My purpose in writing this is to link to Jon Rappoport, who today is republishing an article called Smoking Gun: Fauci states COVID PCR test gas fatal flaw; confession from the “beloved” expert of experts.
This is important information, but I think that Rappoport is missing a critical element. Anthony Fauci has stated, as cited by Jon,
“…If you get [perform the test at] a cycle threshold of 35 or more…the chances of it being replication-competent [aka accurate] are miniscule…you almost never can culture virus [detect a true positive result] from a 37 threshold cycle…even 36…”
Fauci is not lying here. He is misdirecting. He’s admitting here that replication cycles in excess of 35 using the PCR machine destroy the credibility of the results.*** He’s leaving out some critical words: “for its intended purpose.” The PCR
machine test is an amazing tool process that can be used to compare strands of DNA and RNA, and tell us if the strands match or not. That’s the limit of its usefulness, but it has dramatically changed our lives, opened wide the field of law enforcement, and many others. It is the basis for “DNA evidence” that is now so widespread and talked about everywhere. This amazing invention can find one grain of sand from all the sand on all of the California beaches.
But the PCR
machine test cannot diagnose disease. Just for sake of argument, let’s say that there really is such a thing as the SARS-CoV-2 virus or the “Delta variant.” If such a thing existed, it would easily spread, and would probably turn up in all of us. How can we stop the spread of something so small that we cannot see it? We’d all have to live in isolation tents.
But it would not make us sick. Official virology tells us that to be infected with a viral disease, we need a very large “viral load,” not one or two but millions upon millions of the little fellows to become ill. So finding just one, which is all the PCR (purportedly) can do, means nothing. (PCR is not looking for a virus anyway, but let’s keep this as simple as possible.)
So watch Anthony do his magic. He’s saying that amplification cycles over 35 yield unreliable results. He is IMPLYING that cycles under 35 are accurate. That is professional misdirection. He takes us 80% of the way, and let us finish and close on our own. The PCR
machine test as used done is inaccurate at all levels of amplification. All positive tests are false positives, all negative results are false negatives.
machine test is being misused to tell the a lie – that we having a pandemic. We’re not. But without that misused machine, test they could not have pulled that off.
There’s other lies going on, of course, how they report cases, how they do death certificates, how they blame Covid for everything they can stick it to. There’s no science behind lock downs, masking, or distancing. Viruses, if they even exist (I think not), are not alive, cannot stay infectious for 14 days, cannot be transmitted by asymptomatic carriers. It’s a giant web of lies, a house of cards held together by misuse of Kary Mullis’ amazing invention
***Mullis said, if I recall correctly, that machine results in excess of 25 amplifications become less and less reliable, and others have said that by the time they reach 35 amps, are nothing but noise. A study by Rita Jaafar, et al, published in Oxford Academic, claimed that by the time 35 cycles are reached, results are <3% reliable. This would be for, I assume, the machine’s intended use, and not as used in the fake pandemic.