washington’s Department of Genetics at Cold Spring Harbor. Here he and Martha Chase did the Hershey-Chase blender experiment that proved that phage DNA, and not protein, was the genetic material. For this, and his body of work on bacteriophage, Hershey shared the 1969 Nobel Prize for Physiology or Medicine with Max Delbrück and Salvador Luria.
            In 1962, Hershey became the Director of the Genetics Research Unit at Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory. His lab continued to work on bacteriophage, focusing on phage recombination and genetics. In 1974, Hershey retired, though he was still a regular visitor to Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory. In 1979, a building on the grounds was dedicated to him.”

            http://www.dnaftb.org/18/bio-2.html

            …And Abraham flexner would go on to push gilman’s hopkins model throughout the United States…

            https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3178858/

            Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s