Summary: Human beings naturally group due to many factors, but require effective leaders to force changes. Such leaders often rise organically, as can be seen in history with people like Genghis Kahn, whose presence is still widely felt due to his procreation habits. The leaders we have now and have had for several thousand years, are well aware of organic movements and how to destroy them. Two such recent movements come to mind: The racial unrest of the post-World War II era, and the anti-war movement that arose in response to a seemingly unnecessary and barbaric attack on native populations in Southeast Asia in the early 1960s forward.
The response to such movements is easy to predict – the true an hidden leaders among us, whose activities are clandestine, make and force upon us false leaders whose objective is to destroy organic movements, and render the population into eunuch status. The anti-Vietnam-war movement was rendered impotent by the activities of people like Tom Hayden and Jane Fonda, H Rap Brown, Stokely Carmichael, Noam Chomsky, Dr. Benjamin Spock and others. However, it was Charles Manson and company, who gave us a fake but highly publicized massacre in 1969, that drove the stake through the heart of the movement. Having taken on all of the apparent appearances of a populist surge, the anti-war movement was rendered impotent in the aftermath of the Tate-LaBianca killings, and never recovered as the war moved forward, finally having achieved its real goals by 1975.
Similarly, the Civil Rights Movement of the 1960s grew in strength, and needed to be reined in by false leaders, supplied by Intelligence. Among them were people like Rosa Parks, Thurgood Marshall, Medgar Evans, Jesse Jackson, and Ralph Abernathy. But the most prominent of them was Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. This post examines his real origins, a 1959 arrest wherein he was chosen to become a new man with a fake background, a powerful public speaker named Dr. Martin Luther King, who apparently lived on to become fight promoter Don King. Predictably, the Civil Rights movement was left in tatters after King’s fake assassination in 1968. As false leaders do, he led his followers into a brick wall. His was an exercise in false hope, and of killing real hope.
I have put this off long enough, and today decided to begin the research on the follow-up to the facial comparison I did between Martin Luther King., Jr., and fight promoter Don King. The first step in such a comparison is a timeline. First below is the busy life of Martin Luther King, Jr., and below that of Don King, significantly less active.
Martin Luther King
01/15/1929: Born in Atlanta, GA as Michael King
1934: Renamed by his father Martin Luther King, Jr.
1944: Attends Morehouse College
1947: Becomes a minister
1951: Attains Bachelor of Divinity from Crozer Seminary
6/18/1953: Marries Coretta Scott
1954: Pastor of Dexter Baptist, Montgomery, AL
1955: Part of Montgomery bus boycott
1957: Joins Southern Christian Leadership Conference
1958: Stabbed by Izora Curry
1959-60: Pastor of Ebenezer Baptist Church, Atlanta, GA
1960: Jailed in Georgia, freed after two days
1963: Pens Birmingham Letter from jail
1963: March on Washington, I have a Dream
1964: Wins Nobel Prize
1964: St. Augustine Movement
1964: New School
1964: Scripto strike
1965: Selma to Montgomery march, Bloody Sunday
1965: Voting Rights Act passes
1966: Chicago Open Housing Movement
1968: Poor People’s campaign
4/3/1968: I have been to the mountaintop
4/4/1968: Staying at room 306, Lorraine Motel, assassinated
4/4/1968: Dies at 7:05 PM
3/10/1969: James Earl Ray confesses to MLK Murder
3/13/1969: James Earl Ray recants confession
1977: Awarded Medal of Freedom.
There are 27 items there from Wikipedia that I could tie to MLK with a specific date.
Don King:
August 20, 1931: Born in Cleveland
1951: Engaged in illegal bookmaking
1954: Killed Hillary Brown, ruled justifiable homicide
4/20/1966: Killed Sam Garrett
1967: Sentenced to 1-20 years in prison for Garrett killing.
1972: Released after 3 years, 11 months.
1972: Pardoned by Ohio Gov Rhodes with supporting letters from Jesse Jackson, Coretta Scott King, Art Modell, Gabe Paul and others.
There are but seven items on Don King that I could tie to a specific date.
I won’t get into the details of the assassination here other than to assert what most of our readers here know, that it was fake.
What I was looking for in reading about Don King was an open contradiction, that these two men cannot possibly be the same person. There are four events in his history that can be asserted as such:
- 1951, engaged in illegal bookmaking. This is well before MLK’s period of activism, and so there is no evidence they are or are not the same man.
- 1954, killed Hillary Brown, shooting him in the back as he attempted to rob one of his gambling houses. It was ruled justifiable homicide. MLK is a pastor in Montgomery AL at that time. See photo analysis below, as the apparent inmate is not Don King.
- April 20, 1966: Killed Sam Garrett, bludgeoning him to death. He was convicted of murder in the second degree, and was sentenced to prison for a period of one to twenty years. There is no mug shot to accompany this event.
- In 1972 he was released from prison after serving 3 years and 11 months. He was pardoned that year by Ohio Governor Rhodes.
Most of you surely realize that 3 and 11 (= 33) is a spook marker, so that his time in prison is suspect. But I add here that the date April 20 is also a spook marker. It happens 1) to be Hitler’s birthday (and mine), and 2) more importantly, in a non-leap year is the 110th day of the year, or “11”, an important number in spookology. So two of the three events for young Don King are tied to spook markers.
Another tell, by the way, in the Don King legacy, is the list of people who wrote to Governor Rhodes of Ohio to get Don King out of jail. They included Jesse Jackson, Art Modell (former owner of the Cleveland Browns and Baltimore Ravens), and most importantly Coretta Scott King. That’s an impressive list of people seeking release of a common criminal.
So here we have the total time line between Martin Luther King and Don King while the former was still “alive”, and two of the three items that overlap are embedded spook markers. My guess here at this early stage of research is that the killing of Sam Garrett and his serving 3 years 11 months … did not happen. The event and sentence were planted to give us separation from Martin Luther King., Jr. at the height of his ministry. Don King, after his release from prison, gave us the Rumble in the Jungle between Joe Frazier and Mohammed Ali (1974), and the Thriller in Manila between the same two men (1975). Thereafter King was the undisputed king of boxing, sponsoring too many fights to list.
There will be plenty of photo comparisons to follow, so for right now the question is how to overcome the absurdity of the staid and righteous Martin Luther King Jr. with the gregarious and openly on-the-edge character Don King. How can they possibly be the same person?
Answer: He is but one man, an actor, a very good one.
Martin Luther King, Jr. was a polished public speaker. As with all actors, he did not write his own material. I can believe that he, as an actor reading his lines, was rehearsed and prepared for his role of a lifetime. That’s what actors do. In movies There was William Wallace in Braveheart, Samwise Gamgee in The Lord of the Rings, Bluto in Animal House (“Was it over when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor?”), and Pat O’Brien for Knute Rockne, All American and “Win One For the Gipper.”
The point is that Martin Luther King, Jr. was hired as an actor, and his 1954 killing of Hillary Brown, if it was really Don King, was whitewashed. He was given a fake degree and fake background, and read and memorized speeches written for him by some of the best in the business, the same people that write most of our presidential speeches and popular music and appoint and the stand behind and operate the hand up the rear for public officials. He rehearsed and prepared, and in the end, delivered. His life and death served to raise hopes and expectations for black people, and then to dash them on the rocks, a classic ‘killing hope’ project.
Don King, as I see it, is the same person in a different role, is also an actor, and is as non-MLK as can be with the wild hair and gregarious smile and attitude. If he was going to pull off the role of Don King against his MLK Jr., he had to set aside the modest and unassuming nature of the former character, and go all Al Pacino on us. When did Don King become Dr. Martin Luther King? My assertion, 1959, when mug shots appear without a corresponding arrest. Was Don King at that time approached and given a choice, jail or fame? I suspect so.
None save a few here would ever think to question that two men, both named King, one conservative and serious, the other outlandish, could be the same man. That is how they pulled off this charade, however, by creating two diametrically opposite characters. So, off we go into face chop land. There are curve balls aplenty.
First, we have mug shots of Don King, who was arrested in 1954 for killing Hillary Brown (ruled justifiable homicide), and again in 1959, if the photos below are correct. Both sets of photos are said to be of Don King, 1954 and 1959. (I do not know why he was arrested in 1959.)
The photo to the left here (upper above) does not align with either Don King or Martin Luther King. The photo on the right here (lower below), however, aligns with both. So, two problems: Don King was supposedly arrested in 1954 for killing Hillary Brown, but the mug shot shown is not him. However, we have a mug shot from 1959, for what crime I do not know, and that photo aligns with both Martin Luther King, Jr. and Don King.
Here is the 1954 photo, where misalignment is apparent:
Here is the 1959 Photo, where faces align:
It then goes without saying (If A=B and A=C, then B=C), that Martin Luther King and Don King will align. But what happened in 1959 to cause his arrest? We know from official records (well, Wikipedia anyway), that Don King was arrested in 1966 for killing Sam Garrett, and that he was sentenced to jail for second degree murder. But we have no mug shots of the 1966 arrest or conviction. This begs for an explanation.
In the two photos here, right and left, I did one with mouths closed, one with mouths open, and got the same alignment on both. I also did a comparison of right ears, which I know not to be convincing, except for me, as I’ve looked at a lot of them.
Keep in mind that we are looking at a young Martin Luther King, Jr. (L), who supposedly died at age 39, and an older Don King, not sure of his age. There is, however, a basis for comparison.
Notice the two red arrows. They point at the upper helix on each, which to me look identical. Green arrows point at the concha/upper concha, which lighting distorts a bit, but which oddly reflects the upper bar of light on both (R) and (L) photo. The yellow arrow pointing at the upper antihelix, pronounced on both, and with the same upper curve on both. The blue arrow points at the intertragel notch, pronounced on the left, growing closed on the right.
Note on the right that the ear lobe has widened and grown longer. Ear lobes grow at the rate of approximately .22 ml per year, or 2.2 ml over ten years, or .0866 inches, or close to one-tenth of an inch. Over 50 years that’s a half inch. I would judge by “Don” King’s ear lobe in this comparison that he is in his 60s.
We have more to cover here. I am satisfied by photographic evidence that Martin Luther King, Jr. and Don King are the same man. If I leave you unconvinced, so be it. I could be subject to my own confirmation biases, but having done so many photos over the years, I tend to trust my judgment, right or wrong. I did not go looking for this comparison. It was dropped in my lap, and after one comparison, seen below, I knew whoever brought this to me (You Can Call Me Ray) was on to something.
But there are anomalies. For one, why do we have a photo of an inmate in 1954 who is neither Martin Luther King nor Don King? That could be deliberately misleading, or some sleuth who was not very good with photos. We do know, from Wikipedia anyway, that “Don King” killed Hillary Brown in 1954, but was let off. It was called justifiable homicide. Brown was attacking one of King’s betting parlors. That arrest, however, would lead to a mug shot, and it would be public record. Maybe someone just grabbed the wrong one, but there is no mug shot corresponding to the 1954 arrest.
But then there is the oddball 1959 mug shot, for which there is no known arrest to go with it. Yet as shown above, the photo aligns well with both Don King and Martin Luther King. Where did that photo come from, and what was the associated crime?
Finally, we are told that in 1966 Don King killed Sam Garrett, and for that crime we have no mug shot. If someone can produce it, bring it please. We are told that the crime was committed on 4/20/66, and that King was sentenced to one to twenty years. We also know that he was released after 3 years and 11 months in 1972. Both 4/20 and 3X11 are spook markers.
Here’s my speculation: There was no crime in 1966, but Don King had to be erased, that is, there could be no record of him in public when Martin Luther King was at the height of his fake ministry. For that reason he was assigned a fake crime and given a fake jail sentence, removing him from public view. He did not reemerge until 1972, well over three years after MLK’s fake assassination. By that time memories had dimmed, and the new Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., called Don King, outlandish and outrageous, hit the streets.
There was a reason for spook markers on the 1966 crime – it did not happen, nor did the jail sentence. MLK merely went in to hiding, and waited on permission to resume his colorful life.
_________________________________________
Conclusion: Dr. Martin Luther King emerged in the 1960s as the anointed leader of the Civil Rights movement. He was placed there by Intel, and served to galvanize the movement with his powerful public speaking abilities and personal gravitas. He was then assassinated, and the movement was essentially destroyed, his whole purpose. The movement has since recovered somewhat, but still under the thumb of Intel, giving us fake offshoots like Black Lives Matter.
Nonetheless, as I see it, 1960s to 2025, blacks have made tremendous strides forward, thanks to … blacks and certain laws that guaranteed them access to colleges and universities, where their more talented ones have flourished. Racial harmony is better now than then, and black lives do indeed matter more then than now.
Piece of Mindful 
Mark, I was at work and couldn’t wait to get out to read your post!
I had a dream, and you killed it man! Just kidding. But seriously MLK is such an obvious fake leader. I’m thinking they killed him off in ’68 because he was legitimately too “hot” – they needed a lot of real security around him because he was so polarizing, and they had a lot invested in him. Like a dead rock star, he was worth much more dead than alive.
He looks like he had some cheek filler, or just a lot of steaks and bourbon. I was thinking about what a sweet job it would be to be Don King, boxing promotor. 10% of the cut, or any percentage, of a prize fight, would give him huge cash flow. Going to bars every night, bedding all the best women – sounds like a nice severance package after having to put himself at personal risk playing a divisive character, who was under the spotlight constantly.
LikeLike
MLK posed with Muhammad Ali in Atlanta once. The photos are easy enough to google monster.
And Don standing next to Ali is even easier to google monster.
Seems to be at least a 7 inch difference between the two.
MLk was quite short; Don King not so much.
LikeLike
The only height comparison I will accept is the two of them side by side. Good luck on that.
LikeLike
So is your point that mlk isn’t obviously a short fella and don king was obviously not?
LikeLike
Not at all. Proof definitive is in a side-by-side comparison, which at once negates the MLK=DK hypothesis, and highlights the height discrepancy all at once. Failing in that, you are tasked to find photos of each man on flat ground in the presence of someone or something whose or which height can act as a constant.
I was hit often in the early days with people coming to the blog with detailed knowledge of the heights of the people I was comparing, as if there were some common database of how tall people are or were. Bill O’Reilly was an example, and with great effort I was able to transpose the length of his forearm from one photo to another showing that he and Bobby Fuller were of like height. The assertion (without evidence) was that Bill was tall, Bobby short. Not so. Both were/are quite tall. I am skeptical of knowledge of people’s height without objective visual evidence.
LikeLike
Look at the later photos next to Mike Tyson. They are very close to the same height. Tyson was short, about 5’9″. King is shown slightly taller, but the hair distorts his height. Also he appears he could be wearing lifts, his lower legs are quite thin. I
LikeLike
You are correct to call MLK a fake leader. His job was to take down the Black Elite. Pre “Civil Rights” the Black Elite controlled all the resources in the Black Community: Hospitals, Colleges, Law Firms, Banks, etc.. These people were in general the ancestors of freed slaves or descendants of slave owners who were not recognized but educated in secret and set up financially. This class still exists and still looks down upon the “new money” from sports, music, etc… Post Civil Rights the brain drain was significant. As they roll back Civil Rights there is no strong, stable, Black dominated society to return to. All the gifted and talented Blacks have no choice but to work for the Man and do his bidding.
LikeLike
Can you expand – “roll back civil rights” in what way?
Were the Black Elites you refer to, in the post slavery, pre civil rights era – a mixed race descended from slaves and slave owners? Or were some only descended from “pure” Blacks or Black Elites from pre slavery times?
Sidenote, somebody made an extensive website giving their evidence that most American black people descend from blacks already here (ie not the Atlantic slave trade), pretty fascinating but I forget the link
LikeLike
Boethius, if you don’t mind me asking, are you black, or African American? Your opinion is interesting, and point well taken. MLK, as we agree was a fake leader, otherwise he would not have a holiday named after himself.
I would lean towards what Mark said: MLK, and to another extent, Malcolm X were “killing hope” projects. Targeting not just the black elite, but the black masses – from a life of decency into prison. By supplying them with anti-role models: Malcolm X to start, followed by Don King, Muhammed Ali, and then and endless series of fake tough guy hip hop “billionaires”: Snoop Dog, Puffy, Tupak, Bigge, ad nauseum.
Tim, I agree the whole African Slave trade and Slavery in general is majorly suspect. I say that as someone who respects black people: i find it impossible that you could transport a slave ship of black men across the Atlantic and not have complete mutiny, or 90% death rates. More likely many of the “slave ships” were just agricultural migrants. Or migrants moving from a land of hardship to one of economic opportunity. Today, millions of Latin Americans and Chinese are willing to risk their lives to get into the United States. Without whips and chains. A slave system build 100% on fear, punishment, and coercion would not work, would not be profitable. Much more likely most of the blacks were agricultural workers who were not completely free, but moved around according to needs of the bosses, and kept certain freedoms as do present day “illegal immigrants”. I base my opinions not just on conjecture, but having known many Asian immigrants, legal and illegal, some crossing the Mexican border on foot.
LikeLike
Lookup Maya Forbes if you want to know what I’m talking about. First do an image search. Then a wiki.
LikeLike
Reading through article I noted Jane Fonda. I have a comment on Jane Fonda, a contrarian opinion if you will. It is supposed to be true, and is up to a certain rank, that Jane Fonda is the most hated person to veterans. However, above a certain rank, I am willing to bet Jane Fonda is a decorated “military” veteran, if you will, who has received the highest honors from the upper echolons of the Pentagon. Why? Because she was the greatest flak catcher for the military of all time. All the hatred and bitterness of the veterans for being sent into a hot brutal climate with no military objective could be focused on one human being, namely Jane Fonda. Instead of asking real questions on what the hell the point of Vietnam was, the entire right wing, and center, and hell most veterans, could release their ire harmlessly at this ditzy broad, Jane Fonda, who single handedly lost the war – Tokyo Jane. And hence got the military off, so to speak. She is definitely worshipped at the top and given huge rewards for her efforts – marriage to Ted Turner where she got a cut of his billions.
LikeLike
From the Archives: Rabbi Jacob M. Rothschild and the Civil Rights Movement | Atlanta History Center
There are some great pictures online of MLK getting a big party in Atlanta thrown by none other than Rabbi Rothschild himself. In most pictures MLK looks like a drooling idiot, if you will. No doubt I’m sure Rothschild gave him a big, big bonus for winning the Nobel prize. And then no doubt set him up with organized crime bigwigs when he became Don King so he could be an untouchable boxing promoter, coming not only out of nowhere, but as a two bit con, to take over the boxing world. Totally not believable on any level.
LikeLike
A very large irony, and part of this story that demonstrates MLK Jr is a CIA/Mason actor, is the leniency of the justice system to his “doppelganger” Don King. As Mark noted, there has been real civil rights progress since the 1960s, that is indisputable. And one aspect of that is equal rights in the justice system. At present, our justice system is purely based on money and social or caste status.
I will digress briefly; I believe the West, or European civilization, lives under a caste system not dissimilar to the Indian caste system. I know the Indian caste system well, or as well as an outsider might understand it, of which there is not much to know, other than you are born of a certain rank/status, that does not change in your lifetime, except under exceptional circumstances. The Jews are one example in the West of it’s caste system – I believe Jews were traditionally a high ranking banking caste. Yet they do not have complete power, is there is/was also an aristocratic Gentile warrior/landowning class, that is still in existence.
Anyhow, there is zero chance any black who is not juiced would get a justifiable homicide ruling in the 1950s, or a pardon in the 1970s for murder. Today, they likely would still be screwed. And that applies to any race, if you aren’t in the club forget about leniency.
LikeLike
We learned sometime back about a dignified order of blacks who were Freemasons and of royal descent. The only three who come to mind are Sammy Sosa, LeBron James, and Barack Obama. I can vouch for none of them.
LikeLike
This may sound silly, but I believe the Moors may be one such group of “royal” high ranking blacks. Not the Moops as George Castanza insisted in the Bubble Boy episode.
A few examples: there’s a video I saw on Magbittertruths channel where it shows Pope kissing the feet of a group of Moors. Another clue is Othello in Shakespeare is a Moor, and married to a “white” woman.
LikeLike
I’m having trouble with the space between the eyes and the eyebrows. Also, are height charts mandatory for mug shots because there are none here. Yes, DK is probably a fictional character from the get go so why bother with details? Or, it’s a deliberate gaff, like number markers, to tip off those in the know but out of the loop.
The height issue might also be a legitimate concern. Coretta was listed as 5’5” and MLK as 5’7” and they look close. One of their sons does look over 6 feet tall.
I always turn eventually to MLK’s close advisor, Stanley Levison when the subject of MLK the tool comes up. Great name, yup. He’s worth a gander. Looks like The Handler, even when he was pressured by RFK to hit the down low because of the commie odor MLK was dragging around.
A while ago I suggested that Ghislaine Maxwell might be played by the same agent playing Princess Diana- a complete inversion of the secular saint. The right reverend “doctor” inverting to a hustling murderer who trafficked in legally licensed violence would follow the same pattern.
The bottom line, though, for me is that I think they are likely brats, not the same person, but that’s in light pencil. Discuss.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Don King was likely partly created for what I will call an anti-role model for black men. Set out there like Snoop Dog is today as the biggest success story of a black man today, accused murderer, total annoying clown. For the youths to emulate. Don King is setup as a bookmaker and twice convicted murderer, and becomes a hugely successful, rich man.
Also he was the front man for faking all those famous fights of the 70s and 80s. I haven’t watched them all again, but as I’ve mentioned before I was shocked how fake the Rumble in the Jungle was after watching again. I think they figured no one was ever going to watch the re-runs back then, because Ali and Foreman were not doing a good job faking it. They probably invented the rope a dope explanation later for Ali not even giving a good acting performance as being a decent fighter. It was all pro wresting, and Don King acted and looked just like a professional wrestling promoter.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I don’t by any means mean to sound dismissive or snippy, but I have done all I am going to do on this subject. It was a lot of work, and I am not accustomed to that kind of work anymore. I wanted to do an overlay on the ears, but have forgotten how.
Several matters have come up which I did not consider: The Brat hypothesis, certainly plausible; the height discrepancies, ditto.
Here’s a few things I either did not notice or decided to leave out:
This we can all agree upon: MLK did not die on 4/4/68. He did, however, disappear from view.
The man in the 1953 mug shot is neither MLK or DK.
The man in the 1959 mug shot could be either or both.
There is no associated crime or arrest with the 1959 mug shot.
There is an associated crime and arrest with the 1966 murder event, but no mug shot, and it is surrounded by spook markers.
Martin Luther King was a gifted orator, but I was only able to find one photo of him as a young man in his twenties, that of a book cover, called The Seminarian, after his supposed days at Crozier. It’s a jump for me to claim he did not write his famous speeches, but they are some of the most inspiring in American history, setting even Lincoln in the background. (Did Lincoln write his own speeches, or is he an early ancestor of McCartney?)
Here’s an interesting snippet about Coretta Scott King: Geni reveals a connection to the Van Buren family. He was indeed a slave holder. Perhaps there is a Jeffersonian-type link there.
I welcome any and all dissent or agreement in the comments and can with ease highlight some of it, individually or as a group effort, to a new post.
LikeLike
My friend just sent me this. It it doesn’t beat all: Uncle Joe Biden getting his Mason stripes from the Prince Hall’s (they are the black wing of Masonry, another org is Boule). Congrats Joe great job!
Jerry Dunleavy IV 🇺🇸 on X: “anyway here are pictures of Joe Biden becoming a Free Mason on his last full day in office as president https://t.co/vbT4DSDwuN” / X
LikeLike
MLK at Communist School
This is a 1957 photo of MLK at the Tennessee Communist Training School and published in a 1963 edition of the Augusta Courier.
Maybe the “1959” mugshot of Don/MLK is actually the 1954 mugshot. 1954 seems to fit the timeline better, if Don was approached and given the “jail or fame” choice. Because remember this is right before MLK comes on the national scene with the “Montgomery bus boycott” in late 1955.
LikeLike
Photo to me looks like an obvious fake.
LikeLike
As a side bar, I was wondering about actor James Earl Jones. He follows the profile of many prominent black public figures: missing parent(s) at an early age, inexplicable success from “modest” means, entered the military and then became an actor (despite a speech impediment). Also, considerable white lineage.
He came to prominence playing Jack Jefferson, based directly on Jack Johnson, the first great American black boxer and a loud, Ali-esque character from early in the 20th century.
Like Johnson, Jones married white women. As is sometimes the case, relatives essay famous people on screen. I don’t have the links to claim this with any certainty here.
Jones father, Robert*, whom he only met in the 1950’s, was a prominent black actor in the 30’s after a short career as a boxer. He was an associate of Langston Hughes and you can assess what that relationship involved despite Hughes denial he was gay (and a commie)
James Earl Jones later starred in Percy & Thunder as a former boxer and trainer who battles Billy Dee Williams as a thinly veiled Don King.
The name James Earl is shared by Jimmy Carter and MLK’s alleged assassin, James Earl Ray. Also, James Earl Chaney, one of the three civil rights workers “killed” by the KKK in June of 1964.
My default position again is that Jones was likely a royal bastard, had a caretaker family that raised him and that he followed his father into the same intel stream through the theater.
*Robert Jones knew and worked with other suspect characters besides Hughes. He acted for Oscar Micheaux, the DW Griffith of black cinema and was a sparring partner for Joe Louis. Not a CV for some unvetted commoner. You may be familiar with him in The Sting as Luther, the old grifter who gets murdered which sets off the main swindle with the fake betting parlor.
PS- Jack Johnson attempted to join the Freemasons but was rejected. Weird.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Nice well researched work as usual Tyrone.
I wanted to add he was also in Dr. Strangelove at a very young age. Without looking up his filmography, that must have been one of his first roles, under Stanley Kubrick no less.
The subtitle of Dr. Strangelove is “How I stopped worrying and learned to love the bomb”. That is one of the strongest clues, aside from the garbage science, that bombs are fake. Of course Kubrick learned to love the bomb – he probably made good money helping out at Lookout Mountain. As he later learned to love “space”, the final frontier for people without a life. I can’t remember who said that people with no friends in high school are more likely to name their child “Dylan”, after Bob Dylan. My ex did that haha.
LikeLike
Ok Firstly I agree that the two are the same.
And agree with Mark’s entire scenario put forth of the agenda with the exception that “Official” records are not relevant in matters that can not be sufficiently (non-agent) eye witness corroborated in my humble opinion.
Also Boethius comment about agenda is consistent with how TPTB operate and I agree.
And YouCanCallMeRay opinion on the ships and immigration scenario back then I believe spot on and the Jane Fonda expose as well.
I believe that sometimes these actors/actresses are trained in more than one role simultaneously and may compile photos, videos for later publication.
I do not believe Don King existed beyond secret development until Marty had left the building.
All conflicting evidence of his existence during Marty’s life is in a way proof of what I propose.
A different but similar example is that Alex Jones and Bill Hicks were developing at the same time which shows them in “evidence” as being different people but in a contemporary time line. The Powers That Be are great look-ahead planners!
The most correction to my theory of one actor two roles that I’d accept is CLOSE blood relatives…
LikeLiked by 1 person
That’s a really interesting comment. Food for thought.
LikeLike
Thanks for the thoughtful reply. I agree if not the same they are close relatives.
There are some pictures online where it’s most clear. I don’t know how to post pictures here, Mark if you get a chance you might do this. Google Mike Tyson Don King and look at images. Theres a few where King is holding up Tyson after a fight and he has a huge grin. When I first had the idea MLK=DK after someone dropped the idea in a forum, I saw that picture and it was BINGO – same guy or near doppleganger. In the picture DK looks like MLK with a moustache and a wig.
As far as height all pictures of Don King are done by “professional” photographers, and obviously screened before release. So you will never see a candid shot of DK.
For slaves, the Chinese and all the white children who worked in the Satanic mills of New England, they count too. There are still Chinese slaves in the USA today, working in restaurants, sweatshops, massage parlors. It ain’t just blacks who were slaves, a ridiculous premise for anyhow who really understands history.
LikeLike
Thanks to both of you. This is a twist indeed. It may be tomorrow before I get to it but I will. Ray, send me the photos at mpthct at proton dot me. WordPress claims, probably rightly, that their servers would be overwhelmed if they allowed photos in the comments.
LikeLike
Test
https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/Re4AAOSwVNNcSJM~/s-l1200.webp
LikeLike
No go.. I think if that had a jpeg file ending, it would post here – bc not hosted by WordPress servers.
LikeLike
But that photo doesn’t look like MLK to me, if it’s the one you meant Ray..
LikeLike
It does or did to me, look like him. Factoring in many potential changes, like plastic surgery, growth hormone, and demeanor. Did Christian Vale look like Christian Vale of Batman when he played Veep? No. So we’re dealing with an actor. Don King smiles, a lot, shit eating grins, whereas MLK was dour. DK also looks like he could have some dental changes. I see the same actor, potentially. Anyway, it’s not that important to me, as far as I’m concerned we’ve connected the two Kings through Coretta, and Ali was certainly a psyop connecting the two.
LikeLike
We never even got into the “assassination”. If it were real, could his security been any dumber? staying in the same hotel, same room, hanging out on the balcony full daylight. Then after he is shot lets all point where we thought the shot came from? instead of getting down and getting everyone to safety? All these assassinations require you to be brain dead to believe they happened as claimed.
LikeLike