Author: Mark Tokarski

Just a man who likes to read, argue, and occasionally be surprised.

Rewriting the present

I’ve gotten better this year in preserving information – I download important videos, and if an article I read seems important, I copy it and print it. Thus did I save an article entitled A Closer Look at US Deaths Due to Covid-19. I have it on my computer, and this link recovers it from the Wayback Machine.  It first appeared on the Johns Hopkins website, but was deemed inflammatory, that is, truthful and honest research, and ergo not allowed in our Fourth Reich. I reprint it in full beneath the fold. I also screen-capped the graphs and inserted them into the Word document that I used to save the article. That may be grounds for arrest. (The screen-cap yields a blurry quality – I urge you read the Wayback version while available.)

Here is the money shot:

This trend is completely contrary to the pattern observed in all previous years. Interestingly, as depicted in the table below, the total decrease in deaths by other causes almost exactly equals the increase in deaths by COVID-19. This suggests, according to Briand, that the COVID-19 death toll is misleading. Briand believes that deaths due to heart diseases, respiratory diseases, influenza and pneumonia may instead be recategorized as being due to COVID-19.

And we knew this here – CDC ordered doctors and others to classify most deaths that came anywhere near a PCR test as COVID-19, and to label deaths as that even if it were based on mere suspicion. I have said from the outset that the true number of COVID-19 deaths is zero. I stand by that. There is no virus.

During the ten month period ending today, the US has not experienced a rise in deaths over any other year. Things are normal, the same number of people are dying from the same causes as before. This massive hoax has three elements, two discussed here (no virus and PCR as the means by which they create the illusion of one), along with the third, lying by the CDC as to the number and causes of deaths.

Give it a read – it is reasonably short and easily digested. I have to wonder now if Genevieve Briand has disappeared, joining Dr. Kary Mullis on some island somewhere. Notice at the end that I have italicized words from Poorna Dharmasena, whose purpose appears to have been to discredit Briand’s work even when it was published on the Hopkins website. Even though she is correct in her assertions, that there is no pandemic, never has been, it is “irrelevant,” according to Poorna. It is still a dangerous disease.

He is lying about that, and his addendum to the article is technically known as “weasel words,” probably inserted by an editor without Briand’s knowledge.

(h/t: Brandon)

Continue reading “Rewriting the present” →

Be still, my beating heart

First, I recommend to everyone that you read this comment by Paso Robles. After reading it, even though it is kind of a downer, I thought … he nails it.

Second, I am wondering if everyone understands the what and how of this hoax. If so, read no further.

There are two elements that are essential to pulling this off, a kind of Manhattan Project of compartmentalization that allows the criminals behind it to enlist the services of honest people, doctors and scientists, nurses and lab technicians. They all imagine they are doing God’s work, saving humanity from a new and novel virus.

Continue reading “Be still, my beating heart” →

The eight amendment has also been set aside

I have an aunt, the sole survivor of my mother’s family of seven sisters, who is now 99 years old, and on her way out. The family is around her, and one of her daughters quit her job to move her to a place closer to other family members. Imagine, however, that she was alone, in virtual quarantine in a nursing home, relatives not allowed to visit. She would die (or would have already died) in utter isolation.

In my letter to the our Governor Polis, a low and unworthy human being, I used these words:

“… orders from your office have already superseded the 1st (right to assemble), 4th (privacy) and 9th (travel) Amendments to the US Constitution, Amendments that delineate rights that are inalienable. I guess they are not.”

I should have a added another amendment that is gone out the window, the Eighth:

Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.

Continue reading “The eight amendment has also been set aside” →

There he goes again

This is futile, I know, as Dr. Mark Johnson and Governor Jared Polis are just actors, and following orders from above. I find Polis to be especially offensive, appearing in public as he does behind a mask, a man of so little dignity that he is willing to carry out any order coming down without any thought or conscience. He makes me want to puke. Johnson, on the other hand, has the benefit of a medical degree, meaning he really believes in viruses. At least we can forgive him his brainwashed state. Some might object to my reference to “3/11” in Johnson letter, but I am convinced that there is a prerequisite to holding any high office in our world, and that is to be a member of the elite by some sort of order, maybe masonic, but I do not know. The head of the public health department in a county of almost 600,000 people surely does not land there by accident. He has been vetted. My reference in the Johnson letter to abuse and fraud against the citizens of this county is quite deliberate, as a lawsuit is in order. Of course, that would have to go before a court whose members have also been vetted. C‘est la vie.

Continue reading “There he goes again” →

A monumental court ruling

Commenter Paso Robles brought us a very interesting case, a ruling November 11 by a Portuguese appeals that the RT-PCR test is not a reliable test for SARS-CoV-2, so that all quarantines based on those test results are unlawful. The original ruling was, of course, in Portuguese, and found here. Paso also made a Google English translation version available here. Finally, Off Guardian did a short summary of the ruling here. I read, copied and printed the entire ruling. It turned out to be 13,000 words and 34 pages (MS Word). While that sounds like a lot, it read so easily that I was enthralled. Legal minds are, I think, the best minds around. I love the way they convert law to understandable prose.

The ruling involved four German national tourists who went to the Azores, where one of them tested positive for SARS-CoV-19 9 9after testing negative in Germany). All four were quarantined in their hotel rooms for fourteen days. But these guys were not to be messed with. They petitioned the court for a writ of habeas corpus, i.e., produce a body, a right we all possess if we live in lands with laws that are followed. (Not so much USA anymore.) It prevents detention of people without due process. I had forgotten all about it, but if I am quarantined, you can bet I am going to invoke it.

There is, of course, a world-wide news blackout of this ruling.

Continue reading “A monumental court ruling” →

Mask or no mask … makes no difference according to Danish Study

The video above from Dr. Andrew Kaufman is hot off the press. It is eighteen minutes, and you can be sure I downloaded it. Kaufman discusses a study that was finally published in the Annals of Internal Medicine after being rejected by JAMA, Lancet and the New England Journal of Medicine (most likely political decisions from those quarters – I learned during my study of Climate Change that the prestigious journals are all on some level … bought).

The important conclusions, as noted by Dr. K, were that all analyses of results, statistically speaking, “crossed zero.” Imagine that you are studying the effects of using squirt guns to chase squirrels off bird feeders*. You have two feeders and so, when two squirrels are present, you can use one as a control group while hitting the others with the water. In the end, you find that squirrels left alone were 95% likely to return to the feeder, while squirrels squirted were 105% likely to return. The variance in the numbers, some less, some more, but crossing 100%, means that squirt guns are not an effective control for squirrels. That is my interpretation of the meaning of “crossing zero” – -2% to +5% with zero in between.

A real example from the study follows beneath the fold.

Continue reading “Mask or no mask … makes no difference according to Danish Study” →

How did people ever manage without smart phones?

The medical establishment has become a major threat to health. The disabling impact of professional control over medicine has reached the proportions of an epidemic. Iatrogenesis, the name for this new epidemic, comes from iatros, the Greek word for “physician,” and genesis, meaning “origin.” Discussion of the disease of medical progress has moved up on the agendas of medical conferences, researchers concentrate on the sick-making powers of diagnosis and therapy, and reports on paradoxical damage caused by cures for sickness take-up increasing space in medical dope sheets.

Thus begins the introduction in Ivan Illich’s 1975 book Limits to Medicine – Medical Nemesis: The Expropriation of Health. As with his 1971 book Deschooling Society, a critique of education, this book seemed to create a flurry in its time, generating translations and much public discussion in the pre-Internet age, and all to no effect. I’ve read not much further than that opening paragraph, but was stunned that Illich so accurately described in 1975 the current problems associated with medicine. Forty-five years after it was published, the problems have only gotten worse, and the public now seems less able to cope or comprehend.

Continue reading “How did people ever manage without smart phones?” →

Happy Sunday!

We had to go to the store this morning for milk … out into the hinterlands to walk with the common folks, the masked masses. I don’t know why, but this scene played in my head. Cleavon Little’s laughter almost looks like an outtake, but Mel Brooks left it in. Gene Wilder is a superb comedic talent.

A silent film for your enjoyment

Hat tip to Alexie for supplying this video, which I have downloaded in case YouTube censors it for violation of community standards (the “community” in question probably Langley, Virginia). In it Stefan Scoglio, an Italian researcher and Nobel nominee, describes the nitty gritty of virology and how they “isolate” … a word gutted of any real meaning in that profession. It is subtitled, so turn off the sound. I think we on this blog and elsewhere have come a long way in understanding the nuts and bolts of the pandemic, and this simply adds to our body of knowledge. Fortunately, Oregon Matt supplied an English version of the paper that Scoglio refers to here. (While the body of the paper has been translated, all of the references are in Italian.)
 
I also watched Dr. Andy Kaufman give an address at the Red Pill forum on Jekyll Island, Georgia recently. It is titled The Pandemic Fraud Runs Deeper Than You Think. (I don’t think that title applies to me.) He and Scoglio are on the same page.
 

Continue reading “A silent film for your enjoyment” →