Hicks/Jones: How can you not see it?

(See PS)

I am about to enter into no-man’s land, an area I visited years ago. This post has to do with a comedian who faked his death, Bill Hicks, and a controlled opposition broadcaster, Alex Jones. I have maintained for years that the former became the latter, knowing full well that most people do not believe it. I am going to go through the matter in depth, and deal with all of the evidence that I have gathered along with a link to work by others.

Continue reading “Hicks/Jones: How can you not see it?”

Dallas Goldbug got one thing right, anyway

Comedian Bill Hicks (real name unknown) was a psyop, both alive and after he faked his death. Alive he pretended to be a conspiracy theorist, tromping about the stage imitating the head wound to President Kennedy. The “psyop” part of that routine was a deep lingering suspicion that he got cancer at age 32 by some evil means, probably CIA injecting something in him. It was intimidating, and we could not voice our suspicion because we had no evidence.

They were messing with us.

Bill Hicks after his fake death became another psyop, this one promoted by a spook named Ed Chiarini and calling himself Dallas Goldbug. As we have found here, death and rebirth among famous people is not that uncommon, the “Zombie” phenomenon highlighted on the list to the right. So Goldbug got out in front of us and identified Alex Jones (real name unknown), the conspiracy broadcaster from Infowars, as the reincarnation of Bill Hicks. He is, as he knows, quite correct about that. That was intentional, and the only time Goldbug has ever been correct. It was bait.

Now comes the clever part – Goldbug went on to put out a list of loony and nonsensical rebirths, saying that JFK became Jimmy Carter, Jim Morrison became Rush Limbaugh, John Lennon became Steve Jobs, and many others. All of that is obviously nuts wrong, and meant to appear that way. Now when any of us step forward to identify Zombies, the first accusation we hear is that we got the information from Goldbug.

See how it works? It is called blackwashing. It is another way of hiding truth in plain sight. Goldbug created incredulity, and that allows Zombies to hide out behind him. That is why I say he is a spook. And  I wonder sometimes how we can ever manage to come out on top – that sort of psyop is just clever.

Anyway, just for giggles, below the fold is the transformation of Bill Hicks into Alex Jones, the one thing that Goldbug ever got right, but for the wrong reasons.

Continue reading “Dallas Goldbug got one thing right, anyway”

Total spectrum dominance

We are lied to 24/7, with every image seen on TV, even supposed candid ones, either being staged or reviewed before airing. Television is a social control medium used to hypnotize that vast majority of Americans. But some of us have escaped, and are more awake than those around us.

If you want to get away from censorship, there are many avenues. For instance, there is alternative media. You could go to Alex Jones and his Prison Planet. Alex, who was once Bill Hicks, will tantalize you with lies of a different type, but lies nonetheless, designed to satisfy your curiosity. Conspiracy thinkers tend to be smarter people who notice more detail and think critically. Alex knows this. He very carefully satisfies our yearning to know what is true by plying us with lies of a more intuitive type. Alex is a gatekeeper.

Or, you can get the inside scoop on the Internet from SNOPES. It is designed to catch you when in doubt and set you straight. It prevents you from committing thought crime. If you don’t believe jet aircraft can fly though buildings like knife though butter, for instance, SNOPES will reassure you that indeed they can, and tell you why in detail. It’s is a CIA front.

There is always Wikipedia. It is the go-to source, our modern day Encyclopedia Brittanica. It’s riddled with back door spooks, and craftily constructed so that Intelligence agents can glean real information from it while the rest of us need hip waders to maneuver in the bullshit. It’s a CIA front.

Or you can swill in right wing punditry over at FOX. Bill O’Reilly, like Amy Goodman, is a Zombie, planted there to catch you unaware. The whole of the FOX operation is designed to keep low information people in that state, while at the same time helping them imagine they are well informed.

FOX News content is identical to NPR and PBS but in a different package, the latter designed to reinforce your unstated supposition that you are intellectually superior to those around you. NPR and PBS feed you that cat food, opening up a fresh can every day.

Or, you can go the left wing route. Amy Goodman, a Zombie, is waiting to greet you, and lead you a little further into the rabbit hole, but only a little. She’s a gatekeeper too, just like Jones and O’Reilly. If there is really important truth to unearth, she’ll take you there, almost. Not quite.

Talk radio? It’s an agitated medium, and used mostly to keep you angry and upset. Anger clouds the brain and prevents rational thought processes. Don’t like Rush? There’s Thom Hartmann, a Zombie, is waiting to greet you “on the left,” performing the gatekeeping function. (Thom actually hates liberals and progressives. Say what you will about him, he works hard, as does Goodman. I would not want their jobs, living and breathing as they do with people they loathe.  It sucks to be them, but face it, Janis was skating on thin ice as a blues singer, and Brandon DeWilde (Hartmann) was on his way to daytime soaps as an actor.)

The Internet? The Blogs? Reddit and Quora and all the discussions sites?  If you put something true up at those sites, an automated mechanism appears to be in place to vote you out of sight. Those sites are riddled with spooks and trolls, some paid, most just late night voyeurs shooting from the bushes, guerilla snipers. They’ll leave you fifty shades of confused. Some of these snipers are very mean, others very stupid. None are worth our time.

The answer? Turn off your TV, turn on your brain. Vigilant citizenship is work! It requires thinking. We stumble, make mistakes, keep pushing and burrowing, as learning requires mistakes on the way.

Mistakes should not scare you. If you place trust in someone not worthy of it, it is easily reversed. Further, not knowing the answers is a lovely state of mind. Searching for them is the stuff of real intelligent discontent.

This blog, unlike others, has made real discoveries, come upon new insights, and has done something really odd: it has both searched for and found some truth. I beg you try to find another like it. (If you do, tell me. I will link to it.)

We have only just begun.


PS: I forgot the most important left-wing gatekeeper of all, put there to satisfy those of us of higher-than average capacity for processing large volumes of information, Noam Chomsky. He’s advanced in age now, not putting out books like he used to, but I would bet that if you emailed him (his address can be found online but it would be rude to publish it) you would get an answer within hours. I have done this. He used to spend maybe six hours a day on email, indicating that he doesn’t really have a full-time MIT job, just an office. And that makes sense, as MIT is just an adjunct campus for DOD.

Bill Hicks became Alex Jones: Case Closed

My colleague Straight wants me to move forward, to get better at using PhotoShop. It offers a far wider array of possibilities than my current tools. I have been using them because I have so much work ahead, and don’t want to take time to learn such a big and complex program. But I must. Fortunately, MH is already well-versed.

We were attacked over the weekend with what appears to be honest but misguided criticism, that the Bill Hicks/Alex Jones comparison is bogus – a golden apple laid out by Intelligence just waiting to be found. I was aware of that possibility, which is why I went to videos, and not Internet images, to pull two together that showed his features to align.

The comparison is difficult, as Hicks has had plastic surgery to become Jones. But I am convinced they are the same man not just by photo comparisons, but also by profession (both fake “conspiracy nuts”), demeanor (both actors who can project intense venom), having the same cameraman and producer, Kevin Booth, and the simple fact that any damned fool can see that Alex Jones is not 42 years old, but rather a man in his fifties, as Hicks would be. Add all of that to alignment of facial features that cannot be changed by plastic surgery, and we have our man.

The person who attacked us lined up several photos side by side looking for differences, as skeptics do. Straight was able to set them to the right proportions, but we noticed something in all of them. See what you think:

Same teeth

The critic is saying that Jones obviously has a smaller mouth than Hicks, but he shot himself in the foot, as Straight and I noticed that Hicks and Jones have exactly the same teeth.

But this calls for PhotoShop, and MH can do this sort of thing. Here are his four overlay progressions after aligning the photos based on the teeth:

In the end, the teeth in the largest photo there are overlaid over the Hicks teeth in upper left. Note how they align with precision.There is only a slight ghosting effect, but no teeth in different positions.

MH then went one step further and created a gif of the progressionhicks-jones-morph

Focus, if you will, on the teeth as you watch that. After all, what are the odds of perfect alignment of one tooth in one photo, much less the whole rack, on two supposedly different men? Statistically speaking, MH has proven beyond reasonable doubt that Bill Hicks became Alex Jones.

Amen to the Bill Hicks/Alex Jones saga. Case closed.


PS: On the last Jones photo in the gif, or the one on the bottom where all four faces are displayed above, notice the lines extending outward from his eyes. Those are crow’s feet, and not the result of natural aging. Instead, they are a result of extensive plastic surgery, the only reason there is any question about his identity. I expect he may go off the air here soon, maybe a hiatus, as more surgery is necessary to cover those scars.  Or they may just can his ass. We saw this too with both the McCartney boys.

Bill Hicks is STILL Alex Jones

I have been catching some grief, and rightly so, for relying on the work of another person in the matter of Bill Hicks and Alex Jones. That matter bugged me so much that I ran comparisons on my own (I was not able to do so at the time I wrote up the first post on the matter), and was satisfied for myself that the two men are the same.

Since we have now caught the attention of the spooks, I went looking for photos of the two men in a pose that anyone who knows either or both is familiar with: wild-eyed rage. Hicks was is first an actor, and so was able to project a high degree of venom. Jones has the same talent – this is in fact part of his signature as a fake newscaster, to project enough venom to drive normally curious people away. It is part of what spooks call “sheepdipping.” Jones is meant to be such an inflammatory character that he drives people away, thereby protecting secrets rather than exposing them. By such behavior he is able to taint the entire community of people of curious mind as irrational.

So note that Hicks/Jones is given a high platform and is often referred to as the go-to conspiracy guy by ordinary phony newscasters and pundits. And note that when a person stops by the Jones show, Prison Planet, it is found to be a very unpleasant experience, driving most people of calm demeanor away.

I have never been able to watch Jones, even before I came to realize he was really Bill Hicks. He’s too abrasive, his raspy voice is unsettling. It is a very clever maneuver.

Take a look – I don’t think either man (as if) wanted this comparison:

Hicks Jones Angry Composite

From these photos I am able now to confirm beyond doubt that Bill Hicks and Alex Jones are the same person, also known as Freddy Krueger. (Please note – Jones has had some rhinoplasty, as seen before with Lemmy Kilmaster. He has had a ridge inserted in his nose, and some other less noticeable modifications. But the facial lineup is too close to be coincidental. Bill Hicks is Alex Jones is Freddy Krueger.)

Maury Povich: Another Zombie

On July 25, 1969, Manson family members Bobby Beausoleil, Susan Atkins, and Mary Brunner paid Gary [Hinman] a visit. Manson was under the impression that Hinman had money in stocks and bonds, and that Gary had owned his house and cars. He sent the group to Hinman’s house to convince Gary to join the family, which included turning over his assets. According to Beausoleil, the group visited Hinman because Gary had sold him some bad mescaline and Bobby wanted his money back. Whatever the motive was, the conflict lasted 3 days. During which, Charles Manson and Bruce Davis stopped by. As soon as he arrived, Manson raised a sword and quickly struck Hinman in the head, slicing Gary’s left ear and face. Hinman asked Manson why they were doing this and requested him to take the others and leave. Manson and Davis immediately left in one of Hinman’s cars while the others stayed behind. Mary and Susan stitched up his ear with dental floss while Gary, who didn’t believe in violence, just kept on asking them to leave. It all ended on the 27th when Beausoleil finally killed Hinman, stabbing him in the chest twice. Bobby, Susan, and Mary took turns holding a pillow over his face. Beausoleil then wrote “POLITICAL PIGGY” and drew a pawn print on the wall in Hinman’s blood in an attempt to make authorities think the Black Panthers committed the murder. Gary died on the floor with his prayer beads in hand, chanting “Nam Myo Ho Renge Kyo Nam Myo Ho Renge Kyo”, the chant of his faith. (CieloDrive.com)

That’s not even good fiction. The writers’ object was to create a sword-wielding monster of incalculable evil who strikes out randomly at innocent people, and a murderer who stabs with a knife while his lady friends hold a pillow over the man … Hinman a man of peace and love and chanting a Buddhist prayer. There’s also a biblical reference with the ear cut off.  Oversell … much?

The Charles Manson character was an creation of Intelligence, in real life a harmless puppy hired to play a role. He only sold it with the help of a compliant news media that dutifully transmitted the caricature of a wild-eyed sword-wielding monster as “news.” Because it was news, because it was on TV, it was guaranteed that a gullible American public would swallow whole. I was part of that public.

Manson could only be seen, but not heard. If the public got to know him too well, they would easily see through him. He was an actor, and a musician, and a loser. His name was not “Manson,” his persona was an invention, his “family” mere hired hands who moved on to new assignments when the Manson gig was over.

By the way, Gary Hinman did not die that day, or any other day. In going through the names and faces of the Laurel Canyon zombies (walking dead), the name “Maury Povich” had been thrown out as a possibly as one of the re-purposed personas. I had heard of him, and one night while going through photos, I saw Povich, and knew I had seen him before. This was an easy one, as was Brandon DeWilde/Thom Hartmann and Bobby Fuller/Bill O’Reilly, as each man had struck the same pose, then and now, making a side-by-side comparison easy.

HinmanThere is, to my knowledge, only one photo of Gary Hinman in existence, but it is a good one. All too often when doing facial comparisons, I find different poses among candidates, so that comparisons are fraught with difficulties. But something else sometimes occurs – people tend to strike the same poses for cameras throughout their lives. In my own case, I had a photo from 1982 or so, and another from 2014, and I marveled at how my expression was identical in the two. (Check it out here.) So too with Hartmann, Bill O’Reilly, Barbara Walters, Christa McAuliffe, Matt Stone and Trey Parker and Sharon Tate and all of the other phonies we have exposed here. They tend to pose for the camera in the same manner then, and now.

PovichSo too with Hinman, now known as Maury Povich. I didn’t even have to earn my pay on this one. Same angle, same crooked smile, same droopy and dark eyes. Also notice the line from his left ear to his chin, identical on both.

If you, like me, don’t know much about Maury Povich or his work, he has been all over daytime TV these past decades, from A Current Affair to The Maury Povich Show to Weekends with Maury and Connie. “Connie” is Connie Chung, his wife, who went public with her struggles to get pregnant, with Maury at the wheel. Talk about public lives! (They finally adopted.)

Before I forget, here is the comparison that convinced me the Gary lives:

MH and I discussed this, after it was becoming apparent what was going on with the Laurel Canyon zombies. Bobby Fuller/Bill O’Reilly became a FOX News pundit, and agitates the right wing crowd (including my late mom and dad) from that platform. Brandon DeWilde/Thom Hartmann took a radio slot to work with the liberals among us, his primary thrust to keep them in the Democratic Party. He works closely with Bernie Sanders. Phil Hartman/Glenn Beck, known to emote and shed tears on TV as a good actor can do, also works the right wing. Bill Hicks/Alex Jones works the conspiracy buffs, the ones who need misguidance. Pamela Courson/Barbara Walters worked the female daytime TV set, filling their heads with nonsense about party squabbles and fake issues. We have learned to look among the lightweights of journalism for our zombies.

Where does Maury fit in? He has had a platform on daytime TV at his disposal. Daytime TV is a low information mecca. What we have learned is that these actors, these CIA plants, are there to cajole and entertain those who think less and need mere distraction. It’s a full time job to keep people in that low information state, and yet have them imagine they know stuff.

There are others, more serious citizens and academics, who often read and think harder and look a little deeper than the O’Reilly/Walters/Hartmann/Povich set. In a full spectrum thought control environment, CIA is there too, providing the analysts, experts … the Chomsky’s, the Krugman’s, Drudge’s and yes, even Moyers and Sagan’s and Hawking’s** … no matter where we turn, spooks are there to greet us. It appears that the lower-level spooks who worked Laurel Canyon in the 60s were reassigned to mind the mindless TV masses. It’s low-level work, but pays well.

But it goes much deeper. Maury Povich moved to the Flathead Valley in Montana, Kalispell the nearest city. It is a beautiful area, mostly a vacation mecca but swarming as well with California immigrants. It could be just a place for Hinman/Povich to live out his days, but in 2007 he founded the Flathead Beacon, a local newspaper. It is disturbing to realize how deep down into the bowels of society CIA control of news goes, even to a lowly rag in a backwater area of Montana. Nothing is exempt.

William Colby, former head of the CIA, was quoted by Dave McGowan as saying that “The CIA owns everyone of significance in the major media.” Since that statement has been formally “debunked,”there is a good chance it is accurate. I never knew  what the word “owns” meant. I assumed it was some sort of contractual arrangement where someone like Anderson Cooper, a known CIA mole*, is told what to cover and what to emphasize. I never realized, as with O’Reilly, Hartmann, Beck, Walters, Jones, and as we will cover in the near future, Tom Brokaw, that CIA doesn’t just “own” these people. It gives them their name, personality, bio, platform, and marching orders. They are not just working for intelligence, they are its creations.

It is one thing to know that news lies to us all day every day. It is another to realize that the liars are not even real people. They are zombies.

*If he is known, is he really a mole? It is public knowledge that Cooper, son of Gloria Vanderbilt, underwent CIA training while attending Yale. I would simply call him a CIA “employee.”
** Stephen Hawking, a fake, the real man long since dead, is a product of British Intelligence, but the overlap among intelligence agencies world wide is so encompassing that I regard them all as the same agency.

Bill Hicks, comedian extraordinaire

“Another guy I have wondered about … Bill Hicks. Stood up on stage and ridiculed the Warren Commission, dies in his early 30s of cancer … maybe a bit too pat in light of MM’s research.”

The above comment, by me, set off a chain reaction.  Little did I know that better minds were already on this matter.

But perhaps some ground work is in order.

We live in a Truman Show world where just about every piece of “news” is in some manner designed to manage our perceptions. The real world is a mundane place … There are no terrorists, disease is controllable, people generally get along and are cooperative … and dumb, easy to manipulate. TV is the enterprise that spins our heads with fantasies of elections, public debates, opinion polls, suicide bombers, mass shootings, rampant outbreaks of diseases … all fake.

It is a nuanced enterprise. The majority of the population does not need much management, is easily fooled and believes just about any nonsense that jumps from the screen. This has been true from the beginning of TV. It helps to think of it as parents controlling children. Our leaders do not have much respect for our intelligence. We are a herd that has to be managed, distracted, misdirected, so that the real business of running the world can go on without interference from below.

The first intense use of TV to manage the public mind, as I see it, was the Joe McCarthy hearings, used to promote the idea that “communism” not only existed, but was a sinister force that was subtly infiltrating government and entertainment. Though Joe was publicly scolded and died in disgrace, the psy-op worked, and the hoax of communism with agents under every bed subtly took hold. To this day most think it and the so-called “Cold War” were real.

But the bigger show was yet to come – the Kennedy assassination. It was a grab bag of hoaxes on multiple levels, in essence, the day that fake government completely replaced real. Just a few of the multiple layers of manipulation:

  • The event itself was faked, and no one (save perhaps officer Tippet?) died that day or the following Sunday. Like 9/11, it was a TV show, much if it filmed in advance.
  • A committee of Kennedy men, the Warren Commission, concocted a deliberately wild fable about Oswald and three bullets, made to appear to be a cover-up. They knew only the very gullible would believe it. They counted on that.
  • Later, two more Kennedy men, Mark Lane, author of Rush to Judgment, and Jim Garrison (On the Trail of the Assassins), promoted a cottage industry of clues and false leads designed to mesmerize those too smart to buy the Warren Commission Report. We were simply fooled on a higher level.
  • At routine intervals, new information was released, including staged photos of a fake corpse by David Lifton (Best Evidence), and a high quality movie with A-list actors (Oliver Stone’s JFK).

Thus did I get sucked into the JFK business, still going on to this day. James Douglass’ JFK and the Unspeakable is an embarrassing lionization of the man, incidentally sanitizing the reputations of  Khrushchev, Norman Cousins and Pope John XXIII.

Nonetheless, I was both appalled and completely flummoxed that a president could be murdered in broad daylight, and that there was never a real investigation. It was absurd. So effective was this JFK enterprise that I neglected the essential element: Proof of death.

There are  subplots. They are constantly feeding this fire, to this day, so important is the central hoax. Mark Lane, a Kennedy man still going strong, insinuated in a recent book or interview or something that the original Paul McCartney did not believe the Warren Commission, hinting ever so subtly that this caused his death and replacement. It was a complete fable, designed to supplement the “Paul is Dead” psy-op, a separate enterprise run by British intelligence. Lane’s delicious golden apple was oh-so-subtly placed, waiting to be found by those of us fooled on a higher level than ordinary Joe’s. (We are super Joe’s!) (Both Paul and his twin brother Mike are still with us, alive and well last I checked, one of them even possibly still in the entertainment business.)

Another subplot involved New Orleans and an obvious plant, Judith Vary Baker, “author” of Lee and Me, claiming to be the lover of Lee Harvey Oswald, but at least I saw through that bit of deception. I knew that there was Oswald and a doppelgänger or two and she did not. She had her one Oswald doing the work of two.

However, Baker, and another author, Ed Haslam (Dr. Mary’s Monkey) strongly intimated that there was cancer research going on in New Orleans in order to weaponize that disease, using it to inject various targets by subtle means, and then watch them die. (Thus did Nicolás Maduro, president of Venezuela, openly accuse the US of injecting President Hugo Chavez with cancer. That too was planted information, a scam within a scam. Most likely Chavez’s death was faked, that ruse assisted by Fidel Castro, himself a fake. They do like to control the opposition.)

This is all laying groundwork for Bill Hicks. He was a comedian who, as part of his act, openly ridiculed the Warren Commission. He was widely known, drew huge audiences, appeared on national TV. And he died of aggressive cancer in 1994 at the age of 32. Of course many of us were suspicious that Hicks had been murdered. We forgot to ask, just like with JFK, Oswald, Chavez … Did he really die?

Learning that the Kennedy assassination was fake put Hicks’ death in a new light, which led to my comment at the opening of this piece. I had assumed in light of a better view of JFK that Hicks’ death was faked, and that he went into witness protection, or wherever people go after they fake their death. (John Lennon, Canada it appears … I have much to write about the fake death business in the future … in the entertainment business, faking death appears to be an option available to all the players.)

Hicks is still with us. He is still a public figure. He goes by the name Alex Jones. I had no idea when I made the comment above that this bit of underground information was out there. I have looked at the photos and absorbed circumstantial evidence. Of course, nothing is ever certain in this land. Hicks has had some some plastic plastic surgery. But off-air in candid moments, his gravelly voice gone, and I am listening again to Bill Hicks. The resemblance is striking. The facial characteristics that cannot be affected by the surgeons knife … eye width, triangulation of eyes and lips, ear placement, skull shape, hairline … exact match.

People, even those who see through the Hicks/Jones scam, don’t really get it. They don’t understand what Hicks was doing as a comedian, why he was so boldly attacking the Warren Commission. He was a plant, misdirection,  a hired actor playing a role. The whole thing, including his death, was staged to encourage us to keep asking the wrong questions. The ongoing JFK cover-up is routinely fed fresh meat.

Instead of who killed JFK, why the the Warren Commission covered it up, we should have been seeking proof that JFK actually died that day. We did not. That is why it is so important to keep all the theories alive at this late date. That distraction covers up an essential element of our public lies, that we do not select our leaders and are continually fed fairy tales about them. Like Bill Hicks, it is all fake.

Bill Hicks was a misdirection agent. So too is his new incarnation, Alex Jones. To my credit, I avoid Jones. I have only once fallen into his weave, back in 2011 with the fake death of Osama bin Laden. Jones claimed to have eyewitness reports of a helicopter crash at the compound. That was misdirection. There there was no compound, there was no Osama. The “crash” made us forget to look at the basics. It was a complete misdirection, again aimed at those of us too clever to be fooled by ground-level propaganda. It takes special efforts to control our perceptions. .

Bill Hicks played a character for twelve years, and then fake died to play another character, Alex Jones, who is, by the way, an employee of Time Warner. Strange, an alternative media conspiracy buff employed by a major media outlet, ain’t it?

One thing I have learned these past few years is that most people are absolutely credulous when it comes to photo fakery, and on a deeper level think themselves impossible to fool even as every aspect of their belief systems has been rigged from above. So if you’ve come here to ridicule, perhaps you’d be wise to slink back to your own little havens and do it from there, in the coward’s way, and avoid any examination of evidence.

Below is my own facial comparison of the two. I chose images where both were extremely agitated, set the pupils at the same distance, and aligned the faces side by side. In my view, same dude.

Hicks Jones Angry Composite

Ask the question (slightly revised)

[This is a rework of yesterday’s post with revisions to aid in clarity of thought, which ain’t always working for me.]

Often in discussing matters like 9/11 or other false flag events, those of us who don’t buy the official story are challenged to present a plausible alternative. For a true skeptic it is enough to know what cannot be true. As to what really happened, it’s a long and frustrating journey. Keep in mind:

  • Those who did these events are not talking.
  • Even if there are unwitting participants, they fear for their lives, and so are also not talking.
  • Public mythology is part of human history since the beginning of time, a well-understood management tool. Those who manage these events are far ahead of us in planning – i.e. – it is almost an act of e.s.p. to understand the “why” of events such as 9/11 or Boston.
  • Even though skeptical we usually don’t have the expertise needed to fully understand the means by which an event is staged.
  • As the event is “reported” to us we don’t know who we can trust and so are on our own to weather a storm of official “news” media and “scientific” experts.

The people who did these events were smart enough to anticipate that there would be skeptics, and so provided us with bullshit stories when the first bullshit story collapses. Ergo, we are faced with the multi-layered cover-up, the rabbit hole.

Here’s Ron Suskind, a man who passes as a “journalist” in this bullshit land of fables. He interviewed either Karl Rove or Dick Cheney (he’s not allowed to say, part of pthe code of honor of the journalist):

The aide said that guys like me were “in what we call the reality-based community,” which he defined as people who “believe that solutions emerge from your judicious study of discernible reality.” I pnodded and murmured something about enlightenment principles and empiricism. He cut me off. “That’s not the way the world really works anymore,” he continued. “We’re an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality. And while you’re studying that reality – judiciously, as you will – we’ll act again, creating other new realities, which you can study too, and that’s how things will sort out. We’re history’s actors … and you, all of you, will be left to just study what we do.”

So we are left to study the evidence left in the wake of the false flag events secure in the knowledge that the majority of the population is continually fooled and will stay fooled. Even as we do, other events come along to take their place. Those of us who are not convinced are consigned to the margins and subject to ridicule. It is brilliant.

But the official cover stories for these events are ridiculous.  It is only blind faith in authority figures that keeps them alive. Given that they are made up fantasies, there is always some aspect that is so ridiculous as to blow the entire thing out of the water – a lynchpin for skeptics. A few examples:

  • JFK: Commission Exhibit 399.
  • RFK: The official autopsy which says that the bullet that killed him was fired from behind and two inches from his head.
  • MLK: A jury trial finding that the Memphis Police and Fire Departments, the FBI and U.S. military conspired to murder him.
  • 9/11: That jet aircraft flying through concrete and steel as a knife through butter.
  • Boston Bombing: A man in a wheel chair who has lost both lower limbs and who, rather than being dead, is merely grimacing.

That’s enough for the true skeptic to look elsewhere for answers. Given that, the people who plan these events also supply other bullshit cover stories when the original ones fail. People like Richard Gage, Alex Jones, Steven E. Jones, John Lear and Jim Fetzer, to name a few, are  the”second level” of the cover-up. They provide blind alleys. Thus given the absurdity of the cover stories, we are led to other absurdities such as LBJ, the mob, Mossad, controlled demolition, drone aircraft, Mossad, mini-nukes, nano-thermites, stage management by Steven Spielberg and even space aliens dropping by.

It’s hard to watch the original cover stories succeed, but even harder as skeptical people get caught up in the second level. But who are we to challenge the vast American news media or Popular Mechanics or NIST or some other appointed body of appointed experts … it takes some internal fortitude. Even if the bulk of the public is skeptical about the Osama bin Laden caveman story, for instance, they are either afraid to talk to anyone about it for fear of ridicule, or caught up in the second layer.

So it goes. It is a highly sophisticated and effective thought control regime. I’ve been through it, I understand. It’s difficult. Though poll results are kept private on such delicate matters, I assume that even if the bulk of the public is skeptical … they are tuned out. It’s too difficult to imagine such a large conspiracy. The second level of the cover-up also includes a wide array of “debunking” sites to steer people away from real evidence. It is pre-tainted.

In the coming days I am going to offer up some evidence that I have come to believe is reliable enough to derail the official story of some of the major false flag events of our times. It will not be the usual fare already widely circulating, but rather stuff I’ve gathered from tireless and unpaid private researchers who have endured the ridicule and earned my respect. I am not the final judge of character, and can be fooled. But I trust certain people as being men and women of honor. I will relay their findings.

I hope to make it interesting. I don’t have any definitive answers. For me it is enough to know what cannot be true. For the reader, I hope only to assist in that critical first step on the path of learning: Ask the question.