Riding on Substack

I am technically challenged when being offered new stuff – that is, and I think this is common – I fear change. I am going to continue to write on this blog, but I now have a Substack counterpart:

https://marktokarski.substack.com/

I am also on Twitter now, or X:

@MarkTokars6086

I ask now that any people who are interested in following me on either of those forums do so now.

I plan to do more with Substack than just regurgitate blog posts, but for now that is as far as I have progressed. My next step is to get comfortable with Zoom, and then self-promote using that medium. After that I want to bring in people to interview. Dave Klausler has already enthusiastically volunteered, telling me he’d be a boring interview. It reminds me of 1997 when I sat my mother and dad down to interview them on cassette tape.  Mom especially did not think she would have much to offer. Fourteen single-spaced pages later, she had done a marvelous interview that I have since forwarded to all her relatives still with us.

But for now, baby steps. Go to Substack and X and sign up to follow. It will be much appreciated.

MT

 

Censorship, real censorship

A friend of ours (since deceased) spearheaded an effort to construct an elaborate display that traveled around, including at the public library in Bozeman, Montana of “banned” books. I only recall two of them: Invisible Man, by Ralph Ellison, and Fools Crow by James Welch, which was banned in the Laurel, Montana school district. (I can only think that calling attention to that book by banning it made it a very popular item to have for school kids.)

I tried to recall some of the other books on that display – there may have been as many as twenty. The Brave search engine lists Howl, by Alan Ginsberg, Catcher in the Rye by J.D. Salinger, To Kill a Mockingbird by Harper Lee, Animal Farm (in Canada), by George Orwell, so maybe they were part of the display.

The problem is that none of these books were banned. How do I know this? The group that made the display had copies on hand! That means the books were published, had a press run, were distributed and sold. If that is banning, it’s a very lousy job of banning.

Continue reading “Censorship, real censorship”

The propaganda term, “misinformation”

Note: To read this post at Petra’s site, along with quite a few comments garnered already, go to this link.

By: Petra Liverani

Why do we need information other than that provided by the authorities in order to reject the official narrative?

There is a propagandistic implication behind the term “misinformation” that the authorities make valid claims and the reason people reject them is that they are being misled by information from other sources, however, those who reject their claims may base their rejection merely on the information provided by the authorities on the basis that it doesn’t support their claims, they may not take a single step towards any other source but simply reject the claims using their critical thinking skills.

It’s often not a question of which information is relied on but how information is interpreted.

Continue reading “The propaganda term, “misinformation””

Obamacare: The greatest scam ever, and 2.7%

I’ve written enough about this over the years so that if you are curious of the underpinnings of ACA, the “Affordable Care Act”, you can use our search bar. On a desktop or laptop it is off to the right, and on phones and tablets, you must scroll down below comments and other stuff.

The essential feature of Obamacare was Obama himself, sold to us as a juris doctor, highly educated, charismatic, and kind. His most important trait was that he was half black, which released the virtue-signaling passions of liberals to vote and support him as some sort of demigod who could do no wrong, The One. Obamacare in any other form – McCaincare, Trumpcare, Bidencare, would have been dead in the water. Obama’s being a black man triggered release of the largest tax increase in history, and some of the largest subsidies ever given the private sector.

Continue reading “Obamacare: The greatest scam ever, and 2.7%”

Deus absconditus

The phrase used in the title above, Deus absconditus, is new to me. It means “the hidden God”, or “God who hides from me. I ran across it today in a book by Annie Dillard, Pilgrim at Tinker Creek. I am borrowing it from her just as she borrowed the expression from Pascal.

“Pascal uses a nice term to describe the notion of the creator’s once having called for the universe, turning his back to it: Deus Absconditus. Is this what we think happened? Was the sense of it there, and God absconded with it, ate it, like a wolf who disappears round the edge of a house with the Thanksgiving turkey? “God is subtle,” Einstein said, “but not malicious.”

Continue reading “Deus absconditus”

In all seriousness

The only two other persons I have told about this are my Delaware cousins, and I immediately said after “It feels so pretentious!” I am reading Friedrich Nietzsche’s Beyond Good and Evil, and mostly because I don’t have anything else at hand (except Plato’s Republic, and which, like BG&E, is tedious). Nietzsche wrote in a different time, and of course, I only have benefit of him via a translator, as he wrote in German. He often writes in long paragraphs, and uses semicolons too often for my taste – how about shorter sentences? He makes points I (most) often don’t get, or even think a little too subtle for anyone’s taste, even mine.

Continue reading “In all seriousness”

British doctor testifies to existence of inflamed heart arteries in vaccinated

I am going to quote from an article titled “Cardiologist’s testimony on the corruption and dangers of the COVID-19 vaccination” by Dr Aseem Malhotra, a British cardiologist. It is printed in the July-August issue of Nexus, an Aussie magazine that is paywalled. I am only going to quote a brief passage as the article is copyrighted. I think fair use will allow for use of a brief passage. The entire article is five and one-half pages, and is court testimony that Dr. Malhotra delivered to the Helsinki District Court on April 12, 2024. (See Editor’s note below.) There are two links, the first to this testimony, so it is publicly available.

Continue reading “British doctor testifies to existence of inflamed heart arteries in vaccinated”

12 logical fallacies unmasked in the use of the terms “conspiracy theory” and “conspiracy theorist”

Note to readers: Petra is not associated with this blog in any way other than to be an occasional commenter. I asked her a while back if she would allow me to reprint some of her work, and she agreed. This piece from July of last year is long, so park yourself or read it in increments. It incorporates everything I have thought (and much more) about the events of 9/11/2001 in a logical fashion with links to everything. That’s far more work than I can or want to do.

_________________________________

PETRA LIVERANI

“I know that most men, including those at ease with problems of the greatest complexity, can seldom accept even the simplest and most obvious truth if it be such as would oblige them to admit the falsity of conclusions which they have delighted in explaining to colleagues, which they have proudly taught to others, and which they have woven, thread by thread, into the fabric of their lives.” – Leo Tolstoy

“People can be extremely intelligent, have taken a critical thinking course, and know logic inside and out. Yet they may just become clever debaters, not critical thinkers, because they are unwilling to look at their own biases.” – Carole Wade

Continue reading “12 logical fallacies unmasked in the use of the terms “conspiracy theory” and “conspiracy theorist””

A National Review-Inspired Post

I just noticed an issue of National Review in which I had left several flags to re-review later. The issue is July of 24, and all of the flags landed between pages 14 and 15. I am not going to repeat their writing here, though it is surely better than mine. I just want to react to their words.

The AR-15. I am going to repeat what my son-in-law told me years ago. He drew a picture of a basic 22-caliber rifle, and then attached a long handle to it, and maybe a telescope. But the key to the matter of the weapon being dangerous or misused was this: It is not automatic. One press of the trigger releases one round of ammunition. Holding the trigger down will not fire more rounds. The impression that people have from the news is that the AR-15 is a machine gun, but machine guns are illegal.

NR reviewed a Washington Post compilation of its multi-stage investigation of the AR-15, citing a former colleague Kevin D. Williamson that the WaPo series is “scientifically illiterate, error-ridden, propagandistic, and willfully misleading.” NR notes that WaPo even confused bullet velocity with rate of fire. WaPo, of course, won a Pulitzer for the series, as the AR-15 is a popular target for the left.

Caitlin Clark of the University of Iowa scored more points in basketball than any other player, male of female, in NCAA history. She will be paid $76,535 as the number one pick of the Indiana Fever. The WNBA makes about $200 million in annual revenue, compared to $10 billion for the NBA. NR uses this opportunity to take a shot at unions in general, sports unions in particular. They conclude that Clark’s $28 million shoe deal with Nike along with many other endorsements only goes to show that unions reward mediocrity, while markets reward excellence. Actually, I side with NR on this matter.

MIT will no longer require diversity statements from potential faculty hires. I was not aware of the practice, of course, but find such statements, along with other virtue signals (like public apologies) to be degrading. I think it is perfectly all right for a human being to be prejudiced in some manner, as in believing that blacks are not as smart as whites. It’s such a general belief that cannot be disproven, but eventually as we age and if we pay attention to the world around us, we will find so many exceptions as to force the belief to be abandoned. It’s a complicated world. 

The Boy Scouts of America have changed its name to “Scouting America”, this to allow for new policies such as allowing gays to be troop leaders and to welcome girls who identify as boys to belong. I don’t care about any of that. I think that forcing children to wear uniforms is not cool, and robs them of individuality, or at least attempts to do so. But I did once belong to Boy Scouts, for a short while. Two things made me quit: One, a disapproving look from my older brother, whom I idolized, as I put on my BSA uniform one night prior to going to a meeting. The other was a meeting where the scoutmaster said we should conclude the evening by playing games. He asked for suggestions, and I ever the smart ass said “How about ring around the rosie?” Later one of the big shot older scouts took me aside and warned me that “We don’t talk like that around here.” I think I just faded away from scouting, with no encouragement to continue from any quarter, for which I am grateful. 

AI dating apps for women: I have never used an app to get a date, mostly because when I last dated before meeting my wife, 29 years ago, there were none. I simply found someone I liked and asked her out. Since almost all relationships eventually fizzle on their own, I would suggest that my success rate was about as high as anyone currently swiping left or right on Tinder. NR’s take is that it used to be common for parents to find a spouse for their children, which, oddly, is mostly not frowned upon and is still practiced in much of the world. I will close with NR’s poignant final words on the subject:

“[We’re now] in an era of online porn and loneliness. If AI can make sense of modern dating, we’ll have to admit it can do something humans can’t.”