Category: Coronavirus

Dangerous ideas …

The following comment from Paso Robles is generating discussion. With his permission, I am reprinting it here below the fold to give it more exposure. As someone commented below, “Now, that’s a COMMENT!” It is long, but well worth your ten minutes of read time.

Paso was responding to a comment I left yesterday morning, which you can read here if you are inclined. In it, I suggested that since there is no virus, the coming vaccine can be one of two things, harmless or harmful. I felt there were advantages to a harmless vaccine, a saline solution like our former presidents will be administered live on TV. It reinforces the idea that there is a virus, and that viruses exist and are dangerous. It reinforces the idea that the public needs a nanny state to protect us. It reinforces the idea that vaccines work. It reinforces germ theory, already so deeply embedded in the public mind that it may be a century before it is fully discredited.

I don’t need to go on about harmful potions. We all have heard or expressed some fear of malevolent intent.

What bugs me is a comment that followed Paso’s, … “Nice to see POM promoting the vaccine as probably just saline, is that an attempt to increase to take up from people who question things?” I am not promoting! I am not attempting to persuade anyone, nor is Paso. We are just fleshing this out. Anyway, if you know how to read and reason, you don’t need advice from the likes of me. I am trying to decide what I want to do. If this pandemic is merely using a virus to achieve other goals, mentioned in my comment linked above, then the virus and the vaccine are less troublesome. To me. Just to me. You’re on your own.

Continue reading “Dangerous ideas …” →

Of Monkeys, Mice and Men: From Natural Bodies to Digitized Bots

Prologue — Emerging From the Rabbit Hole

Biotechnology is the new digital.

 ~ Nicholas Negroponte, founder and chairman Emeritus of MIT’s Media Lab

This post is a prologue to a new series I am launching here at POM . . .

Have you ever met a person who had plastic surgery? If so, did he/she have only one plastic surgery? From my experience, many individuals who undergo plastic surgery for one body part, progress to enhance other body parts. Body augmentation seems addictive, and could potentially go on ad infinitum — that is, if the person has unlimited finances, and if doctors don’t issue restrictions. Epitomizing this obsessive undertaking is the account of the individual known as the “Human Ken Doll” (recently transitioned to a woman), who has willingly submitted to more than 100 cosmetic procedures. This phenomenon also reminds me of a Brady Bunch episode in which Carol Brady is inspired to paint one room of the house, and Mike Brady is highly reluctant, as he is concerned that once she paints one room of the house, she will feel the urge to paint another, and another . . . You get the point. Of course, in the fictional land of Brady Bunch, Mike Brady was both a professional architect, and a husband, and he aptly perceived where Carol could potentially get carried away with her house augmentation endeavor. 

A “renovation” theme is apropos given where my series is heading, as well as suited to the goals of the “Reset,” in which the central planners have delineated the retrofitting of humanity. In this particular instance, I am discussing augmentation of humans on the nano scale, in which the alterations may not be readily and immediately apparent. I plan to shed more light on this aspect, which may encompass a string of subtopics such as vaccines, gene therapies, gene editing (i.e., CRISPR), digital gene sequencing, digital twinning, biohacking, bioprinting, human-computer interaction (HCI), microelectronics, bio-MEMS, nanotechnology, Internet of Bodies (IoB), Internet of nano-things, transgenic mice, chimeric organisms, bio-surveillance (i.e., embedded watermarks), and programmable matter. 

The technocratic engineers seem intoxicated with an insatiable desire to augment society, including our genomics. As of now, there are very little regulations in place by which to tame them. COVID may be the the most significant catalyst to their global venture, which may result in the evolution or devolution of humans — depending on the angle from which it is being viewed. 

Continue reading “Of Monkeys, Mice and Men: From Natural Bodies to Digitized Bots” →

What is shingles?

“Varicella viruses are examples of viruses that cause latent infections. The varicella-zoster virus remains in the body after causing the initial infection known as chicken pox. If it is reactivated, it travels through nerves to the skin where it causes the blister-like lesions of shingles. The virus then returns to its dormant state.”

The above words, taken from the Yale Medical website called All About Viruses, stand as official truth and are completely without supporting evidence. As Dr. Stefan Lanka has said, “In the course of my studies, I  and others have not been able to find proof of the disease-causing viruses anywhere.”

I am witness to two people I know suffering from shingles, which I know to be painful. I’ve never had the disease. I am not even sure I ever had chicken pox. I do remember a time when I was in perhaps first grade being kept in a tent at home for several days. I don’t remember any pain, but Mom was with me at all times. And, I remember the day I was finally allowed to return to school, happily leaving the house to get on the bus, which offered door service.

Did I have chicken pox? Measles? I do not know. And what, pray tell, is shingles, really? Germ theory is not able to prove the existence of the virus, and can only judge it to be real by surrogate, the presence of antibodies. That is not direct proof of anything. Under germ theory, and this is remarkable, after one week of infection, we make an antibody called IgM, not specific to anything. Thereafter, IgM goes away, and IgG appears, after another calendar week. This is the scientific justification for quarantines,  aka imprisonment without due process. After three weeks IgM is gone, and IgG assumes permanent residence in the body.***

Continue reading “What is shingles?” →

Rewriting the present

I’ve gotten better this year in preserving information – I download important videos, and if an article I read seems important, I copy it and print it. Thus did I save an article entitled A Closer Look at US Deaths Due to Covid-19. I have it on my computer, and this link recovers it from the Wayback Machine.  It first appeared on the Johns Hopkins website, but was deemed inflammatory, that is, truthful and honest research, and ergo not allowed in our Fourth Reich. I reprint it in full beneath the fold. I also screen-capped the graphs and inserted them into the Word document that I used to save the article. That may be grounds for arrest. (The screen-cap yields a blurry quality – I urge you read the Wayback version while available.)

Here is the money shot:

This trend is completely contrary to the pattern observed in all previous years. Interestingly, as depicted in the table below, the total decrease in deaths by other causes almost exactly equals the increase in deaths by COVID-19. This suggests, according to Briand, that the COVID-19 death toll is misleading. Briand believes that deaths due to heart diseases, respiratory diseases, influenza and pneumonia may instead be recategorized as being due to COVID-19.

And we knew this here – CDC ordered doctors and others to classify most deaths that came anywhere near a PCR test as COVID-19, and to label deaths as that even if it were based on mere suspicion. I have said from the outset that the true number of COVID-19 deaths is zero. I stand by that. There is no virus.

During the ten month period ending today, the US has not experienced a rise in deaths over any other year. Things are normal, the same number of people are dying from the same causes as before. This massive hoax has three elements, two discussed here (no virus and PCR as the means by which they create the illusion of one), along with the third, lying by the CDC as to the number and causes of deaths.

Give it a read – it is reasonably short and easily digested. I have to wonder now if Genevieve Briand has disappeared, joining Dr. Kary Mullis on some island somewhere. Notice at the end that I have italicized words from Poorna Dharmasena, whose purpose appears to have been to discredit Briand’s work even when it was published on the Hopkins website. Even though she is correct in her assertions, that there is no pandemic, never has been, it is “irrelevant,” according to Poorna. It is still a dangerous disease.

He is lying about that, and his addendum to the article is technically known as “weasel words,” probably inserted by an editor without Briand’s knowledge.

(h/t: Brandon)

Continue reading “Rewriting the present” →

Be still, my beating heart

First, I recommend to everyone that you read this comment by Paso Robles. After reading it, even though it is kind of a downer, I thought … he nails it.

Second, I am wondering if everyone understands the what and how of this hoax. If so, read no further.

There are two elements that are essential to pulling this off, a kind of Manhattan Project of compartmentalization that allows the criminals behind it to enlist the services of honest people, doctors and scientists, nurses and lab technicians. They all imagine they are doing God’s work, saving humanity from a new and novel virus.

Continue reading “Be still, my beating heart” →

The eight amendment has also been set aside

I have an aunt, the sole survivor of my mother’s family of seven sisters, who is now 99 years old, and on her way out. The family is around her, and one of her daughters quit her job to move her to a place closer to other family members. Imagine, however, that she was alone, in virtual quarantine in a nursing home, relatives not allowed to visit. She would die (or would have already died) in utter isolation.

In my letter to the our Governor Polis, a low and unworthy human being, I used these words:

“… orders from your office have already superseded the 1st (right to assemble), 4th (privacy) and 9th (travel) Amendments to the US Constitution, Amendments that delineate rights that are inalienable. I guess they are not.”

I should have a added another amendment that is gone out the window, the Eighth:

Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.

Continue reading “The eight amendment has also been set aside” →

There he goes again

This is futile, I know, as Dr. Mark Johnson and Governor Jared Polis are just actors, and following orders from above. I find Polis to be especially offensive, appearing in public as he does behind a mask, a man of so little dignity that he is willing to carry out any order coming down without any thought or conscience. He makes me want to puke. Johnson, on the other hand, has the benefit of a medical degree, meaning he really believes in viruses. At least we can forgive him his brainwashed state. Some might object to my reference to “3/11” in Johnson letter, but I am convinced that there is a prerequisite to holding any high office in our world, and that is to be a member of the elite by some sort of order, maybe masonic, but I do not know. The head of the public health department in a county of almost 600,000 people surely does not land there by accident. He has been vetted. My reference in the Johnson letter to abuse and fraud against the citizens of this county is quite deliberate, as a lawsuit is in order. Of course, that would have to go before a court whose members have also been vetted. C‘est la vie.

Continue reading “There he goes again” →

A monumental court ruling

Commenter Paso Robles brought us a very interesting case, a ruling November 11 by a Portuguese appeals that the RT-PCR test is not a reliable test for SARS-CoV-2, so that all quarantines based on those test results are unlawful. The original ruling was, of course, in Portuguese, and found here. Paso also made a Google English translation version available here. Finally, Off Guardian did a short summary of the ruling here. I read, copied and printed the entire ruling. It turned out to be 13,000 words and 34 pages (MS Word). While that sounds like a lot, it read so easily that I was enthralled. Legal minds are, I think, the best minds around. I love the way they convert law to understandable prose.

The ruling involved four German national tourists who went to the Azores, where one of them tested positive for SARS-CoV-19 9 9after testing negative in Germany). All four were quarantined in their hotel rooms for fourteen days. But these guys were not to be messed with. They petitioned the court for a writ of habeas corpus, i.e., produce a body, a right we all possess if we live in lands with laws that are followed. (Not so much USA anymore.) It prevents detention of people without due process. I had forgotten all about it, but if I am quarantined, you can bet I am going to invoke it.

There is, of course, a world-wide news blackout of this ruling.

Continue reading “A monumental court ruling” →

Mask or no mask … makes no difference according to Danish Study

The video above from Dr. Andrew Kaufman is hot off the press. It is eighteen minutes, and you can be sure I downloaded it. Kaufman discusses a study that was finally published in the Annals of Internal Medicine after being rejected by JAMA, Lancet and the New England Journal of Medicine (most likely political decisions from those quarters – I learned during my study of Climate Change that the prestigious journals are all on some level … bought).

The important conclusions, as noted by Dr. K, were that all analyses of results, statistically speaking, “crossed zero.” Imagine that you are studying the effects of using squirt guns to chase squirrels off bird feeders*. You have two feeders and so, when two squirrels are present, you can use one as a control group while hitting the others with the water. In the end, you find that squirrels left alone were 95% likely to return to the feeder, while squirrels squirted were 105% likely to return. The variance in the numbers, some less, some more, but crossing 100%, means that squirt guns are not an effective control for squirrels. That is my interpretation of the meaning of “crossing zero” – -2% to +5% with zero in between.

A real example from the study follows beneath the fold.

Continue reading “Mask or no mask … makes no difference according to Danish Study” →

Information on masking for customers and businesses, courtesy of Peggy Hall

I recently paid $29 for a webinar given by Peggy Hall of The Healthy American. Towards the end of the 2-1/2 hour presentation, Ms. Hall advised that she is a business woman making her living, so that while I might technically easily disseminate her video, doing so would not be a morally acceptable choice.

So, I decided that my best course of action was to re-watch the video and take notes, and then pass the notes along to you. I set aside today, Sunday, for this purpose, and then found that Ms. Hall has provided many notes to go along with the video. I think I am OK to use them ‘as is’, but will take them all down if I get an objection from that source.

I do recommend that you buy and watch the video. She is a good speaker with a fluid brain. If you doubt me, watch her below in action with the Orange County, California Commissioners.

https://youtu.be/wfVRYzCog4Y

The following day Orange County removed its mask requirement.

Continue reading “Information on masking for customers and businesses, courtesy of Peggy Hall” →