I gotta go!

[Operating in memory in writing this piece. Harper’s Ferry became “Fort Sumpter.” I’ve changed it and acknowledge the error.”]

I received in my inbox this morning the following comment:

I imagine those misspellings are British, and that we are dealing with a person from there.  It is a long thread  from earlier this year in which I offered a few comments on Mai Lai, the McCartney twins, Jane Fonda, etc. Here is the overall link, perhaps including this side-thread, perhaps not. I responded:

Wisdom is where you find it, and truth a slippery rascal. I am trying to understand this one-sentence comment in search of both wisdom and truth. I am not here to disrespect you or to merely dismiss what you say. But the comment to me seems to lack depth. Pattern recognition is part of truth-seeking, but not all of it. We can walk and chew gum.


This got me to thinking about John Brown, the agent provocateur who supposedly attacked [Harpers Ferry] in Monty Python Holy Grail fashion, triggering the Civil War. Part of his history from that time has him staging raids in the Kansas territory on innocent households, killing five people in seemingly random fashion. The odd thing was that this In Cold Blood crime went not only unpunished, but uninvestigated. The gist was that Kansas was a territory at that time, and so did not have the governmental functions necessary to investigate and prosecute such a monstrous crime. But I doubt that. Kansas was a territory, had laws and sheriffs and jails and most likely, bounty hunters.

My take was a little different. There was no massacre, and John Brown was being given a back story that he would need to do his business at Harper’s. Part of his back story is that he took his cues from stargazing, seeing patterns in constellations and such as indicators to him personally that he must act in certain ways. Schizophrenia, in other word. The man was one wheel short of a tricycle, or so it was made to appear. Pattern recognition where there were not patterns got the best of him.

Enough of that, as I don’t know where this piece is going, but something is driving me to write this. Yesterday, as I did my workout at the gym, a man I know casually there stopped by on his way out and told me he had watched the band Rush in a concert in Denver. I know the name Rush, but not their music, and he played a bit of it from his own iPhone recording. One thing led to another, and we ended up talking about Jim Morrison. He mentioned a book he had partially read and given up on, called Weird Scenes Inside the Canyon, mentioning possible military connections between rockers and the military. I said off-handedly that Jim had not died, that his death was fake.

Such things are matter-of-fact to me, and I always need to remember that civilians are not prepared to deal with them. But the conversation went on, me oblivious to the fact that I had lost him and that he was beginning to think me batty. I could be, I add. I mentioned Jim’s girlfriend, Pamela Courson, had also faked her death and reappeared as Barbara Walters, replacing the original who was not cutting it. I noted how the original was of stooped posture, unsure of herself, and certain to fail, while Courson as her replacement was confident, beautiful, and successful.

I am not here to change minds. I long ago realized that only happens by accident and not by any magical potion that I dispense. I cannot help people without eyes to see the obvious. Recently, visiting cousins in Delaware, the piano player (and a good one) took time to explain to me that John Lennon and Paul McCartney had come off the road, gone in to seclusion, worked really, really hard, and had become the Mozart’s of their time. Ten years ago I might have taken time to explain that John and Paul were fakes, good singers but part of a much larger package of deceit and intrigue. Now I merely sat and listened. I do not know if I give off clues that people find off-putting, but I had no desire to set my cousin straight. I let it all go. Not my place.

I think this is bringing me around to where I want to go with this. A few months ago I did photo comparisons of JFK and Jimmy Carter, wanting to set straight anyone who followed Dallas Goldbug. To my shock I found that facial plates matched! I had dismissed Goldbug as a misdirection artist, him once claiming that Jim Morrison became Rush Limbaugh. I was able to set that aside, and JFK/Carter on its face seemed absurd, so I never followed up on it.

So I began to collect photos of Carter, assemble a time line,  and quickly realized the two men were so far apart in birth and death that one could not possibly be the other … so I now think. And, in so doing, I was forced to contemplate this mysterious character who appeared during the Carter presidency, his brother Billy. He was not present for most family photos. Maybe a good reason is that he was not the family’s best representative. I can see that. Maybe my own birth family would like me absent from family photos. I certainly want nothing to do with them, God rest their souls.

However, I did what I could … there is very little of Billy Carter available, but there is this:

That’s Billy and RFK side by side. Of course they do not line up! Perhaps, if Billy closed his mouth, they would. The hairline, eyes, nose say sometheeeeeng. I did something I’ve never done before. I put up the post, and walked away from it. This is too much, even for me. And, it is a sinkhole.

So, as I process all of this I have come to two conclusions:

    1. I have to follow up on JFK/Carter and RFK/Billy, to see where it takes me.
    2. Unrelated, I need to go back to 2015 or so, when I had an awakening of sorts and began doing photo work. I want to put together a compendium of all that we’ve discovered here since that time. I say “we” as many good helpers have come and gone. There’s tons of good work there.

I sound like a guy on his way out, but I am not. As long as I keep stumbling on things, and as long as random comments lead to long posts that seem unrelated, like the one I opened with above, I will keep on writing. I like writing, I like that it is so easy for me as I see others struggle.

Where once, in headier times I was getting 2,000 hits a day her, the trend is downward and will get to a point where I started in 2006, where I saw that in one day we got 80 visits! “I gotta go” has been the most common response over the years, and yet I feel in my soul that my lonely journey here, my search for truth, has taken me places that few others have traveled. It’s been fun, but also worth keeping. All of this work means sometheeeeeng.

Hence, the need to chronicle all the discoveries. It will take time. I know you gotta go, do so in peace.

5 thoughts on “I gotta go!”

    1. Thank you. I wrote from memory and should have read my original work, but did not. Memories can be so unreliable.

      Note, however, that on the night that Brown “stormed” HF, there was one guard on duty there. Either the arsenal was given low priority by the Army and left exposed, or there was a stand down. In my mind, of course, we never get straight history of anything, so that the Civil War needed a Pearl Harbor like event to set it in motion. There is no truth to the rumors that Harper’s Ferry was attacked by missiles launched from nearby submarines, and that one of the missiles was ridden by Slim Pickens.

      Like

  1. Jimmy was seven years younger than jack per the narrative. We’re told Jimmy was 52 when elected. Could definitely pass for 60 something per a Google image search. They do favor each other; but Jimmy favors his gordy side though. His mother really favors her cousin berry of course. Maybe the Kennedy’s were just an acting clan not related by blood?

    Check out his sister kick during the second great war. Ole girl married into the Cavendish clan of course.

    Like

    1. “Acting clan” has a nice sound to it. Presidents in the modern era are actors. Looking at Jack and Jimmy, and possessing eyes that can and have been fooled but that are tempered with years of photo-gazing, I do not see the same person but instead two. But I’ve spent so much time with photos of Nicholson, Damon, Sheen, Mirren, Mansfield, Hinckley, Son of Sam, Hillside Strangler, Dahmer … I see more than just familial resemblance. As I’ve often noted, I had more that fifty cousins on either side of my parents’, and not one of them has any more than a trace of familial heritage, and never an identical facial plate. In the eleven years and thousands of photos I’ve studied, only in one did I see a near-duplicate face, and that was of a father and daughter, and with that I had no basis for knowing the size of the two noggins, just that the resemblance was striking.

      In fact, no two people look alike, but there is something going on in Brave New World fashion, where people align perfectly in facial characteristics, but are easily distinguished. Again, I’ve mentioned this many times, but compare Charlie Sheen and Pierce Brosnan, different lineage, different nationalities, twelve years difference in official age, indistinguishable from one another in facial features. There is something going on here … sometheeeeng.

      Liked by 1 person

  2. That is a striking facial alignment, but some of the features themselves are very distinctive – Carters nose/ nostrils and lips are very different from JFK’s. And they have young photos of Carter so I don’t think plastic surgery can answer it. Also in a profile view, JFK has this very vertical straight up big block of a forehead, while Carter’s is rounded and slopes back at an angle from the brow. That’s the skull shape itself, not easy to change..

    Like

Leave a Reply