“The military . . . establishes contact with a TA [target audience] using face-to-face communication (F2C) and psychological actions (PsyActs) . . . Both are audiovisual products consisting of agents of action who deliver messages to a TA . . . Both require that the people involved follow a set of guidelines while play acting to deliver the messages. Both are used to modify the behavior of the A [audience] . . . to help create audiovisual products, the military can enlist the services of theater actor guilds . . . The people who convey these messages are known as agents of action (also called actors) . . . Some agents of action can be key communicators . . . These individuals are usually seen as trustworthy to the TA . . . PsyActs are conveyed by these actors in the presence of the TA . . . The agents of action follow a general script to convey these messages. These scripts are basic guidelines which allow the actors to adjust their message as the conversation progresses so that it doesn’t sound fake . . . This is a type of live theater performance that can be carried out in a variety of settings . . .”
~ Mark M. Rich, New World War: Revolutionary Methods for Political Control
Several researchers in the truth community (see here, here, and here) have determined that the main reason for the seemingly choreographed stunt performed collaboratively by Will Smith and Chris Rock during the 94th Academy Awards ceremony was to surreptitiously promote the new Pfizer alopecia drug treatment (AKA a covert alopecia awareness campaign). Accordingly, Pfizer was a primary sponsor of the 2022 Oscars, and recently announced their new drug under development to treat alopecia.
I submit this March 30, 2022 article, “Ridiculous: Viral Oscars Theory Says Pfizer Staged Slap to Promote Alopecia Drug” and this March 31, 2022 article, “Evidence does not support the claim that Pfizer staged Oscars confrontation to promote new drug,” as evidence that the alopecia promotion narrative may have been an intentional bread crumb to lure conspiracy theorists down a scripted rabbit hole.
I surmise that the reason why numerous truthers immediately recognized and described this stunt as being “transparent” fakery is because it may have been designed to be relatively obvious — and then subsequently (and almost instantly) mocked by the MSM. My suspicion is that the Pfizer sponsorship (and its future alopecia treatment) — as related to the Oscars and Jada Pinkett Smith — may have been inserted to induce this conspiracy theory.
It seems nearly everyone in the fakery analysis community took the bait.
Don’t you think this was too easy? Perhaps truthers may be feeling a false sense of pride — as if they won this time around. Contrary to the assertion put forth by Miles Mathis (MM) that this staged event represents a “big miscalculation,” I suggest this face-slapping incident may have been strategically gamed (as a PsyAct), along with the accompanying alopecia publicity stunt narrative. Is it any coincidence that a game developer seemed to magically transform into a conspiracy theorist — almost overnight? Prior to this event, this prolific game blogger appears to have written nearly exclusively about gaming (see here and here).
Sorry to say, I think the conspiracy theorists were played. This phenomenon (falling for tasty, tantalizing morsels of conspiracy theories) seems to be occurring more frequently these days (see here). This is no time to proudly strut around donning tin foil hats. If anything, the elites may have added a few feathers to our peacock suits. And we may be between a Rock (named Chris) and a hard place — that is, a place of self-reflection and reckoning. We have serious work to do if we are truly going to unpack the tricks of the trade served up by the elites.
So, is there more to reveal with respect to this story? My goal is to explore supplemental layers that may hallmark this potential Smith/Rock psyop — to move beyond the “schlepping for Pfizer” (c/o MM) explanation offered by other shrewd skeptics — as represented in the links I provided above.
In an attempt to inch us closer to seeds of truth — and away from hare loss anecdotes and crafted hare holes (hat tip to POM commenter OregonMatt) — I sense the You Tube channel, Subtle Infinity, is getting warmer with its March 30, 2022 analysis, “Will Smith and Chris Rock | The Real Slap in the Face.” In a nutshell, this analysis describes the event as a means to trigger the reactionary emotional body in the viewers — subliminally keeping the gullible masses in a lower vibration imprinted with victimhood and survival mode (thereby milking loosh) — enabling the elites to have increased authority and control. I would add that subliminally perpetuating black-on-black violence furthers an amygdala hijacking agenda. To this end, the Wetiko-possessed elites (the initiated) prefer their scripted reality to maintain the blacks as slaves portrayal (albeit subtle and covert). Thus, as a slapping incident (rather than a punching scene), it serves as a slap in the face to (uninitiated) black people. The underlying message of this touch point is that humans are emotional beings whose animalistic instincts are uncontrollable, propelling us to lash out at one another (including those of our own race).
Rather than consciously perceiving what is likely a fake slap on the main stage; tragically, it reflects, rather, a metaphorical slap in our faces. By transcending the superficial response to this event, we may determine that if this was a street theater-esque psyop, it most likely has more to tell us about ourselves, than it does about the actors involved. I would go so far as to assert that if this was a PsyAct, it may have been a weaponized tactic with the viewing audience being the target.
It is, therefore, sad to see how the alternative media may have been duped by accepting only the shallow layer of the reveal. The demands moving forward in this increasingly false reality will force those of us with eyes to see beneath flagrant fakery to embody greater analytical wisdom. We best practice and enhance our critical thinking chops, lest we be chopped or slapped silly by advanced artificiality to come.
In an effort to peel additional layers . . . This may be somewhat of a stretch as I am thinking aloud — I wonder if this Smith/Rock interplay was some sort of data mining social impact field experiment. Please hear me out. I will be succinct. (To be fair, I am not the only reality observer contemplating the public opinion data harvesting angle.)
Most social behavior field experiments involve monitoring the impact of both a sender and a receiver. In the instance with Smith and Rock, what if Smith was acting as an active (sender) agent, while Rock was serving as a passive (receiver) agent? Let us suppose for a moment that Smith was intentionally displaying an exaggerated action with unjustified motives (theoretically putting his positive reputation on the line), and Rock was scripted to exhibit an exaggerated non-action — reflecting a submissive reaction (theoretically — and perhaps even esoterically — putting his public image of manhood on the line). Consequently, the social impact — and potentially the influencing of social norms resulting from this action/non-action presentation — could be measured by the accumulation of data via social media analysis. Within this hypothetical context, the ultimate inquiry would be to determine how their respective public images were impacted by contrived behavior (one being the over-the-top angry bad boy, while the other being the unusually stoic, un-manly good boy).
Paradoxically, by socially depicting a bad boy image in the short run, Smith’s social image may be elevated in the long run. While this may seem counter-intuitive — and improbable at the moment — I submit two potentially relevant studies (see here and here) that may offer support for my theory. Furthermore, it seems Will Smith swiftly attempted to make amends for his bad boy behavior. I imagine the social media response to his atoning actions will be harvested as well; and as I hypothesized, his celebrity reputation may ultimately be enhanced — just in time for his next big project (keep reading). At the very least, this televised interaction was an apparent boost to Rock’s new stand-up comedy tour — ironically titled “Ego Death.” Hmmmm. On further reflection . . . This coincidental occurrence seems so . . . allegorically esoteric . . . or, dare I say, masonic?
Is it possible that Will Smith and Chris Rock (knowingly or unknowingly) engaged in a secret initiation ritual at the 2022 Oscars ceremony that may have elevated them in the ranks, while simultaneously promulgating dissension, hatred, and racism among the profane masses?
Moving forward in my thinking aloud exercise . . .
One foot further in the direction of deeper critical analysis (again, leaning away from tempting hare trails) lands us at the Boulé.
The Boule, (an acronym for Sigma Pi Phi) and pronounced “boo-lay”), was formed to bring together a select group of educated Black men and women. Fashioned after Yale’s Skull and Bones, the Boule historically takes pride in having provided leadership and service to Black Americans during the Great Depression, World Wars I and II, and the Civil Rights Movement…The members of the Boule pose as Freedom Fighters or Civil Rights Activists on the surface. In truth, the elite members are operating for personal gain. The Boule works in concert with their masters in maintaining the grip of Illuminati supremacy on their people. The Boule is another arm of the nefarious secret societies that recruit, indoctrinate and cull for the dark forces. Therein are perks galore, power and notoriety all lying in wait for the easily compromised soul…In the Greek system, the Boule was the Lower House of Parliament. Charged with organizing the affairs of the city for the King. Let that sink in.
[Before proceeding with intimations of Boulé entanglement, I want to be extremely clear that I do not believe many of the accusations ascribed to Boulé members — particularly when it comes to pedophilia and murder. I implore readers to use their own discernment when reviewing the relevant links I am providing herein. I have employed such links to evidence pertinent inter-relationships and connections to the material at-hand.]
It has been posited that Boulé members sell out their (often disenfranchised) black brothers and sisters for power and money. The Boulé reportedly has intimate ties to the Prince Hall masons, and presumably means “advisers to the king.” Keep in mind, it was the Fresh Prince, Will Smith, who received his first Academy Award on that now-infamous night for his leading role as Richard Williams (AKA King Richard) in “King Richard.” Notably, it has been reported that Jada Pinkett Smith is a member of the Boulé.
When speaking of the Boulé — as with other secret societies — it is speculated that initiates are required to act out orchestrated humiliation rituals (which may explain why male celebrities are frequently scripted to dress up as “drag queens,” as seen here with Chris Rock on the “Fresh Prince of Bel Air”). Please consider that Boulé initiates do not necessarily need to be homosexual, nor authentically perform homosexual acts. Instead, what seems more likely is that initiates are required to role play ritualistic acts — both in fiction and in “real life.” Intriguingly, in films, Will Smith has had multiple gay encounters; and in “real life,” some lip smacking (with David Letterman) — and even prior face slapping drama in 2012 (in Russia) with a male television reporter (Ukrainian, no less), who purportedly tried to kiss him. To reiterate, these engagements do not signal that Smith is gay. My point being, he may be required to play gay to ingratiate himself into the exclusive club. The fact that this potentially symbolic stunt played out during the week of the Spring Equinox (of the sign of Aries the Ram) may carry additional occult significance.
If we were to expand our analysis of this slapping spectacle outward in a potentially more valuable 360 degree perspective, we may also detect hints of subliminal Twilight language . . . At a very quick glance, does Will appear to resemble WIII — unconsciously evoking WWIII? In the same vein, may we juxtapose this potential signaling with the seemingly sudden promotion of a Wii game analyst (and presumed Wii developer) as some savvy reality analyst . . . Do you notice the similarity of Wii to WII, or more specifically, WWII? Come to think of it, on the heels of this incident, came the report of Bruce Willis (who, by the way, is bald) being adversely affected by a brain disorder called aphasia. Could Willis signal WIIII (meaning WWIIII)? Yeah, that may be a reach . . .
Regardless, game theory (à la cognitive warfare) may be operating in the background of Hollywood-ish ploys. Supposedly trivial public displays may represent the deployment of militarized objectives, with the main stage agenda being demoralization and the suppression of the human spirit — a war on our hearts and minds.
Lastly, Will Smith is starring in an upcoming film titled “Emancipation.” Therein, he plays the lead character, Peter, which is reportedly based on the true story of “Whipped Peter” — a runaway slave who escaped from a Louisiana plantation. Incidentally, Peter means “rock” (h/t Super Torch Ritual) — oddly evoking Chris Rock. Were Will Smith’s antics at the Oscars intended to raise black people up, or unconsciously trigger slave undertones?
On March 29, 2022, Goro at Super Torch Ritual (STR) wrote,
“Chris” means “Christ-bearing” and “Rock” is the meaning of “Peter”. Chris Rock is essentially “Saint Peter.”
Subsequently, on March 31, 2022, Goro at STR posted a short piece titled, “Rock impact continued,” highlighting the fact that Vladimir Putin will be requiring oil buyers to open rouble accounts in Russian banks as of April 1, 2022; and pointing out that Russia’s cultural capital is St. Petersburg — the birthplace of Putin — named after St. Peter (= rock).
Commenter naikvard at STR had this to say in response:
As far as I know, this is planned via the BRICS using WEF. The gold production control started plan in 2016.
Zelensky may be playing both parts here. The idea is to contain new order or create chaos.
the BRICS or bricks = rock.
Russia has fixed the gold rubble rate.
Rouble can be read as Rubble which also means Rock
Do you see that Boule is embedded in a scrambled anagram of rouble? Was the Smith/Rock incident a Boulé trigger event to signal the System’s imminent move with the Russian rouble? I think this type of cryptic messaging is a valid avenue of exploration, and at least could conceivably guide us past the more transparent signals (intentionally) left in our path.
Stay tuned for more “rock” (and possibly slapping; as in, sanctions) Twilight language — as the chaos magic continues to rage among the rubble in Ukraine, the roubles in Russia, and the Boulé in Hollywood . . .
The SHOW must go on.