If it were that easy …

Some very good work passes by our eyes every Friday might on Bill Moyers’ Journal, and July 10 was no exception. His guest was Wendell Potter, former head of corporate communications for CIGNA, the nation’s fourth largest health insurance company.

Potter had an epiphany of sorts, not unlike Dr. Peter Rost, former pharmaceutical executive who wrote a tell-all book, The Whistleblower: Confessions of a Health Care Hitman. Potter’s came when he went to a health care expedition in Wise, West Virginia.

I borrowed my dad’s car and drove up 50 miles up the road to Wise, Virginia. It was being held at a Wise County Fairground. I took my camera. I took some pictures. It was a very cloudy, misty day, it was raining that day, and I walked through the fairground gates. And I didn’t know what to expect. I just assumed that it would be, you know, like a health– booths set up and people just getting their blood pressure checked and things like that.

But what I saw were doctors who were set up to provide care in animal stalls. Or they’d erected tents, to care for people. I mean, there was no privacy. In some cases– and I’ve got some pictures of people being treated on gurneys, on rain-soaked pavement.

And I saw people lined up, standing in line or sitting in these long, long lines, waiting to get care. People drove from South Carolina and Georgia and Kentucky, Tennessee– all over the region, because they knew that this was being done. A lot of them heard about it from word of mouth.

There could have been people and probably were people that I had grown up with. They could have been people who grew up at the house down the road, in the house down the road from me. And that made it real to me.

BILL MOYERS: What did you think?

WENDELL POTTER: It was absolutely stunning. It was like being hit by lightning.

Potter recalls later riding on a CIGNA jet and eating food from gold leaf china. The contrast between West Virginia and corporate luxury troubled him deeply.

“Okay, I can’t do this. I can’t keep– I can’t.” One of the books I read as I was trying to make up my mind here was President Kennedy’s “Profiles in Courage.”

And in the forward, Robert Kennedy said that one of the president’s, one of his favorite quotes was a Dante quote that, “The hottest places in hell are reserved for those who, in times of moral crisis, maintain a neutrality.” And when I read that, I said, “Oh, jeez, I– you know. I’m headed for that hottest place in hell, unless I say something.”

That’s rare. Rare indeed. Most of us adapt our minds to the power structure around us, internalizing the contradictions and self-justifying as we must, shutting out everything else. I doubt any other health insurance executives in this country bother to attend health care expeditions. They are more likely to be found in their blinded offices looking over financial reports and making decisions that destroy lives. All in insulated splendor.

Sources now say that there’s a parade of lobbyists going in and out of Senator Max Baucus’s office. Recently the Washington Post disclosed (Familiar Players in Health Bill Lobbying) that Baucus is being lobbied by two former chiefs of staff, David Castagnetti, whose clients include PhRMA and America’s Health Insurance Plans, and Jeffrey A. Forbes, working now for PhRMA, Amgen, Genentech, Merck and others.

He’s completely shut off from ordinary people. He doesn’t know how bad it is, how ordinary people on Main Street don’t go see doctors because of cost, don’t have insurance because they can’t afford it or are not allowed the privilege.

Potter says that the industry has its ways. He talked about Michael Moore’s movie, Sicko, and how the insurance industry deliberately set out to blunt its effect on Capitol Hill:

WENDELL POTTER: …part of the effort to discredit this film was to use lobbyists and their own staff to go onto Capitol Hill and say, “Look, you don’t want to believe this movie. You don’t want to talk about it. You don’t want to endorse it. And if you do, we can make things tough for you.”

BILL MOYERS: How?

WENDELL POTTER: By running ads, commercials in your home district when you’re running for reelection, not contributing to your campaigns again, or contributing to your competitor.

BILL MOYERS: This is fascinating. You know [quoting from a document circulated on Capital Hill], “Build awareness among centrist Democratic policy organizations–”

WENDELL POTTER: Right.

BILL MOYERS: “–including the Democratic Leadership Council.”

WENDELL POTTER: Absolutely.

BILL MOYERS: Then it says, “Message to Democratic insiders. Embracing Moore is one-way ticket back to minority party status.”

The people who lobby Capitol Hill are not amateurs, and they do not persuade by force of reason alone. Money and relationships are part of it, to be sure.

But my dark side also thinks that there is more, much more going on that we’ll never be privy to. There are potentially damaging financial relationships and sexual dalliances, knowledge of which is available to lobbyists when needed to keep congress people in line. John Ensign was recently exposed – how many other lay awake at night knowing that someone knows something about them- that they’ve been Abscammed or given the Gary Hart treatment?

In my many dark moments of concern for Max Baucus, I wonder if he’s been caught doing something naughty, perhaps even entrapped. That is, after all, a common form of persuasion – one that we seldom hear about. We only know the fallout.

We’re shut out. Our job is to break down the barriers, make our voices heard inside the velvet curtains of the offices of Congress. It’s not an easy task. Blogs don’t do it – staffers only monitor us for damage control. Phone calls and letters don’t do much good either -these people are not fools – they know what public opinion says. They are unable to respond to it.

Protests are routinely ignored – as Russian expatriate Dmitry Orlav observed,

The American way of dealing with dissent and with protest is certainly more advanced [than that in Russia]: why imprison dissidents when you can just let them shout into the wind to their heart’s content?

Baucus, of course, ham-handedly adopted the Russian response. He’s not particularly good at public relations.

What is the answer? It is no different for us than any other country under the thumb of power – we have to rise up and cast off our rulers. The various peoples of the Soviet Union did this with apparent ease, but theirs was a different situation. Most of them did not suffer the illusion of living under a democratic regime. Americans are deliberately led to think they are in charge of their own lives by mere exercise of meaningless voting rituals every two years, replacing one set of scoundrels with another. If it were that easy, the whole planet would be free.

I don’t see change happening any time soon, I’m afraid. I talk to very few people who have a much of a level of awareness of the true nature of our society and government. There are not enough to make a difference at this time.

So the only answers are patience and education.

This could not be worse …

What could be worse for a liberal? I drove up to my favorite coffee shop, Rockford, here in Bozeman, and it had that yellow tape around it, and the front window was covered with a gray tarp. There had been a fire.

I thought of how Norm must have felt when the Hungry Heifer went down.

Anyone know what happened? Wulfy, Bob? Any ideas on what’s the second best coffee shop in Bozone?

Democracy in America

President Obama’s speech in Cairo, which had American journalists swooning at his feet, was indeed a polished presentation. American policy in that area of the world has not changed an iota, mind you, but the vessel in which it is delivered has been spit-shined. Obama is cool awesome.

In the speech, Obama acknowledged that the United States had engineered the 1953 coup d’état that overthrew the democratically elected government of Iran.

In the middle of the Cold War, the United States played a role in the overthrow of a democratically-elected Iranian government. Since the Islamic Revolution…

This is interesting. “Played a role” is a qualifier added to minimize the importance of U.S. involvement, like saying we “played a role” in World War II. But every Iranian knows this history, probably every human in the Middle East. Here it is, 56 years later, and there is finally official acknowledgment by a U.S. official.

By that standard, it will be 2075 before any information on U.S. involvement in fomenting the rebellion following the recent election is disclosed. Barring medical advances, I probably won’t be around.

Before I am reminded that the people of Iran don’t have true representative government, and that there is true reason for unrest, and that people do want better things for themselves there, let me add that U.S. is messing in Iran for reasons having nothing to do with the legitimate aspirations of the Iranian people. The U.S. does not care about democracy. In 1953, the U.S. saddled Iran with a fascist thug, Mohammad Reza Shah Pahlavi, “The Shah”, and kept him in power until 1979. The rebellion that year, though it did not end well, was as much against the United States as the Shah himself.

So let us be spared pompous preaching about representative government in Iran. In the United States, more than 70% of us want single payer health care, more than that would settle for a legitimate public option. It’s not allowed.

So let’s not aspire too much about Iranian democracy until we get some meaningful form of representative government for ourselves.

Wouldn’t it be great if Americans took to the street? What is it about Iran that its citizens can be so informed and involved? As bad as their government might be now, it seems to work better than what we have.

Courage, Mom …**

The Bozeman Daily Chronicle* today had a relatively long piece (Health reform will affect how Montanans access care) on the health care debate, and in uncharacteristic fashion, took a few shots at Senator Max Baucus. It starts at paragraph 48:

But some are skeptical Montana’s six-term senator is capable of pushing substantive change.

“Max Baucus is purely a satrap of industry,” said [Rick] Meis from Montanans for Single-Payer. “He is a small power figure who is totally manipulated by the powers that be.”

Between 2003 and 2008, 23 percent of money raised by Baucus’ campaign and political action committee came from the health industry.

A range of medical interests are represented in his list of donors. According to the Center for Responsive Politics, the insurance industry provided $784,685; health professionals gave $848,141; and health services and HMOs chipped in $465,750.

Two of Baucus’ biggest contributors are Schering-Plough Corp., a health care company that contributed $92,200 during the five-year period, and Blue Cross Blue Shield of Montana, which contributed $62,350.

Meis said Baucus’ proposal is heavily influenced by those donors.

“It’s what the insurance industry is telling him, because they’re buying him,” Meis said.

From Meis’ perspective, single-payer is the obvious choice if not obscured by industry interests.

“There’s not a single-payer system in the world that doesn’t work better,” he said.

A Baucus spokesman, Ty Matsdorf, quickly circled the wagons, saying that Baucus has on occasion done things the industry didn’t like, as if now doing them the biggest favor in the world now was thereby justified.

But that’s not the point. Even though it didn’t happen until paragraph 48, a Montana newspaper went after Max Baucus. I’m not sure what that means – it could be (one can only hope) that the health care crisis and Democratic attempts to crap on us are having severe fallout, and that Max’s usual base of support, which includes major Montana newspapers, is eroding.

Time will tell. We must keep the pressure on. Please, everyone, do not make nicey with Max. Badmouth him at every venue, on every forum. Kindness only feeds him.

*The Bozeman Daily Chronicle has in the past been behind a subscription wall. I hope the practice has ended – this article is accessible at the time this is written.

**P.S. Did anyone else see the movie “Wag the Dog”?

Query for readers …

Gentlemen and ladies: Assume that I am a lightweight, and that I am going to read only one book (or set of essays) by theologian/scholar Reinhold Neibuhr. Assume that my attitudes about the existence of a deity are pretty well set, and that I am interested more in ethics and the behavior of nations. What would you recommend?

He said it better …

“Let me give you a word of the philosophy of reform. The whole history of the progress of human liberty shows that all concessions yet made to her august claims, have been born of earnest struggle. The conflict has been exciting, agitating, all-absorbing, and for the time being, putting all other tumults to silence. It must do this or it does nothing. If there is no struggle there is no progress. Those who profess to favor freedom and yet depreciate agitation, are men who want crops without plowing up the ground, they want rain without thunder and lightening. They want the ocean without the awful roar of its many waters.” Frederick Douglass, 1857

This is a message to health care reform advocates who think the best way to get what we want is to “work with” Democrats who want to “work with” Republicans and come up with a “compromise solution” that gives everyone a little bit of what they want. Nonsense!

As Douglass also said, or should have said, power concedes nothing without a demand. It takes a fight, and there is no fight to be had if you don’t even know who your enemies are. (They are Democrats.)

Working with power to get things from the powerful is as useful as working with your bank to get your payment lowered. Unless you can somehow threaten them, hurt them in some manner, they yield nothing. The word that comes to mind concerning “working with” recalcitrant Democrats is “losing”.

With that in mind, Obama has suggested that MoveOn and others who have been running ads against Mary Landrieu in Louisiana stop doing so. That tells me something important: Those ads are hurting Landrieu, and should continue. Pain is good.

Too bad, however, that she just got reelected. Nonetheless, MoveOn should continue inflicting pain. If nothing else, hurting a “Frenemy“** is reward enough.

**I just learned this word today, and could not wait to use it.

Drill baby drill!

The masses find it difficult to understand politics, their intelligence is small. Therefore all effective propaganda must be limited to a very few points. The masses will only remember only the simplest ideas repeated a thousand times over. If I approach the masses with reasoned arguments, they will not understand me. In the mass meeting, their reasoning power is paralyzed. What I say is like an order given under hypnosis.
Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf

Yes, I will start out this day by citing Hitler’s words about the limited intelligence of the masses. Next, I’ll talk about how I hate children and pugs and kittens. But the Fuhrer’s words came to mind as I read a Billings Blog piece on the use of stock phrases in politics.

But I must qualify Hitler’s words and my own thoughts on the subject. There are indeed stupid people out there. And smart ones. Most people are of average IQ, which is why it is average, and further have only limited interaction with politics. Issues are complex, but politicians have but a few seconds to grapple with those issues in the public eye. So they use catchy phrases, and there are some very high-priced people out there who come up with those phrases.

So take a minute to read a Politico summary of a confidential memo circulated among Republicans about how to deal with the health care crisis. And then as you make your rounds of newspapers, blogs and TV news, note how many of them are following Frank Luntz’s advice:

Humanize your approach. Abandon and exile ALL references to the “healthcare system.” From now on, healthcare is about people. Before you speak, think of the three components of tone that matter most: Individualize. Personalize. Humanize.

…define the crisis in your terms. “If you’re one of the millions who can’t afford healthcare, it is a crisis.” Better yet, “If some bureaucrat puts himself between you and your doctor, denying you exactly what you need, that’s a crisis.”

The arguments against the Democrats’ healthcare plan must center around “politicians,” “bureaucrats,” and “Washington” … not the free market, tax incentives, or competition.

The healthcare denial horror stories from Canada & Co. do resonate, but you have to humanize them. You’ll notice we recommend the phrase “government takeover” rather than “government run” or “government controlled”…

“One-size-does-NOT-fit-all.”

“A balanced, common sense approach that provides assistance to those who truly need it and keeps healthcare patient-centered rather than government-centered for everyone.”

Democrats are not very good at this game. Remember the debate about health insurance for children? It was ripe for exploitation by the likes of someone like Frank Luntz. Here’s what the Democrats used as their catch phrase: S-CHIP.

Anyway, this is America. We don’t really discuss anything. Journalists don’t ask good questions, politicians are allowed to repeat catchphrases in three minute television interviews. The heated debates behind closed doors in DC are about marketing, and on the Democratic side, how to manage the damned progressives, rope them in and neutralize them.

Remember how we solved the oil shortage: “Drill, baby, drill.”

That’s as deep as we ever go.

Saying nothing, but saying it well …

Dear Mark:

Thank you for contacting me about reforming our health care system.

Recently, a number of Montanans have taken time to share their personal stories about health care with me. These situations are often frustrating and emotional, but they reinforce the need for significant health care reform. I deeply appreciate your willingness to share your story with me.

Some of the letters I received have come from uninsured Montanans. Today, nearly 154,000 Montanans do not have health insurance. Other letters come from folks who are dangerously underinsured, who are paying more than they can afford, or from folks who are worried about loved ones losing jobs. Montanans concerned about health care come from all walks of life.

I firmly believe that all Americans should have access to quality, affordable health care without discriminatory practices. I believe proposals to fix our system should maintain patient choice, emphasize preventative care, and control costs to consumers and the government.

The Senate plans to take up this important issue in the coming weeks. In fact, we are already evaluating a number of competing proposals. I will look closely at all of them. Moving forward, I will keep your views in mind because personal stories like yours are the best evidence of the need for reform.

Please do not hesitate to contact me again in the future if I can be of further assistance.

Sincerely,

Jon Tester
United States Senator

Sterling Life, Private Insurer

An email this A.M from my brother on our wonderful system of private insurance::

I had mom to the dermatologist yesterday. All her cancer lesions have healed nicely except for the end of her nose. We will do four more weeks of treatment (ointment three times a week), and I will bring her back to the doctor on August 5. Here’s a complication however. It turns out the prescription ointment is very expensive (her last prescription, which ran out a couple weeks ago) was over $600. The doctor’s office sent over some samples, which will last about another week. The doctor gave me another prescription, but the pharmacy at Billings H & R will not fill it because mom’s insurance (Sterling) turned down the claim on the first prescription and so Billings H & R is already out $600 on this deal. So I’m going to visit with the doctor and see if we can get some samples to finish out mom’s treatment, and also see if he will file an appeal with the insurance company to pay for the first prescription.

I had a nice visit with the pharmacist, who is really upset with Sterling, and with supplemental insurance in general. He said they readily approve prescriptions for cheap drugs, and constantly turn down prescriptions for expensive drugs. In his opinion if we don’t get a single payer, or at least a public option, we’re headed for increasing disasters. Don’t you love all the benefits free-market health care brings us!

We have been paying insurance premiums to Sterling (currently over $180 per month) for decades now. We do a lot for their bottom line. They don’t do a thing for ours.