This is meant to be a primer for first-time visitors to this website. We are a stable of six writers (at this writing), four active and two not, and we search for truth. That may sound like a conceit, as if we have some special mission in life. We do not. We are simply people with active minds and of a curious nature. We want to know what’s up.
I blogged for many years and went around in circles, never moving forward. Much of American history is meant as a wheel-spinning exercise. Events like the Kennedy assassination or 9/11 were planned to be that, full of misdirection to keep us occupied in place without forward movement. Some time in early 2016 I re-read Weird Scenes in the Canyon by Dave McGowan. I noticed something odd – rock stars and actors of the 60s and 70s were dying right and left, scores of them. “This cannot be,” I thought. These people are not dying. They are going underground.
Thus began a search in which I was joined by the writer straightfromthedevilsmouth, who I call Straight. He has remarkable organizational, computer and math skills. He put all of the dead rock stars in a database and began looking for clues about their demise. He also has a startling sixth sense in his ability to make visual connections among various people.
I did a search of the Social Security Death Index, and found only a few of the dead there, and those few were often ‘signaled’ with hokey Social Security numbers (33s and 47s, etc., the Intelligence signature). We had a breakthrough of sorts when in a comment I addressed the strange death of Bill Hicks. Another commenter said that Hicks had faked his death too, and re-emerged as Alex Jones. That turned out to be both true and controversial. It haunts us to this day, but we will not back down.
Some time along the way Tyrone appeared on the scene, and at one point brought with him a picture of Bobby Fuller, who bears a strong resemblance to Bill O’Reilly. Using “face splitting” techniques, as described in another post, I found that Fuller, who faked his death in 1966, did not just resemble O’Reilly, but rather was identical to him to the degree that I asserted that Fuller was a CIA plant who faked his death, and that O’Reilly is a complete phony who used to be Fuller. Others would emerge in this manner – see our Honor Roll of Zombies. There is not universal agreement on these findings, even among us, but judge for yourself. We are only orthodox about one thing – that belief is the enemy of knowledge.
Tyrone eventually joined us as a writer – he brings his own style, his own ideas. He has done considerable work on his own, including the paper JFKTV, which caught my eye and led me to him. He can turn a pithy phrase like no other. He calls our work “face chopping.”
As we moved forward, we began to notice that twins were a common occurrence among stars – we already knew that Elvis and Paul McCartney were twins due to the work of Miles Mathis. I noticed that there were two Mark David Chapman’s. We thought at one time that Will Smith had surgery to lower his ears … nope. He’s twins. See the Honor Roll of twins for more – they are too numerous to list.
We did not know where this was taking us. Other oddities emerged. One writer, who is silent to this point, showed us that Inger Stevens, who fake died in 1970, looked exactly like Emma Thompson. But they could not be twins – there was a whole generation between them! I went searching for PBS news anchor Judy Woodruff, and Straight, with that sixth sense, brought me Dalida – again an exact replica, but a generation between them. Others on the Internet had noticed that Jennifer Lawrence and Helen Mirren were replicas, fifty years apart!
Daddieuhoh came on board, and brings with him depth and scholarship – he can lead us to academic papers, and is the questioning force here that keeps us from assuming too much without rock solid evidence. He is also pushing forward with new ideas on how all these twins and replicas emerge. He too is beginning to play with photographs, so much more lay ahead from him. Be sure to check out his research showing that Gandhi was controlled opposition and that the Dreyfus affair was an enormous and intricate psyop.
Straight recently noticed that Matt Damon lines up with ten (or more) other actors, a resemblance so strong that it cannot be coincidental, and yet different enough to be recognizable. We are now debating among ourselves the possibilities that are causing this phenomena. These are not twins. These are replicas.
That is where we are at right now, November 14, 2016. We invite you to examine the menus on the right here to review our methodology, our twins, our zombies, and, like us, enjoy the ride. We do not know our destination. We only know that as much as we have learned, we have a much longer road ahead.
(I should add, we are not limited to this research. Every writer here is free to go his or her own way and take us down any road. We don’t have rules, nobody is boxed in, but we do try to keep it interesting.)
Piece of Mindful 
I appreciate the kind words, Mark. Very exciting times ahead for our research.
LikeLike
I am a walking compliance to the mundane…..
I am a channel of art to those with the allowance to afford free thought to tune in to tuning out any political gain for game…..
I am one eyed and mind opened to see through truth…
I am a bear that hibernates one eyed closed to contain my youth…..
LikeLike
LikeLike
Vincent Price, not Bela Lugosi
LikeLike
Hello friends,
In the past few weeks I have been contacted by two separate people who found my website after visiting your blog. Whether I was mentioned specifically or just in the blogroll on the sidebar, your site has driven valuable traffic to my site, and for that I would like to say thanks.
Having checked out some of your blog today, I can tell you now that you have a new, regular visitor. My daily routine online has gotten progressively more simple over the years as more and more outlets have proven themselves to be fools, liars and charlatans. So far I do not detect any of that from this blog.
With that being the case, my morning routine will now include gmail, reddit, Fakeologist, and Peace of Mindful. Occasionally my YouTube subscription list (usually just to peruse the titles). And of course one domestic newspaper to read the headlines.
If you would be so interested, I would like to arrange some kind of interview with one (or more) of your stable, either via skype or, if there are concerns about remaining anonymous, then via email back-and-forth.
It would help me to better understand where you (singluar or plural) are ‘coming from’ (so to speak), which I can then present to my own audience, and may well drive more traffic to your own site — which all micromedia content creators must value.
Thanks again for your work,
JLB
LikeLike
We are kind of a herd of cats, but I can contact the others about an interview. I am retired but they all have jobs and stuff.
LikeLike
Sorry, but the navigation for this site is terrible. I am looking for all parts of the prosperity gospel preacher series, could you link it here please?
LikeLike
Thanks for your interest EGON. There are three of them. Just click on “K. Starr” on the right hand panel under POM Contributors and you will find them there.
LikeLike
JFC this is sad and cruel. KYS.
LikeLike
I’m happy to have stumbled over this site! I thought I’d already seen most of it but the above very surprised me. I’m an old fan of Bill Hicks and… WTF, Alex Jones, you’re kidding? And Fleetwood Mac Peter Green didn’t die but they surely did fuck around with him.
Well, what ever, I’ll stick to my Open for anything, attached to nothing principle.
LikeLike
I’ve just read your Matt Damon and Paul/Mike pages & Im fascinated tho puzzled. Why would ‘they’ want to swop a Beatle? Did Elvis’s twin not really die at birth? Would like to read more on this, and also more on the convid debacle. Please can you point me to where to look on your site?
Many thanks &
Thank you for doing this work.
And have you looked at Colin Morgan?
Interestingly he was lead in a play called ‘A Number’ by Caryl Churchill early 2020 where he played 3 separate clones
LikeLike
Of course, I am on the outside looking in, and so do not know the inner workings. In both intelligence and in entertainment, twins are useful. They can be in more places than one, and cover more ground. Janis Joplin was twins, and one did live stage performances, the other interviews and other public appearances. Miles Mathis suggests Elvis was twins, as he found two live birth certificates, and one of his readers suggested that one performed in Vegas while the other was in Hollywood making those crappy movies. I’ve found two Anderson Coopers, and a few musical performers whose names I’ve forgotten, Rhianna for instance, where we have photos of both in one place.
The Beatles were not a spontaneous grouping. They were tested and tried out in Hamburg, and in the early days the two McCartney’s were regular switch outs. Others have suggested there were two John’s too. I could never satisfy myself to that. I am satisfied that they did not write their music, and that after they quit performing in public, they had ghost writers and studio musicians, and only provided voices. Quite a scam, with Macca being one of the great poseurs of history. Play around the blog, read the Elvis piece at the Mathis site (which suggested that I look for a second “Paul”, easily finding two after getting used to photo examination. Perhaps it will inspire you too.
LikeLike
Mark, you have mentioned a ‘blog roll’ — where is that? You state also: “We invite you to examine the menus on the right here to review our methodology, our twins, our zombies, and, like us, enjoy the ride.” But I am not seeing any menus on the right on my screen. Is there another page I’m missing? Thanks!
LikeLike
It depends on the device you use. If you are on a desktop, which is what it is designed for, then everything appears on top and on right side. If on an iPad or other device, it is shuffled around, and you have to scroll down, infinitely it seems, to reach this stuff. On an iPhone … forget it. My iPhone will not even allow me to sign in and stay signed in, and the WordPress app is less than worthless.
I need to upgrade, but I do not know how. I spent $1,200 on what I have, and will spend no more to for it. I leave that to the millennials, I guess, as this boomer has gone as far as possible.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks, Boomer! :). Appreciate your reply! Found the blog roll and will keep exploring.
LikeLike
That is quite the primer lol…
LikeLike
I can’t agree with you guys more in regards to Matt Damon and the number of different identities the actor who plays him performs.
From Leo DiCaprio, Mark Wahlberg and Nate Diaz to only name a few.
I have taken some great stills where you can see, without a doubt, where the latex mask covers the eyelids if you guys would like to see them for yourselves just let me know.
LikeLike
I would like to see that!
LikeLike
Me too.
LikeLike
Do you know how I can upload a photo?
LikeLike
Hello,
We are a new independent news company, and we would love to reprint some of your articles, specifically the Engineered Nanoparticle one. Would this be acceptable, provided credit/links are included? Thanks!
LikeLiked by 1 person
The person who wrote that piece goes by the name Stephers. Give her due credit and don’t name me in your article and then go for it. She no longer writes here but as proprietor of the blog I give my permission.
LikeLike
I’m so late to this party (this blog) I run the risk of commenting about a topic already run through the grist mill.
Nice to hear from others who see what most don’t, I feel less alone. Been matching faces of old B&W movie actors and their more current counterparts for some time.
Additionally, seems that many children of actors (employing the moon bump prop) appear to be little replicas (of a parent) as well. To me, because I’ve trained myself to see it, moon bump overuse has become obvious, tedious. What a ridiculous reality.
Hollywood replication (as well as mtf/ftm/intersex bio-typing) is so common, that I stopped tracking/caring about it. Yet, this rinse repeat phenomenon is unrecognized by anyone I personally/directly know.
Clones. You read people (acting knowledgeable, when actually, most likely just parroting) saying ‘oh clones can’t live past a couple of months.’ But how do I know such a proclamation isn’t just misinformation? Also, more probable than not, there are different types of clonage processes and products.
Cloning and the movement of consciousness from one host to another is a topic of interest of mine stemming from personal experience and reliance on perceptual-ability in order to navigate reality. Seriously doubt anything I’d have to contribute to a discussion on this platform would have any scientific/academic measurable/scrutable basis.
When I consider Hollywierd cloning other thoughts run through the mind scape like incubator babies, orphan trains, catacombs, human trafficking, epstein, white house/black market, organ/genetic material (23 and me/CV test anyone??) harvesting, etc. etc.
If I didn’t know better, I might think that it’s people that are THE harvestable commodity of this generated reality – with every other asset falling behind.
LikeLiked by 1 person
What are your latest interpretation of this “replicas” effect? That we are in Matrix?
LikeLike
I’ve come to the belief most of the exotic crap you hear they are peddling is crap. Maybe they are making clones, very easy to do, I have done that myself in the lab, not sure what the point is with humans.
Here’s two lines of investigation of the most difficult research: Where did we come from, and where does life come from? Origins of life research in academia is a real joke. From a fundamental biochemical perspective, it appears we were engineered. Because there is far too much order in a living organism to have appeared randomly, i.e. random Darwinian selection mechanisms (survival of the fittest nonsense).
However, there is evidence of so-called genetic drift. Meaning the nucleotide/protein sequences of critical genes across related organisms tend to be highly similar, yet not identical. And the differences are in the less critical parts of the amino acid sequence, where a simple change of amino acids will not affect the structure or function. However, in the in most conserved areas of the protein there is 100% conservation of sequence. Suggesting there is a selection pressure on maintaining the exact protein/nucleotide sequence, and aberrations from that coding sequence will result in offspring that will not survive, due to malfunctioning critical proteins. And there are MANY examples of single nucleotide mutations that result in deformed individuals, some occurring as often as a few thousand individuals.
LikeLike
I have another hypothesis that sounds crazy, and it counter-Darwinian. I believe the present species on earth have not evolved but many may have been the result of previous hybridization experiments. There is plenty of evidence humans have created a huge library of plant varieties by mixed breeding and crossing. What if the same thing has happened with animals? What if monkeys, for example, did not make men, but were made from men? I do not see any reason, especially in deep past, why man would not have tinkered with cross breeding species. Because monkeys, for example, appear to be a possible human/dog/squirrel hybrid. I mention this because there is acquatic ape hypothesis, that humans came from a monkey/seal hybridization, which is not a bad guess. However, my best guess is humans a parent original species from which hybrids were made.
LikeLike
Must look further at this, intriguing. I mentioned to traveling companions that there is no way a giraffe evolved to eat high fruit. Can you imagine intervening steps of ascendancy? He would survive on same food as all other species, and have no reason to grow a long neck.
As Darwin chronicled, species adapt. But dinosaurs do not become birds, cats do not become dogs.
LikeLike
If there were dinosaurs. They appear to be a colossal fraud started by a few English “gentlemen” rivals who were able to sneak this fraud under the radar. Unlike Piltdown man.
The biophysics of dinosaurs is all wrong. The amount of weight they were supposed to support on two legs with little chicken arms, just preposterous.
If you want further confirmation dinos are one of most lucrative frauds of all time, look no further than the numbers. The rock that destroyed the dinosaurs was 6 miles wide and happened 66 million years ago. Even my 80 year old mom knows dinos are shiite.
LikeLiked by 1 person
What is the purpose of this fraud, in your opinion?
LikeLike
You asked the right question! I don’t know what the purpose might be.
LikeLike
Editing of the timeline and history narratives.
LikeLike
Well first of all dinosaurs are an extremely lucrative fraud. I don’t think I need to go into the details, so many museums, movies, stuffed animals. It’s big business.
And it creates a story for the earth that supports the story of evolution. And evolution of the earth. Lets just say I (or us common folk) have little idea what happened more than 10 thousand years ago. They like neat little “just-so” stories to show atheistic materialistic science knows everything, similar to the way the old time religions did.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I can keep going on dinosaur fraudulence. It solidifies the narrative of extinction, and humans, if not life on earth, are nothing but accidents based on the product of random chance. A human who believes this will not take life as seriously, and will be amused more easily by bullshit time-wasting entertainments, like gambling, video games, etc.
The dinosaurs reinforce the random story of the earth coalescing out of ball of dust floating around some billions of years after the “big bang”, then proceeding through billions of years of random evolution to create these majestic creatures, that were wiped out in a day. Just like you can be by an asteroid or nuclear bomb. The truth is earth wide extinction events are likely a myth. If they actually happened there’s no way we would have such a diversity of life on earth now.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I cannot buy into dinosaurs being a hoax, as it seems too broad. True, the earth would have had to been a different place to support such creatures, but some time read Velikovsky on the possibilities for species when the planet is bombarded by meteorites and the like. He attributes the explosion of new species to that effect. I have to reread it now that I brought it up.
Also note, Stephen Hawking probably died in the late 1980s and was replaced … that would have been done to advance modern physics and cosmology, which is not real. I could never do any facial work on Hawking as ALS had distorted his skull, making it impossible. But I do look at pre-80s and post 80s Hawking, and see two different men. Just the shape of the skull is a giveaway. So too is the behavior of the wife.
LikeLike
Mark, it comes down to dating. First we need to define dinosaur – I will say it has to be megafauna. But are you telling me you can reliably date a supposedly fossilized bone found in a rock from more than 66 million years ago? Because that is when they are claimed to have died? And you do know you, and I, cannot see these bones? That all dinosaur bones are “locked up” from public display and cannot be viewed? Dem bones dem bones dem dry bones.
So Velikovsky can reliably tell us what happened 66 million years ago? Thats funny.
LikeLike
I really cannot speak to this as you do, but I do observe that there are dinosaur digs all about, and that most finds are mundane. I also note and have read about dating techniques, from one side that none are reliable, to the other, where some methods can be reliable but are easily mucked up or misrepresented, like carbon dating where the beginning period depends exclusively on what is found in the surrounding area.
I see in virology where a profession is dominated by groupthink and anyone who doesn’t go along is not around to get along. I will give you that.
LikeLike
I highly suggest people go to cluesforum and read the forums on dinosaurs. A large number of them are already proven frauds, in the mainstream media – it is just not widely disseminated when someone debunks these mythical creatures.
Moreover, say we take the fossils as real, and very old. Well they were likely marine organisms. You just can’t have an extremely large land animal, not possible. As far as the earth being different millions of years ago, that is pure speculation. A complete intact “dinosaur” skeleton from some of the more famous species, like T Rex, has not been found. The media loves to tell the public about every new BS discovery, and the public laps it up with delight.
LikeLike
Speaking of mythological creatures (dinos) and their lying accessories (archeology professors and their D students – only morons go into archeology) – I have another rant. The mythological creature called the crusading journalist. I have noticed in movies one of the biggest BS plots is some journalist cracks a case and defies all odds to expose their findings to the world, and make everything right. What a crock of shit. Is there a single example of actual investigative journalism at a high level changing anything? The examples we know about we know are complete BS – like Woodward and Bernstein. Berstein even admitted the press was full of CIA plants in Rolling Stone in the 1970s.
LikeLike
Amen, brother! Just an example, in the TV series Bosch, one of the characters is Scott Anderson, a reporter for the LA Times. I cringe every time he is on screen, as he is a virtual free agent set free to investigate corruption anywhere he finds it. They have even had scenes here he and his editor are discussing his work, with the editor offering no guidance other than to say carry one, go here your instincts lead you.
That is fairly typical of all TV and movie journalists, rough and ragged and making powerful people cringe. In real life, journalists are trained in the manner described by Ben Bagdikian, where they are brought in wet behind the ears and then trained to work a beat, and slowly over time stop having original ideas. Needless to say, truly curious and inquisitional people leave the profession.
I have heard, have no way of knowing, that a journalism degree is among the easiest to acquire.
LikeLike