Part 9: Tuned In ~ A Mother’s Intuition on Transmission from the Jabbed to the Un-Jabbed

Part 9 of the Series, “Of Monkeys, Mice and Men: From Natural Bodies to Digitized Bots”

My maternal instinct leads me to sense a relatively new feature has been added to the dystopian, anti-life, nature-defeating and dangerous game afoot . . . Given the abundance of anecdotal reports from women (both injected and non-injected with medical devices pertaining to COVID) exhibiting menstrual irregularities, and pregnant women enduring unexplained miscarriages, I have been occupied with ascertaining knowledge about the potential method of transmission. What I have uncovered, within the context of engineered nanoparticles (ENPs), may be applicable to plausible concerns that have surfaced in the past month. 

Accordingly, multiple researchers have been questioning, speculating, and even debating amongst themselves with respect to the mode of passage from one jabbed person to another, who is unjabbed. These bright minds are also attempting to hone in on precisely what is being transmitted. Please read here (Makia Freeman posits that re-wiring genetic code may be affecting physical and energetic fields), and watch here (from the 28 to 37 minute timestamps, Dr. Carrie Madej suggests injected people may be acting as wireless antennae), here (David Icke hypothesizes the jabbed may be broadcasting a frequency), and here (five prominent physicians emphasize this is an undetermined form of transmission, but not viral shedding) in this regard.

The central question I would like to address is as follows: If ENPs are present in these new, experimental injections — purportedly addressing a new condition called COVID — are they able to be transmitted to non-injected individuals; and if so, by what mechanism?

In my published “fictional” account, “Confessions of an Engineered Nanoparticle,” I discussed that injections may incorporate ENPs. For additional framework, review this astute analysis from October 2009 at PreventDisease.com exploring the immersion of nanoparticles in vaccines, including the dangers and the potential long-term agendas, such as “control of the global populace.” From the 2009 article, “Through nanotechnology, researchers have . . . been able to create artificial pores able to transmit nanoscale materials through membranes.” The article continued, “However fraudulent, it was an imperative for world powers and pharmaceutical cartels to promote the effectiveness of vaccinations and enact national pandemic preparedness policies which mandate vaccinations. In 2005 the World Health Organization (WHO) developed international health regulations that would bind all 194 member countries to pandemic emergency guidelines which could enforce such a mandate. Without these procedures of public health (and propagandized vaccine campaigns) in place, there would be little or no voluntary cooperation from the public to roll up their sleeves and accept the inoculations. Public participation is an essential tool that will soon allow big pharma to inject the most effective surveillance tool ever designed into billions of people.” 

Before proceeding with my brief explanation, I encourage readers to review Part 3 (on self-spreading vaccines), Part 4 (on pheromones), and Part 6 (on nanorobots) in this current series, “Of Monkeys, Mice and Men: From Natural Bodies to Digitized Bots.” By converging much of that information, one may get closer to comprehending how ENPs operate in ways that are unique to advanced nano-sized materials, and how these features may apply to transmission. 

Significantly, this academic paper published by Dr. Yuval Elani in September 2020, “Interfacing Living and Synthetic Cells as an Emerging Frontier in Synthetic Biology,” may also help to provide rich context to understand the nascent methodology combining biological and biotechnological (synthetic biology) architecture, including protein engineering, and its implications. As described by Dr. Elani, “The most dominant form of artificial cells involve cell‐sized capsules, such as liposomes, polymersomes, coacervates, proteinosomes and hydrogel particles, which act as the chassis. These compartments can be functionalised with biomolecular components, including transmembrane channels, enzymes, cytoskeletal elements, gene circuits, and transcription/translation machinery. In doing so, cellular characteristics can be mimicked. These include cellular processes and behaviours (e.g. signalling cascades, communication, motility, energy generation, replication, and computation) as well as architectural motifs (e.g. membranes, organelles, and tissues).” The main takeaway from this paper is that by deploying these “micromachines,” the intermingling of living and synthetic components will give rise to new modes of function and responses never before observed in humans. This will require new language, such as “embedded hybridization,” “hybrid bioreactors,” and “synthetic signaling cascades,” to depict the emergent engineered communication.

Old paradigms will no longer be sufficient to comprehend what may arise through the addition of synthetic cellular and molecular systems, introduced by bio-engineering tactics that are proliferating much too rapidly for us to understand, let alone properly regulate, or willingly permit.

I am sounding the alarm to those who remain illiterate in “bio-nano” speak, as the bio-nano colonizers will continue to invade our pristine biological form with their synthetic, bio-computing edifice — that is, until we grasp their method of bottom-up digitized colonization and stop it in its tracks through peaceful, yet bold action

While ENPs may migrate through the air and through dermal exposure (and via ingestion), what is most important to grasp is that they may not literally be jumping from one person to another (or “shedding”). Instead, they may emit signals that are not only incoherent to the human body in which they penetrate, but may also send out disruptive signals (much like a mis-tuned musical instrument or un-tuned, fuzzy radio station) to those who are not injected. Think of a metronome gone rogue, so to speak. In this case, their transmission may not be through physical contact, but rather, through piezoelectric and excitation properties or an evanescent fieldnot compatible with natural, biological operability. 

Essentially, ENPs, which exhibit unique electromechanical and conductivity characteristics, can operate through various processes, such as nanopiezotronics (or nanophotonics, ionic forces, electrostatic capacitance, or perhaps a form of resonance energy transfer, such as surface plasmon resonance, or plasmoelectrics), that may account for this resulting disruptive cascade of signaling among human beings (who, until recently with the introduction of implantable synthetic biological components and engineered nanomaterials, along with pervasive EMFs), engaged in exclusively biologically-programmed piezoelectric interpersonal communication (including chemosignaling via pheromones) — akin to quorum sensing among bacteria.

Readers may want to view the documentary, “Resonance Beings of Frequency,” portraying how humans convey natural frequencies amongst each other, as we are beings of unique sympathetic resonance who are entrained together (much like similarly-tuned tuning forks). I also encourage reading my post from June 2020 discussing the synchronization of humans via heart entrainment. Exposure to artificially-induced EMFs (and now, ENPs that may triangulate with drones, 5G, or radiofrequencies) may adversely influence us by interrupting our natural flow of electrical impulses.

As per Pfizer, in their published protocol for the clinical trial of the experimental COVID concoction (see p. 67-69), they mention observing and studying pregnant women and lactating women (unjabbed) who were exposed via inhalation or skin contact to trial participants who were jabbed. While ENP transmission is typically exhibited by electromechanically emitted signals, there may be two exceptions to this method of transmission (as evidenced in studies), in that ENPs may be able to be transmitted directly from a mother to a fetus through the placenta (see here and here), and they may be able to pass directly from a mother to a baby while breast-feeding (see here under “Lactation: Risk Summary”).

Please review my end references to this post that may further elucidate the (often smart-enabled) transmissible workings of ENPs when introduced into the human population. Of significant interest, one leading DARPA-funded researcher in the area of semiconductor-piezoelectric nanomaterials is Zhong Lin Wang, of Georgia Tech, who authored several of the linked studies. 

Additionally, a premier corporate innovator in the field of nanolectronics, including biologically-embedded electrostatic sensors and actuators (BioMEMS), is Coventor, a Lam Research company, which has received DARPA funding for its efforts in the application of BioMEMS to medicine and homeland security. I remind readers that I referenced Lam Research in my first essay (in April 2020) at POM, in relation to the first reported U.S. death from COVID of Patricia Dowd, a 28 year-long employee at said company. While it has taken over a year to put most of the COVID puzzle pieces together, it seems I may have come full circle.

Given what I have learned about the technology of nano-scale, biologically embedded, wireless intelligent sensing devices (that may exhibit piezoelectric transducer capabilities), I find it curious that venture capitalist Moncef Slaoui, who is a chief scientist in bioelectronics (see here, here, here, and here regarding his collaborators) was selected as the initial leader of Operation Warp Speed. In addition to serving on the Board of Moderna — and evoking the first installment in my series in which I highlighted Singapore’s A*STAR — Slaoui served as a member of A*STAR’s Advisory Board. In 2016, when Slaoui was Chairman of Global Vaccines at GSK, he asserted, “This agreement with Verily to establish Galvani Bioelectronics signals a crucial step forward in GSK’s bioelectronics journey, bringing together health and tech to realise a shared vision of miniaturised, precision electrical therapies. Together, we can rapidly accelerate the pace of progress in this exciting field, to develop innovative medicines that truly speak the electrical language of the body.” Could Operation Warp Speed be serving as the jump-start for the mass implantation and implementation of weaponized electroceuticals (introduced without informed consent), designed to be interconnected and to interface with the cloud? What better way to insert pervasive and programmable “smart” bioelectronic networks — that are electromagnetically sensitive — than through injection (under the guise of a medical therapy)?  

To all fellow moms out there: Protect yourselves and your beloved babies (young and old) — and for goodness sakes, listen to your mothers’ intuition! Do not allow yourselves to be tricked into accepting what may eventually result in mechanistic and degenerate interpersonal communication, defined by 0s and 1s. May you lead your families in tune with the innate rhythm and sacred pulse of Mother Nature. Humanity needs us now, more than ever. 

Inspired by Alison McDowell

Cautionary note: At this time, while my position on transmissibility from injected individuals to non-injected individuals (specifically with respect to COVID-related jabs) is evolving, I sense that most adverse effects attributable to incoherent signaling may be temporary and non-lethal. However, I suggest caution for particular populations (mainly pregnant women and lactating women currently nursing their babies) when coming in close contact with individuals who have been jabbed with new experimental medical devices (see Endnotes 1 and 2). Perhaps, this may be a time for young mothers to temporarily recede from direct contact from those who have been penetrated by the impetuous prick.

Anecdotal note: As background history, I breast-fed my children for many years, and stopped more than 10 years ago. Subsequently, my ability to lactate discontinued. When I was actively nursing, and would go through longer bouts of time during the day without breast-feeding, I would frequently get a physical feeling in my breasts, referred to as “let-down.” Needless to say, I could barely recall that feeling, until last week, when — out of the blue — I felt this very sensation. This is not normal. It lasted for about 10 seconds. I had been food shopping earlier in the day. I can only guess that most of the people shopping (as well as the supermarket staff) have been jabbed with experimental nanotech-laced biologics. It was a busy shopping day. When I felt that “let-down”— which I have not felt for 10+ years for good reason — I could not help but register, and mentally note it. Then, when listening to a video essay presented by David Icke (also linked above), he noted (at the 5-minute time stamp) the very same symptom presenting in another woman. I had been hearing many first and second-hand reports of menstrual irregularities (which I have also been experiencing), but not let-down. So, I thought it was a one-off. But, given this other report, I suspect that my hormones were influenced by piezoelectric signaling my body received when present among jabbed people — that is clearly not coherent with my current age and physical status. No, my body did not begin lactating out of nowhere — but the feeling was there. Then I found this document, “The use of Piezoelectricity for Rapid Increase of Milk for Insufficient Lactation.” Take this information, and my story, as you will. I cannot ignore it.

Endnotes:

1) On the topic of engineered nanoparticles and hormones, it was reported in April 2020 that DARPA-funded researchers at MIT were able to remotely control hormone release in humans by injecting novel magnetic nanomaterials that modulated ion channels.

2) An additional warning may be implied from studies related to water-soluble carbon nanoparticles that were utilized in India to prevent mosquito larvae from reaching maturity. It was suspected that the mechanism was suppression of a specific hormone.

References:

Nanoparticle communications: from chemical signals in nature to wireless sensor networksNanotechnology Perceptions, March 2014. 

“More generally, the need to convey information between two separated entities has always existed, in both the animal kingdom and in human society. There are many methods in which data can be encoded, transported and decoded. In human society, common ways of communicating include delivering physical packets (mail), speech (acoustic waves), modulating electromagnetic waves at various frequencies (radio waves in air, and optical waves in fibres), and visual observation of physical movements (hand, flag, or smoke signals). In the animal kingdom, chemicals can also be used to convey very simple messages. This chemical signalling can exist on a cellular level, and also in an external environment.”

“A good question is, why would we devote our time and resources to study chemical communication? There is, of course, scientific curiosity: to better understand how organisms signal to each other. Important questions can be asked, such as will a breakdown of signalling cause collapses in colonies? Aside from this, chemical signalling can also inspire engineers to design chemical-based communication systems. On a microscopic scale, microsurgery and drug delivery robots will likely need to communicate with each other (Fig. 1), and this cannot be achieved with conventional electromagnetic waves. This is primarily due to the antenna size and transmission energy constraints of electromagnetic wave-based communication systems. Nanosized particles can be emitted at a relatively low energy expenditure level, and allowed to propagate to neighbouring robots. This article will discuss such challenges in greater detail lateron. In this section, we will examine how organisms signal using chemical molecules in nature, and how this can be extended to form a general communications system.”

Nanonetworks: A new frontier in communications” IEEE, by Ian F. Akyildiz (abstract only) 

“Novel nano-antennas based on nano-materials as well as the terahertz band are investigated for electromagnetic communication in nanonetworks. Furthermore, molecular communication mechanisms are presented for short-range networking based on ion signaling and molecular motors, for medium-range networking based on flagellated bacteria and nanorods, as well as for long-range networking based on pheromones and capillaries. Finally, open research challenges such as the development of network components, molecular communication theory, and new architectures and protocols, which need to be solved in order to pave the way for the development and deployment of nanonetworks within the next couple of decades are presented (emphasis added).”

Nanonetworks: A New Frontier in Communications” Communications of the ACM, November 2011 (full text)

Downscaling existing communication paradigms. The tools provided by nanotechnology are enabling the extension of well-known communication techniques to the nanoscale. First of all, carbon nanotubes and graphene nanoribbons have been proposed for electromagnetic nano-antennas.6 A graphene-based nano-antenna is not just a mere reduction of a classical antenna, but there are several quantum phenomena that affect the propagation of electromagnetic waves on graphene. As a result, the resonant frequency of these nanostructures can be up to two orders of magnitude below that of their non-carbon-based counterparts. However, their radiation efficiency can also be impaired because of this phenomenon. Second, carbon nanotubes have also been proposed as the basis of an electromechanical nano-transceiver or nano-radio,5 able to modulate and demodulate an electromagnetic wave by means of mechanical resonation. This technique has been experimentally proved in reception, but would require very high nanoscale power sources for active transmission.

Terahertz Band: Ultra-broadband communications in nanonetworks. Focusing on the use of graphene-based nano-antennas and thinking of the expected maximum size of a nanomachine, the Terahertz Band (0.1THz-10THz) enters the game. Indeed, we have recently shown that a one-micrometer-long graphene-based nano-antenna would expectedly resonate in the aforementioned band.6 This very high-frequency range, in between the microwaves and the far-infrared radiation, has recently caught the attention of the scientific community because of its applications in security screening and nanoscale imaging systems. In our case, we think of the Terahertz Band as a very large transmission window that can support very high transmission rates in the short range, that is, up to a few Terabits per second for distances below one meter, or as several transmission windows more than 10 gigahertz-wide each as we’ve recently shown.For the time being, it is not clear how nanomachines with limited capabilities can exploit the properties of this huge band, but several options come to mind.”

“. . . we proposed the use of pheromones for molecular communication in long-range nanonetworks, such as, for transmission distances approximately one meter. Pheromones are molecules of chemical compounds released by plants, insects, and other animals that trigger specific behaviors among the receptor members of the same species and whose propagation relies also on the molecular diffusion process.”  

Nanoantenna — A ReviewInternational Journal of Renewable Energy Technology Research, January 2015 

“Another application of the nanoantennas is to create more compact, faster circuits and computers that use packets of light, instead of electrons for carrying signals. Such photonic circuits could be used for a new type of sensitive sensors which detect tiny traces of chemicals and biological materials, making them useful for applications including analyzing a patient’s DNA for medical diagnostics, monitoring air quality for pollution control and detecting dangerous substances for homeland security (emphasis added).”

NanopiezotronicsAdvanced Materials, by Zhong Lin Wang, 2007 

The new field of nanopiezotronicsMaterials Today, by Zhong Lin Wang, May 2007

Recent progress in piezotronics and tribotronicsNanotechnology, January 25, 2019 (abstract only)

“This review highlights advances in piezotronics and tribotronics with focus on fundamental theories, nanoscale materials, functional devices and simulations. Our emphasis is mainly about their application for third-generation semiconductor. The concepts and results presented in this review show that the piezotronics and tribotronics will facilitate the development of MEMS/NEMS, self-powered sensing, man-computer interfacing, and active wearable electronics (emphasis added).”

What is Nanophysics: Survey of Course Topics” by Branislav K. Nikolić, Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Delaware

Piezoelectric Response of Multi-Walled Carbon NanotubesMaterials, April 21, 2018

Carbon nanotubes: properties and applicationMaterials Science and Engineering: R: Reports, January 15, 2004, by Valentin N. Popov (abstract only)

Safety Assessment of Carbon Nanotube Nanocomposites: Challenges and PerspectivesJSM Nanotechnology & Nanomedicine, by Tian Xia

Graphene-based chemiluminescence resonance energy transfer for homogenous immunoassayACS Nano, April 24, 2012 (abstract only)

Physicists Discover an Unexpected Force Acting on Nanoparticles in a VacuumScience Alert, by Fiona MacDonald, April 11, 2017

Nano-bio-computing lipid nanotabletPhys.org, by Thamarasee Jeewandara, March 5, 2019

Carbon Nanotubes” (describes CNTs as “probably the best electron field-emitter known”)

Lipid nanoparticles in COVID-19 vaccines: The new mercury to antivaxxersScience-Based Medicine, by David Gorski, February 15, 2021 (Note: read between the lines)

Comparing Semiconductor Nanocrystal Toxicity in Pregnant Mice and Non-Human PrimatesNanotheranostics, 2019

ZnO nanoparticles embedded in polyethylene-glycol (PEG) matrix as sensitive strain gauge elementsJournal of Nanoparticle Research, November 2014

Call for Papers: Special Issue on: Design and Fabrication of Microscope and Nanoscale Devices for Application in Energy, Environment, and MedicineASME Journal of Nanotechnology in Engineering and Medicine

Hybrid BEM/FEM Coupled Electromechanics” Coventor (A Lam Research Company)

Business profile for Debjyoti Banerjee (previously a team leader in microfluidics/MEMS at Coventor)

Google Partners With GlaxoSmithKline to Develop ‘Bioelectronic Medicines’How Africa

Verily Leadership (Note the bio below of Co-founder, Brian Otis)

“As a Fellow at Verily, Brian pushes the frontier of medical device innovation, leading the company’s discovery and rapid prototyping efforts. He joined Verily from the University of Washington Department of Electrical Engineering where he was an Associate Professor. Previously, Brian held positions at the University of Washington Kelly Tremblay Brain and Behavior Laboratory, the UC-Berkeley Ralph Freeman Neuroscience Lab, The Berkeley Wireless Research Center, Intel Corporation and Agilent Laboratories. He received his MS and PhD in Electrical engineering in the field of low power integrated circuits for wireless sensors from the University of California, Berkeley.”

Verily’s nanoparticle program finds its swerve with Verve” by Mark Audeh, Nanoparticle Program Lead, Verily, May 7, 2019

“One of the first programs at Verily, back when it was still a part of Google X, was our nanoparticle program. At the time, we wanted to see whether nanoparticles could be designed to find and attach to particular types of cells and to be detected and measured by a body-worn device once the nanoparticles found their targets . . . Theoretically, nanoparticles can be engineered to deliver specific therapies to individual cells or tissues . . .

. . . nanoparticle irreproducibility was an ongoing problem for us . . . Many commercially available particles we worked with initially were insufficiently characterized and exhibited inconsistent properties . . . While nanoparticle-based therapeutics exist, they only serve to alter the solubility, toxicity, or pharmacodynamics of a drug . . .” 

We saw an opportunity to contribute meaningfully in this area, by developing a high-throughput synthesis and screening platform to engineer libraries of well-characterized nanoparticles with predictable properties at scale (emphasis added).

Such a platform would allow us to . . . generate a considerable amount of data on novel nanoparticle formulations that will help us better understand their behavior and improve future design . . . 

. . . We have also invested in and optimized instrumentation for in-depth, high throughput characterization and data capture on all of the particles we produce to develop a clear picture of the physical characteristics and chemical composition of the particles (i.e. size, charge, stability) and the impact they have on biological behaviors.This includes assessing binding to specific cell types, toxicity, tissue penetration, and so on (emphasis added).”

In addition to this high throughput in vitro screening, we have developed a proprietary method of ‘barcoding’ unique particle formulations to conduct in vivo studies in what we anticipate will be a faster and more efficient manner. Currently, particles are tracked in vivo largely using fluorescence, making it challenging to study more than one at a time. By embedding unique DNA “barcodes” in the particles, we can track them with precision in vivo using DNA sequencing. This means we should be able to study many unique formulations in a single in vivo model, tracking each formulation’s location and stability independently. We are just beginning this work of assessing the biology of formulations in vivo (emphasis added).

By gathering all of this information on the chemistry, the physical characteristics, in vitro assay results, and in vivo study results, we are building a data analysis pipeline to more efficiently design and synthesize particles in the future (emphasis added).

Verily, I swear. Google Life Sciences debuts a new nameSTAT, by Charles Piller, December 7, 2015

Business profile of Andrew Conrad, Founder and CEO of Verily, a Google Life Sciences company

Nano Liposomes in Novel Drug Delivery Systems: a reviewNanotechnology, February 2016

Ionizable cationic lipid for RNA delivery” (patent)

Lipid Nanoparticles Enabling Gene Therapies: From Concepts to Clinical UtilityNucleic Acid Therapeutics, June 2018

Nanotoxicity: a key obstacle to clinical translation of siRNA-based nanomedicine” Nanomedicine (Lond), February 2014.

“The positive charges can facilitate interaction with the negatively charged cell surface [35,36]. Cellular damage can be caused by direct interactions between the cationic groups and cellular components, or indirectly by reactive oxidative species (ROS) formed in the presence of cationic materials. The resulting cell toxicity can be manifested in an acute or delayed manner [37]. It should be noted that the mechanism about how cationic nanomaterials cause cyto-toxicity is still not well understood and an alternative mechanism has been proposed [38]. Other obvious damage includes ‘lysosomal overload’ of poorly biodegradable nanocarriers, which results in the accumulation of visible autophagic vacuoles and apoptotic cell death [39] (emphasis added).”

55 thoughts on “Part 9: Tuned In ~ A Mother’s Intuition on Transmission from the Jabbed to the Un-Jabbed

  1. Fantastic research and presentation. I’m following this with more interest and agreement than in any write-up so far, I think just because I have taken some of the cues you’ve offered in previous articles, and become better educated on the subject. What they say they want to do with these technologies they may not be able to accomplish, but on the other hand, they’re not usually revealing their full plans to us, are they? Just like the nonsense of seeding our bodies with the ability to create “spike proteins”, that don’t exist in the first place…but it is of course the story that gives the ‘vaccine’ popular plausibility. Which leaves open the question (which you have given much effort to answer), what is the real intent here?

    So now we have the fun thing of magnets sticking to injection sites, which I know you’re aware of, and which points to ferrous nanoparticles, at a minimum. If others haven’t heard of this yet, here is a link to some reference points on that subject. As you can see, the first demos of the phenomenon I saw were not fully convincing, but….https://cuttingthroughthefog.com/2018/12/26/health-matters/comment-page-7/#comment-122162

    Liked by 1 person

  2. That’s only because the “vaccines” are recent and material has not had a full chance to diffuse throughout the body and brain.

    Like

      1. OM – I had actually considered providing a hyperlink to the “magnets-sticking-to-vaccinated-at-injection-site” in one of the very last sentences in my post – where it says “that are electromagnetically sensitive”. I had seen the compilations at 153 news, but had not yet seen Makia’s take (or Tim Truth) on it (as you can see, I hyperlinked to Makia in my post with regard to the main discussion topic). In any case, I had e-mailed a shorter compilation of testimonials to Mark, and we briefly discussed it. I did not feel confident enough in this information to hyperlink – as you know, I prefer mainly to hyperlink to primary sources of scientific material. However, now seeing more of these testimonials, I do feel it is legitimate, and aligns with the information I have presented herein. Thank you for weaving this into the comment thread. I am interested if any readers feel comfortable asking any of their injected friends/family to do the magnet experiment, and can report back. My sense is that the magnetic pull may decrease the farther out from the second dose of the shot. Most people I know received their last dose of Pfizer or Moderna nearly two months ago.

        Liked by 1 person

        1. On Makia Freeman . . . It looks like he posted an update on May 4 to the hyperlink I had provided, which I will leave here in the comments: https://thefreedomarticles.com/covid-vax-transmission-phenomenon-frequency-change/. It is an insightful read (although with a slightly different take than I presented above), referencing David Icke (who I linked above as well). Makia also references the “DNA as antenna” material of Benveniste and Montagnier that I highlighted in a previous post from August 2020: https://pieceofmindful.com/2020/08/13/the-ghost-in-the-pcr-machine-plugged-into-the-covid-nightmare/.

          Like

        2. OM – In light of the magnet challenge phenomenon (still unconfirmed, yet potentially pertinent), and relevant to Endnote 1 in my exploratory exposition, this material may be applicable: https://bioelectronics.mit.edu/media/cvs/polina-anikeeva-cv.pdf. I had planned to incorporate this CV of Polina Anikeeva from MIT, but did not see a place for it – that is, until now. So I am dropping it in the comments in case you would like to review her research efforts (which I indicated in the endnote has been DARPA-funded), including work with remotely-controlled magnetic nanoparticles (and “magnetic proteins”).

          Like

            1. Thanks for the follow-up report. Interesting to see the reactions of these kids. Their collective response could be summed up as a giggling “whatever”.

              I didn’t go to Highwire to see if Del himself had anything to say about the “why” of the magnetism, but it stood out to me that J. Jaxsen didn’t have much to offer.

              Like

                1. Good video, once you get past the way too long meaningless stuff in the first part. Start around 8 or 9 minutes if you speak Espanol, around 12:00 if you don’t.

                  Positive charge…Jack, the BBC debunker, looks like he could be Dan Wilson’s brother or cousin. He also has an aura of being corrupted.

                  Glad they got “Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPIONs) placed in context, though it was odd to hear the chef timidly say that he’s sticking (for the moment) with the thought that nothing magnetic is being injected, after presenting evidence for that very thing.

                  Like

  3. One thing I’ve learned from mother undergoing MRI is this: One is not allowed any metallic items (jewelry, etc) while undergoing procedure, as this will cause interference from signals emitting from tissue and organs.

    That is, in presence of alternating electromagnetic fields, metal will become energized and in turn emit a signal of its own.

    Tracking of human beings in this heavily polluted electromagnetic environment may be a reality. Not from one’s phone but from one’s bodily self.

    Like

      1. Someone did, if I’m mistaken I apologize.

        But sentiment remains! No voice of reason (‘conservatism’ ) anywhere.

        From “the church”? One has to be crazy to believe.

        But then again, all religions are founded on ” belief”, is that not true??

        If not you- I sincerely apologize. Someone said it…and I agree!

        🙂

        Like

  4. The “most conservative” state in the Union…
    And nothing but LGBTQ agenda. Gotta love that. Any word from ‘the church’ regarding Covid fraud??

    Crickets…go back to sleep.

    This place and its people ate a joke!!

    Roll over and take your “vaccine”.

    Sleep well.

    Like

  5. https://bioelectronics.mit.edu/publication/chen-2013-maximizing/
    “By combining physical simulations with robust scalable synthesis and materials characterization techniques, this work provides a pathway to a model-driven design of magnetic nanoparticles tailored to a variety of biomedical applications ranging from cancer hyperthermia to remote control of gene expression.”

    Worth repeating? “…remote control of gene expression.”

    What could possibly go wrong?

    Like

    1. Steve – Yes. This is very troubling. The paper you referenced is #46 of the publications on Anikeeva’s CV (linked in a comment above). One of the collaborators on that paper was Ritchie Chen: https://www.forbes.com/profile/ritchie-chen/?sh=337d5b8f5b4b “Chen’s research found that dysfunctional brain regions could be stimulated by metal nanoparticles powered by magnetic fields without having to invasively implant wires.” Given her work with the BRAIN Initiative, I suspect Anikeeva’s research spans further than remote control of gene expression: https://www.braininitiative.org/2019/02/07/breaking-new-ground-in-neural-technology-dr-polina-anikeeva/. As you may recall, this evokes the work of James Giordano, which I highlighted in August 2020: https://pieceofmindful.com/2020/08/28/mass-zombification-via-remote-biohacking-the-farce-awakens/, and may even harken back to the work of Jose Delgado: https://www.ststworld.com/jose-delgado/. This may all seem sci-fi to most, but these capabilities seem highly plausible.

      Like

      1. Steve – The opening quote to my paper linked in the comment above: “We can use electrical current, either direct or alternating current, or a magnetic field to change the way certain brain networks operate. By changing those brain networks, we change brain functions. And at certain times, we have shown that these can be operative in changing the way people perform on certain cognitive tests and also the way people feel about certain things. Now, that’s not exactly mind control the way Obi-Wan does it, but we could begin to look at the new brain science as a form of bio-technological Obi-Wan Kenobi. In other words, we’re harnessing various forces of science, technology, and of nature to be able to influence the way a brain works and the way the mind operates.” ~ Dr. James Giordano, neuroscientist and Chief of the Neuroethics Studies Program at Georgetown University (as stated in the video above)

        Like

        1. Meanwhile, on the topic of psychological operations . . . Literally, overnight, face coverings morphed from masks of pride to masks of shame: https://www.rt.com/usa/523770-biden-masked-vaxxed-messaging/. Insidiously and ironically (darkest of ironies), the unmasked, jabbed adults now view themselves as champions and models of freedom (who, of course, will be towing young masked children beside them), and the masked, unjabbed as enslaved. This does not bode well, or end well. I sense the definition (and expression) of integrity among unjabbed (To mask or unmask? is the question of the day) may be altered in undetermined ways . . . Good luck out there everyone. I will not be judging others in any way, shape, or form. This is unchartered territory for most of us, and will come down to very individualized decisions, based possibly on modified stances on morality.

          Like

          1. This is public relations, or professional lying, as Chomsky called it. These are the same people who came up with the phrase “Support the Troops” to neutralize opposition to the Iraq invasion, and who suggested hiring Jenny McCarthy, a woman who spent more time naked than clothed in public, to be a spokesperson for (and to thereby discredit) the anti-vaccination movement.

            Like

            1. OM – So, what will be the protocol for “verifying vaccination status” (showing papers at the door, until a QR-coded version applies?)? No talk yet of verification strategy around here. A family member experimented today with no mask in a store – no questions, no push back. Will see what happens moving forward, when the (manufactured) problem becomes – unjabbed entering stores unmasked and “faking” being vaxxed. That will ensure a quicker roll-out of govt-issued QR-coded immune passports (cough…cough…slavery passports) which they so desperately crave.

              Like

                1. While my essay focused on women, and may potentially resonate most with female readers, I want to acknowledge how much I cherish the men in my life, and to honor the remarkable men (writers and commenters) I have met through POM. Accordingly, I am offering this video in the thread: “The Planned Destruction of Men” https://tombarnett.tv/2021/05/14/the-planned-destruction-of-men/. It was posted today by holistic healing coach, Tom Barnett. I feel that the insights provided in the discussion are not only pertinent to the scamdemic and the larger transhumanism agenda (related to my current series), but they also lifted me up in a supportive way that I suspect others (particularly men who aim to preserve authentic manhood and humanity) may gain fortitude and focus from as well. I suggest that the entire 80 minutes (can also view in higher speed to save time) is well worth an open-hearted listen. I sincerely hope you find the time, and may feel similarly elevated as I did. Love and gratitude to all the men supporting your women, and your children, and to any men who simply wish to self-reflect and continue to evolve. Feel free to leave your feedback in the comments. ~ Stephers

                  Like

                  1. So, I spent a few hours going into my local town today, and observing the people. Given the updated CDC guidelines, I had anticipated seeing many unmasked individuals, both outdoors and indoors. Boy, was I wrong! As I have never become habituated to mask wearing, I found it hard to believe that people (whether jabbed or unjabbed) were not eager to show their face again. After all, the “authorities” told them it was now safe to do so (at least the jabbed ones). I observed the opposite effect. I saw an increase in mask-wearing – including those riding in their cars alone.

                    If you can stomach watching this news report from Rachel Maddow (I know, it’s not easy – sorry, guys), https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show it helps to explain from a mainstream perspective the phenomenon I witnessed today. Again, I was taken aback by the overwhelming response to hold on to the mask – for dear life, and for virtue signaling, as well. But, as is reflected by Maddow in this revealing clip, these people have been “re-wired” and now they are going to have to “re-wire” themselves back, so to speak. It’s creepy as heck, but also fascinating to observe. I knew normies would have a tough time getting out of their fear state, but this is next-level – something I would not have predicted at this stage of the sinister game. These people are essentially fighting to stay imprisoned.

                    Like

              1. Yeah, you and Julie appear to know where this is likely headed. I have no idea for the state of Oregon beyond the empress’s declaration above.

                While buying our weekly raw milk today, the farm woman told us of a few groups getting together in defiance (perhaps I should say in a demonstration of ignoring) of the “new normal” customs. One gathering place is a restaurant that has stayed open throughout this game, and has completely ignored mask/distancing edicts. They have been fined $9000, but simply ignore the fine, as it has been handed to them by OSHA, so they conclude it has no teeth. That’s the story as told to me, and at least we may have some real people to associate with, a human need that we (wife and I) have simply not had available for a long time.

                Like

  6. And the brain will work the way we (overlord Crown royals) say it works. This fits so neatly into the “emerging markets” strategies involving human capital bonds bought and sold on the block chain. Behavior is the key metric in a (virtual/gamed) social engineered (manipulated data) system. Extract data, manipulate data, claim some “benefit,” collect a big, fat (crypto-currency) “check.” No wonder Goldman Sachs all in. Data is THE commodity that new capital markets need (FEED ON) or the system collapses. Why collect random natural/organic data when you can engineer the data you need? The ultimate in “insider trading.”

    There was no “recovery” from the 2008 failure. No growth, no capitalism, it seems that simple.

    It’s all connected — Covid and climate change. Data = big payoffs/paydays.
    https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/06/covid-recovery-climate-and-health-hand-in-hand/

    Like

  7. Please watch out for Del Bigtree…and all the rest. Dare I say Mark already touched upon this? If they are even in a pseudo-prominent position (where someone gives them airtime), most likely they are compromised.

    [video src="https://153news.net/files/videos/2021/05/14/162096983840242-720.mp4" /]

    Like

    1. Rastus – I, too, have cautioned about Del Bigtree, as well as Judy Mikovits, Dolores Cahill, David Martin, and Rashid Buttar. Yes, there are others associated. I think many that ride along, though, are not willing “controlled opposition” but may get caught in the net, so to speak. I am keeping my eye on this “Arise USA” tour, that I think begins today, and goes to September. If you watched the whole video you linked, there is mention of it, and many of the controlled opposition notables have been dropping shout-outs in recent interviews. I want to emphasize that this does not mean that everyone involved is mis-directing intentionally, and in fact, the ones who get strung along are often individuals who may seemingly have gotten so close to the truth, that they have to be co-opted to control them (perhaps Carrie Madej is one example).

      Like

  8. This looks like a “fun” read – a mainstream take on how viruses evolve. Or “evolve” if you prefer – I don’t claim any final absolute answers on these matters. I do enjoy reading about it sometimes, with a skeptical frame of mind. And this one looks fairly granular – many mainstream accounts of “evolution” seem to trot out the same few superficially-persuasive, but fairy tale-like explanations over and over again, ad nauseam. If anyone wants to critique it, please do!

    https://www.historyofvaccines.org/index.php/content/articles/viruses-and-evolution

    The link came from that “Yves Smith” lady who runs NakedCapitalism.com. Her real name incidentally is “Susan Webber,” as in the famous Webbs of the Fabian Society, perhaps? I’ve been eagerly on the edge of my seat anticipating their comments section to have a total meltdown, in reaction to the change of “guidance” on masks from CDC, Biden, et al. Given their dismay at even minor rollbacks, I’d thought there’d be an immediate s***show backlash, but so far – crickets. Maybe it’s stunned silence? But they’re posting about other stuff as if it didn’t even happen! And I haven’t seen any commenters try to bring it up. Unless the discussion is raging in their daily “Links” page – I never read that feature anymore.

    Like

  9. Stephers,

    What would distinguish this kind of (graphene manipulation) research from what is called “gain-0f-function” research? One is “living” and one is not? One is intended, one is not?

    From the article: “We don’t know exactly what’s happening at the quantum level, but at the same time, we can manipulate it,” said Saxena. “It’s like those famous ‘unknown unknowns’: we’ve opened up a new door to properties of quantum information, but we don’t yet know what those properties might be.”

    Don’t a lot of these “discoveries” that end up becoming weapons evolve from observations of researchers picking through the heap of unintended consequences?

    I’m not quite sure what the difference is? Or why one (gain-of-function) is dismissed so readily by some. Perhaps I’m missing something.

    Like

    1. Steve:

      Well, these are good questions, and I will attempt to give an informed answer. From my understanding, gain-of-function (GOF) research is exclusively applied to purported pathogens (bacteria and “viruses”): https://ahrp.org/what-is-gain-of-function-research-who-is-at-high-risk/.

      GOF research is not typically terminology associated with advanced nanomaterials that work in tandem with next-generation EMFs. The research I am describing (as it may relate to potential magnetics and/or frequency emissions in injectable biotech) is considered much more high-tech, and I imply in my writing that this research is being weaponized. See these links for some ideas on unprecedented (and potentially very dangerous when applied to human biology) technology (that I have not yet covered, but may be relevant):

      https://www.energy.gov/science/bes/articles/tuning-terahertz-beams-nanoparticles
      https://www.entrepreneur.com/article/367304
      https://www.tera.group/marketapplication/
      https://www.tera.group/technology/#CoInventors
      https://teraview.com/6g/
      https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/adma.201904965
      https://www.mdpi.com/journal/magnetochemistry/sections/spintronics
      https://www.technology.org/2019/01/16/spintronics-miracle-material-put-to-the-test/

      Therefore, one could conceive of both research avenues (yes, both in labs) as “gaining function” in some non-natural way (regardless of intentionality, or if the object of manipulation is “living” or not); but GOF typically falls into a specific niche with pathogens, whereas weaponized functionality of cutting edge nanomaterials (i.e., graphene) is in its own category — mainly involving magnetochemistry, electrical engineering, and nanoscale semiconductors (and conjugating this with biology to create cloud-connected synthetic biology and bio-computing).

      My guess is that GOF research with alleged pathogens may have reached its pinnacle long ago, and the biotech/pharma industry is keen to dissolve these efforts. It may be obsolete at this point, and why it is being used as a red herring (which I hope is becoming more clear now that it is being covered vociferously in the mainstream, and as MT noted – now “allowed” to be discussed on Facebook, etc).

      I am suggesting that the “lab leak” narrative (which was successfully beta-tested in the alternative media, I might add) is simply cover to allow the GOF research to go by the wayside. I do not like to make predictions, but I venture to guess that GOF research and its associated labs will be “shut down,” and this will be made to appear as if there is some big win for the people and the politicians (cough, cough, Rand Paul) in shutting it all down.

      Between you and me, my sense is they have much more advanced technology already in-the-works, and even more innovative covert tech waiting in the wings. Thus, they create some embellished “opposition” narrative to take themselves down. But this is how they always do business, right?

      Liked by 1 person

      1. Great comment. Well said.

        “I venture to guess that GOF research and its associated labs will be “shut down,” and this will be made to appear as if there is some big win for the people and the politicians (cough, cough, Rand Paul) in shutting it all down.”

        Yes, and even if they don’t “officially” shut GOF down, the story will be that it has been locked up “safely” via impenetrable security and containment; no more world-wide pandemics from these labs!

        GOF has always been a red herring, a natural outgrowth of the whole virus narrative red herring. Will the penny drop for a few more astute observers due to this little propaganda kerfuffle? We hope.

        Liked by 1 person

      2. Yes, Stephers, this is how they always to business. The masses, except for the few who follow these things closely, always find themselves decades behind the action. Thanks for your sense of that’s happening with GOF, where it’s headed, and what to look for next. I’m so glad you generously share the many gifts of your persistent research and analysis. Many thanks to you and to Mark for keeping this small, but scrappy, forum moving toward the “bang.” Onward through the fog.

        Like

  10. Hello OregonMatt and Stephers, from your perspective, what would be your advice for an unjabbed female in life-partnership with a jabbed male regarding risk of harm and ability to maintain health in context of sharing body fluids in intimate relations between jabbed and unjabbed? This nightmare has hit very close to home, and a way forward is needed, please help.

    Like

    1. Hi Jamie,

      First off, I am so sorry to hear about this tense situation, and I feel for you. I will speak for myself, and please know that I am offering my support to you as educational guidance as a wellness consultant and empowerment coach, and NOT as medical advice. I believe strongly that we all need to be responsible for our own health and well-being, and do our own research.

      That said, you may be surprised (pleasantly, I hope) in what I have to say – as it is not commentary shared widely among doctors (featured heavily in alternative media) who fear “shedding” of a “spike protein” from a jabbed partner to an unjabbed partner.

      At this point, if you have been with your life-partner for some time since he has been jabbed (either intimate it or not), you have already been exposed to any frequencies or energy fields he might be emitting or transmitting – in the sense that whatever could potentially (we really don’t know for sure) influence you in an adverse way has already occurred. Any intimate exchange is not going to compound that, as the research I have compiled provides no evidence of any physical contamination being transferred from one person to another. I have yet to see evidence of any form of “physical contagion” – within the context of COVID or COVID injections.

      In my opinion (with my coaching hat on), if you are in love with your partner, I suggest embracing one another (in all ways – physical, mental, emotional, and spiritual) through this challenging time – despite being split on the injection situation. I can only imagine it is not an easy pursuit, but if you can work through any fear you might have of him “passing” something on to you, it will serve best for both of you.

      If I were to put my health coaching hat on, I have some recommendations that may also help to quell your fears, as we do have natural options available to us – particularly, as women who may be concerned primarily about our reproductive health. To that end, I suggest a product (to use preventatively) called Ovasitol: https://theralogix.com/products/ovasitol-inositol-powder. If you order one container (a 90-day supply), you should be fine, as, so far, it seems any menstrual changes among women have been temporary. I can say that has been the experience for myself and my daughters. We all experienced changes, but it seems to have corrected. Two of us have been taking Ovasitol for the past month. (I learned about it through my holistic endocrinologist.)

      While I am hesitant to recommend specific brands (as I do not want to sound like I am promoting products), I want to be sure that if you purchase any supplements, they are “clean” and do not compound any issues. From my experience, many “health” products on the market come with their own potential adverse effects, due to unnecessary components. Following is a list of a few supplements, in the event that you do experience adverse effects:

      If you begin to experience . . .

      Headaches, respiratory symptoms, and/or gastrointestinal upset: Oregon’s Wild Harvest “Aller-Aid” (Quercetin/NAC) and Pure Encapsulations Green Tea Extract (decaffeinated)

      Bleeding irregularities (menstrual or otherwise): Boiron Cinchona officinalis (30c) 3-5 pellets 2-3x/day – allow to dissolve in mouth, 15 min away from food/tooth brushing (homeopathic remedy available online, including Amazon – if you must)

      Chest pain/heart arrhythmia – PLEO Stroph Drops 4X (homeopathic remedy of Strophanthus gratus) available online – 5 drops 3x/day (can place in small cup of water or directly in mouth)

      If your partner is having any adverse reactions from the injection (and is open to natural healing), I recommend Jarrow Formulas TMG Crystals and Pure Encapsulations Liposomal Glutathione (keep refrigerated, even upon arrival and unopened). At this time, I do not recommend these two products for those unjabbed. Although natural – liposomal products (in particular) have similar properties as nanotech (i.e. – nanolipids) in the way they can travel in the body – which is why I also think they may be of particular benefit in neutralizing nanoparticles, since they share these properties, and may be the only way to get deep enough into the tissues/organs to help eject them. As of now, I have no studies (or personal experience) to offer in this regard, and thus, is why I would only recommend this protocol for those who got the injection; as they have nothing to lose, so to speak, in making efforts (gently and naturally) to attempt to detox, or at the very least, support proper functioning of the body.

      Please feel free to ask any questions if you would like more details (including links) on these products. I have no doubt you can find them – and learn more about them – on your own. I wish you the best, and I hope I have not contributed to amping up your fears through my writing. My goal is to inform and educate others as best I can, as I, too, am learning and wish to share – with the intention of empowering others.

      Liked by 1 person

  11. Thank you for your wellness and empowerment educational guidance in the context of also doing my own research. I appreciate your valuable addition of information and kind words.

    Like

  12. Fantastic read and so much to investigate here. Bravo! About the anectotal note: Have you ever heard of the arcline or 6th body? I am new to kundalini yoga and learned that it is a line of energy from ear to ear like a halo. Women have another arcline from nipple to nipple because it is the space where a child will be nurtured. Pretty awesome stuff!

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s