Notes: New writer, Katy Perry, the davidcrosby effect, Freddie

I want to put down a couple of brief notes before I go on a search for Tyrone McCloskey’s piece, written to be published here. I want his article to assume top-of-page position, and cannot wait to read it.

Tyrone, author of the paper JFKTV*, has been adding to our efforts here in the comments, and always comes up with interesting stuff, often out of the blue. His family background is in the movie business, so you might guess that he knows a little bit about the people and forces behind it. But I will leave him to tell us what he wants to tell, and welcome him aboard.

I have to search for his piece because WordPress does not notify me when an article has been put up for “review.” He said it is in there, and I don’t know how to find it on my own blog! It is a kink, and we’ll get it worked out.

I am looking forward to being one of a stable of writers here. It being me, myself and I over the years has been many times fun and not, as my mistakes are ‘out there,’ while my successes got very little traffic. I am not much of a promoter.

_________________

Continue reading “Notes: New writer, Katy Perry, the davidcrosby effect, Freddie”

Nothing is real…

…and nothing to get hung about.

Living is easy with eyes closed.

Misunderstanding all you see.

Do you think maybe they were trying to tell us something? Well, my eyes are open. And I’ve accepted Mark’s generous invitation to blog here to try to share what I see from my perspective. I told him I wouldn’t have time to contribute for awhile, but dagnabbit it’s just too compelling. I was previously commenting here under the pseudyonym ‘daddie_o’ but that username is already taken, so now I’m ‘daddieuhoh.’

A little bit about me: I’m a disenchanted academic. My field is in the social sciences. About the 1st of this year, I happened to start watching a documentary called “9-11: The New Pearl Harbor.” The scales fell from my eyes, and I was thrust into a couple of months of intense reading up on many different conspiracy theories, trying to sort fact from fiction. I’m still at it. I’ve come to the conclusion, mainly thanks to others’ research, that much of what we see on TV or read in the newspapers is fake and phony. We’re being manipulated and duped on a grand, almost unimaginable scale. Our thoughts and passions are being molded and orchestrated. So much of the world we think we live in is a sham, a conjob. And so many of the conspiracies we read about are false leads and misdirection. Waking up to this realization was psychologically difficult at first. A bona fide ontological rupture. But I would not trade my newfound perspective for anything. I’m wide awake inside the Matrix, and I’m not going back to sleep.

Continue reading “Nothing is real…”

Housekeeping notes

There are several matters to discuss concerning this blog before we move into uncharted waters.

Off to the right here are two new menus, the Honor Roll of Twins, and the Honor Roll of Zombies. We have done a lot of work here on  that subject, but it has never been indexed for easy access. Now every discovery we have made is but a link away. We invite scrutiny, and want mistakes pointed out. We accept challenges from honest citizens. (I have deleted many comments here, but not to be censorious. Spooks lurk all about on the Internet, paid agents who search the blogs looking for leaks of guarded information. They then attack those sources, but usually in a subtle way, trying to undermine confidence, create doubt, but never really saying anything of value. We have gotten good at spotting them, and get rid of them.

But if you, honest citizen, see something here you think far afield and wrong, do your own analysis, bring your information here in the comments. As I like to say, we only learn from mistakes (which is why the SAT exams are such a huge joke, smothering critical thinking skills in the crib), and if we make mistakes, we can always fix them. If we think you are wrong, but that your challenge is honest, you’ll find us polite and welcoming.

But we never thought that this blog would become what it is, an honor roll of exposure of spooks. Straight and I, months ago, were sitting on top of a list of dead musicians and actors gathered from McGowan’s Weird Scenes Inside the Canyon, and began work. I remember the early work, as Straight is a great organizer – he put together a database of all the relevant facts about each death, and I went through the Social Security Death Index looking for real deaths.* I remember various conversations, one of which where we agreed that we did not know where this information would take us, but that we should push forward. “Follow the truth no matter where it leads,” said Edward Abbey and many others. A lot of people say that, claim to follow truth. Few do. Fear of having a “conspiracy theory” stops them in their tracks, as I discovered with Joelle Steele.

Anyway, that is how we got here. That is why there are the two lists off to the right. We’ve been following truth, and are as surprised by where it has led us as any reader. Be warned, surprises ahead, bizarre in nature. But we are following truth, no matter where it leads. Answering the question “Why?” must necessarily follow “What?”

_____________

I want to pass on what Straight and I have learned thus far:

  • Any time there is a death of a celebrity, athlete or musician, be skeptical. If the person died at an older age, say age 53 (5+3=8) as with Jerry Garcia, John Denver, Jim Henson, Vladimir Lennon, Philip K. Dick, they probably retired with a gold watch, job well done. If they died young, say at age 27 (3 raised to the 3rd power, or another way to say 33), as with Kurt Cobain, Janis Joplin, Jimi Hendrix, Pigpen McKernan or Jim Morrison, they probably faked their death and will reappear in another form. Same with age 33, as with Karen Carpenter, Sam Cooke and Ray Gillen, same deal. Reassignment.
  • Any time there is a major event that has the mainstream (and alternative) media stumbling over itself to cover it, be skeptical. Since so many of our Zombies ended up as newscasters of some form, I conclude that the entire news media is a fake enterprise.
  • There is not nearly as much death and mayhem going on as we are led to believe by media. There is no “occult” to be taken seriously. There are no “suicide bombers,” and the mass shootings are all fake. Police shootings are currently being used to stir up black-on-white distrust, like Charlotte. It was faked. The Boston bombing was fake, as were the Paris and Brussels “terrorist attacks.” (Such events require a fake media to be believed.) This has led me to believe that we are not dealing with cold-blooded killers, just hoaxers who are managing public opinion to nudge us down the road they want us on. I don’t know if they are psychopaths who simply avoid killing due to annoying blowback effects, but I do know they are restrained in actual deaths. So far. (This includes 9/11.)

In other words, relax, people! Walk alone in your neighborhood at night, leave your house unlocked, trust other people to do the right thing. (I left my IPad at Costco yesterday. I called them – someone turned it in. I expected no less.) Bad things happen, and those bad things are usually the result of careless accidents, alcohol, drugs, love affairs, people in desperation … but there is no one outside the military and the medical cartel plotting real mass death events. If our search for truth has taught us anything, it is that people are good.

Also, just for fun, keep your eye out in the news for spook signalling. 33 Chilean miners trapped – a fake event. 33 people hospitalized in New York after smoking synthetic marijuana – fake. The Ku Klux Klan – an Intelligence front. (“K” is the 11th letter of the alphabet, x 3 = 33. Just learned this last week.) Zika virus discovered in 1947 … a hoax. Pete Ham died at age 27 .. nah, he didn’t. He faked his death.

Isn’t the search for truth fun? Isn’t life great? Isn’t it nice to live on a planet where most people are good?

_____________

All that said, I have exciting news, beneath the fold:

Continue reading “Housekeeping notes”

More McCartney stuff

page-118

[Note: I have added a face split of Mike McCartney, 1957 alongside Mike McCartney, 2007, to show that even after 50 years, facial features still line up precisely. See the last photo towards the end.]

The photo above is page 118 of the book Face to Face: Analysis and Comparison of Facial Features to Authenticate Identities of People in Photographs, by Joelle Steele. She studied the “Paul is Dead” psy-op and concluded that all twelve of these photos are various morphs of the same man.

She is wrong on that matter, but easily forgiven. She committed a mistake I make so often that I easily understand. She answered the wrong questions – did he die? Was he replaced by a body double?

Of course not. He is twins.

I will put the rest of this post beneath the fold to allow readers to study the photos without my input. See what you come up with – I ain’t the final word on this stuff. I’m still a student.

Continue reading “More McCartney stuff”

A comment worth a second look

We have a couple of projects in the works and many on the shelf here, enough to get us well into next year. We are doing due diligence on one that, if the evidence holds up, will be of high importance, in my view and Straight’s. It will at the very least expose major Intel control of a police department in a small city.

In the meantime, I urge all interested readers to stay caught up on the comments. There is real forward movement there. I might surprise you with a twin or Zombie, and Straight is always working that stuff too. But the answers to the questions “Why Zombies?”, “Why twins?” and “How so many twins” are beginning to flesh out in the comments.

Below is one I liked from an unknown party, first time I’ve heard from him/her, or perhaps just a new name for the commenter – I really don’t care. It is the content that counts. S/he used the name Frito under The Steve Clark Blunder post, and was responding to my glib assumption that Anderson Cooper, or the Cooper twins, had been assigned low-level work as CNN news readers, unbecoming of Vanderbilts.

“While your dismissal of Cooper as a lowly CNN reporter is kind of funny, and I love the idea of him reading it and recognizing that he’s in a pretty low status job for a Vanderbilt, you underestimate the benefit to Intelligence of a CNN reporter. He’s the guy legitimizing all the fakery. He’s the guy who interviews relatives of victims after false flags. He’s the guy interviewing the politicos. His influence is not small. The Face of CNN is a relatively important Intelligence Asset position. I’d say he outranks most entertainers. Singers teaching girls to be slutty certainly have a powerful and pernicious influence. But the whole industry does that. Whereas CNN is the place where news stories are turned into video to get inside TV watchers heads. The singers influence the culture, Cooper shapes, translates, and communicates the Narrative, putting every news event, real or fake, into the desired context for Intelligence. All that said, I see your point. The ratings for cable news are abysmal and getting worse.”

Titanic musings

My reading slowed to a crawl during our recent European trip, but I did manage to finish a couple of books – each has been a struggle, collections of evidence portending to exciting conclusions. I dutifully struggled through them. Each was intriguing.

Today: The Titanic Conspiracy: Cover-ups and Mysteries of the World’s Most Famous Sea Disaster, by Robin Gardiner and Dan Van Der Vat (1995).

Later down the road: The Thirteenth Tribe, by Arthur Koestler (1976)

_______________

The Titanic: The famous movie starring Leonardo and Kate did not come out until 1998, and of course, in true Hollywood fashion, told us nothing. Worse, all of the scenes involving water in that movie lead to my unwillingness to suspend disbelief: The water temperature that night was 28 degrees Fahrenheit (salt water freezes at a much colder temperature than regular water), and so offered only a few minutes of consciousness to those who went into it.

The authors, Gardiner and Van Der Vat, here take us through a tedious summary of eyewitness testimony and the hearings that were held by the US Senate and British Court of Inquiry, all necessary. They are thorough.

Then they jump ship on us. They lead us with a string of confusing clues that point towards something far more sinister than a massive naval clusterf***. They refuse to follow the evidence because it might lead towards a conspiracy theory. They instead take the trampled path of moral cowardice, concluding that everything went down just as official history says.

A far more enticing scenario, not even far-fetched given what we know of public hoaxes these days: Insurance fraud. JP Morgan, the true owner of the Titanic, had another ship, [a virtual twin named] the Olympic, that had struggled at sea, endured two costly accidents, and cost him a fortune. Damages to the ship appear to have been repairable, but that is not really clear from scant evidence. Morgan was mostly self-insured on that vessel, but fought his way through the British legal system seeking compensation for one incident involving a British navy ship. He lost at every level.

Morgan was in Florence at the time of the disaster. He was scheduled to take the maiden voyage, but backed off claiming ill health. Instead, he was shacked up with a mistress. He also held back some valuable works of art that were scheduled to be shipped aboard Titanic to New York City.

The authors detail how easy it would have been to switch vessels, as it all works out timing-wise. There was very little aboard either ship that directly identified it, and the scant evidence recovered from the deep does little to reassure us – that is, even though two items of hardware can be tied to Titanic, they could have been easily switched as both ships were in dry dock prior to the disaster.

There appears to have been a rescue ship in the area, the Californian, but it sat in the water as the Titanic went down. Was it supposed to be on hand after a deliberate collision with an iceberg? Controversy swills about Californian’s location that night, from eleven to fifty miles away.

Also, there was a fire in one of the [coal] bunkers, allowed to burn even as the ship was in Southampton in the week prior to its voyage and throughout the journey. It was even going on during boat drills to test seaworthiness. Such a fire would not sink the vessel, but would weaken the steel – allowing it to go without remedy seems insane.

I don’t know what is true, of course, but the point is that we need more and better research than these two authors could muster. They got scared off by the old CIA bugaboo from the 1960s, that speculation on anything outside official truth leads to a “conspiracy theory,” and they are just too sane and stable to go that route.

But there is a catch 22: Had they gone that route, given Intelligence control of the publishing industry, the book would never had seen light of day. Self-publishing in 1995, unlike today, was a vanity affair. Maybe the authors came face to face with the censors, and engaged in the noble art of smuggling truth.

Here’s a titillating detail they included but did not investigate:

“The rest of the day [Monday, April 15, 1912] yielded twenty-seven bodies, including one identified as Colonel J.J. Astor, whose initials were on the collar of its shirt. Mysteriously, there was also a handkerchief with the initials “A.V.” as well as $2,440 and £250 in notes plus several gold items (belt buckle, watch, pencil, cufflinks and diamond ring). His estate exceeded $100 million. Many of the bodies had two or more layers of clothing; Astor had a blue serge suit and brown boots with his brown flannel shirt. How strange that Astor, unquestionably on the ship after the last boat left, should turn up dead near a lifeboat. He undoubtedly died in the disaster, but was the body really his?” (pp 163-4)

In fact, Astor’s final minutes of life read like a bad novel – he steps forward and asks to be included on a life boat only 2/3 full, but is denied the request. He stoically accepts the verdict on his life by the lowly Second Officer, Charles Lightoller, and goes to his quarters to release his dog to enjoy a few moments of freedom before they both perish.

I don’t know, that just reads like fiction, you know. What do they call it? Oh yeah … it sounds like bullshit.

The Cooper twins – a closer look

Much of our work here on this blog has been about twins, but the focus has shifted as we have moved forward. We no long wonder who might be twins. We wonder who isn’t.

In my post about Anderson and Carter Cooper, where Carter, supposedly 28 months older, faked his death in 1988, I deliberately short-shifted the twin question. I thought it was a time sink. But it has been bugging me. I showed one photo where the boys looked very close in age and dressed alike, and left it at that. There were other photos showing them to be older and younger than each other, but I suspected they were fake. I chose not to go down that road, as the post was about the boys as grown men, faking their lives.  It was too much detail for one post.

Here’s the original photo I ran of the boys:

cooper-boys

It’s funny in that it is the mother, Gloria Vanderbilt, who looks pasted in to that photo. Wyatt is looking below her head, as if she should be shorter, and Gloria is looking somewhere else, not at Wyatt. Her skin tone is lighter and much softer, and she is out of focus compared to the others. The lower part of her torso has a ghostly quality about it. But the boys are in focus, and they look like twins to me. They perhaps inserted her later to remove someone else – the birth mother? Who knows with rich and famous royal families. (Thanks to Tyrone for that link, showing Anderson’s lineage all the way back to Edward I Longshanks Plantagenet (1239-1307).)

Then there are these two:

 

Those both look like real photos, and the boys again look very much alike and close in age.

But I ran into photos like this:

childhood-photo-1

Now there’s an age difference! Anderson’s head was pasted in, by the way.  Notice how he is of a lighter shade , but it’s a pretty good paste-up. I am not convinced, but you might be, and that’s no problem. If they are not twins, we have our first evidence of that.

childhood-photo-2

This one is a little easier to see a problem. Again the boys are dressed like twins, but this time it is very easy to spot fakery. And again, it is Anderson’s head that was pasted on. Notice how the professional photographer forgot to have him look at the camera, like Carter is doing. Gloria and Carter are in sharp focus, Anderson is not, and again, his skin tone is lighter than theirs. This photo is clearly a paste-up, with turtle-necks making it easier to splice the head on the body. That is probably why Intel chose these photos – turtlenecks.

It reinforces my suspicion that the three photos of the boys above (wherein they look close in age, and like twins) are real, while these two are fakes.

This will leave the perceptive reader with a question: The boys were born in 1965. Did they know at that time that they would be called on by Intelligence to become fake TV journalists? I doubt it. The photos were real at one time, and once it was decided that Carter would do his fake swan dive and morph into Anderson, they merely took some old family photos and fixed them up to fit the new facts. Since there was no Internet prior to the late nineties, that would be the time that this was done, after Anderson and Carter were in play.

I now think that everyone who has a position in news media is a fake person, including all TV pundits and news readers. I do not exclude local media, but down that low in the game, stupidity, good looks and believability might be the lead qualifications for employment. So somewhere at Langley or wherever is a file called “Anderson Cooper,” and nearby a person who manages that the scam along with several others. I would guess that a whole floor or wing of a building is devoted to management of fake news personalities.

The important conclusion to draw: Reliable fake people are in place to assure that all news is managed.

Rihan Rihanna danna?

Rihanna is a beautiful woman, so there being two of her is a real treat. Like Drake down below, there are images of her about with her “twin,” and yet Wikipedia makes no mention of that. So I gather that it is being done to muddy the waters, as with Drake, as Rihanna is indeed a twin.

First the publicized “fake” twin shots:

That really ought to seal it, as they look genuine to me, and they look like twins. But having learned from my Steve Clark episode not to presume anything, I went ahead and ran down nine photos, five of which turned out to be one twin, four the other.

Here is Twin #1:

That, we can all agree, is a very sultry, sexy woman. You meet someone like her in a bar, find out she is with a guy, and ask “Have you got a sister?”

She does, in this case. Twin #2:

Are you picking up on this? Twin #2 is more open and gregarious, and smiles very easily. We find this so often with twins, one a little more withdrawn and the other more outgoing. It must be just how they play off each other growing up, the roles they adopt.

Bear with me, as I will do but one face split:

rihanna-14-and-21-composite

They are so close that I am wondering if famous people can wear fake ears, because the ears give away the game. The chin is a tad longer on one, the noses miss by just a very little bit. These are identical twins, or my name is not Drake.

That’s it for today.

Drake(s)

We have such a backlog that I am going to push forward, perhaps getting two sets of twins out today. We have known about these for weeks, and  Straight has been patiently awaiting my letting them go.

First up is Drake. We are aware that there is a meme our there pushing the notion that Drake is twins, but only in a “wishing it were so” manner. This is where we get photos like these:

drake-twins-1drake-twins-2

It’s clever, as it is masking the fact that Drake really is a set of twins by fake-outing them as twins. The first photo above looks like monkey business, as the pant legs on both look identical, leading us to believe that the upper bodies are PhotoShopped in as well. I don’t think so, but I wonder about them dressing identically in public. It might be a very good Photoshop.

The second photo looks real to my somewhat trained eye. I am just judging by light source, which is to our right, and seems consistent on both. But it too could be a very good PhotoShop, done to run interference.

But set that aside. It is obviously intended to create misdirection. There are two of them. Here is twin number one:

And Twin #2:

Indeed they are difficult to tell apart. Twin #1 has higher ears, but beyond that they are very much identical twins. I will do two face splits, so as not to be too annoying, just so you can see how I separated one from the other. This held true for all six of these photos.

As you can see, the noses are identical as are the mouths. One has a slightly longer face, the eyes do not line up, and of course, the ears give it away.

I know nothing about Drake other than he is very popular, and I see no harm in him being twins.

As always, I question where these sets of lookalikes are coming from. Is there a factory? Are they doing IVF in royal blood lines? (Straight has followed blood lines back for various celebrities, and always, without exceptions, finds they are of royal lineage. The fact that the Drake twins are of African descent is no exception, as there are royal families going back to on that continent too.)

We have many, many more twins to follow. Next up: Rihanna.

Anderson Cooper, intrepid reporter

[Note to readers: This is the post I should have done two days ago, when suffering from jet lag. I am back to normal mental acuity, such as it is (though I am getting up ridiculously early now). Please ignore anything prior to this concerning either Anderson or Carter Cooper, or Steve Clark.]

Carter (1/27/65) and Anderson (6/3/67), are the children of writer Wyatt Cooper* and designer/artist Gloria Vanderbilt. Though born 28 months apart, it is hard to see that age difference in some childhood photos, such as this one:

cooper-boys

Note the identical jammies! However, other photos do put them farther apart in age, so it is not conclusive. The subject of twins, while a recurring theme at this website, will not be discussed beyond this, as it does not matter if the boys were born at the same time or merely strongly resemble one another, or indeed underwent plastic surgery (as with Paul and Mike McCartney). The important conclusion I draw is not that they are twins, but rather that each now plays the role of “Anderson Cooper, intrepid reporter.”

Here they are as youth, Carter to the left, Anderson to the right:

Carter is said to have plunged to his death in a 1988 suicide, but I will show below that his death was faked.

Why wealthy people fake their deaths … is a layer of the onion. As with the fake-dying Kennedy’s – Joseph Jr., Kathleen, John F., Robert, Robert and John F. Jr., along with scores  of musicians and actors, fake death is common in royal lineage. Some, like the Kennedy’s, are too well-known to reappear as Zombies. Where they go is a matter of speculation. Miles Mathis, in his paper on the JFK assassination, suggested they might form an underground ruling council, the “invisible government” we allude to but never seem able to identify. That is admitted speculation, but highly intriguing.

The musicians and actors, and as we see, Carter Vanderbilt Cooper, are re-purposed, often in the fake news business**.

That is an important lesson I have learned from our study of dead rock stars – musicians can fake their trade, and the news business is rife with phonies, Zombies and poseurs. So news, like music,  is often fake.  That is how so many lies and so much illusion is passed on to us – by use not of Intelligence agents in news, but Intelligence assets.***

Each of the boys above has a fully developed skull, and pupils are at a distance where they will stay until death. Consequently, I can show that each is currently a version of Anderson Cooper. First, Anderson:

That is admitted, so should not be contentious.

Now Carter:

Young Carter has his head angled, so we get a wider and narrower skull as a result. But I am satisfied that these photos are of the same person.

Finally, Carter and Anderson, to show they are two different men:

Here are a few photos of the man we know as Anderson:

And just three of Carter, who I think appears less frequently (and who was assigned the task of appearing on Jeopardy earlier this year):

_____________

*Wyatt died in 1978 at age 50, but, do you suppose he might have faked his death? Such a thing is not unheard of in the Vanderbilt line. (Wyatt was Gloria’s fourth husband.)

**We intend to broaden that search beyond news and into science, economics and academia (where Jimi Hendrix now resides). There is tremendous fakery all about us.

***Anderson, if anything in his bio is true, admittedly spent summers while at Yale undergoing CIA training. Most likely Carter was with him during that time.