Mass Zombification via Remote Biohacking: The Farce Awakens

“We can use electrical current, either direct or alternating current, or a magnetic field to change the way certain brain networks operate. By changing those brain networks, we change brain functions. And at certain times, we have shown that these can be operative in changing the way people perform on certain cognitive tests and also the way people feel about certain things. Now, that’s not exactly mind control the way Obi-Wan does it, but we could begin to look at the new brain science as a form of bio-technological Obi-Wan Kenobi. In other words, we’re harnessing various forces of science, technology, and of nature to be able to influence the way a brain works and the way the mind operates.” ~ Dr. James Giordano, neuroscientist and Chief of the Neuroethics Studies Program at Georgetown University (as stated in the video above)

How did everyone around us get the COVID mind meld? Are you still seeing people in a Corona coma or a stupor of fear, or at the very least, a COVID thought prison? Have they joined a new religion — the cult of Corona? Does it seem like most people are not in their right minds? Perhaps it is because they are not, and can not be operating at full mental capacity.

How the heck could the controllers pull this off? How could they remotely narcotize an entire world populace — transforming them into passive, conformist, obedient automatons — while simultaneously sickening and possibly killing targeted individuals and groups? Is there a technology available to the controllers that could kill two birds with one stone?

I suggest that the controllers are operating with plausible deniability — under cover of a scapegoat virus. The virus is a red herring, as neurobiological technology has continued to make advancements and is potentially being used covertly against the human population, as a method of mass disruption and destruction. 

Is the entire scope of this mass hypnosis being rationalized as a matter of national and global security — framed under cover of a health biosecurity paradigm? If so, I might refer to this project as “Operation Human Biohack.” This globally scaled operation seemingly involves biotracking humans in order to hack the human brain and body through the use of directed energy to affect human physiology, with the end goals of hijacking the human heart, and creating a hive human mind that will eventually take control of the population — a swarmocracy, if you will. 

The best way to hack a human may be through our DNA. We carry within us crucial life-altering information that is essentially unknown to us. This data is stored within the crystalline structure of our DNA. My speculation is that our DNA has been studied among military, machine learning, neuroscience, and biotechnology sectors, with the ultimate intention of merging us within a Borg-like hive mind AI-controlled system. 

Following is a 13 minute overview discussing neural interfacing with computers, as well as techniques of weaponized neurotechnology. I would like to zero in on one segment of the video featuring historian and philosopher, Yuval Noah Harari, in his 2018 presentation, “Will the Future be Human?” sponsored by the World Economic Forum.

We can hack not just computers, we can hack human beings and other organisms . . . Whether viruses or bananas or humans, they are really just biochemical algorithms, and we are learning how to decipher these algorithms. When the Infotech revolution merges with the Biotech revolution, what you get is the ability to hack human beings. Now what do you need in order to hack a human being? You need two things: you need a lot of computing power and you need a lot of data, especially biometric data, not data about what I buy or where I go, but data about what is happening inside my body and inside my brain. And maybe the most important invention for the merger of Infotech and Biotech is the biometric sensor that translates biochemical processes in the body and the brain into electronic signals that a computer can store and analyze.” Harari continued, “We are probably one of the last generations of Homo sapiens, because in the coming generations, we will learn how to engineer bodies and brains and minds. These will be the main products of the economy.”

Could there be a vast array of advanced neuroscience-based technological modalities implemented on a global order to bring about scalable mental enslavement? In the field of neuroscience, one highly effective synthesis of techniques is referred to as Integrative Scientific Convergence, and is discussed in a 2017 presentation referenced later in this post called “Brain Science from Bench to Battlefield: The Realities and Risks of Neuroweapons.” I suggest that the worldwide acceptance of mask-wearing and physical distancing, along with self-quarantining and house arrest, are visible symptoms of technotronically induced menticide, and that the face diapers serve as emblems of acquired dehumanization and acquiescence to an invisible enemy.

While there are numerous forms of effective mind control (for example, media propaganda, school indoctrination, weaponization of NLP and memetics), and many researchers over the years have clearly documented and analyzed them, I would like to highlight one form of highly advanced mind control that has received less coverage — that of targeted neuroweapons arising from the field of neuroscience. My stance is that these neuroweapons, while considered to be “non-lethal,” can be used to control minds, and to influence emotions and physical bodies in highly detrimental ways, even resulting in death. In the context of what we have been witnessing in 2020, is it possible that some increases in illness and death that have occurred in areas of the world, and in particular populations, could have resulted from scalable and precision neuroweaponry?

I contend that the technocratic controllers consider us as human nodes in a neurolinked interface — like cogs in a wheel — with the aim of remote mental enslavement of the world populace, utilizing advanced nano-particulate matter, controlled by AI, that can be steered and programmed within human brains and bodies. And they are well on their way — 2020 has been their quickening. Speaking of neurolinking, Elon Musk is debuting a working model (with a live demonstration) of his Neuralink project today, August 28, 2020, featuring human symbiosis with AI. Could this be another red herring or Trojan horse? At the very least, may it signify the slippery slope of human-AI convergence?

Many barriers have been broken when it comes to this manufactured pandemic crisis. One in particular, is the Blood-Brain Barrier (BBB). I surmise that the controllers have been synergistically priming the pump for years, breaching the permeability barrier to our brains through the implementation of toxic-inducing methods — including pharmaceuticals, vaccines, GMOs, fluoride, mercury fillings, geoengineering, aluminum and other heavy metals (via vaccines and geoengineering), cyanide, pesticides, artificial sweeteners, polysorbate 80, wireless technology/pulsed EMFs, scalar technology (i.e. – HAARP), microplastics, and microwaved food. The consolidation of this toxic soup of tools in the technocratic tool belt has seemingly culminated in the grand biohack (packaged within a biosecurity threat vehicle) that we are currently experiencing. For those who may still consider that 5G is the main culprit of the illness and dis-ease that we are witnessing and experiencing in 2020 (encompassed within “Operation Human Biohack”) — I perceive 5G as merely an accomplice, and as such, may be serving as an additional red herring. I think we need to keep our eye on the entire covert biohacking program. 

So, what capability can consolidate these techniques, and at the same time eclipse all of them, resulting in mind zombification, combined with the current constellation of physical “COVID” symptoms? This is not easy to answer; however, I offer several videos herein to make a case that a highly militarized capability may be at play, and that the “boys with their toys” might be busy stirring the pot — mentally, emotionally, and physically. Nanotechnology may be at the forefront of this phenomenon, utilized in tandem with electromagnetic deployment that can be directed with precision from multiple sources, including satellites, GWEN towers, small cell towers, radar installations, smart meters, desktop and laptop computers, handheld devices, wearable devices, implantable devices, and possibly household appliances. 

Dr. Martin Pall is Professor Emeritus of Biochemistry and Basic Medical Sciences at Washington State University. In his 2018 presentation to the National Institutes of Health (NIH), called “Diverse Health Effects of Non-Thermal Microwave/Other Frequency EMFs: The Mechanism by Which These Diverse Effects Are Produced: Why 5G Will Be Likely to Be Vastly Worse,” he emphasized the dangers of pulsed EMFs, and the “insanity” of the impending widespread rollout of 5G:

“Pulsed EMFs . . . are in most cases much more biologically active than our non pulsed, or what are called continuous wave EMFs. And that’s been shown in 13 different reviews because all wireless communication devices communicate via pulsations that are potentially . . . much more dangerous . . . the current plan . . . is to put out tens of millions of these 5G antennae irradiating every single person and every other organism in the whole country without even a single biological safety test of genuine 5G radiation. This is in my judgment absolutely insane.”

Just to reiterate, it is entirely conceivable that biohacking can operate regardless of 5G technology, as there is seeming evidence that such capabilities have been executed for decades (primarily as reported from within the Targeted Individual community). Indeed, 5G and even 6G and forward iterations of wireless technology, may serve to enhance the implementation of invasive predatory technology. Further, this consolidated system of high-tech moving parts may have been amped up since December 2019 in certain geographic areas, and in certain individuals and groups, and could continue to be ramped up in any PLANNED waves or future surges that the controllers desire. The key here, is that the central planners could maintain full control over this technological process, whereas they could not in the event of a virus (bioengineered or otherwise) based on a model of physical contagion. Even further still, if this were simply a matter of widely blasting deleterious signals from a cell tower, then surely would not their minions living in these areas be in harm’s way? So this is where the concept of precision targeted technology comes into play (beyond 5G alone), and may make more sense. 

Please watch this two-minute overview describing the Blood-Brain Barrier. It may be helpful before proceeding. 

One of my takeaways from this video is that the BBB blocks most pharmaceuticals from entering the brain. This may be a healthy defense mechanism, and should give us pause prior to taking any drug that purports to break through the BBB. The video also references that sound waves can be used to breach the BBB.

Many of us are familiar with the concept of “leaky gut.” However, less people are aware of “leaky brain” (AKA neuroinflammation), which may result from the over-breaching of the BBB. Here is a 6-minute video describing symptoms of leaky brain.

We should also talk about electroporation. This term has recently surfaced in light of how the process may be utilized in administering vaccines. However, in this instance, I am referencing electroporation for its potential use over long distance. This short video explains how electroporation may be used to breach the BBB.

Within the context of remote targeted neuroweaponry, our brains can be selectively “zapped” (by means of electroporation) via devices that exist around us. Even so, most humans would never know, as any such perpetrators are invisible (and may be nearly all AI-controlled).

This video below is a 5 minute “shortcut” version of Dr. James Giordano, as he spoke to military cadets about advancements in neuroscience and neurotechnology at the Modern War Institute in 2018. Dr. Giordano serves as an appointed member of the US Department of Health and Human Services Advisory Council and Human Research Protections. He is a researcher and leader of the EU Human Brain Project, and has served as an appointed member of the Neuroethics Legal and Social Issues Advisory Panel of the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), and Senior Advisory Fellow of the Strategic Multilayer Assessment Branch of the Joint Staff of the Pentagon. You can read his full bio here.

Dr. Giordano has reportedly been in the field of neuroscience and dual-use neuroweaponry for 40 years and is an esteemed and leading expert. Thus, I focus on his presentations, from an educational perspective, to demonstrate that my contention herein is not a sci-fi scenario, but is based on existing technology. 

Following is a pertinent excerpt, from Dr. Giordano’s talk providing what I consider to be the “meat” of my rationale that we may be experiencing  subjugation by means of biotracking and biohacking through the use of weaponized neurotechnology occurring “under the radar” — pun very intended. If this is the case, it is an invisible crime that leaves little to no trace, and thus, would be extremely difficult to prove, as is explained by Dr. Giordano below: 

“The brain is and will be the 21st century battlescape . . . You will encounter some form of neurocognitive science that has been weaponized . . . in your personal and professional lives . . . It is valid, valuable, and already in operational play . . . might be targeting individuals on a level that allows either direct attribution or covert engagement with non attribution . . . Neuroscience has only been in existence for forty years . . . Increasingly, it is becoming an international, multinational, global, and independently exercised event and endeavor.”

Dr. Giordano continues, “So, how then can we use these elements as weapons? We ordinarily talk about drugs, bugs, toxins, and evermore, we’re considering devices. I can disrupt an individual from the level of their cell to their system, and disrupt individuals . . . all the way up to the social fabric, target a specific individual, change or eliminate that individual with very little attribution and trace, and be able to leave prior to any attribution. We also see the use of bio-data as a viable weapon, manipulating bio-data so that I can then put into your particular medical records subtle information that may change the disposition of whether you’re sick or not; change how you’re treated. . . By altering that information . . . I essentially change the you of you, and I can do that in very subtle and insidious ways. Furthermore, I can do that on a variety of different levels that can affect key individuals . . . or I can do that on a much larger scale — groups, populations — and if I change those data, I change the way you’re being regarded and treated . . .”

I can create small robotic units — controllable robotic units at the nano scale — and that these too can be aerosolized to create a nano swarm of bio-penetrable materials that you cannot see — that can penetrate, all with the most robust biochemical filters that are able to integrate themselves through a variety of membranes, mucus membranes and wherever —mouth, nose, ears, eyes — can then be up-taken into the vascular system to create clumping . . .  and these can be weaponized, and they can be done on such a level that their presence is almost impossible to detect and as such, the attribution becomes exceedingly difficult to demonstrate [emphasis added].” 

Here is the longer, one-hour version if you care to watch Dr. James Giordano’s presentation, “The Brain is the Battlefield of the Future,” in its entirety.

Here is another one-hour presentation called “Brain Science from Bench to Battlefield: The Realities and Risks of Neuroweapons,” that Dr. Giordano gave at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in 2017.

Following are excerpts from his 2017 presentation that serve to support my notion that we may have been witnessing worldwide mental annexation, or worse yet, a form of psychological and/or physical sepsis. I am not suggesting that Dr. Giordano is doing such actions, but that the technological proficiency exists.

“If I’m able to in some way assess and affect this thing that is in at least some way demonstrably and perhaps, to a large extent, responsible for making you, YOU— your persona, your thoughts, your hopes, your dreams, well, look at the power that that can yield. We like to talk about influencing hearts and minds, but this is a question of influencing brains, to influence hearts, to then influence minds [emphasis added].”

“ Moreover, in utilizing the brain sciences in these ways, I think it becomes important to understand the formal definition of the term that I will use repeatedly throughout this lecture. This term — a weapon . . . something that mitigates aggression and fosters thoughts and feelings of affiliation or passivity . . . and/or something that incurs burdens of morbidity and/or mortality [emphasis added]. . . It used to be that I needed to be exceedingly close to someone to . . . influence them with a weapon . . . now we see, as we create both distal potential as well as much more capable potential to affect them in a variety of different ways . . .”

“I can use . . . much newer forms that utilize a highly specific electromagnetic pulse signal [emphasis added]. . . I can also look at neurogenomics and neurogenetics — look at genetic profiles of individuals and groups to be able to determine what genes may be in fact coding for certain structures and functions of the brain. I can utilize proteomics and other forms of biomarkers AND I can utilize neurocyberinformatics [emphasis added].”

During his 2017 presentation to Lawrence Livermore, Dr. Giordano briefly mentioned a previous DARPA project called “Narrative Networks,” which was designed to develop narratives for the execution of psyops, and to influence “group brains.” You may want to review more information on this project here at DARPA’s site, or here, in which another author describes how this project was utilized by DARPA to hone in on mastering propaganda techniques. Could we be witnessing the fruit of this work?

I think you get the point. Here are a few more excerpts from the 2017 presentation that are eerily timely:

“We can also utilize something called TITAN which is Tiered Integrative Tracking and Access Networks that utilize biologically implantable chips to then track key individuals in a variety of circumstances, and then yoke these to known information about the way brains work, to create narratives and behaviors . . . the idea of indwelling biosensors that are able to then upload remotely telemetrized information is quite real . . . This is a key area for dual-use because these types of sensors are being developed for populational monitoring of key biological variables that can be then uptaken into health and information databases . . . the idea to be able to take a key individual set of biological metrics and immediately in real time pull them into a large-scale data analytic to say this is who this person is, and this is where this person’s been, and who this person has been interacting with. Could be very very useful . . . This is a cat that’s already out of the bag . . . this is being used and being conducted on an international scale . . . [emphasis added].”

What we want here is a morbidity factor, not necessarily mortality factor. I want to make people sick and what I do here is the virus is not necessarily the bug, the virus is what I put over the Internet.What I put out over the Internet is this . . . a virus, bacteria, an agent that I have infiltrated into your fill-in-the-blank. I say it’s a weapon of mass destruction, and what I tell you is it’s going to produce paranoia, anxiety, and sleeplessness. What I have just done is I’ve recruited every paranoid hypochondriac to think they have whatever that is. I’ve used salient and sentinel cases, and I create essentially a legion of what’s known as the ‘worried well.’ They now flood emergency rooms . . . I can affect subsequent generations to incur a public health morbidity and mortality effect that then creates increased economic and perhaps social burden . . . [emphasis added].

“Now we can utilize nanoscience to create much better drugs to get them where they gotta go in the brain. I can create nanoscience and nanotechnology to be able to escort certain drugs across . . . the blood-brain barrier . . . But I can also use nano-particulate matter in a very indiscriminate way. The idea here is that I can get something called high CNS aggregation material that is essentially invisible to the naked eye . . . And, in fact, this has been entertained and examined to some extent by my colleagues in NATO and to those who were working on the worst use of neurobiological sciences to create population disruption . . . then we get to devices . . . sensory mobilizing agents use high electromagnetic pulse energy that may also utilize high levels of sounds . . . of light energy, and they disrupt neurological sensory function. Already being used now . . . [emphasis added].”

I include herein one more video (see above) featuring Dr. James Giordano’s discussion in 2013, “Predictive Neuroscience: Facts, Fictions and Fears of Scanning Brains and Reading Minds,” in which he discusses how they can use Neurogenomics/Neurogenetics by identifying neurogenomic/neurogenetic sequences and targeting these sequences. They can use these sequences in predicting functions and behaviors. They can also use individual proteomics and phenotypes to predict behavior. He explains that DNA-RNA protein metabolism may describe not only what you are, but what you might become. So, in this context, by linking functional imaging with anatomical data, and genetics and chemical biomarkers, they can identify who they think is predisposed to act in a certain way. He extrapolates this construct to the greater population. He even explains that they can identify an individual’s protein expression to see where that person might be on an “expression curve.”

By the way, guess what several developed countries have in common? The relevant answer, in this case: massive human brain projects (see Endnote 1). Please keep in mind (pun intended) that several of these projects collaborate across country borders.

I would like to submit this final video featuring Elana Freeland, one of the foremost investigative researchers in the fields of geoengineering and bioengineering. She has been a main inspiration and source of knowledge for me, as I have navigated my “truth” journey over the years, primarily with respect to the potential subjugation of humanity through “invisible” advanced technologies. 

Here is a brief excerpt: 

“. . . the fourth operation is the directed energy warfare operations — that’s particle beam weapons, high-powered microwave weapons, etc. that are all in space now and that’s why we have the Space Force . . . Then you go on to the fifth operation is surveillance and neural operations that includes watching us, knowing what we’re doing every second with all these billions, trillions of sensors that we’ve even swallowed, that are all around us in the ground, in the trees, in cities, everywhere . . . And neural operations . . . this is where it gets a little scary where these nanobots that we have breathed in, and sensors, can actually be used for brain control at a distance . . . Then next is the biological transhumanism operations — these are genetic operations . . . also again, I have to say that geoengineering is involved in producing a hive mind nanoparticle delivery electro-optical technology . . . remote genetic engineering of DNA, replacing nature with virtual reality . . .”

I have written previously about why the human heart vortex is so critical, and that I sense the human heart, which connects all hearts together, and to the earth’s heart, may currently be under attack. On a more tangible, and personal level, I am suggesting that within the directed energy weapon paradigm, the physical heart can be targeted and damaged from a long distance utilizing covert technology. Incidentally, and anecdotally, I was in the hospital in mid-February with obscure heart-related and bodily symptoms. These symptoms, including arrhythmia, chest pain, rib pain, neck pain, back pain, jaw pain, muscle weakness, shortness of breath, and night sweats came on suddenly and lasted for five weeks. These sequelae ended as abruptly as they began.

Will there come a time in the foreseeable future when our bodies will not only be perceived as designer bioweapons, but will be owned and patented by the controllers? Is it perhaps conceivable, and even helpful, to consider that we could legally or energetically safeguard our bodies and our RNA/DNA? Is this even worthy of a discussion, particularly if one conceives of this current physical incarnation as simply a brief blip within the infinite scope of the entire multi-dimensional omniverse, and our seemingly infinite physical incarnations within it? These are deep questions with no definitive answers. May the pandemic farce be with you, or NOT with you . . . Let’s hope your mind can decide.

Endnote 1: You can check out various brain projects at the following links:

References for Further Reading:

Healing is Voltage by Jerry L. Tennant

Under an Ionized Sky: From Chemtrails to Space Fence Lockdown by Elana Freeland

The Zapping of America: Microwaves, Their Deadly Risk, and the Cover-Up by Paul Brodeur

The Struggle for Your Mind by Kingsley Dennis

Mind Control, World Control: The Encyclopedia of Mind Control by Jim Keith

Project: Soul Catcher: Secrets of Cyber and Cybernetic Warfare Revealed Volume Two by Robert Duncan

The Invisible Crime by Michael F. Bell

The Invisible Crime Part II by Michael Fitzhugh Bell

A New Breed: Satellite Terrorism in America by Dr. John Hall

Guinea Pigs by John Hall

Covert Technological Murder by Renee Pittman

Remote Brain Targeting by Renee Pittman

Bright Light on Black Shadows by Dr. Rauni-Leena Luukanen Kilde

Neural Dust: Ultrasonic Biological Interface

Repairing leaky blood-brain barrier may rejuvenate brain function

Wi-Fi is an important threat to human health by Martin Pall

The Fatal Attraction of Techo-Fascism by Mark Petrakis

24 thoughts on “Mass Zombification via Remote Biohacking: The Farce Awakens

  1. How does that explain ‘us’ though? You, the other writers on this site, the commenters, myself, other websites, YT accounts? The majority of us are exposed to wifi, routers, cell phones, antennas, Pharma, etc….how are we immune? Do we all have a certain common thread? Or will we wake up on the ‘wrong’ side of the bed one morning, so to speak, suddenly believing the narrative? (I sure hope not 🙂


  2. I wonder the same thing as DTOC, but while reading your piece, I entertained some theories, at least regarding myself. Giordano talks in the first video (haven’t yet watched the others) about the connection between the mind and the emotions. I have long believed pop culture—movies, tv, music, news, novels, advertising—is a way to entrain and control people. The more emotionally and intellectually invested you are in any of this material, the more responsible it is for “making you YOU,” as Giordano puts it. I can see how it would be fairly easy to collect information about how people’s neuropathways work according to the types of entertainment they consume, books they read, subjects they study. And I know one thing that makes me different (maybe sometimes makes me seem smarter than others, even when I’m not): Most of the stuff others invest themselves in, emotionally and intellectually, leaves me cold. And it always has. Though I had a few shows I liked as a kid, I grew up resenting the constant idiotic blather of the TV when the rest of my family watched it, and lay awake the night we had cable installed filled with dread at the serious certainty that we’d let Satan into our home. I never cared about any genre of music and still don’t; I’ve driven in the car by myself for ten hours without even thinking of turning on the radio or putting in a CD. When I hear music blasting at deafening levels in other people’s cars, I’m not just annoyed—I feel sorry for them. Don’t they like listening to themselves think? As a 12 year old boy, I fell asleep in the theatre when I tried to watch The Empire Strikes Back. Even porn has never done anything for me, though my sex drive and interest in women has always been strong. Porn just couldn’t compete with my own visions of what was sexy.

    Sorry for going on so long about myself. But do you think, Stephers, that the effectiveness of this mind-and-heart-control technology may have been built upon, and be dependent on, the more old-fashioned methods of mind control that have always been a part our arts and culture?

    Liked by 1 person

  3. Thank you, Stephers. As usual, great insights and a huge bit of work on an important subject. The ties to emotion (unconscious) seem key to “their” success. Long ignored as just “psychological,” the entire history of man is foundational to “modern man’s” psyche. These powerful elements of the human spirit are buried deep in delusion and illusion and herd us toward a constant focus on “consciousness,” which is fragile and relatively new in the big scheme of things. Denying the power of the unconscious equates to the denial of our fear and destruction of nature (instinct). I’m afraid that those at war with us and nature are more aware of the psychic deficit than most commoners, which makes us easy prey. Enjoyed your thoughts a lot.


  4. Yes, Stephers, agree with Steve here, I appreciate the amount of work that went into this piece. I want to leave it top of page for a good long time to allow maximum views. Much of it focuses on weaponry, so I hope that readers here are aware that in the mind of the controllers, we are the enemy. If the Scamdemic has taught us anything it is that there are no boundaries. Every country on the face of the earth just said “How High?” when WHO, a mere frontispiece, said “Jump!” All of this weaponry is aimed us us, not some foreign enemy.


  5. And how many positive tests without ever being tested are out there, in addition to the false positives and other deliberate misdiagnoses?


    1. Even if the guy really had tested positive, it would be meaningless. The test is 100% unreliable, especially in testing for a virus never proven to exist. It would also be helpful of our ducktors could show us how viruses, if they even exist, cause disease.


  6. Of course. Not in any way trying to diminish the ridiculousness and inaccuracy of testing, just thought it noteworthy that statistics are being generated with NO TEST — a lot like elections; vote tallies with no connection to actual voters.

    Liked by 1 person

  7. To the question of whether there’s any covid mortality whatsoever (still sort of an open question to me, whether it’s 100% fiction, or has any sliver of reality… Whether virus or.. Nano sized robots! As this Giordano alleges he can create):

    I know someone who works at a big insurance company and sees a lot of data and numbers all day. He was saying that it appears there will be a drop off in cancer-classified deaths (among others), coinciding with the introduction of covid as a classification (or “billing code.”)

    Say the cancer deaths were running at about 11k per week for a long time. They now suddenly drop to 8500 as, presumably, the 2500 difference are now called covid. This of course goes to the idea that all cause mortality is roughly level with previous years. But starts to get a little more concrete in terms of specific illnesses seeing a suspicious, sudden drop in deaths. He said that it will be awhile before the numbers are definite or clear enough to really see exactly what all the trends are.

    He also pointed out the financial incentive to classify deaths as covid, especially as most come from the Medicare covered age group, and will not be highly reimbursed. Even with the covid bonus, it may just increase from $10k to 12k, say.

    The hospitals are hurting from loss of regular business, as well as additional burden of all the covid protocols. The covid bonus is just a tiny band-aid as they hemorrhage money, was my impression. Typically the commercially covered consumers provide their profit, and subsidize the Medicare covered group.


  8. But hey, I guess we should be celebrating that cancer deaths are miraculously down 20% all of a sudden! Lol. Have there been any news stories on that? I wonder if there will be, and if they will be so brazen as to take credit for it… Skirting the issue that it happened just at the time covid was introduced as a classification.

    I also got the sense that this skew in statistics has happened before when “new diseases” are intoduced into medical coding. Covid may be a bigger data skew, but there are probably prior examples where subjective diagnoses are merely shifting numbers around, rather than showing an actual new disease.


  9. On nano-neuroengineering (July 6, 2021): “Nanoparticles create heat from light to manipulate electrical activity in neurons”

    “Nanomaterials have been used in a variety of emerging applications, such as in targeted pharmaceuticals or to bolster other materials and products such as sensors and energy harvesting and storage devices. A team in the McKelvey School of Engineering at Washington University in St. Louis is using nanoparticles as heaters to manipulate the electrical activity of neurons in the brain and of cardiomyocytes in the heart.”

    “The findings, published July 3, 2021, in Advanced Materials, have the potential to be translated to other types of excitable cells and serve as a valuable tool in nano-neuroengineering.”

    “‘We showed we can inhibit the activity of these neurons and stop their firing, not just on and off, but in a graded manner,’ said Singamaneni, the Lilyan & E. Lisle Hughes Professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering & Materials Science. ‘By controlling the light intensity, we can control the electrical activity of the neurons. Once we stopped the light, we can completely bring them back again without any damage.’”

    “In addition to their ability to efficiently convert light into heat, the PDA nanoparticles are highly biocompatible and biodegradable. The nanoparticles eventually degrade, making them a convenient tool for use in in vitro and in vivo experiments in the future.”

    “Raman, professor of biomedical engineering, compares the process to adding cream to a cup of coffee.”

    “‘When you pour cream into hot coffee, it dissolves becomes creamed coffee through the process of diffusion.’ he explained. ‘It is similar to process that controls which ions flow in and out of the neurons. Diffusion depends on temperature, so if you have a good handle on the heat, you control the rate of diffusion close to the neurons. This would in turn impact the electrical activity of the cell. This study demonstrates the concept that the photothermal effect, converting light into heat, near the vicinity of nanoparticles tagged neurons can be used as a way to control specific neurons remotely.’”

    “‘The excitability of a cell or tissue, whether it be cardiomyocytes or muscle cells, depends to a certain extent on diffusion,’ Raman said. ‘While cardiomyocytes have a different set of rules, the principle that controls the sensitivity to temperature can be expected to be similar.’”

    “Now, the team is looking at how different types of neurons respond to the stimulation process. They will be targeting particular neurons by selectively binding the nanoparticles to provide more selective control.”


  10. In my post above, I quoted from Yuval Harari’s 2018 WEF presentation, “Will the Future be Human?”.

    I should have quoted from his more relevant 2020 WEF presentation on “hackable humans”: So, I have pulled a few pertinent quotes (never too late, right?):

    “We are no longer mysterious souls; we are now hackable animals.”

    “In the coming decades AI and biotechnology will give us godlike abilities to re-engineer life and even to create completely new life forms . . .”

    “After four billion years of organic life shaped by natural selection we are about to enter a new era of inorganic life shaped by intelligent design — our intelligent design is going to be the new driving force of the evolution of life . . . In using our new divine powers of creation, we might make mistakes on a cosmic scale.”

    “The result . . . might be a race of humans who are very intelligent and very disciplined, but lack compassion, lack artistic sensitivity, and lack spiritual depth.”


  11. RE: Rockefeller University’s Kavli Neural Systems Institute (launched October 2015)

    “Meet the Leaders of the Kavli Neural Systems Institute” (from October 2015)

    This was the prompt/premise of the linked interview:
    “How do signals between the body, the environment, and the brain come together to generate, behaviors, thoughts, and emotions?”

    This is part of the response from Jeffrey Friedman, MD, PhD (who was Co-director of Kavli Neural Systems Institute at that time):

    “. . . we’ve developed a number of methods, but one that I wouldn’t have anticipated is a nanotechnology that allows us to control neural activity in living animals using radio waves or magnets. The technique essentially involves hijacking a heat-sensitive molecule in neurons of the tongue that acts as a sensor of thermal pain. When it gets activated, the neuron fires. We found a way to tether this molecule to an endogenously produced iron nanoparticle called ferritin, whose job is to prevent iron from causing toxic effects by sequestering it. We found that when we insert these constructs into neurons in a living animal, exposure to radio waves or magnetic fields activates the ferritin and noninvasively activates those neurons . . . We’ve also figured out how to make a version of the construct that inhibits rather than activates neurons, and we are using this to activate some neurons in the circuit and inhibit others and monitor the behavioral consequences.”

    For greater context, see my October 2021 post on Kavli’s work in neuroscience and nanotechnology:

    Relevant to this post – Friedman’s colleague at the Kavli Neural Systems Institute (at Rockefeller U) was Dr. Cori Bargmann (, who was one of the architects of the BRAIN Initiative, launched by President Obama in 2013 to create neurotechnologies for the next generation of brain research.

    Here is a link to one of Friedman’s patents which is relevant to the linked discussion, and pertinent to my exploratory essay above:

    “The present invention provides methods and compositions for the remote control of cell function based on the use of radiofrequency waves to excite nanoparticles targeted to specific cell types.”


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s