I posted this on my blog the other day and Mark asked me to post it here. There are a few paragraphs at the end that may be controversial, but I will happily expand on them if asked. Also, the formatting is weird on the pictures so to see them clearly just click on them.
I’ve had a couple requests over the last few months to explain exactly how I do Wiki numerology and I figured it’s about time I created a tutorial.
First let’s start with the Intelligence signals:
108, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 133, 147, 166, 174, 194
208, 211, 233, 247, 266, 274, 294
308, 311, 330, 331, 332, 333, 334, 335, 336, 337, 338, 339, 347, 366, 374, 394, etc.
There may be more signals that I am not aware of. The top nominee is 88.
Now that we know the numbers, the first thing I do when I go on a Wikipedia page I want to examine is press CTRL F and search each number in the box. In a large Wiki page you may pull up way too many results so what I recommend is to scroll down to the “References” section and select the up arrow next to the Intelligence number (8, 11, etc.). In some cases, like below, there will be multiple choices for a number (a, b, c, d, e). Be sure to select each letter and read each selection.
If I select the number 8 on Vladimir Putin’s page it shows me this quote:
OK, so how do you interpret this? It is my belief that every single thing on these Wiki pages is flagged on purpose. Here is what each quote usually means:
- “That never really happened”
- “We did that/That was our doing” (Intelligence)
- “He/She/It is one of us” (if a certain person or company is flagged)
- “That is false”
So in my opinion the best explanation for the quote above is #2 “That was our doing”. That means that the Russian economy was manually manipulated to grow during Putin’s presidency. The other interpretation could be that the economy never really grew, they just said it did to make Putin look good.
Some shorter articles have less than 8 references. This does not mean that Intelligence is not involved, it just means that Intelligence is less likely to be involved and/or isn’t giving any clues.
When you select a quote, be sure to only analyze the wording that comes after the previous reference. To explain better, look at the image below. You will see the quote for 33 is “Putin’s mother was a factory worker and his father was a conscript in the Soviet Navy, serving in the submarine fleet in the early 1930s. Early in World War II, his father served in the destruction battalion of the NKVD.” Notice that I did not select anything before the previous reference number 30. The reason it is 30 is because 31 and 32 was included with 33.
When parents and their occupations are flagged, like in the quote above, it usually means that either both his parents were Intelligence or that those are not his real parents. Another scenario is that a famous person’s name or birth is flagged. If it is a historical figure it may be a sign that person never existed and if it’s a modern figure it may be a sign he/she is a reassignment or the identity is completely fabricated. Use your best judgment for the interpretation.
Some of the most interesting (and satisfying) flags are in bunches with the 110-119 and 330-339 flags. In this case the 110-119 flags cover his 3rd presidential election. The vote-rigging, opposition groups, protests, injuries, and arrests are all flagged. I take it to mean it was all controlled opposition.
330-339 flags opinions of Putin by other world leaders. It shows that almost everything we know about international diplomacy is false.
So now go try this on your own. You will find an unusual number of flags for marriages, divorces, and children. You will find a large number of charities and awards flagged, and certain individuals and companies are flagged over and over again (Bernie Sanders, Craig Ferguson, Apple, Emmy Awards, etc.)
One more thing I should note. This method is not only a good way to find out what is fake or did not happen, it is also a good way to find out what is real that they tell you is not. For example, take the famous Enfield Poltergeist incident of 1978 that inspired the recent Conjuring 2 film. The consensus in the scientific community, and debated in the paranormal community, is that the girls faked some or all of the paranormal activity.
If you click on the image and zoom in you will notice that the accusations of Janet faking the activity is flagged with an 8 and 11. When you have an article that suggests an event did not happen, and the main things that are flagged involve skeptics and research proving it is impossible, that is a good sign that it is actually real. You will find this as you look at occult, paranormal, esoteric, metaphysical, and even extraterrestrial articles. You are free to believe what you like, but why would you believe in the skeptic community if the science community turns out to be a fraud? The skeptics are an Intelligence front themselves.
If you are wondering why I chose the Enfield case as an example, I know somebody intimately involved with the case that has let it be known SPR is a front and Playfair in particular was MI5 (Grosse probably too). It was Playfair and Grosse who faked many of the incidents in order to blackwash Janet. The paranormal activity was very real in that house, and was a result of a very talented astral projector who did not yet know how to harness his gifts. That is information that has been tightly controlled for nearly 40 years. The fact that Wiki numerology confirms this is all I need to see.