Preface: Before I begin, I would like to introduce myself to Piece of Mindful readers, since this is my first post. Mark personally asked me to give writing a chance, and I am more than happy to oblige him. A little about myself…I will be 30 years old in a matter of days, I have a Bachelor’s degree in Economics (graduated summa cum laude), and I possess knowledge in a wide variety of areas due to a lifelong passion for interesting information. Those who know me often say that I should sign up to be on “Jeopardy!”. In terms of Myers-Briggs personality types, the best fit for me is INTP, “The Logician” or “The Thinker”. I have always had a great admiration for the Sherlock Holmes character, and I apologize in advance for the number of times I will likely reference Holmes in making a point. My mind works very much like Holmes’s does in the stories. I refrain from social life to a large extent (by choice), and I am almost completely unplugged from modern popular culture. Although I own a TV, I rarely watch it. The only radio I listen to is BBC World News, and I do not follow any modern pop music. The only form of media I am interested in is film, and I have always been a big fan of Stanley Kubrick. This is all I will bore you with about myself…
My purpose in this particular article is resolving what I will call the Tokarski Phenomenon, named after the owner of this blog Mark Tokarski and his extensive catalog of work surrounding facial alignment. Just so that it is clear what I mean when I say “the Tokarski Phenomenon”, I would like to define the term. The Tokarski Phenomenon is defined as the excessive preponderance of facial alignment doppelgängers amongst Western public figures. Whether we are talking about “batches” such as the Damon Batch and Katy Perry Batch or the “twins” that Mark has written about extensively, the underlying phenomenon is basically a prevalence of facial alignment doppelgängers amongst public figures far outside of that which statistical norms would forecast. In this article, I will not only show that existing explanations (both common and uncommon) for this phenomenon are wholly inadequate, but I will also provide a strong case for the true explanation for this curiosity termed “the Tokarski Phenomenon”.
The existing explanations for the Tokarski Phenomenon fall into two buckets, as I referenced, both common and uncommon. The first, which I will call the “common-man” explanation, is that there is a Golden Ratio that naturally selects these people for their prominent positions. We are told that the only reason the person in question became a successful public figure is BECAUSE they possess this exact facial alignment. For Golden Ratio proponents, we must imagine that acting auditions amount to the Casting Director pulling out his caliper and marking down the facial measurements down to the millimeter, and making decisions thusly. This picture is as absurd as it sounds. Mark has termed Golden Ratio as simplistic and said that it “eliminates the need to think a little harder”. I could not agree more. Mark has roughly calculated the odds of perfect alignment of 7 facial features being around 1 in 10 million. If we imagine a lottery with a jackpot designed to hit once in every 10 million tickets, then we imagine a drawing where 10 million tickets were sold, but suddenly there were DOZENS of unconnected winners! And it turned out they all worked in the same job industry! The lottery commission would immediately know that they had been scammed, and refuse to pay out. This is what we witness with the prevalence of facial doppelgängers in public figures, but the average person does not care to think a little bit harder about what this implies. As Sherlock Holmes would say, “You see, but you do not observe. The distinction is clear.”
We could also envision the lottery pulling duplicates of the exact same set of 7 winning lottery numbers (each with 1 in 10 million odds) upwards of 30 times in a single year. This would be so statistically improbable that it is essentially impossible to be caused by random chance. The fallacy being made by the average person here is to confuse attractiveness with facial doppelgängers. Attractiveness is relatively common. I am sure every reader knows at least a few people who would be widely considered attractive. Attractiveness is the lesser lottery prize…matching a few numbers or the Powerball. Facial doppelgängers are the statistical equivalent of the jackpot. Do not confuse the two. Mark has astutely pointed out that Matt Damon is not particularly attractive. If there were a single face type that Hollywood was longing to match, there is no reason it should be particularly his face. Having upwards of a dozen faces perfectly matching to the Damon template is a statistical oddity completely off the charts. Having such a small subset of people as public figures contain a such a high percentage of matching doppelgängers is also a statistical oddity completely off the charts. Golden Ratio, as an explanation unto itself, is for those who do not wish to actually think about this problem…it explains nothing.
The next explanation, the uncommon one, would fall into the Miles Mathis category of “The Families”. We are told that familial relations cause the facial doppelgängers. Since they are 4th cousins (or whatever), their faces align. This also does not hold water. Facial alignment does not run in extended families. My facial alignment is nothing like that of my cousins, or even my own brother. Mark has pointed out that the only time he has randomly found this kind of alignment in a family was between a father and a daughter. This means that we are left with the confounding idea that although these doppelgängers have the facial alignment that you might find between siblings, they are at best distantly related cousins. You might say, “Well maybe they ARE siblings!” but I remind you that these people look nothing alike…aside from their facial alignment. This makes the familial explanation wholly inadequate. Some factor is causing a facial alignment to the level of a sibling relationship (or more) in a set of essentially unrelated individuals, yet unlike siblings they otherwise bear no resemblance to each other whatsoever. This is remarkable and confounding. Familial relationships do not explain the Tokarski Phenomenon, even if we were to consider a vast conspiracy whereby these people actually ARE siblings. We would see far more resemblance beyond the facial alignment in that case, but in reality we do not.
If neither existing explanation actually holds for the Tokarski Phenomenon, then what are we left with? We are left only with genetic engineering. And do not forget, as Holmes would say, “How often have I said to you that when you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth?” This is where I must explain how I came upon the absolutely flawless facial alignment seen in the main photograph of the article. When one thinks of genetic engineering, who is the most concrete example from which to work? For me, I immediately think of Paris Jackson, daughter of Michael Jackson.
Let me clue you in on something in the photograph above…that man could not have fathered that girl. For starters, the skin color, eye color, and nose shape are all dramatically different. Even in the most unlikely genetic lottery, he cannot possibly naturally be her biological father. Yet, according to the official story, we are told he IS her biological father. Both Paris and Michael have publicly insisted upon it. You might say, “Well, she must have been fathered by someone else”, but why should we believe that? Paris has been very open about conspiracies in her own right. She believes her father was murdered, yet she insists that Michael Jackson is her biological father. I am not the first person to suggest that Paris was genetically engineered; a simple search turns up numerous major articles on the subject. The idea is that Michael oversaw her creation as a human. We can imagine that Michael was the basis for at least some of the genes, and was able to select as many modifications as possible make her perfect. This fits absolutely perfectly with Michael Jackson’s known personality and obsession with his appearance. He essentially wanted his own perfect doll as a daughter, and he made this come true through genetic engineering. This would explain both of their insistences upon a biological relation, even in the face of the dramatic differences between them.
The most remarkable thing about the face match presented in this article (which is between Paris Jackson and Olivia Wilde, for the record) is that it was my FIRST attempt to make such a match between two people! This should be a 1 in 10 million proposition, yet I nailed it on the first attempt by simply narrowing my focus on someone genetically engineered. Voila! Paris Jackson here is matched with Olivia Wilde (real name Olivia Cockburn), and I chose Olivia Wilde on sheer intuition. Now, you might think I am just really good at analyzing faces, but trust me…I am not THAT good. This is an absolutely flawless match, with alignment of the eyes, nose, lips, ears, chin, and hair line. Perfect. When we research Olivia Wilde (Olivia Cockburn), we find exactly the elite background that we would expect. Both of her parents have their own Wikipedia pages (Edit: and two of her grandparents! Her grandfather was a propagandist!!), and are what would be considered “connected”. I also encourage you to find a photo of Olivia with her parents. She does not resemble them and is several magnitudes more attractive than they are. We can envision these wealthy, well-connected parents seeking out a chance to make their child stunningly beautiful if such an opportunity were offered. This is the same opportunity that Michael Jackson took advantage of.
Paris Jackson is the lens by which all aspects of the Tokarski Phenomenon can be put into focus. She is clear proof that genetic engineering can edit polygenic traits such as skin color, and should leave no doubt that genetic engineering can modify traits such as facial alignment. Why do the “batches” and “twins” align with each other so perfectly? Identical gene sequences were inserted into their genome for facial alignment. This kind of technology in use would greatly increase the probability of a specific facial alignment appearing frequently in public figures. It would also explain why none of these people look anything alike otherwise. The largest batches, such as Damon and Katy Perry, are no doubt a product of the same “maker”. The batch itself implies that the same genes were inserted, so they are essentially all the same “brand” of face. Cases of mere twins might be competitors, or more simply just a custom job. The Damon face is the generic model, the Jeep of genetically engineered faces. Twins would then be the cutting edge technology, the Northrop B-2 Spirit stealth bomber of genetically engineered faces. All features of the Tokarski Phenomenon can be explained by genetic engineering, and it is impossible to explain the Tokarski Phenomenon without genetic engineering. It would actually be quite simple to conceal such a technology…one covert clinic per continent, or even a public genetic clinic doing legitimate work like checking for genetic diseases could act as a cover for this much more significant technology. Such technologies are currently available to and known by the public, and it is not wild to think that this technology may have existed for significantly longer than the public has been aware.
There are many more questions that I do not explore here. WHO is doing this? WHY are they doing it? These are excellent questions, and I encourage people to comment with their thoughts in that area. Is it simply elites seeking to engineer a Nietzschean Superman? Rogue scientists seeking profits? Or is it an extraterrestrial species that has been genetically engineering humans for millions of years? The possibilities are numerous, and I have no data to theorize in these areas. For as Holmes would say, “It is a capital mistake to theorize before one has data. Insensibly one begins to twist facts to suit theories, instead of theories to suit facts.” All that seems certain is that these public figures are genetically modified humans. They are GMO. Perhaps we should lobby to put a sticker on them.