Law enforcement versus Apple: Another fake showdown

The fake battle between Apple and law enforcement over the Apple iPhone used by the fake terrorist is hard to understand. What is really at stake?

First, the San Bernardino event was fake. I investigated just one of the supposed victims, “Sierra Clayborn,” a fake person with fake photos and identity and family. Piece of cake. If I can do that anyone can. (What was odd that there was another “Sierra Clayborn” in Chicago, and she was as fake as the California one. Two fake people, same name, different parts of the country. What gives?)

When the spooks stage these events, they have to make up persons, giving them occupations, names, photos, family – because the American news media is state controlled and the public too dumbed down to know better, they don’t have to try too hard, which is why it is so easy to spot the fakery. The Sierra Clayborn photos were so amateurish that they had to be laughing as they put them together.

Secondly, there is nothing “locked” about an Apple phone. The technology came out of DARPA, and was designed to track us. Government has been able to eavesdrop on our cell phones from the get go.

Thirdly, there was no “terrorist” doing any shooting, so whoever supposedly did the fake deed is either a fake name or a spook or Green Beret or Seal or private terrorist from Blackwater or its successors. All is known about that person already.

So what is up with wanting to know the fake information on the fake phone? My guess: Legal precedent, one less constitutional protection. We had no privacy to begin with, but now they apparently want to formalize our subservience to the surveillance state.

Blessed are they who do not see, and yet believe

I still suspect that Antonin Scalia is really dead, and am happy about that. Given the level of corruption in our society, it is hard to point at just him and lay blame for the record of the Supreme Court in years past. He had a lot of help.

Never mind the notion that these justices, appointed for life, hold final say over too much, have too much power. They are essentially unaccountable. Even an obviously flawed decision like Citizens United, which they solicitedstands unchallenged. The whole system, never intended that way by the framers, needs to be chucked. The Supreme Court under Marshall essentially usurped its power, becoming the eqivalent of the British House of Lords.

But let’s take a closer look: death certificate issued by person who did not see body; cause of death unknown; no examination of the death scene; no autopsy or even examination of corpse; closed casket vigil; closed casket funeral. I do hope he is dead, and we will proceed as if he is. But we have nothing in the way if evidence that he is really dead. No body, no proof.

If you are a person of faith, you don’t have a problem. Some of us need to be convinced.

Again, I suspect he is dead. But without actual evidence, all we have is hope.

Inconvenient documents

The post below dealt with the matter of fake death, and a commenter noted that fake deaths are not uncommon:

“We are now able to disappear thousands of bodies, whole passenger planes and the most notorious “terrorist” in history. Practice makes perfect. One need only think of the “witness protection” program to see how easy it is to relocate thousands of people in new lives and new places, in plain sight — like Montana. The truth is out there.”

Here’s another example: while no “plane” hit the Pentagon on 9/11, there apparently was a flyover, though witnesses place the track of that airliner off line with whatever hit the building. The pilot of that airliner, Chick Burlingame, is supposedly one of the thousands of victims of the sleek and shiny reptiles who pulled of that stunt that day. If he did not really die, he would have to take on a new identity and begin a new life. He would have to be careful not to blow the gig.  But what would happen if others knew about his fake death and began talking?

This might interest you. 

Continue reading “Inconvenient documents”