2022: The Year of the Black Tiger — and the Year of SPIONS?

Writer’s Note: These are busy times for most of us. I will keep this relatively short, and perhaps fill in more details in the coming weeks. I simply aim, for now, to point out what the Machine may be telegraphing in the months to come. When I refer to the “Machine” orchestrating its next moves, I am not simply alluding to elite men and women sitting around a table sipping fine liqueur, nor frolicking by Moloch-revering bonfires. I am also hinting at whispers of technological intelligence and/or synchromysticism serving to define the experiences conferred in our shared reality. I know that is a mouthful, and I acknowledge this enigmatic phenomenon may be situated outside our awareness. Regardless, I urge readers to avoid allowing this conundrum to stump you, or to prevent you from perceiving the grander (and potentially symbolic) unfolding landscape — that we call reality.

As many already know, 2022 ushers in the Chinese Lunar Year of the Tiger. This is the year of the Black Water Tiger, and runs from February 1, 2022 to January 21, 2023. According to chinesefortunecalendar.com, the 2022 Chinese New Year Day is on Tuesday, February 1, 2022, but the 2022 Chinese Black Tiger Year starts more specifically on February 4, 2022 in China’s time zone — signifying the date when the sun enters the 315th degree on the tropical zodiac. (“That means the Chinese Lunar New Year is not the first day of Black Tiger Year. If a baby is born before February 4, 2022, then the baby’s zodiac sign is the Cow, not Tiger.”)

Interestingly, on February 4, 2022 (the official day of the Chinese Black Water Tiger), the thriller series “Suspicion” is expected to debut. When you click on the link to the series promo, do you see the title in all caps — SUSPICION? If you remove four of the letters, do you see “SPION”? This seemingly irrelevant tidbit may come in handy as you read on . . . 

Back to this new series . . . “Suspicion” — produced by Keshet Productions — is based on the award-winning Israeli series, “False Flag” (also produced by Keshet). Incidentally, Keshet, in Hebrew, means “Rainbow.” For me, this evokes the book, The Invisible Rainbow (by Arthur Firstenberg), in which it “should be noted that the title refers to the entire electromagnetic spectrum comprising the colors of the rainbow, including the invisible frequencies such as radio frequencies and the fields generated around conducting wires.” Strangely enough, the convergence of electromagnetic fields, radio frequencies, and conducting (nano)wires is the focus of this post. 

On December 21, 2021, it was reported by Defense One that a new universal COVID injectable treatment was developed — based on a Spike Ferritin Nanoparticle platform. The Walter Reed Army Institute of Research claims their vaccine platform will “work against not just the existing strain but all of its potential variants as well.” This process of vaccine delivery has been referred to as magnetofection. On that very same day, it was also reported that DARPA-funded carbon nanotechnologist extraordinaire (with alleged ties to Wuhan), Charles Lieber, was found guilty (convicted by a jury) of lying about having Chinese government ties. Did that signify an end to a particular element of the COVID operation? Was this indicative of the induction of a new element — perhaps iron? Was there a switcheroo from C to Fe?

I also wonder why both the aforementioned news events were announced on the winter solstice. Does this infer some occult significance? After all, Lieber was initially arrested on January 28, 2020, and the concept of ferritin nanoparticle vaccines had been circulating for some time — even going back to 2018 (pre-COVID era). Furthermore, there was a related patent issued on September 29, 2020 to Jeffrey Friedman (of Rockefeller University) and his colleague, Sarah Stanley. Their invention entails a method for modulating cell activity remotely using ferritin nanoparticles. Accordingly, radio frequency waves excite nanoparticles using a technique called Nanoparticle Induced Circuit Excitation (NICE). If this sounds familiar to readers, it is because it may harken back to Lieber’s external electromagnetic control of syringe-injectable nanowire mesh systems — which I highlighted in the references at the end of my “Confessions of an Engineered Nanoparticle” in April 2021.  

The most intriguing cherry on top of this external electromagnetic control narrative, however, is a particular character who is deeply embedded at the intersection of mRNA vaccine development, respiratory transfection, repurposed drugs (see #11 and #15 here), and genetic manipulation via external pulsed electrical fieldsAKA in vivo electroporation (see Endnote 1). This person of interest is Robert W. Malone. Apparently, he was suspended from Twitter on December 29, 2021, and had more than 520,000 followers. At the time of this writing, it has been reported that Malone was interviewed by Joe Rogan (on December 30, 2021). Although this is all the buzz in both the mainstream and alternative media, the interview has not yet been released to the public, but Malone did offer a brief prepared statement.

So, how did Malone ascend from his BARDA-backed, militarized initiatives (authorized with DoD secret clearance) to being propped up as a central voice of COVID-vaccine skepticism? These are, indeed, strange (and manipulated?) times we live in. 

Let’s keep exploring . . . 

This may be a good time to revisit Part 9 of my bio-digital convergence series: “Tuned In ~ A Mother’s Intuition on Transmission from the Jabbed to the Un-Jabbed” (May 2021). In the endnotes, references, and comments section therein, there was plenty of discussion surrounding SPIONS. If you do not recall, here is a succinct refresher on SPIONS: SPIONS are iron oxide nanoparticles that are structurally shaped to enable efficient delivery of pharmaceuticals toward targeted locations. Essentially, SPIONS are nanocarriers operating on a magnetic platform. It should be noted that ferritin is a spherical iron storage protein that can be synthesized with magnetic iron oxide to form a superparamagnetic protein called magnetoferritin (MFt). For us lay people, SPIONS and MFt are nearly indistinguishable, as MFt is simply ferritin that has been functionalized to be superparamagnetic due to its iron oxide core. 

——————

Here are some relevant comments from Part 9:

STEPHERS

May 13, 2021 at 8:05 pm

OM – In light of the magnet challenge phenomenon (still unconfirmed, yet potentially pertinent), and relevant to Endnote 1 in my exploratory exposition, this material may be applicable: https://bioelectronics.mit.edu/media/cvs/polina-anikeeva-cv.pdf. I had planned to incorporate this CV of Polina Anikeeva from MIT, but did not see a place for it – that is, until now. So I am dropping it in the comments in case you would like to review her research efforts (which I indicated in the endnote has been DARPA-funded), including work with remotely-controlled magnetic nanoparticles (and “magnetic proteins”).

STEVE KELLY

May 14, 2021 at 5:52 am

https://bioelectronics.mit.edu/publication/chen-2013-maximizing/

“By combining physical simulations with robust scalable synthesis and materials characterization techniques, this work provides a pathway to a model-driven design of magnetic nanoparticles tailored to a variety of biomedical applications ranging from cancer hyperthermia to remote control of gene expression.”

Worth repeating? “…remote control of gene expression.”

What could possibly go wrong?

STEPHERS 

May 14, 2021 at 7:16 am 

Steve – Yes. This is very troubling. The paper you referenced is #46 of the publications on Anikeeva’s CV (linked in a comment above). One of the collaborators on that paper was Ritchie Chen: https://www.forbes.com/profile/ritchie-chen/?sh=64db6c615b4b “Chen’s research found that dysfunctional brain regions could be stimulated by metal nanoparticles powered by magnetic fields without having to invasively implant wires.” Given her work with the BRAIN Initiative, I suspect Anikeeva’s research spans further than remote control of gene expression: https://www.braininitiative.org/2019/02/07/breaking-new-ground-in-neural-technology-dr-polina-anikeeva/. As you may recall, this evokes the work of James Giordano, which I highlighted in August 2020: https://pieceofmindful.com/2020/08/28/mass-zombification-via-remote-biohacking-the-farce-awakens/, and may even harken back to the work of Jose Delgado: https://www.ststworld.com/jose-delgado/. This may all seem sci-fi to most, but these capabilities seem highly plausible.

STEPHERS 

May 14, 2021 at 7:18 am

Steve – The opening quote to my paper linked in the comment above: “We can use electrical current, either direct or alternating current, or a magnetic field to change the way certain brain networks operate. By changing those brain networks, we change brain functions. And at certain times, we have shown that these can be operative in changing the way people perform on certain cognitive tests and also the way people feel about certain things. Now, that’s not exactly mind control the way Obi-Wan does it, but we could begin to look at the new brain science as a form of bio-technological Obi-Wan Kenobi. In other words, we’re harnessing various forces of science, technology, and of nature to be able to influence the way a brain works and the way the mind operates.” ~ Dr. James Giordano, neuroscientist and Chief of the Neuroethics Studies Program at Georgetown University (as stated in the video above)

STEPHERS

May 15, 2021 at 8:23 am

. . . and here is information on injectable smart ferro-magnetic hydrogels: https://principia-scientific.com/advances-on-magnetic-sensitive-hydrogels-in-tissue-engineering/. When reading this in-depth paper, potentially within the context of COVID, I can’t help but recall the “Covfefe” meme: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Covfefe.

STEPHERS

May 27, 2021 at 8:00 pm

Remember the work of Polina Anikeeva I referenced? Her work is noted here, in addition to “SPIONS” and additional potential options to explain this phenomenon: https://humaninternet.org/magnetic-nano-particles.html.

——————

Will you decide to inject SPIONS into your body? Are you daring to sport some fancy ferritin nanoparticles? It may be all the rage, with many falling easily in line for yet another Trojan horse, as it seems people may possibly be catching on to the fact that their current COVID inoculations did very little to prevent illness (let alone “transmission”) in this latter part of 2021 (see Endnote 2). 

Anyone care for magnetic morphing (h/t Clyde Lewis) in the new year? Should we be concerned about the safety (or lack thereof) of magnetic nanoparticle substrates, particularly in terms of their application and accumulation in human bodies?

Will the masses ever come to grips that no SARS-CoV-2 has ever been properly purified or isolated? Will they some day begin to learn about remote-controlled nanoscale radio pharmaceuticals, as well as nanoparticles that can be controlled remotely via electromagnetics? If so, will it be too late, as, sadly, they may have already been magnetofected?

Ah, so many more questions than answers. I can only hope the new year will bring with it more clarity (and perhaps, sanity).

For now, I will leave you with this four-minute video (see below) that may possibly get your mental wheels turning . . . 

Writer’s Final Note:

In an effort to proactively lean into clarity, I would like to suggest that this entire COVID/Omicron event has very little to do with public health. Rather, it has nearly everything to do with Web 3.0.

The most recent indicator of this is Fauci’s public announcement that self-isolation time be reduced to 5 days. This CDC-initiated assertion has many people feeling upset and perplexed, as they still think this is a public health event.

When one grasps that this entire scenario is being scripted by and for the Spatial Web, the situation into which we have all been involuntarily and forcefully immersed starts to become more discernible.

Whomever (whatever?) comprises the masterfully conniving Machine utilizes a cornucopia of tools. Moving forward, if one senses that a news event does not fall neatly into the puzzle of public health (or the climate change narrative, for that matter), one may want to consider how such puzzle piece reflects one or several of the frameworks listed below. Keep in mind, this is just a partial list of the components of Web 3.0 many of which I have elucidated here at POM (h/t Alison McDowell), with newer pieces ever unfolding as this digital matrix infrastructure is swiftly and insidiously built:

Cryptocurrency

Blockchain/smart contracts/DAOs/decentralized finance/tokenization (see here)

QR coding (see here)

Digital avatars (see here)

Non-fungible tokens (NFTs)

Social impact finance/bonds (see here and here)

Human capital investing/biocapitalism/stakeholder capitalism (see here)

ESG portfolios

Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) – see here

Electronic health records

Digital inclusion

Digital nudging (see here)

Data surveillance

Digital twins (see here)

Fourth Industrial Revolution (4IR) – see here

Globalization 4.0

Society 5.0

“Health” monitoring/testing – testing, testing, and *more* testing (see here)

Biometric screening/assessments

Biometric tracking (see here)

Predictive profiling

Internet of Things (IoT)

Internet of Bodies (IoB)

Internet of Nano-Things (IoNT)

Internet of BioNano-Things (IoBNT)

Wireless Body Area Networks (WBANs)

Artificial Intelligence (AI)

Machine learning

Neuro-prosthetics

Lifelong learning

Social-emotional learning

Evidence-based practices (EBP)

Synthetic biology

Nano-biosensors/quantum dots/2D semiconductors/bio-nanotechnology platforms (see here)

5G and beyond/Tactile Internet (TI) – see here (December 20, 2021 paper)

Remote work

Build Back Better initiatives

Public-private partnerships

Precision medicine

Wearables for “wellness”

Smart Cities (see here)

Data dashboards

Vaccine (health) passports (see here)

Digital identity

Interoperable patient data

Brain-computer interface (BCI) – see “Endnote” here

Human augmentation (see here)

Mixed/augmented/virtual reality (see here)

Pay for Success finance (see here)

Pay for Success repurposed drugs/early treatments (pharmaceuticals and nutraceuticals) – see here

Pay for Success children’s wellness (see here)

Play to Earn e-games marketed to impoverished children and teenagers (see here)

Endnotes: 

1) If readers recall, I discussed electroporation in August 2021 in my Remote Biohacking post. I think it is a very important read, and still highly applicable. 

2) One of the researchers listed in the December 2021 Nature briefing on Omicron is Harris H. Wang. Notably, Wang specializes in synthetic biology at Columbia University (funded by the typical suspects: NIAID, DARPA, NSF, DOE, Burroughs Wellcome Fund, and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation), and was advised at Harvard University by George Church. For those who may not be familiar, I previously wrote about Church, which you can review here and here

Happy New Year, POM family!

63 thoughts on “2022: The Year of the Black Tiger — and the Year of SPIONS?

  1. Be skeptical, please.

    That La Quinta Spanish presentation, in addition to stating nano-routers had MAC Addresses, also stated they had “encryption” capabilities.

    OK, let’s think about this for one moment please. It involves:

    dedicated graphene hardware in form of “cryptographic processors” (for encryption and decryption)…all fabricated in non-existent Graphene Wafer/Chip Fabrication facilities (ie “FABS”). But don’t worry, there is a patent for it somewhere!
    if not dedicated graphene cryptographic processors, then general purpose processors (GPPs, like those found in everyday PCs) PLUS software. That is, encryption and decryption is split between GPP hardware and associated software.

    Conclusion:. Boy oh Boy are these “nano-routers” are complex!! We can theorize with Max Igan, but WHERE is this stuff being manufactured???

    Max Igan, the liar who said he was attacked and “in hospital” some time back.

    Has ANYONE seen a graphene chip?? Has anyone PROGRAMMED one? Using what? Fortran? C#??

    How many logic gates do these graphene nano-routers contain?

    I’m truly astonished! All of this, too, powered by what?? Ambient electrical current found within human body?? Those terrahertz active (vs passive) antennas need to be powered by something!!! Any device powered by RF energy from a Cell Tower, for example, would be considered a passive device. Kind of like RF ID tags sewn into clothing. Active devices need their own actual energy source.

    Thank you for final POM post of 2021!! 🙂

    Like

    1. Rastus,

      There is no mention of LQC, nor graphene nanorouters, nor Max Igan amidst this post. Not one of these elements is required as per discussion of wireless external electromagnetic control and magnetofection. The topic I discussed herein can (and should) be considered in a disparate manner. It seems your tangential comments would have been more appropriately placed in the comments thread below my previous post (where we were actively discussing nanorouters). Don’t you agree?

      There is a reason I do not post Max Igan videos, as it seems they serve to sensationalize and steer conversation in a certain direction that may not be warranted. That said, just because he discusses a topic, does not denigrate it as falsehood. I think we would be best advised to avoid such black & white thinking.

      Happy New Year, Rastus!

      Like

    2. I wish a “Happy New Year” to Stephers, Steve Kelly and above all…M. Tokarski for keeping it all going. Mark I hope you have a speedy recovery. I know how Dupuytren’s contracture can put a damper on life when the biggest part of life consist of using your hands…as a musician it has also taken a toll on mine. I have the nodules in my palm and the fingers have yet to curl lame…but the pain is there and I’m scared the time is near. I guess we all face the final curtain, But at least we still have our fans,right Mark ??? Whatever the machine may put out in the months to come or years to end…

      “Far and wide or deep within”…As long as she keeps “puttin’ out”…I’ll keep “puttin’ in”…and you,my friend… do the same.

      Like

  2. If THIS doesn’t make you laugh, there is something seriously wrong with you. “You” of course meaning no one in particular, any reader of course 🙂

    Is comical beyond anything!!

    So Max a week ago was presenting that slide show from La Quinta as truth! The same person who stated he was beaten within 3″ of death some time ago.

    Like

  3. I have no idea what software might be programmable via nanobots, but there was some discussion about using DNA for data storage. I have no doubt there are geeks working on it from every angle. There could be stunning revelations in the next year or two, and if that were possible, even more outrageous lies than ever.

    What gets me is the vast and worldwide deployment of whatever the 2020 and 2021 jabs actually were. I kind of suspect there were a few finished products in the mix. These open source investigations are still on the outside looking in.

    There is a lot of energy in higher frequencies and nano machines won’t need much. The graphene plexiglass was absorbing terahertz waves. The reports of geiger counters clicking near the jabbed, to me sounded like surplus harvested energy being unloaded as stray ionization.

    Such a vast field of innovation happening with all this stuff. We would just be guessing to know who next years winners would be.

    Like

  4. There was a PsyOp, Noack, allegedly a graphene expert. Basically, in his lectures he said graphene just acts like razor blades, which are just cutting, making the vaccinated fear the virus and the vaccines. He happened to die, and was mourned in a video by his attractive GF, who happened to be pregnant. So, is it chips, or just particles? Zephaniah, the Bible thumber, jumped on the vaccine – Bluetooth functionality bandwagon. Leeland Jones too, mixing QR codes and Bluetooth, just ridiculous. Anthony (micro needle-) Patch does not put anything out to the public anymore, so we don’t know if the code to bottomless pit has been received. Well, we would know, my guess. Maybe Omicron is the Omega, the end. Of the world, or just the operation. The hangouts have jumped the shark.
    Spions may be a joke too, the German word for spy is Spion. All an annoying nothing burger, except fear, trauma, sick and broke people. We don’t know, I don’t even know what’s happening in the house across the street, so not knowing where something is manufactured is not an argument. Typed on my phone, this is the platform.

    Like

    1. Horst,

      Are you implying that Noack really died? Have you watched the videos of his partner/wife? I will leave them here: https://www.bitchute.com/video/acc2rp9Z0dNF/ and https://www.bitchute.com/video/eRyem2SGGWpt/. You can decide if you think she is being genuine. (I would be curious to know what ScottRC thinks about her “presentations.”)

      I had recalled seeing Noack last year with his staged police arrest (see the link here https://www.bitchute.com/video/vEY1EDkDnhFQ/), so I already had a bit of a heads up, so to speak. The stories surrounding Noack are psyops. Information warfare surrounding graphene is intense. I am not sure that any of us can decipher the truth.

      Like

      1. This stuff was all over Telegram in Germany. The messenger they allegedly want to ban. The GF: her body language, the hair done by a professional, crazy but voluminous, high school acting… It gave me a WTF moment. Then I realized the blunt Bible references, “He died for you!”, Noah(ck). I presented my little LH collection here, stating I don’t know. But the big picture tells it all. Hangouts and shills. I had a look at the interview with Malone, on top of his Twitter before it was banned, recorded on his beautiful estate too. He laughs about future war, special forces, drone swarms. My gosh. A big picture approach is the answer, it’s all about fear and distraction, end of story. Take that list in the article here, one can easily get lost researching only one point. The kingdom is within. POM is welcome, I look at the stuff too, sorting things out like here leads to the big picture.

        Like

      2. Stephers, I checked out the videos since I’m flattered you were curious what I would think about them. I just laughed and laughed. At least she squeezes out actual tears, unlike our American crisis actors. Maybe they have better crisis actor coaching in Germany? Well, maybe not. I would have directed her to tone it down a little and, for God’s sake, to stop hugging her pregnant belly. Let the melodramatic text do most of the work, sweetheart. Then again, none of this shit is supposed to be subtle, is it?

        Whether it comes from the mainstream or the “opposition,” I think it’s best to discount any information that’s soaked in dramatic displays of emotion. People who actually have something worthwhile and honest to say tend to just say it.

        Liked by 1 person

        1. “Then again, none of this shit is supposed to be subtle, is it?”

          Nope, it’s always done revelation-of-the-method/hidden-in-plain-sight style, it works better that way. Whenever I suspect psyop I always look through the “where-are-the-obvious-clues” lens and if I don’t find any I cannot accept it’s a psyop. If them there clues ain’t jumpin’ out atcha like an evil jack-in-the-box, well, some serious head-scratchin’ needs doin’. They just gotta be there for a genuwine psyop.

          Aussie stand against the police by restaurant-owner and patrons is a heart-warming start to the year which I’m not looking forward to at all.
          https://www.bitchute.com/video/X0c85VDZ4Kp9/

          Like

        2. So Stephers and Scott … and any others. Even though this doctor/pathologist doesn’t say there’s no “novel” virus and even though his background might look very suspicious I think he’s genuine. What do you think?

          Dr Roger Hodkinson
          Former chairman of a test committee in general pathology at the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada
          CEO Western Medical Assessments
          https://www.bitchute.com/video/JwhAiexP0cI9/

          Like

          1. Petra,

            Please don’t hate the messenger . . .

            Are you aware of Hodkinson’s background?

            I will leave the relevant links:

            https://mutantdx.com/principals/
            https://clpmag.com/disease-states/cancer/multigen-diagnostics-launches-dna-sequencing-technology/

            Click to access MultiGEN-Sequencing.pdf

            https://pitchbook.com/profiles/company/56240-92#overview (financed by Vencore Capital)
            https://pitchbook.com/profiles/investor/51004-81#overview (info on Vencore Capital)
            http://www.vencorecapital.com/clients/by_industry/ (more details on Vencore Capital and the industries it finances: computer and peripherals, life science, semiconductors, software, media, telecommunications and wireless sectors)
            https://westernmedical.ca/employees/roger-g-hodkinson/ (was his company profile, but has been curiously scrubbed)
            https://westernmedical.ca (link to the company where he was CEO/Medical Director – note evidence-based clarity)
            https://www.walshmedicalmedia.com/proceedings/improved-internal-control-for-molecular-diagnosis-assays-34092.html (info on his MutantDX business partner)

            One hint is his MultiGEN technology: “multiplexed assays based on a novel modification of the ‘Gold Standard’ Sanger sequencing method.” Does this sound familiar: https://www.thermofisher.com/us/en/home/life-science/sequencing/sanger-sequencing/applications/sars-cov-2-research.html? MultiGEN tech may be what got us into this whole COVID mess in the first place (?).

            We need to hold this “opposition” accountable for their previous actions, and ask why they are showing up being casted as heroes in this narrative (and see if they fall into any of the Web 3.0 categories I listed). In terms of Hodkinson, he falls very neatly into Evidence-based practices (EBP), as well as “Precision Medicine” (which can be dual-use).

            Like

            1. Sorry, Petra – one link was a PDF, and did not transfer properly. I will try again: https://cs.uwaterloo.ca/~mannr/Roger%20Hodkinson%2011621-1.pdf. Just in case, I will have to copy/paste the first part of the 16-page document here (strikingly, no mention of his MultiGEN technology platform!):

              Dr. Roger Hodkinson
              Dr. Hodkinson is the CEO and Medical Director of MedMalDoctors.
              He received his general medical degrees from Cambridge University in the UK (M.A., M.B., B. Chir.) where he was a scholar at Corpus Christi College. Following a residency at the University of British Columbia he became a Royal College certified general pathologist (FRCPC) and also a Fellow of the College of American Pathologists (FCAP).
              He is in Good Standing with the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Alberta, and has been recognized by the Court of Queen’s Bench in Alberta as an expert in pathology.
              Dr. Hodkinson has had a long and varied career giving him valuable insight into many fields of medicine that now benefits our clients:
              ★ General practitioner in the UK and Canada
              ★ Assistant Professor, Faculty of Medicine, University of Alberta, with extensive teaching
              experience.
              ★ Laboratory accreditation inspector for the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Alberta.
              ★ Staff Pathologist, Misericordia Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta.
              ★ President, the Alberta Society of Laboratory Physicians.
              ★ CEO of Stirrat Laboratories, a large private medical laboratory in Edmonton.
              ★ Pathologist with the Medical Examiner’s Office, Edmonton, determining the cause of death at autopsy.
              ★ Chairman of the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons Examination Committee in General Pathology Ottawa.
              ★ CEO and Medical Director of an IME company: Western Medical Assessments Corporation, Edmonton Canada.
              1 of 16
              On June 11, 2021, Dr. Hodkinson was interviewed by Anna Brees of BREES MEDIA for the third time on the very important matter regarding COVID. The transcription is included overleaf.
              While the transcription was done in good faith, inadvertent mistakes cannot be discounted, for which the transcriber apologies. Further, the transcriber does not take responsibility for any actions resulting from the transcript. For a better understanding of the interview the reader is encouraged to view the original, full video – if they can find it on the web.
              Unfortunately, due to the controversial nature of the material covered in the interview, it is continually being removed from the internet which is why this transcription was made and is provided, free of charge, in order to allow the other side of the story to be transmitted and heard, quickly, easily and efficiently,.

              Like

            1. LOL. I’m hopeless. I just get so sick of being on guard against controlled opposition that I let it down from time to time … until I muster the strength to be pull it back up again and recognise that that’s what it is. I really would have to look more closely because I don’t see obvious signs and not admitting to the non-existence of a “novel” virus isn’t clear evidence of controlled opposition as I know people who are definitely not controlled opposition who believe in it. In any case, controlled opposition can serve its purpose when you’re trying to convince those who swallow the story whole at least to some degree. I don’t like to push half-truth but sometimes I think it’s OK.

              Like

              1. Petra,

                I have heard this “argument” supporting “half-truths” . . . That does not jive with me. I support full, solid truths. No more perpetuation of the germ theory myth. No unifying with individuals who support perpetual testing (yet somehow express skepticism of specific vaccines – but not all inoculations). Shills are gonna shill . . .

                Sadly, those of us who elucidate full truths (or at least attempt to) are incessantly accused of “dividing” the “truth movement.”

                I acknowledge this process can be painful, and it places more of the burden/responsibility on each and every one of us.

                As my friend (a fellow full-truther), Alison, stated in her brilliant post today (https://wrenchinthegears.com/2022/01/02/the-us-federal-reserve-told-us-in-april-2020-expect-universal-daily-testing-if-you-want-to-participate-in-society/):

                “So keep this in mind for the new year as you sample the smorgasbord of offerings laid out by pandemic content creators and Covid entrepreneurs. The hivemind keeps track, of course, as it learns us and refines its war-game tactics. Will consumers realize many foundational concepts are at odds with one another? Or will they sample indiscriminately, because they like so many of the personalities delivering the information?”

                “If you do not believe in deadly viruses that spread through populations and kill lots of people, the majority of what is circulating among the social media resistance talking heads and those echoing them becomes irrelevant. Noise, noise, noise nudging you towards the universal testing protocol. If you get to that place, you’ll have a lot more time to spend researching the Internet of Bio-Nano Things . . . You have to be prepared to leave your identity as a content consumer behind and step into the role of researcher. Don’t be afraid. You can do it. I believe in us. We don’t need leaders; we can walk each other home as equals, as collaborators.”

                These half-truths permit the likes of Malone, McCullough, Kory, Mikovits, and Martenson (and many others) to dominate the airwaves – gunking up the system with noise, noise, noise (h/t Alison McDowell). It is time to cut through this noise.

                Cheers to clarity in 2022 . . .

                Liked by 3 people

                1. Honestly, Stephers, I loathe half-truth too (“Half-truths make great lies” is at the very top of my 9/11 page) but the thing is some people are deliberately spreading half-truth while others have genuinely got it wrong and that’s a significantly different thing. What perturbs me with RH is that he SEEMS so genuine to me … despite the fact that he has a very dodgy background. Reading the Waterloo interview you posted brought me to tears so if he is paid controlled opposition then top marks for acting! I tried to post in response to your next-to-last comment but it didn’t post. If you see it can you post it otherwise I’ll try again.

                  Like

                2. Excellent post by Alison. One of the commenters there helps clarify what is confusing, by saying,

                  “A lot of people are essentially saying things like, Don’t be a refusenik to McCullough or RFK Jr just because they believe a pathogenic virus exists, or because they advocate for early treatment rather than exposing the whole fraud of virology. But it never occurred to me that the “early treatment” folks are sending health freedom folks right into the hands of empire. That is a super important point.”

                  Liked by 3 people

                3. Okaay, Stephers, the signs do seem all there I have to admit. Just need to do a little more confirmation. Not happy! I think they’re breaking their rules a little with him, don’t like it when they break their rules. Of course, having the rules in the first place is not good either but if they’re going to have their rules and follow them then I think they should at least be consistent – all the time.

                  How on earth do these people perform the way they do? Do they need to undergo mind control to be able to hold such contradiction? How can they act so against what’s being done so convincingly without believing a word they say? I really don’t get it.

                  Like

                  1. Petra,

                    I do not have a good answer for you. But, I think it gets even worse than what I already presented. Guess who was involved with sequencing (and “testing” for) the first SARS “virus?” https://www.researchgate.net/publication/8466337_Identification_of_the_Severe_Acute_Respiratory_Syndrome_Coronavirus_by_Simultaneous_Multigene_DNA_Sequencing

                    Hmmmm.

                    I suppose my question for you is, what do you think Hodkinson actually got “right” in the video you linked? It seems I had a very different reaction to what he said than you did. I did not find him to be convincing. It also seemed he was reading from a script, and his tone/demeanor was overly dramatic (leaning into melodrama) in my opinion.

                    Like

                    1. Petra,

                      On the contrary, I do not find this to be a waste of my time. Until now, the SARS (1) operation was mostly enigmatic to me. I have tried to piece some of those pieces together, as I find it crucial to fully grasp how its “sequel” (SARS 2) was implemented so masterfully. It seems Hodkinson – and his partner, “Moorthy” – may have been a key missing link. More to come on this front, as I pull additional pieces together . . .

                      Like

                4. Alison’s recent post is spot on, as usual. Repetition is key to programming/conditioning. In the comments was this video that walks us through the psychological warfare we are all being exposed to on a daily basis. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QND31bJ78qI&t=761s

                  Ultimately, hierarchy is always about control, and the misuse of symbols, repeated over and over again is the “magic” that captures and tortures us. It’s a battle for souls and we seldom think of how important it is to know our own soul, or even that we have a soul. Everything has a soul. It’s where freedom comes from.

                  Liked by 1 person

                  1. I simply cannot bear it. I cannot bear the way they humiliate us mercilessly while most of us defend their lies and mind-control as if our lives depended on it.

                    It’s incredible, I’m always thrusting out these two Holocaust survivors who compare what’s going on now to what happened to them … and BOTH of them even say what’s happening now is worse.

                    And people will say in response that they are being offensive by comparing the two things. Can you believe it? They are the victims who know through hard experience and yet they are accused of being offensive. It’s just beyond belief.

                    92 year old Holocaust survivor speaking at rally in Canada (4 mins)
                    https://www.bitchute.com/video/bgTToIt2MuRR/

                    “… the first thing I have to tell you is even then nobody told us it was done for our own good, we all knew what was happening. And when I see people today masked I think of the yellow star which gave everybody liberty to aggress me, to insult me, to call me a carrier of disease, to spit on me even.

                    … this is worse. It is more insidious, it concerns more people, there is a hypocrisy in the public narrative that is absolutely unbearable to say that we are doing this to protect the old. … I would gladly exchange [my years left] for the lives and livelihoods and happiness of the generations that come after me to live their lives as I have been.

                    To have masks, to see people defile their children with masks is … totally unbearable to me. … It’s been said you’re not allowed to obey and if you obey someone who wants you to do evil then you cooperate, you aid and abet in evil.

                    The other thing I want to leave you with is the thought on voluntary submission which was written about in the 16th century by a French philosopher which ends, “Cease to obey and you are free,” “Arrêtez d’obéir et vous voilà libre.” Thank you.”

                    Vera Sharav, founder of the Alliance for Human Research Protection, speaking at rally in NY (8 mins)
                    https://www.bitchute.com/video/fP2cyScL9XHi/

                    “Fear of infectious epidemics was exactly what the Nazis used to demonise the Jews as spreaders of disease. Today the unvaccinated are being accused of being spreaders of disease.”

                    These are heart-breaking testimonies of Israelis who’ve suffered severe adverse effects from the jab. I know Jews rule the world and Israel is an abomination but nevertheless it does seem unfair that Jews were subjected to medical experiments then and proportionally are most subjected now.
                    http://www.vaxtestimonies.org/en/

                    Like

                    1. As I have mentioned here before, the holyhoax is another psyop. All of the top nazis were jews, including Hitler. It was a Jewish project to motivate European Jews to colonize Palestine. Don’t believe anything these jewish actors claim.

                      Like

                    2. I judge fakery on a case-by-case basis. I find these two women completely convincing so unless you have a good case to make for their being actors on an individual basis I will accept them as genuine – funnily enough a Jewish friend who supports the BS said derisively in response to my emailing her of the 92 yo survivor’s speech: “She could be one of your ‘crisis actors’,” which made me really mad.

                      I know we were told massive lies about WWII and I’ve heard that Jews themselves orchestrated the persecution of their fellow Jews but obviously if that’s the case Jews still suffered right? I think to say that Jews weren’t persecuted is an absurdity, there is simply too much evidence. Any time you want to say they weren’t I think you need to put links or an explanation with very good evidence.

                      Like

                    3. @ Tillandlongname

                      you are on the right (train) track, but not fully, let me explain why;

                      the word “holohoax” does not do justice to the real kidnappings, deportations and silencing of the many European jews who indeed were turned to gas or ash, but into new citizens in various countries in the world, mainly the new state (=clean slate, easy to fudge numbers and the more the better was the motto back then) of Israhell (if you’ve been there, you know what I talk about and if you haven’t been there, keep it that way).

                      I use the wording Holocaust Story to refer to the almost obligator 6 million souls vaporized in 5 ehh 15 ehhh 45 min without leaving a trace, the holocaustos narrative ; the sacrifice by fire.

                      But I profited from my unique genealogy to map out what I could from my own family.
                      I went 8 generations back, 6 from my (before the war-) jewish grandfather
                      and I mapped out all descendants of those jewish ancestors
                      giving me a total of a bit over 1600 people
                      and I have an overview of which camps they went and all kinds of statistics

                      that line up with the published peaks in transports of Dutch jews to Poland (and beyond!)

                      but what I suspected to find was that those jewish families would be inflated (I reasoned; the more fake kids who fakely died, the more compensation money), but the opposite was true; there are many others missing if I compare the family sizes of my other 3 branches, all non-jewish mostly protestant rural Dutch.

                      good you see Nazionism, that is so crucial to understand WWII and therefore the whole world after

                      I can recommend to learn about Plan Patagonia next, it is the literal expansion of Nazionism

                      with the Argentinian “Operación Papelclippo” a bit bigger than with the gringos; 5000 vs 1600 according to “official” figures….

                      https://fakeologist.com/fakeopedia/index.php?title=Plan_Patagonia#Nazionism

                      Liked by 1 person

                5. OMG you are good Stephers! My thinking exactly! Waking up the awake on accepting the half truthers for the greater good is a challenge indeed. Thank you for you’re brilliant reply. Happy clear and coherent thinking New Year!

                  Like

              2. A half-truth is like a half-slave, never gonna’ be free, never gonna’ be able to dream one’s own dream. Just be you, it’s perfect in Creator’s universe. No need to embellish.

                Liked by 1 person

        3. ScottRC,

          I knew I could count on your expertise, my thespian friend. 2022: the year that ScottRC launches a concierge acting coach practice? I am being serious. I would sign up for your acting coach services! 🙂

          Like

          1. Stephers–Oh, stop. lol.

            I also thought the guy who introduced Noak’s girlfriend in the first video was interesting. I’ve seen that facial expression, heard that tone of voice before. He comes across like someone who knows damn well he’s about to drop a big fat turd of a lie on you and isn’t particularly confident you’ll accept it, but is so amused by it that he just can’t resist. Any idea who that guy is?

            Liked by 1 person

  5. I tend to read your posts with my hands over my face through the gaps in my fingers, Stephers, and have a strong impulse afterwards to cross my index fingers at the screen and run screaming from the room – if I can’t handle your posts then I guess it’s not unreasonable that others are not prepared to handle the less confronting lie of a fake pandemic.

    It’s ironic with all this scary biotech that the most primitive forms of control – masks, sanitising, social distancing and lockdowns are being used upon us … although, of course, there are the tests and the jabs and then the sanitisers and masks contain hazardous chemicals. Anecdotally, it seems more people are getting sick in Australia in the middle of summer – wonder if it’s to do with the jab or whether just coincidence that I’m hearing of a few people and it’s not really more than normal.

    I tend to think if there’s the slightest possibility that someone might be controlled opposition then they will be until proved otherwise so didn’t even look at Malone but it seems from your article my suspicions were confirmed. There’s a law firm in NSW supposedly defending the rights of those not getting jabbed or whatever and my first thought was, “They’ll be controlled opposition,” but was too lazy to check them out. I had reason to look at them the other day and saw on LinkedIn they had presented in their court case a video of an American news anchor allegedly suffering ill-effects from the jab. I was surprised on LinkedIn that someone had said, “Looks staged,” which I chimed in with. I’m really amazed at how candid people can be on a professional site. Doesn’t matter where you bloody turn – controlled opposition – drives me crazy. Where the hell are genuine lawyers speaking up about the complete trashing of human rights? Where the hell are they?
    https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:6882192342644862976/

    Like

    1. the lawyers are all bought and paid for, just like the doctors and the politicians and so on. Very few will go against the narrative, and they can be easily silenced.

      Like

      1. But there are a few genuine doctors and other health professionals speaking out … with – true enough – absolutely loads of controlled opposition health professionals but there are so very few lawyers that I can see – controlled opposition or genuine.

        Like

  6. Another amazing journey into the fog of bio-nano-tech research, Stephers. I instinctively thought of blood while reading your post. Iron, oxygen, hemoglobin absorption and all the coagulation issues popping up.
    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32691747/ This article did not explain much, but there is research, and as usual seems to have potential for good, or for much evil.

    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22324868/ This seems more on point.
    “The proteins dynamically encompass the particles in the protein corona. Here we propose a method based on nanomagnetism that allows a specific in situ monitoring of interactions between iron oxide nanoparticles and blood plasma. Tracking the nanoparticle orientation through their optical birefringence signal induced by an external magnetic field provides a quantitative real-time detection of protein corona at the surface of nanoparticles and assesses eventual onset of particle aggregation.”

    These studies are not new. I can only imagine the current state of this field of research, all the while keeping close an awareness of who/what is funding this kind of research.

    Love how this kind of discussion promotes creative, outside-the-box exploration. Thanks Stephers.

    Liked by 2 people

  7. Hi! I’ve commented on POM a few times before, but never on one of your posts. I’ve been following Alison for about six or seven months now and since she speaks so highly of you and your work, I’ve summoned the courage to comment.
    I’d like to thank you for this really informative post and especially for the list of terms at the end. It’s super helpful! When I began to post really heavily about Alison’s work on both Twitter and YT, lots of people told me that the vocabulary was “too hard to understand and remember”and that they were ready to give up on trying. Thankfully, most didn’t. Having an actual list of terms allows people to get a more complete picture of how these things relate to each other and to the whole.
    Thanks again!!

    Liked by 1 person

  8. Hi again! I don’t know whether or not you hold comments for review, but when I saw that mine didn’t show up I remembered that I should let you know that other times I’ve made comments on POM, the comments have been found in spam on a couple of occasions and then taken out of spam and posted. Maybe that’s happened again. I thought it best to let you know. Thanks!

    Like

  9. Well, that last comment did show up! I’ve realized that it was my mistake, so I’ll repeat what I’d originally said.
    I’ve been following Alison’s work for six or seven months now and since she speaks so highly of you and your work, I’ve finally summoned the courage to comment.
    The article /post you’ve written is really informative! It’s answered some questions I’ve had since the first time I read about SPIONS. Also, I can’t thank you enough for the list of terms you’ve included at the end of the post. When I first began to spread Alison’s work to everyone I know on Twitter and YT, there were a number of people who felt that the vocabulary was “confusing” or “hard to follow.” Thankfully, they didn’t give up trying to understand. A list like this one is a great way to familiarize oneself with the individual terms and also with how they relate to one another as a whole.
    Thanks again!!

    Liked by 1 person

    1. HQO,

      I had never checked the Spam folder before (I am still a WordPress novice). Sure enough, your comment did automatically go to Spam, and so I had to “approve” it. Moving forward, hopefully, this will not be a problem.

      I am glad you commented, and that you feel this post is informative. All I can say is – I am trying my best, despite having little time to devote to this blog.

      It was a last-minute decision to include the list of Web 3.0/Spatial Web terms at the end. As time allows, I will gradually add informative hyperlinks to the listed terms. I only had time to begin with a few of them at the get-go.

      My main reason for this reference list is for truth-seekers who desire more discernment when it comes to navigating “resistance” to the consensus narrative, and who may find it helpful in considering if a popularized opposition figure or “movement” seems to fit neatly into one of the listed categories. Even if not intentionally misleading resistance, it is still possible that someone (or a group of people) may inadvertently be steering naive followers into a Web 3.0 “booby trap,” thereby engaging in Spatial Web enterprise. It is my aim to help steer individuals away from such engagement, while fully acknowledging that all digital tools feed the AI beast (i.e. – using debit cards/credit cards, blogging, Amazon shopping – 3 ways in which I willingly, yet reticently contribute). We can only do so much given our respective lifestyle choices.

      That said, I am simply asserting that this is a time of reckoning, when we need to soul-search and be increasingly mindful with our digital involvements, as well as making efforts to be diligently aware as to whom and what we choose to direct our attention.

      Accordingly, I will give one example that may elucidate how I suggest applying this method of cross-referencing popularized individuals (whether regarded as consensus narrative figures or opposition “models”) with the “list.” In the past week, much attention has been drawn to a letter (satirical) that was written and distributed by tech entrepreneur Steve Kirsch (someone who has been associated with Robert W. Malone whom I referenced above, as they appeared together on Bret Weinstein’s DarkHorse channel on June 11, 2021 https://malone.substack.com/p/dark-horse-podcast). Here is the December 29, 2021 letter that has been widely circulated, “How the game is really played”: https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/how-the-game-is-played. Following are links to information about Steve Kirsch:

      https://www.technologyreview.com/2021/10/05/1036408/silicon-valley-millionaire-steve-kirsch-covid-vaccine-misinformation/
      https://www.worldfinancecouncil.org/speaker/steve-kirsch/
      https://celebhook.com/m10-steve-kirsch-net-worth-2021-is-ceo-steve-kirsch-billionaire/
      https://www.treatearly.org/overview
      https://www.skirsch.io/about-me/
      https://www.vacsafety.org

      After reviewing the December 29 letter – in addition to the material on Steve Kirsch (remember, context is crucial) – do you find his letter to be helpful? Do you think it will gain traction in ways that will make lasting positive changes? Does he fall neatly into any of the listed categories? If so, which one(s)? Hint: think “repurposed drugs/early treatments.” Again, even if he means well, these are the types of questions I ask when determining my engagement with such material.

      Like

      1. That’s disappointing if Kirsch has some agenda – I haven’t looked into him, just read a few of his recent articles on vaccine injury etc.

        I sort of get the feeling lately that there’s too much credible or concerning “anti-vax” information coming out, that it’s going to entrench the unvaxxed in their views, and spread a little bit into the vaxxed who have buyer’s remorse, or wariness of endless boosters.

        Whether that anti-vax agitation is mostly real or mostly controlled op, it goes to the idea that they’ll move towards trying to “test and trace” or something.

        To that end, what if they actually flipped the tables on their faithful vax followers? They love to do that sort of thing. Just imagine – if they came out and said (some variation of) “well, we did screw up on this vax…”

        Whether there is widespread vax damage or not, that could be a giant anti-placebo effect to all the vaxxed – filling them with panic and fear and confusion. It would probably be more nuanced than that, how they’d message it, but it would be obvious that “they screwed up – meant well, but screwed up” or something. Then a new terrifying variant – everyone vulnerable allegedly – and in the mass panic, they’d roll out some kind of intrusive test and trace system.

        Like

        1. TimR,

          Test and trace – along with “early treatments” and “repurposed drugs” – comprise what I call the “side hustle.” The leading (most vocal) “opposition figures” who have come out against vaccines (well, let’s say, certain vaccines) seem to be very supportive of testing and tracing: https://twitter.com/Philly852/status/1477318283590356996. Robert Malone from August 5, 2021 – “We need very active surveillance, tracing, testing . . . We need the ability to test (ideally self-test) for SARS-CoV-2 infection.” It sure is convenient that Malone no longer has a digital paper trail on Twitter. That said, this revealing tweet is still circulating.

          Like

        1. From Robert Malone on January 2, 2022:
          “It is starting to look to me like the largest experiment on human beings in recorded history has failed. And, if this rather dry report from a senior Indiana life insurance executive holds true, then Reiner Fuellmich’s “Crimes against Humanity” push for convening new Nuremberg trials starts to look a lot less quixotic and a lot more prophetic.” https://rwmalonemd.substack.com/p/what-if-the-largest-experiment-on

          Hmmmm. What an interesting comment from someone who is still promoting his RelCovaxTM vaccine (a second-generation multivalent SARS-CoV-2 vaccine): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_OygHCE9F2A. Stunningly, the company with which he is collaborating – Reliance Life Sciences – is a subsidiary of the largest conglomerate in India, Reliance Group/Reliance Industries Limited: https://www.crunchbase.com/organization/reliance-life-sciences. “The Reliance Group is India’s largest private sector enterprise, with annual revenues of US$ 66.8 billion. The Group’s activities span oil and gas exploration and production, petroleum refining, petrochemicals, polyester, plastics, organized retailing and telecom. The Group’s flagship company Reliance Industries Limited is the largest private sector company and a Fortune Global 500 company.”

          Why is no one reporting on his intimate relationship with this company, including the details on his impending vaccine rollout (slated for first quarter 2022: https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/business/india-business/reliance-gets-nod-to-start-covid-19-vaccine-trials/articleshow/85680924.cms)?

          In Malone’s RelCovaxTM presentation linked above, at around the 18 min timestamp, he notes that his vaccine will be marketed to adolescents and children (Phase II and Phase III of his study), following its rollout to the adult population. I could have sworn he was concerned about the children: https://ourgreaterdestiny.org/2021/12/robert-malone-md-on-vaxxing-children/. Something is way fishier in Virologyland than people can even imagine. Throughout his presentation, he mentions a hydrogel that is in his (allegedly) safer vaccine (also see here https://www.msn.com/en-in/news/other/covid-19-vaccines-time-to-reset-the-impact-bar/ar-AAPz5Do). I will be looking more into this . . . I have not yet found a full ingredient breakdown of his product. Any readers care to help with this?

          Like

  10. Here and there, as I have time, I am continuing to add new elements to the Web 3.0 checklist at the end of my post, in addition to informative hyperlinks. So please look out for these additions. I think they provide very helpful context – both in breadth and depth. Thanks!

    Liked by 1 person

  11. Rosemary Frei brings up an angle I wish I knew more about – the role of “theoretical modeling” in virology. I just simply don’t have a grasp on the nature of virology lab work – how much can be seen directly under a microscope (or electron microscope), if anything – and how much is “interpreted” based on indirect observation.

    She seems to have a good grasp on the technicalities, with her microbiology degree and background writing about science, but I wish she (or someone) would really give a big picture view of the field, so we laypeople could get a better sense of how much is hocus pocus, and how much (might) be constrained by actual evidence or observation.

    Here are some of her comments that pique my curiosity, which is really all it is – It may be too “in the weeds” to make a difference as far as mass public opinion goes:

    “…N501Y is posited to make the spike protein bind tighter to the ACE2 receptor. Influential theoreticians have performed mathematical modeling based on this hypothesis. This modeling suggests that this tighter binding allows the virus to enter more easily, and that therefore this makes the virus more transmissible.

    Yet as far as I’ve been able to find, there is still no concrete, direct proof of this. And note that epidemiological data cannot be used to definitively detect the effect of an amino-acid in a virus. Only experiments involving direct observation of the virus’s interaction with the body can determine that.

    The main evidence that the top three theoretical-models cite as proof of stronger bonding between the N501Y form of the novel coronavirus and the RBD is from just three scientific manuscripts, and these describe experiments with the virus in mice or petri dishes, not observation of whether in fact the variants are truly more contagious or more deadly….”

    https://www.rosemaryfrei.ca/laying-out-the-evidence/#

    Like

    1. Tim, you said:

      “Yet as far as I’ve been able to find, there is still no concrete, direct proof of this. And note that epidemiological data cannot be used to definitively detect the effect of an amino-acid in a virus. Only experiments involving direct observation of the virus’s interaction with the body can determine that.”

      You just answered your own question(s), and this sentence of yours is well spoken “Only experiments involving direct observation of the virus’s interaction with the body can determine that.”, and that is impossible due to lack of a virus, for starters, and for multiple reasons discussed over and over here.

      “…stronger bonding between the N501Y form of the novel coronavirus and the RBD”
      Pure fiction, except in genomic modeling via computer. As you say above, this cannot be seen. The virus doesn’t exist outside of “data”, and that statement cannot be shown to be incorrect. And it doesn’t matter what they say can be seen under any kind of microscope, because their virus “isolation” procedures at the start nullify anything that follows in the chain of “discovery”.

      All of this kind of material is script writing on top of virtual modeling. Virological story-telling is reaching a crescendo. It has sold well in the past, and the push is on to up the ante. For another experience in the virtual world of virus, see the paper (2004) posted by Stephers earlier today. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/8466337_Identification_of_the_Severe_Acute_Respiratory_Syndrome_Coronavirus_by_Simultaneous_Multigene_DNA_Sequencing

      Like

      1. Thanks OM. To clarify, the last three paras there are Rosemary Frei.

        Let me ask you this, just to get some ground under my feet because I’m completely ignorant as to what really goes on in virology departments/ labs. You write:

        “…And it doesn’t matter what they say can be seen under any kind of microscope, because their virus “isolation” procedures at the start nullify anything that follows in the chain of “discovery”.

        But just putting that aside for a moment, let’s give them a pass for a second on their “isolation” procedures and pretend it’s all hunky-dory — are their theoretical models at least heavily constrained by this matter of “what can be seen under a microscope”? Or are we completely in cloud cuckoo land of theoretical models that have been constructed indirectly – say, from experiments on mice or in petri dishes or whatnot?

        I guess I’m trying to understand, as a layperson, where the line is between observable phenomena (putting aside other issues) and virtual modeling, storytelling, theory, etc.

        I mean, I read NakedCapitalism a lot, and these blanking wonks go on about all this minutiae of numbered spike proteins and all the rest, in absurd detail… It’s frustrating to engage with, because they’re using it rhetorically to impress (I suspect), but nevertheless I don’t really have a grasp on the game they’re playing. What is purely invented, and what is at least constrained by a connection to some actuality (whether that actuality is being correctly interpreted or not.)

        This modeling business seems to go on across the sciences nowadays, with the rise of advanced computing —- climatology, of course. I’m not sure what others are the big offenders. Someone should write a book for the layperson, explaining what it’s all about, and really letting you peek inside that world as best one can.

        Like

        1. Timr,

          Great inquiry. As far back as the early 1990s the U.S. Forest Service-USDA “grew” trees on computers. We busted them, finding that their simulation forgot to stop growing at 200-plus years, creating 300-foot-tall “computer-generated” trees, and per-acre yields that quickly became a joke in Congress and out in the public sector.

          One thing I think I have learned from quantum theory is that observation is influenced by the observer’s subjectivity, which cumulatively invents/creates “scientific reality.”

          Where “the line” exists is not known to me, and may be unknowable, IMO. Certainly worth further exploration.

          Like

        2. TimR,

          I’m as in the dark about all this as you are, but if you haven’t seen Rappaport’s latest blog post, it might be worth a look. He uses Dr. Andy Kaufmann’s analysis of a typical “Methods”” section of a typical paper purporting to have “isolated” Sars-CoV-2. Kaufmann has been roundly outed as a limited hangout among writers and commenters here, but his take-down of this study’s “isolation” techniques is compelling. It seems the authors of this “scientific” paper use technical and procedural language to bury the fact that, not only did they not “isolate” anything, but they didn’t provide an iota of evidence that there was any virus of any kind floating in the soup they poked their pippettes in.

          https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2022/01/05/a-million-new-covid-cases-in-one-day-news-for-yokels-rubes-and-educated-morons/

          Liked by 1 person

          1. ScottRC/TimR/Steve/OM,

            Like ScottRC, I found JR’s January 5, 2022 piece to be helpful and informative. I found his January 4, 2022 piece to be illustrative as well: https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2022/01/04/covid-everybody-will-be-infected-no-exceptions-stop-pretending-otherwise/.

            Last comment (which I consider astute) in the thread from JR’s 1/4/22 post:

            “The believers in covid include so many writers who consider themselves opposition to covid policies . . . several of the substack articles written by these believers, such as Alex Berenson, Steve Kirsch and Margaret Anna Alice. All three of them are dismissive of any statement regarding the non-existence of the virus, Margaret Anna Alice stated in an exchange on her stack:
            https://margaretannaalice.substack.com/p/dispatches-from-the-new-normal-front/comments that stating covid doesn’t exist makes one look like a flat earther, and so that kind of statement should be avoided. I view these writers as covidian cultists themselves, though they seem to think that they are opponents of the cult.”

            Another comment from the JR article (January 4, 2022) – getting more closely aligned to my perspective on actual “causality” (sans “virus”):

            “CK_ says:
            January 4, 2022 at 10:12 pm https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2022/01/04/covid-everybody-will-be-infected-no-exceptions-stop-pretending-otherwise/#comment-684185
            Here’s La Quinta Colunmna’s summary of their Graphene Oxide research. They blame GO [Graphene Oxide] for both “COVID deaths” and the adverse effects from the clot shots.”

            https://rumble.com/vri3uf-thumbnail-233-nanotechnology-identified-in-vaccines-composition-and-purpose.html”

            I should note that LQC and associated “Rumble” videos tend to sensationalize and perpetuate a “depopulation” narrative which is not aligned with my nanotech biocompatibility assertion. I consider my ongoing presentation to be measured and well-informed ~ based on related scientific literature and global nanotech initiatives (declared/unclassified). They also do not address the potential issue of jabbed individuals causing un-jabbed individuals to become sick (via some type of mechanism relating to the 2D semiconductors that have been identified in the concoctions: https://www.orwell.city/2022/01/complex-microtechnology.html).

            I also want to emphasize that Kaufman and Rappoport (as well as Cowan and Lanka, and perhaps even Bailey) are leaving out the novel causality which LQC and I have presented (essentially, radiation poisoning from the synergistic play between nanotech + EMFs). Bailey is getting closer lately by reporting on undeclared components (seemingly “electronic”) identified in the injectable formulas: https://earthnewspaper.com/2021/12/24/the-covid-19-fraud-and-war-on-humanity-by-dr-sam-bailey-part-3-1850/.

            I will leave one more link to an interview with Dr. Lee Merritt (who references the Spanish flu and how there was no “contagion” found, and notes very plausible causes for that illness), which I found to be very informative – with two caveats: It is an AJ/Infowars segment (ugh, kinda sucks, but please try to place this aside in order to watch the 9 min edited clip with fresh eyes/ears); Merritt leaves out the nanotech component – which (as POM readers know by now!) I consider to be crucial in fully grasping causality (again, sans virus).
            https://rumble.com/vri4j5-dr.-lee-merritt-warns-5g-linked-to-global-covid-19-outbreaks.html

            Like

            1. Thanks, Stephers, for the JR article. Seems like this magic show is about to become exposed for all to see “the trick.” Anyone remember HAARP, and the speculation around it’s purpose? Then suddenly they announced it was “closed.” Some type of “global electromagnetic net” supplementing the proliferation of towers and hand-held devices would seem like a likely place to look for missing puzzle pieces.

              Like

            2. Glad to be of service, Stephers, if inadvertently!

              This is a good commentary I think on SARS-1 entitled, Cough and Awe – SARS. I originally found it at a different location which disappeared and now I can only find it here but the background is horrible and there’s an annoying animated gif so I’d be inclined to copy and paste it so it’s more easily legible if you want to read it. I don’t think it will tell you anything you probably don’t already know though.
              http://www.sweetliberty.org/issues/health/sars.shtml

              This is a link to various items on SARS-1 which I haven’t looked at.
              http://www.whale.to/a/sars.html

              Perhaps you’ve posted on this and I’ve missed it – apologies if so.
              When you speak of novel causality are there specific symptoms you think feature, eg, loss of sense of smell/taste and shortness of breath?

              Like

          1. TimR,

            I hope OM does not mind . . . I found this excellent comment he left today at Alison’s site (https://wrenchinthegears.com/2022/01/02/the-us-federal-reserve-told-us-in-april-2020-expect-universal-daily-testing-if-you-want-to-participate-in-society/), and since I think it is relevant, I will leave it here (without his permission – but since this was public, I will assume ok???):

            oregonmatt says:
            Kennedy is misinformed and misinforming. There is no “dead” viral debris, as there is no virus. There is always, however, cellular debris from normal cell breakdown and death, i.e., random free-floating genetic material that exists until it is consumed or discarded. Some of these nucleic acid fragments can be detected, and this picture can be extended to include nucleic acid debris from bacteria and fungus (always present) as well. There is also cellular signaling, both incoming and outgoing, which amounts to another expression of detectable genetic material. There is no room in this picture for “evidence” of virus that is produced by dishonest methodology, a methodology that is clearly designed to promote belief in a fictitious entity.

            PCR, therefore, has zero meaning in this context, no matter what cycle threshold is used, but Kennedy’s continued invocation of virus, as in “dead or inactive”, clouds the issue and helps the viral Rockefeller narrative survive.

            JANUARY 5, 2022 AT 1:34 PM

            Liked by 1 person

  12. For those who may be reeled in by the mass formation psychosis meme being generated by the likes of Malone, McCullough, and Rogan (https://www.helleniscope.com/2022/01/10/dr-robert-malone-mass-formation-psychosis/) – only to be “counter-posed” by the likes of Bruce Lee at Forbes (https://www.forbes.com/sites/brucelee/2022/01/02/what-is-mass-formation-psychosis-robert-malone-makes-covid-19-vaccine-claims-on-joe-rogan-show/?sh=7cfa73f51d4c) with his martial art-style of information warfare – this guest contribution at wrenchinthegears.com may serve as a soothing, clarifying balm: https://wrenchinthegears.com/2022/01/12/conscious-gardeners-guest-post-by-cliff-gomes/. Be alert for many more similar back-and-forth whiplashing psyops to come in 2022 . . .

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s