Wiki Numerology Tutorial

I posted this on my blog the other day and Mark asked me to post it here. There are a few paragraphs at the end that may be controversial, but I will happily expand on them if asked. Also, the formatting is weird on the pictures so to see them clearly just click on them.


I’ve had a couple requests over the last few months to explain exactly how I do Wiki numerology and I figured it’s about time I created a tutorial.

First let’s start with the Intelligence signals:








108, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 133, 147, 166, 174, 194

208, 211, 233, 247, 266, 274, 294

308, 311, 330, 331, 332, 333, 334, 335, 336, 337, 338, 339, 347, 366, 374, 394, etc.

There may be more signals that I am not aware of. The top nominee is 88.

Now that we know the numbers, the first thing I do when I go on a Wikipedia page I want to examine is press CTRL F and search each number in the box. In a large Wiki page you may pull up way too many results so what I recommend is to scroll down to the “References” section and select the up arrow next to the Intelligence number (8, 11, etc.). In some cases, like below, there will be multiple choices for a number (a, b, c, d, e). Be sure to select each letter and read each selection.

If I select the number 8 on Vladimir Putin’s page it shows me this quote:

“During Putin’s first presidency, the Russian economy grew for eight straight years, andGDP measured in purchasing power increased by 72%”

OK, so how do you interpret this? It is my belief that every single thing on these Wiki pages is flagged on purpose. Here is what each quote usually means:

  1. “That never really happened”
  2. “We did that/That was our doing” (Intelligence)
  3. “He/She/It is one of us” (if a certain person or company is flagged)
  4. “That is false”

So in my opinion the best explanation for the quote above is #2 “That was our doing”. That means that the Russian economy was manually manipulated to grow during Putin’s presidency. The other interpretation could be that the economy never really grew, they just said it did to make Putin look good.

Some shorter articles have less than 8 references. This does not mean that Intelligence is not involved, it just means that Intelligence is less likely to be involved and/or isn’t giving any clues.

When you select a quote, be sure to only analyze the wording that comes after the previous reference. To explain better, look at the image below. You will see the quote for 33 is “Putin’s mother was a factory worker and his father was a conscript in the Soviet Navy, serving in the submarine fleet in the early 1930s. Early in World War II, his father served in the destruction battalion of the NKVD.” Notice that I did not select anything before the previous reference number 30. The reason it is 30 is because 31 and 32 was included with 33.

When parents and their occupations are flagged, like in the quote above, it usually means that either both his parents were Intelligence or that those are not his real parents. Another scenario is that a famous person’s name or birth is flagged. If it is a historical figure it may be a sign that person never existed and if it’s a modern figure it may be a sign he/she is a reassignment or the identity is completely fabricated. Use your best judgment for the interpretation.

Some of the most interesting (and satisfying) flags are in bunches with the 110-119 and 330-339 flags. In this case the 110-119 flags cover his 3rd presidential election. The vote-rigging, opposition groups, protests, injuries, and arrests are all flagged. I take it to mean it was all controlled opposition.

330-339 flags opinions of Putin by other world leaders. It shows that almost everything we know about international diplomacy is false.

So now go try this on your own. You will find an unusual number of flags for marriages, divorces, and children. You will find a large number of charities and awards flagged, and certain individuals and companies are flagged over and over again (Bernie Sanders, Craig Ferguson, Apple, Emmy Awards, etc.)

One more thing I should note. This method is not only a good way to find out what is fake or did not happen, it is also a good way to find out what is real that they tell you is not. For example, take the famous Enfield Poltergeist incident of 1978 that inspired the recent Conjuring 2 film. The consensus in the scientific community, and debated in the paranormal community, is that the girls faked some or all of the paranormal activity.

If you click on the image and zoom in you will notice that the accusations of Janet faking the activity is flagged with an 8 and 11. When you have an article that suggests an event did not happen, and the main things that are flagged involve skeptics and research proving it is impossible, that is a good sign that it is actually real. You will find this as you look at occult, paranormal, esoteric, metaphysical, and even extraterrestrial articles. You are free to believe what you like, but why would you believe in the skeptic community if the science community turns out to be a fraud? The skeptics are an Intelligence front themselves.

If you are wondering why I chose the Enfield case as an example, I know somebody intimately involved with the case that has let it be known SPR is a front and Playfair in particular was MI5 (Grosse probably too). It was Playfair and Grosse who faked many of the incidents in order to blackwash Janet. The paranormal activity was very real in that house, and was a result of a very talented astral projector who did not yet know how to harness his gifts. That is information that has been tightly controlled for nearly 40 years. The fact that Wiki numerology confirms this is all I need to see.


This entry was posted in American wilderness. Bookmark the permalink.

19 Responses to Wiki Numerology Tutorial

  1. John in Texas says:

    Paranormal activity is real. I have experienced it and know others who have as well. There is more out there than our 5 senses.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Straight – I am going to need your help with some spook markers. I am beginning to suspect, just based on available photos, that the My Lai massacre was another public hoax. I know you’re busy, but if you could scan the Wiki page on that event sometime, I’d really appreciate it.


    • Well right from the top:
      347 dead
      11th Brigade
      26 soldiers charged – 2+6=8
      Went public in November 1969 (11th month)

      The gist of the flags (I only looked at the first 7-10) is that much of it was faked and exaggerated but nothing directly indicating that nobody was killed. The 11 flag gives the impression the point was to increase domestic opposition to the war and the rest of the flags call BS on the dramatic killing of women and children, bodies in trenches, etc.

      And that would make sense. Maybe the soldiers came in and killed a few men, they cordoned off the rest, brought in the spook soldiers and faked the massacre part. Or maybe they took a real incident where a few people were killed and exaggerated. Or perhaps it was fake from the bottom up?


      • It will be interesting. But this woudl explain why Lt. Calley was never punished – for the same reason Manson never went to prison for real. I’ll let you know as I progress.


        • tyronemccloskey says:

          Calley got a few months house arrest at an Army base, but that’s nothing- His commanding officer, Capt. Medina was represented by F. Lee Bailey, so there’s that- (Another “Lee” to add to the list- Lee/Leigh must have spook implications beyond just a marker since it shows up often enough to notice)


  3. Also, just a footnote, John Denver when he faked his death changed the wing registration number on his Long EZ to NC555JD. I looked up “555” and is said that it signifies “a person is going though a major life change, neither good nor bad, but major.”

    It seems that any number that is paired is significant. Mathis suggests that ‘8’ is used because it is a Fibonacci, but I am more inclined to think that it is the 222 yielding 8, but also the three twos totaling 6 which is 3+3, so that 8 is just another way to express 33. 27 is the same, 3 raised to the 3rd power, or 3^3. 53, George Michael’s fake death, is 8, then a variant of 33.


  4. marsinvirgo says:

    This is very important work/info, thanks for sharing.


  5. Vexman says:

    Thanks for this wiki, Straight. I was taking numerology into account for quite some time now. You’ve made it as a single list, where I wanted to share and comment on that particular detail. As you put it, there are most certainly markers and intelligence signals to hail to each other. It’s kind of like a secret handshake / symbolism that is used in order to identify yourself when that needs to be done. But then there is something more to it, which would translate as a esoteric meaning. For which, I suggest, one has to believe into magik involved.

    The numbers 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 33 and all multiples of them have esoteric meaning to the hoaxers and are used in multitude of combinations and are as such i.e. geometrically encoded in brand names and encrypted in corporate logos. They are used as numbers of councilmen, signatories, and important documents. Dates with numerological significance are used to dedicate monuments, to stage false flag events and to plan assassinations – false and real. Without fail, the Rulers nearly always numerically or symbolically leave their fingerprint. For example, the original number of states in USA was 13, the Constitution has 7 articles and was signed by 39 members of the Constitutional Convention. What is the purpose of leaving a numerical trail of one’s crimes and exploits? Is it an arrogant calling card to share/show with other spooks? Are they lucky numbers? Or do the numerals themselves contain some more mystical quality? All of these, of course.

    Now, although it is very clear that occult was introduced as a project, there is a significance in its meaning to the numerology used in many cases. Sometimes it has to be taken into consideration in order to explain the use of numbers in more proper way. In example, why is the highest military rank a 5 star general, who wears 5 5-pointed gold stars? Why do Sheriffs wear a 6-pointed gold star? What do these “occult” amulets/symbols have to do with protecting the country? Plato wrote in his work “Kritias” that the numbers 5 and 6 were sacred in Atlantis, they were encoded in architecture, art, and ceremonial life ‘to honor the odd and even days.’ The number 5 represents the male principle of conscious outward action, while 6 stands for female intuitive receptivity. 5 represents the male principle of outward action. Ancient cultures all over the world shared the belief that the Sun represented the male principle while the Moon represented the female. So a “soldier,” or Sun warrior, wearing 5, 5-pointed golden stars most certainly resonates strongly the male principle/energy.

    Modern “occultists” and hoaxers believe 5 to be the Number of Death. The greatest intensification of any number is its triplicate, making 555 literally “Highest Death.” Could this be why the highest military rank (5 star generals) wear 5, 5-pointed stars on their uniform? Could this be why the US Pentagon building is 5 concentric, 5 sided pentagons, with an inner court of exactly 5 acres? Interesting that so many of the corporate pre-planned boy/girl bands, bands created by corporations, not by the musicians themselves, such as the Spice Girls, Pussy Cat Dolls, New Kids on the Block, Backstreet Boys, N’Sync all have 5 band members and each member represents/acts/dresses in a certain unique way – the bad boy, the pretty boy, the prep, the hippie, etc.

    As a more sinister example of numbers used in fake/hoax events : in 1962 the perpetrated “Cuban Missile Crisis” lasted for 13 days, and 13 months later, to the day, JFK was allegedly assassinated – 11/22/63 (11+22 = 33, 6+3=9=3×3). As the official story goes, he was shot in the exact same 3 spots as Hiram Abiff, who, representing the persecution of the Templars on Friday the 13th, 1307, was struck in the back, the throat, and the head.

    There is so much more to this numerology subject. As the most important in my view, I’d like to point to the fact that in order to let these symbolism and gematria speak in its sinister meaning, one should drop all prejudice about the origin of numerology and accept superstition as the leading force behind it.

    Liked by 1 person

  6. calgacus says:

    I would be interested in some speculation regarding the true meaning of these numbers. I believe that many of these numbers may refer to astronomical cycles, years (the last 2 digits of a year, or something like 47BC, 47AD) and maybe gematria stuff,Tarot etc. People should look on the wikipedia page of the number and then look at the BC and AD year associated with the number. Some interesting meanings:
    8 can be associated with Venus(Lucifer, Hesperus) (look for pentagram of Venus)
    11 Sunspot cycle, important in sports, Apollo 11, maybe related to twins (twin towers,twin peaks,twin mountains), 11 remaining apostles
    47 year cycle of Mars, appears many times in Star Trek, important at Pomona College, CIA
    88 piano keys, dead man’s hand (also 11), number of modern Constellations, Heil Hitler
    Regarding some cycles you can see this


  7. I don’t know who mentioned this, perhaps that Jungle Surfer idiot, but it struck me as a tell: The 11th letter of the alphabet is K, so that Ku Klux Klan, KKK=33. That would signal Intel front.


  8. Maarten Rossaert says:

    Thank you for this tutorial, Straight. You have piqued my curiosity about the nuances in meaning between the various numeric signals they use. Please develop this research further.


  9. Roelf_zelf says:

    I tried this on Assange’s wiki. It’s nearly impossible for him not to be controlled opposition. I’m very disappointed however that I can’t find any markers on his page. Of course some of your numbers are used, but they are in sequence and there doesn’t seem to be anything wrong with it. Maybe I don’t see it. I’ll try a couple more, such as Bradley Manning and our great “hero” Snowden.


    • I am currently using Wiki to research the 2002 failed Venezuelan coup. It’s a gold mine of numerology. The very first footnotes are 8 and 9, and they are in no order whatsoever. Footnote 1 appears for the first time on page 13.'état_attempt


    • daddieuhoh says:

      I found plenty of markers. Anyway the biggest giveaway is Assange saying that he is “annoyed that people are distracted by false conspiracies such as 9/11.”


      • Rebecca says:

        This may be a stupid question, so apologies if so. But does it matter if the numbers are in chronological order? I guess they could alter the order of things to flag what they wanted, but the comment above made me wonder if I was misreading things. I just had a look at Pamela Anderson’s wiki page.


        • daddieuhoh says:

          Not sure what you mean. Are you saying does it matter if the wiki reference numbers are out of order? Like, if you have a 33 that appears after 32, does that mean it’s normal? If that’s your question, then I think the answer is no: the numbers can still be markers.


  10. calgacus says:

    This numerology business seems to be a form of steganography. Steganography is related to cryptography, but it is more about hiding messages in plain sight. More than 500 years ago a spook called Johannes Trithemius wrote a book called Steganographia. The book talks about magic and spirits (spooks) but it is about steganography and cryptography. The third volume was decoded recently. The book was probably just a manual for spooks since it seems it contains only banal information (but maybe there is another level of steganography that was not decoded). Of course there is a connection with alchemy and similar spook literature that may contain real scientific discussion and other coded messages (Mathis considered the possibility that spooks knew about the charge field for ages). The Invisible College may have used such techniques to exchange info.
    A link about Trithemius


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s