Numeric signals, I know, are a matter of uncertainty with readers here. I have wondered if I merely find what I am looking for … confirmation bias, but they are too prevalent and consistent, way too predictable.
We had a mass murder last night in Denver last night. A man supposedly walked into a Walmart and just started shooting people. He hit three, they all died. He was a very good shot. [He fired thirty shots, hit three people. Got it?]
The photo of Ostrem, whose name appears scrubbed at Geni.com, has been bugging me. Do you notice, as I do, a different shading of skin color around the eyes? It is almost as if they have inserted a pair of sinister and close-set eyes in the photo. Or, he could have an occupation that requires he wears goggles … welder? Aviator? Does he wear a hat for a living that keeps his high forehead covered? And what is with the pink cardigan and high collar – it looks effeminate, almost as if they pasted his head on a woman’s shoulders.
But overall, this photo does strongly resemble that if the man leaving a store down below. Keep in mind that we make assumptions when watching news, and don’t verify. The photo of this man and the man below being the same man only means that they are the same man, and not that this man committed any crimes, or that the photo below was taken at WalMart in Thornton. Maybe it was, but we need to verify details, something that is never done with news broadcasts. People just accept them at face. If this is a fake event, both photos could have been taken anywhere, anytime.
Denver is spook central, home of Columbine and the Batman shootings, two of the major fake events of the last twenty years. The problem: people don’t just randomly shoot other people! People do kill other people, don’t get me wrong, but it is fueled by love and addiction and alcohol. It is never just random. That is an Intelligence psyop meant to keep us in high tension, this idea that random strangers will murder us for no reason. Spooky!
Suspecting it was a fake event, I looked for markers. here is a photo of our TV set as a police officer told the highly gullible members of the media about the event. Though it happened earlier in the day, this news broadcast was used to interrupt the Kimmel show at the times shown lower right.
And, there they are, lower right. The time is 11:17, or 11 and 8. Timing was just perfect.
I accidentally recorded thus stuff because I record Jimmy Kimmel. I listened intently, Knowing they would tip their hand. Look again at the time, lower right, one minute later
That is 11:18, or 11 and 9, or 911, their old standby. Yes, 11:17 is followed by 11:18, but do you suppose the timing of [the reporting of] this event was set to happen at this time? I do.
The two people standing behind the police officer are of interest, as they are calm, non-uniformed, and yet front and center. Who are they? We are not told. They calmly speak to one another and smile throughout the interview. I wonder what their role is. Are they set decorators? Did they have a role in the staging? Are they supervising the officer? It is odd they are so prominent.
Here is a “surveillance” photo of the suspect:
Steely eyed, well-groomed, military cut, clean-shaven. Told to walk out at a certain time, he did so, having done nothing. He is military. I feel that more than know it. By the way, the time of this screen shot, not seen, is 11:26, or 11 and 8 one more time. [Also note the numbers across the bottom … 1, 39 and 4, totaling 44, or another way of expressing 8. Yes, I know it could all be coincidental, but the same damned framework of numbers pops up every time.]
I need to follow up on this, as I suspect there was a fake shootout last night, and that the perpetrator was killed, and that the case is now closed. I will let you know. Right now I am tired. We senior citizens get up very early. [As of 8:30 this Thursday evening, 11/2, he is still at large, and the community is frightened.]
[Update: the suspect was apprehended last evening without incident and is in custody. He was said to be nonchalant, both in the shooting and arrest, indicating to me that he is merely an actor. They have also provided a fake witness, Aaron Stephens, age 44, who said that he was using self-checkout when the guman fired about thirty shots. Like James Holmes, the fake Batman shooter, they have officially kept him alive, so he will have to endure a fake trial and a fake life imprisonment sentence before going on to his next assignment.]
[Update: They have now TV-interviewed the spouses/relatives of the “victims,” and it is appalling. They grimace and show pained expressions, talk about what wonderful loving people these were, and yet are not shedding tears! They are acting. You’d think that when they budget these events they would toss in a bottle of Visine, but they don’t.]
Just understand that all numbers should appear at regular intervals, randomly though not evenly. When certain numbers as we continually see appear time and again, always the same numbers, it is beyond coincidence. They are signing their work, rubbing our face in it.