Author: Mark Tokarski

Just a man who likes to read, argue, and occasionally be surprised.

What was the name of that country?

This story is fairly predictable. It is from the Russian news outlet “RT.com” (Russian Times*). I was told by Polish Wolf that Obama’s wars, as opposed to Bush’s, were smarter, better waged, kinder and gentler … something like that.

So we bombed Libya, murdered its leader, and the liberals now have all moved on to more murder and mayhem in Syria. (Some things never change. It was the liberals who initiated the Southeast Asian wars, and the millions killed there.)

In the meantime .. I love the last line of this story:

However, if the new Libyan authorities fail to bring peace to the country, that wouldn’t become an obstacle for the US to control its vast oil reserves, believes Richard Spencer, founder and co-editor of AlternativeRight.com.

“I think the US is very happy if Libya becomes a chaotic place where there is no real central power opposing anything they do,” he shared adding that “political stability and having the oil flow are two very different things.”

______________
*The Washington Post, demonstrating its acute self-awareness, referred to RT as the “Russian propaganda outlet.”

Progressives and Democrats are bickering again …

I have an iMac computer, and feel really stupid about it. I used at get angry with my PC, as if it were a person. It was slow revving up, and sent me messages every time it did something. “I am backing up your files.” “I am updating your software.” “I am crashing now.”

I bought an iMac. It too is slow and annoying. If it goes to sleep and I wake it up, it snaps to attention! So it appears. But the keyboard doesn’t work. The network is not connected. That takes a couple of minutes. Just like a PC.

Apple has created the illusion of the superior computer. And I bought in. They totally got me with their slick ads and all of the product placement and all of these people who swear by Apple products.

Here’s an interesting post. Progressives and Democrats are aligned in objectives. In this case, we all want to see a strong minimum wage. And yet here we are fighting.

Don Progreba swears by the Democratic Party, and that is why we fight. He gets annoyed with progressives because he assumes we cannot see the objectives. Because we do not support Democrats, he thinks we are the problem. We are smug, he says, intellectuals who are lost in wonkiness and don’t offer practical solutions.

I would like to work with Don in fighting for a just minimum wage. He’s a nice guy, a smart guy, a teacher who is well-read and has depth and knowledge. But Don has laid down a gauntlet: In order for progressives to work with him, we must support the candidates of the Democratic Party. They are slick, like iMacs.

The Social Security program explained …

Social Security,like the Postal Service, is under attack, perhaps the most deadly such attack in its history. Where Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush launched a full frontal attacks, President Obama is more clever. Reagan’s defeat was so sound that he, for perception’s sake, became a supporter of the program. George W. Bush merely changed the subject, but each attack took its toll.

Obama is working behind the scenes to undermine Social Security by defunding it, claiming that in so doing he is providing a tax break for the middle and working classes.

(OK guys. Democrats have left the room now. We can speak freely.)

The ruse is easily uncovered. If Obama wanted to provide a tax break for the middle and working classes, he could do so without tapping Social Security revenues. It’s a choice he made, and so exposes him as yet another enemy of the program.

The American tax system is a mystery to ordinary people. It is neither simple nor transparent. The owning classes, now known as the 1%, understand it well enough to play it to their advantage, and so have a huge advantage over the rest of us. Obama could not pull his defunding stunt in an informed environment.

What follows beneath the fold is intended for readers who are interested in the actual workings of the Social Security program – non-partisan people of curious mind.

Continue reading “The Social Security program explained …” →

The game is afoot

WARNING!!! This article contains shrill language and images. Parental discretion is advised.

For sale, pennies on the dollar!
I never cease amazement at the despicable ruin our country is falling into, institutions one after another succumbing to our owning/investing class. These are the rent seekers. They provide a useful service – reallocation of capital – and otherwise live quite well off the efforts and savings of others. They call themselves “investors,” “job creators,” “hedge funds,” “capital management firms,” and have even absconded with the honorable word “entrepreneur.” In normal times they are useful to us, but given too much power become predators rather than servants.

Wall Street banks have fallen. Financial ratings agencies wear tarnished badges, and can no longer be trusted.* Poor people have been targeted with credit card debt, and home owners saw their savings disappear in the 2007 meltdown. Even college students are now an indentured class, owing mountains of debt for which there is never, ever an escape clause.**

The latest institution targeted is the Postal Service.

Continue reading “The game is afoot” →

Ugly people, ugly country

What to the following people and organizations all have in common?

Bill Kristol
Bill O’Reilly
Sarah Palin
Mike Huckabee
Kathleen McFarland
Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs
Mark Joyella
Jeffrey Kuhner
Tom Flanagan, spokesman for Stephen Harper
New Gingrich
Bob Beckel
Bo Dietl
Marc Thiessen
John Hawkins
Christian Whiton
Jonah Goldberg

Answer: They have all called for the murder of Julian Assange.

Attorney General Eric Holder and Vice President Joe Biden are more restrained – Biden only called him a “terrorist.” Under the “who says A must say B” dictum, that is as good as a death sentence. Holder is merely pursuing Assange with all his heart and soul, apparently working with Karl Rove* to capture him and bring him to American justice via Sweden.
Continue reading “Ugly people, ugly country” →

Fun on the innertubes

David Crisp prides himself on saying a lot with a few words. He’s pretty good at it too. I wish I could do that. I’ve been trying to think of a three or four-word remark that would convey my attitude that Crisp masks the many failings of American journalism behind professional condescension.

Ok. Here goes: …

Damn! Can’t do it. I do not have his economy of words, “addition by subtraction,” as he says.

We apparently agree that Dave Budge is a “schmuck” (Budge’s word). An exchange between the two David’s led me to the following exchange between Budge and Jim Larson. The subject at hand is a Scott Brown campaign video Budge posted, a collage of sound bytes surrounding Obama’s painfully obvious statement that no one makes it on his own*.

Larson I’m sure Dave, that we both disregard a lot of what we hear.

Neither Kennedy nor Reagan argued for higher taxes, and I am glad not to pay higher taxes, but what they argued for doesn’t change what was.

What I would like to hear is your cogent explanation of how the high tax rates of the sixties and seventies coexisted with a juggernaut American economy.

I don’t make the request rhetorically. It’s been awhile since I’ve visited the blog, but I can remember reading some illuminating economic commentary here when you took the time to write something other than a glib reply.

Budge: What I would like to hear is you finding me arguing for lower taxes in the current environment – ever. In fact I’ll pay you $1000 if you can find such an argument that I’ve made. In fact, read this.

What your doing is arguing a point that isn’t made either by me or in Brown’s ad.

I’m not in the mood to argue something that I don’t subscribe to.

Larson caught him in one of those moods. Budge exhibits an authoritarian nature, unwillingness to confront evidence that everything he knows is wrong, and clumsy deflection.
_____________
*American campaigns offer up stuff like this to allow American journalists to talk about American campaigns without delving in substance.

Why not ice cream for breakfast?

I have been struggling to come up with a way to incorporate the suffix “itute” onto the word “dietitian” as a means of conveying the essential bankruptcy of that profession. Another profession equally bankrupt, economics, lends itself quite easily – “econitutes.” They are, as Keynes reminded us, usually slaves of some dead and “defunct economist.”

It would be interesting to study the intellectual depth of every profession, including my own. Most of us are just going through the motions, repeating received wisdom. True depth and understanding is rare, and those who have it rise to the top. But in the dietary fields, along with economics, quite the opposite is true. With economics the driving force is easily understood. Powerful people who benefit from low taxes and little regulation want it kept that way, and so finance the schools that teach the horse shit that dominates the field.

Dietitians are different – I don’t know of any who are wealthy. Like chiropractors, they have to sell a low-value product and so dress it up as science. A few of them are lucky enough to latch on to some moneyed interest – Bronson Arroyo, a pitcher for the Cincinnati Reds, hired one during the offseason last year. And she, of course, preached to him the standard wisdom of the profession – eat carbs in large quantities, minimize fat. Watch out for them trans-fats! (As if such a thing even existed.)
Continue reading “Why not ice cream for breakfast?” →

Aurora: Time to move on

Lizard, a bright young man of considerable depth, wrote a chancy post yesterday regarding the possibility that James Holmes, the accused shooter in the Aurora tragedy, might have been heavily drugged, and might not have been the only shooter. This sort of speculation usually brings out those of opaque mind frame who cannot embrace the thought of conspiracy. The others that usually chime in – those who automatically resort to ridicule, are absent in the comment thread under this post.

Conspiracies abound in this country, and it is not hard to understand why. The old chestnut says it best: If you like sausage, don’t ask how it is made. Americans are deeply indoctrinated in American exceptionalism. They will readily believe conspiracy theories about others* – a Soviet plot to kill the pope, 19 Arabs performing high-skill maneuvers in 757’s after learning to fly Cessna’s – but immediately cringe at the notion of Americans doing such deeds. That’s the mindset that Lizard entered. But I’m impressed with the bulk of the comment thread.
Continue reading “Aurora: Time to move on” →

I say there, jihad with your tea?

Man it has got to be hell for Brits wearing masks in the Syrian sun
The linked article is about two photographers who stumbled into the wrong camp in Syria and were taken captive for a brief while. It’s odd in that one of them, Jeroen Oerlemans, a Dutch photo journalist, claims that several of the men had British accents, “Birmingham”-like, and one he called “South London.”

The conclusion drawn by western media is that Syria is igniting a call for jihad from around the world, including Muslims from Great Britain.

Maybe so, but my own suspicion is that the two photographers stumbled on one of many camps where Western agents provocateur are posing as Syrian rebels for the sake of exacerbating that conflict.

After all, the Syrian “rebels” have to be on of the best-armed fighting forces in the region. Syria is one of seven countries* that, according to Wesley Clark, the Bush regime wanted toppled. Since it is clear that Obama is carrying forward the Bush agenda, and and since it goes without saying that the US is not truly interested in democracy or any other such window dressing, then I think it reasonable to be suspicious when one encounters the King’s English in a supposed rebel outpost.
_______________
*Iran, Syria, Iraq, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia and Sudan

Bernie Madoff sits in jail while other criminals are partying it up

Bernie scammed the wrong people and became a monster
Bernie Madoff sits in jail now, and deserves to be there.

It is a Saturday in July, and many other criminals of Madoff’s stripe are out today on their yachts, and will later today dine in fine restaurants, enjoy cocaine* and perhaps a call girl to top off the evening. In the meantime, there sits Bernie.

Why are so many called, but only one chosen? Why you, Bernie, and no one else?

It’s a no-brainer. Look at the victims. Bernie chose powerful people to scam. Others, say like Angelo Mozilo, former head of former Countrywide, chose weak people. It’s OK to scam weak people. That’s what the free market is all about. But rough up someone with money and connections, and you’ll wind up in jail.
____________
*There are no penalties for powerful people regarding use of drugs. However, a black person smoking a joint might easily end up in prison. That’s the American way. The “War on Drugs” is really a war on minorities.