“Covid was a multi-trillion dollar worldwide Psyop meant to see how much they can control us. That’s why people dislike me… because I don’t give a shit. I’m going to tell the truth.”
“Governments, media, tech platforms, and pharmaceutical companies all moved in lockstep. Billions were spent. Dissent was punished. Questions were treated as moral failures. The goal wasn’t public health. It was to measure how quickly people would surrender their judgment, their jobs, their kids’ education, and their right to say “no.”
“85% of people complied. They took the shots, accepted the mandates, and then acted shocked when the same institutions that sold them certainty started walking it back. A lot of them still can’t admit it was a test of compliance. They’d rather keep calling people like me dangerous than look at the data, the lab-leak evidence, the shifting narratives, or the damage done to kids and small businesses.”
“That’s why some people still hate me. Not because of football. Because I wouldn’t play along. I said I was immunized when I meant I had my own protocol. I refused the product. I called Fauci what he is. I pointed out that a captured media and a captured public-health apparatus don’t get to lecture anyone about “the science.” And I’m not going to start lying now just because it’s easier.”
“I don’t give a shit about the cost. I’m going to tell the truth. The experiment happened. Most people failed it. A smaller group noticed in real time and refused to pretend otherwise. That’s the only scoreboard that still matters.” (Pittsburgh Steelers quarterback Aaron Rodgers)
I should just let this statement roll without comment … but dammit it, I’m me! I can’t, I just can’t.
First, of course, congratulations to Aaron Rodgers for possessing moral courage. It’s a rare thing. Of course, it helps to have millions in the bank, but how many other millionaires are silent on the matter? Or, worse yet, complicit – right Dolly? Mr. Hanks?
I don’t agree with the whole statement, but that’s not important. The nexus of this matter is that a public figure had the courage to follow his conscience and do the right thing. Moral courage is so rare, and generally, there is a huge price to pay for it. Thus far he paid, as I read it, a $14,000 fine to the NFL for some blathery reason, but is now the quarterback for the Pittsburgh Steelers, in his final season. Courage, Mom.
Here’s AI on the subject, whichever AI it is that accompanies my Brave Browser (its emphasis):
Aaron Rodgers is unvaccinated against COVID-19. He confirmed this in November 2021 after testing positive for the virus, explaining that he is allergic to an ingredient in the mRNA vaccines (Pfizer and Moderna).
Key Details
Alternative Protocol: Rodgers underwent a “homeopathic” treatment to raise antibody levels and petitioned the NFL to be recognized as vaccinated, but the league, NFLPA, and joint doctors denied the request and classified him as unvaccinated.
Public Statements: In August 2021, he told reporters he was “immunized,” a statement he later defended as truthful but misleading, citing a “witch hunt” against disclosing personal medical information. He stated he avoided the Johnson & Johnson vaccine due to reported side effects and its temporary pause for clotting issues.
NFL Protocols: As an unvaccinated player, Rodgers was subject to daily testing and mandatory masking at team facilities. He missed at least one game in November 2021 due to a positive test and subsequent isolation.
Kudos to Rogers (assuming his sincerity) for not blindly following protocol, and doing some thinking on his own. His story functions as a good controlled op story, though, being like a mini version of the current RFK jr soap opera. In both cases we have plenty of pushback on the recommended “treatments” for whatever “virus” is popularized in the moment, but the virus itself is sacrosanct. The key underpinning to both Roger”s and Kennedy’s stories is “you can believe the virus attacked us from nature (bat, civet, pig…), or you can believe it jumped out of Fauci’s Wuhan cauldron (lab leak). We don’t care which you believe, as long as you believe….”
Measles is being given the current cameo, with a couple of people having died with illness “associated” with measles.
On Mr Hanks, I wrote the following little piece in late 2020 or in early 2021.
“Empire Building in the 21st Century (or, “Those evolving/mutating bat particles”)”
The world’s greatest empire, an empire that rules over all so-called sovereign states, has unleashed, once again, its most feared and most powerful weapon. Yes, the Rockefeller empire of medical/religious churches and affiliate organizations has launched its most direct viral attack yet on the world’s population. Several unlucky citizens are confirmed to have died of the virus or some other cause already.
This evil creature, well…it’s not actually alive…this thing, this VIRUS…is quite intelligent, and that’s why it’s so effective. Even though lacking a brain, heart, nervous system, arms, legs, wings, or anything else to make it functional or give it a modus operandi, this mini-monster has jumped and flown and traversed oceans (after escaping from its normal hangout in a bat, or civet-cat, or pig or something, it’s all a bit muddled), and ended up in Tom Hank’s nose. And in Australia, of all places! We know that because he said so, so it’s true (and it was reported in the New York Times). We also know (as reported in The Guardian), that this virus had a fling with a couple of Chinese nationals, killing one of them by mistake, before making its mysterious journey down under.
After landing in Tom’s nose, this brainless but brilliant particle of protein with a snippet of rna or dna or some other bat (or civet or pig) fibers attached, bored straight through his protective mucous layer, managed to sneak past a few white blood cells, and arrived at the door of a very, very, good looking cell on the side of Tom’s sinus cavity. Slimy, but beautiful. Our little particle prick couldn’t help himself, of course, he knocked, and she let him in. And if that wasn’t bad enough, he didn’t tell her that he was a bat, or civet, or pig, or whatever, and that his jism just wouldn’t get the job done in the end. But she didn’t care, and she didn’t ask. He stuck his rna in her dna, and contrary to all the known laws of biology, the earth moved. This suited both of them just fine, so he kept stickin’ it to her, and boy did she ever respond. Now and then she would swell up and burst open, and lines of cute little rag-tag “particles” marched on out of her, kind of like Snow White and the seventy dwarves.
As a result, Tom got the sniffles, then he sneezed. Unfortunately for the rest of the world, Tom did not shove his mouth into his elbow before letting loose. Worse yet, he sneezed again, no elbow. It was probably the second sneeze that infected the prime minister before he traveled to America. The CDC should know about this stuff, and they say that a second sneeze is usually necessary, with an effective range of from one millimeter to six miles.
In case you’re wondering, Tom got well, but of course he’s a great empire patriot, so it figures. The big mystery was how in the world could a bat protein prick impregnate a human sinus cell. After all, everyone knows this cross-species stuff can’t happen, with the wrong dna/rna and all (not to mention physical morphology). The medical mafia kept putting the story out there that the viral prick-dude would “hijack” the cell’s machinery, or “trick” the poor thing into (get this!), allowing it to REPLICATE. Makes a lot of sense, right? I’ll stick with the story above, just pure lust and earthquakes.
Finally, I have it from good sources that a collaboration between the Rockefeller, Gates, and Mircrosoft tech wizards figured out a way to get little Ai computers installed in all those nasty little v/buggers, and that’s how they fixed the glitch in the copulation chemistry (in silico sequencing by Illumina or the equivalent can do anything you tell it to do, ya know). And that’s how the west was won, and why the Empire stays strong.
LikeLike
the proof that DNA is the hereditary mechanism was provided by a little lunar lander-like virus of course
LikeLiked by 1 person
That’s a nice story, full of the internal contradictions of virology. You did a nice job laying it out. But Aaron (who is not Jewish) has to be wrong to think that it was just done to see how they could control us. 85% sounds about right, and they surely knew that going in. What was their true intent in the injections? It can only be fewer people, the same as with climate.
LikeLike
I’m curious Mark where you found the Rodgers quote. When people like him come out with something so close to bone truth, I wonder if the news outlets will actually discuss it seriously, or discuss it at all. I know my stepmother doesn’t like Rodgers or Djokovic for not going under the thumb of authority, which I find very disappointing, but common. At some point I’ll probably let her know the truth how I feel, but no need to start family arguments over this, as they want us to. They already know not to get into politics with me since I openly don’t take them seriously. I’m going to start calling myself a “no-wing” nutjob.
Rodgers summation is actually almost exactly how I felt in late 2021, when this Covid con got me to see the world more for how it is. Frankly Rodgers seems like a very intelligent person who figured out by pure reason and logic that the status quo is not on the up and up, and because his time is limited he hasn’t been able to do enough research into infectious viruses, and see the evidence behind them is very shaky. Speaking of that, I went back and read Miles criticism of terrain theory, which I found valid, but then he practically endorses traditional vaccines, and vaccines for eradicating smallpox. Considering he is suspect of so much of history, I find it surprising he can’t conceptualize how clever individuals in the 19th century could create a “smallpox” and many other viruses, out of thin air – when there was ZERO physical evidence of a discrete infectious particle. We didn’t even get protein structures until the 1950s, so the structural nature of this viral pathogen was completely unknown before it was officially labeled as the “culprit” of some vague disease. When you consider the industrial pollution they were creating starting in the medieval period, with no advanced chemical knowledge of it’s danger, its not hard to think it was chemical poisoning, and possibly intentional, in the times before the late 20th century, when analytical chemistry had advanced to the point where it was simple to test for these dangerous chemicals. IMO air pollution is likely the culprit of most of these diseases they label as viral lung infections.
LikeLike
Actually the date of industry, and industrial revolution, no doubt lies far deeper in the past than is officially recognized. For example, I am quite confident Rome was mass producing weapons of war, and also things like shoes and textiles, on a mass scale, far before the official 18th century date that is given for the industrial revolution. Also China no doubt was manufacturing fine items like silk textiles and porcelains for thousands of years. Which is accompanied by industrial waste, which I doubt was intelligently handled until the last 30-40 years when simple chemical analysis made it obvious contamination of things like drinking water and food (vegetables, fish) were excessive.
LikeLike
Even before industry population density alone would have been very toxic in large tribes or small towns.
LikeLike
I think I got this on Facebook – they run “reels”, or video shorts, and operate on an algorithm that is designed to feed you what you like to the exclusion of everything else. So I have followed Lucy Biggers there, and maybe due to that Rogers got thrown in. It was not a video, but a screen quote. I clipped it and sent it to myself.
LikeLike
I have nothing against controlled opposition or even the people who enact these scams. I don’t know their circumstances or reasoning, there is so much I don’t know so I certainly don’t make any moral judgements.
What I believe was going on with covid is an extension of the DNA/genome project. Which is simply a more effective and less obvious way to profit from disease. There is a lot more to it including soft control but this comment will be long enough already.
Vaccines, cancer treatments etc are now seriously questioned by the mainstream. People especially don’t want to get chemotherapy due to the obvious almost immediately damage it causes. Like vaccines taking over from cutting someone open and putting pus in the wound. New cancer treatments (supposedly acting at the DNA/RNA levels) will replace chemotherapy with a less obviously toxic treatment. Most people will be happy. All they need to do is find out what PCR tests they can give humans to identify early disease (cancer) and then find what chemicals they can give humans to stop the test from being positive. We saw that done with the lipid nanoparticles (and supposed covid vaccines) and it worked for a few months, these can be given perhaps for much longer. They can do something similar for any sequence they discover and link to a disease. No symptoms are required just testing. This treatment will be a lot less toxic than chemo and we will all cheer it on. Due to early detection and less toxic treatments cancer survival rates will improve dramatically.
Other disease and cancer will continue to be fed through the current methods. But most disease will be identified through a sequence and cured through drugs (or magic RNA ) that cause the lack of that sequence.
This has been the dream since my wife first studied biotechnology in the late 1900s. Covid is simply about seeding these ideas in the mass consciousness and quickly setting up the infrastructure at the cost of the taxpayer.This testing of drugs and sequences is what secret virology labs are actually doing. Just playing with different toxins and sequences must be fun.
I believe this is a good step forward for us peasants and our families. Less immediately toxic cures and disease is always a positive. And it will be a giant step forward for the very rich with much larger profits. It’s probably further away than it looks. I believe we still need to increase cancer rates with testing first and poison badly the current older generation before we can get the required level of enthusiasm for the new treatments. But it’s on its way, everything is built and tested just one last generation of horrific mustard gas poisoning to go.
The big bonus for big pharma will be if the can stop the tumours they will simultaneously increase the toxic load on the body (due to that part of the defence being taken out and the slightly toxic treatment) creating a significant increase in many other diseases and even more profits. And we have the scapegoat (covid vaccines and Fauci) ready to go and be blamed by anyone suspicious.
LikeLike
Interesting hypotheses as far as I can follow it.. feels a little like you are writing in a condensed way and assuming people already know what you mean. Assume we have no idea what you’re talking about, what exactly is the plan?? “Put it down where the goats can get it,” as one old Southern talk show host used to say..
LikeLike
Im not a very good writer.
The plan is simply to replace chemo and other supposed cancer treatments with supposed genetic treatments. Of course just replacing current cancer treatments with doing nothing would get a better result but…
The rest of my waffle is me attempting to explain how they will pull the con game. Which is probably by adding more poison like always therefore stopping the bodies current response to the original poisoning just like they do with everything else.
I believe there is already a PCR like test out that can supposedly detect 50 or so different cancers.
Covid was important because people are now confident in the PCR testing and the new RNA injections. That’s why every major controlled opposition had to say how horrific these injections were. Now norms can simply say I was alright last time just a little sick, much better than chemo. I’ve had a dozen of these treatments already. Of course the anti cancer treatments will be much more expensive.
LikeLike
Of course the treatments will actually make people sicker. But at least they won’t be as bad as current treatments.
Earlier detection will allow for most of the population to be treated just like statins and blood pressure medication.
There are currently too many people saying no to cancer treatments and faring better than those saying yes. This is not good for business. Fortunately for our rulers mist people say yes still but the percentages are changing.
LikeLike
I just left a very affirmative comment on your hypothesis, not sure where it went. The trend is more heroic cancer therapies that cost more, replace more older treatments, and yet of course don’t “cure” cancer.
LikeLike
I mean, in theory, these drugs and treatments are supposed to be tested against a control group that doesn’t get them, or gets a placebo.. but I know there are ways to either sabotage that, or present the results to recommend intervention (even if a close reading of the study suggests otherwise.) Jennifer Daniels, on her podcast, used to analyze journal articles in that manner..
One thing you said in your first comment I’m still curious about – it sounds like you’re saying their RNA treatments can insure a “negative” PCR test? Not that it cures anything, but just that they have a way to rig the test or play to the test?
One issue there perhaps, is that you could get treated, get a negative test result, but then still be symptomatic.. no? And if cancer, possibly get much worse and die. Then their statistics would not look very good.. but maybe relative to chemo the statistics would improve, as you suggested.. hm, I guess they’ve worked out all the angles –
LikeLike
As far as I can find they never test cancer treatment vs no treatment. It is considered unethical. So the treatment only has to be better than the current treatment. There are some mice studies where treatment is tested against no treatment. But they generally involve injecting mice with lots of cancerous cells and both groups die in a few days.
Cancer is like a cold or pox or mole etc that is part of the bodies detox system. Eliminating a cancer is through any means other than reducing the toxic load seams to have a negative effect on health.
If you look at the Pfizer covid vaccine trials you will see that those injections created a vast reduction in positive PCR tests for a few months after which time there eventually became an increase.
By introducing another poison to the body you can immediately stop the current detox and make it create a new one. If you can force a slow release (perhaps using lipid nanoparticles or through weekly treatments) you can keep this going for a while.
There are many things that can destroy a tumour or prevent it from forming they simply will find some of these. I’m not really even suggesting serious trickery. I actually believe they will delay or interupt tumours being formed or at least make a different tumour form somewhere else.
LikeLike
I’m not surprised if they use that “unethical” dodge to remove the control arm.. we’ve seen that other times, I think even with covid they sabotaged long term results with that excuse – vaccinated the control group (if it was even a real study.) Hilarious – throw out your own best practices and high scientific ideals, the minute they’re inconvenient to the results you want..!
On the covid PCR test, they could also tune the results by setting the cycles, eg, to find more or less cases. But I can certainly see how it would be useful if they could control the test results via the vax – more fine-grained control, vax vs unvaxxed..
LikeLike
HI Alex, thats probably the best theory I have heard that explains the biotechnology boom, when it’s effectiveness is highly questionable.
Having worked in the field for a while, as a protein structure/function guy, I see a molecular zoo of drugs that gets bigger, more complex, and typically costly over time. It’s quite ridiculous how many biological drugs are now approved for cancer treatments, and how many are in clinical trials, for the same old cancers. I wonder where they get all these poor patients.
Anyhow you’re likely correct in your theory, I’ve had similar thoughts but not as logical as yours is stated.
LikeLike