The above video is part one of three by Richard C. Hall, a British television personality and researcher. It is 49 minutes, and the first fourteen are unrelated. He then introduces Neil Sanders. The two episodes that follow are of shorter length.
I was in Europe two years ago when I ran across Sanders, probably on Hall’s show. For some reason I was aware of him. At that time he was writing about mind control and rock & roll, and was an advocate of various “Paul is Dead” theories. I contacted him (I was in the same time zone) and brought him to our research on McCartney showing him to be a set of twins. We had a few emails back and forth, the last of which had him saying that he had seen my work and that of Miles Mathis, and that we “just hadn’t done our homework.” Good lord, I realized – we had done far more research than had he had. This man was a fake!
I noticed about Sanders that he had a droll manner of delivery that has him going on and on without ever reaching a conclusion. In the PID stuff I decided that his role was to keep the juggler’s balls in the air, to never let the mystery be settled even as I made it obvious to him that it was settled.
I judged him to be a disinformation agent. His heavy exposure on the Hall show made me suspicious of Hall, who was also a promoter of the work of Dr. Judy Wood. I had not yet figured out Wood at that time, but that circle is now complete.
Since that time Mr. Hall has taken on the showcasing of the Madeleine McCann case, a young girl who disappeared in Portugal in 2007, or so we are told. It has all the markings of a JonBenét-like psyop. It is the reason I ultimately came to conclude that Richard C. Hall is a disinformation agent.
Listening to Saunders, it is easy to see that he is steeped in the official truth of the Manson case, that he really was a prisoner who was set free, that Sharon Tate and the others really were murdered. His book is 564 pages, a tome, and just from listening to him I judge that not a word of it is true.
It is all rehash. Why? Tune in at about 27:35 and he will tell you why. He says that he goes through the official story so that it can all be set aside, but that never happens. (Mathis has actually done the setting-aside work. Saunders knows not to mention him, as it would drive traffic his way. Or perhaps he thinks Mr. Mathis has not done his homework again.)
Here is my theory: Mr. Mathis has made considerable inroads, and knowledge that the Tate Massacre was a hoax is well-traveled now. Intelligence has decided that they need to retake control, and so have reassembled the ‘official’ story, slapped Saunders name on it, and are circulating it at ‘conspiracy’ sites.
Why Richard C. Hall? I don’t know. Because he lends himself to such use? Saunders may be making the rounds to all the big disinfo sites, perhaps next on Fetzer and Prison Planet. But the message is obvious to me … Mathis has done damage, and this is a containment operation.