Maury Povich: Another Zombie

On July 25, 1969, Manson family members Bobby Beausoleil, Susan Atkins, and Mary Brunner paid Gary [Hinman] a visit. Manson was under the impression that Hinman had money in stocks and bonds, and that Gary had owned his house and cars. He sent the group to Hinman’s house to convince Gary to join the family, which included turning over his assets. According to Beausoleil, the group visited Hinman because Gary had sold him some bad mescaline and Bobby wanted his money back. Whatever the motive was, the conflict lasted 3 days. During which, Charles Manson and Bruce Davis stopped by. As soon as he arrived, Manson raised a sword and quickly struck Hinman in the head, slicing Gary’s left ear and face. Hinman asked Manson why they were doing this and requested him to take the others and leave. Manson and Davis immediately left in one of Hinman’s cars while the others stayed behind. Mary and Susan stitched up his ear with dental floss while Gary, who didn’t believe in violence, just kept on asking them to leave. It all ended on the 27th when Beausoleil finally killed Hinman, stabbing him in the chest twice. Bobby, Susan, and Mary took turns holding a pillow over his face. Beausoleil then wrote “POLITICAL PIGGY” and drew a pawn print on the wall in Hinman’s blood in an attempt to make authorities think the Black Panthers committed the murder. Gary died on the floor with his prayer beads in hand, chanting “Nam Myo Ho Renge Kyo Nam Myo Ho Renge Kyo”, the chant of his faith. (CieloDrive.com)

That’s not even good fiction. The writers’ object was to create a sword-wielding monster of incalculable evil who strikes out randomly at innocent people, and a murderer who stabs with a knife while his lady friends hold a pillow over the man … Hinman a man of peace and love and chanting a Buddhist prayer. There’s also a biblical reference with the ear cut off.  Oversell … much?

The Charles Manson character was an creation of Intelligence, in real life a harmless puppy hired to play a role. He only sold it with the help of a compliant news media that dutifully transmitted the caricature of a wild-eyed sword-wielding monster as “news.” Because it was news, because it was on TV, it was guaranteed that a gullible American public would swallow whole. I was part of that public.

Manson could only be seen, but not heard. If the public got to know him too well, they would easily see through him. He was an actor, and a musician, and a loser. His name was not “Manson,” his persona was an invention, his “family” mere hired hands who moved on to new assignments when the Manson gig was over.

By the way, Gary Hinman did not die that day, or any other day. In going through the names and faces of the Laurel Canyon zombies (walking dead), the name “Maury Povich” had been thrown out as a possibly as one of the re-purposed personas. I had heard of him, and one night while going through photos, I saw Povich, and knew I had seen him before. This was an easy one, as was Brandon DeWilde/Thom Hartmann and Bobby Fuller/Bill O’Reilly, as each man had struck the same pose, then and now, making a side-by-side comparison easy.

HinmanThere is, to my knowledge, only one photo of Gary Hinman in existence, but it is a good one. All too often when doing facial comparisons, I find different poses among candidates, so that comparisons are fraught with difficulties. But something else sometimes occurs – people tend to strike the same poses for cameras throughout their lives. In my own case, I had a photo from 1982 or so, and another from 2014, and I marveled at how my expression was identical in the two. (Check it out here.) So too with Hartmann, Bill O’Reilly, Barbara Walters, Christa McAuliffe, Matt Stone and Trey Parker and Sharon Tate and all of the other phonies we have exposed here. They tend to pose for the camera in the same manner then, and now.

PovichSo too with Hinman, now known as Maury Povich. I didn’t even have to earn my pay on this one. Same angle, same crooked smile, same droopy and dark eyes. Also notice the line from his left ear to his chin, identical on both.

If you, like me, don’t know much about Maury Povich or his work, he has been all over daytime TV these past decades, from A Current Affair to The Maury Povich Show to Weekends with Maury and Connie. “Connie” is Connie Chung, his wife, who went public with her struggles to get pregnant, with Maury at the wheel. Talk about public lives! (They finally adopted.)

Before I forget, here is the comparison that convinced me the Gary lives:

MH and I discussed this, after it was becoming apparent what was going on with the Laurel Canyon zombies. Bobby Fuller/Bill O’Reilly became a FOX News pundit, and agitates the right wing crowd (including my late mom and dad) from that platform. Brandon DeWilde/Thom Hartmann took a radio slot to work with the liberals among us, his primary thrust to keep them in the Democratic Party. He works closely with Bernie Sanders. Phil Hartman/Glenn Beck, known to emote and shed tears on TV as a good actor can do, also works the right wing. Bill Hicks/Alex Jones works the conspiracy buffs, the ones who need misguidance. Pamela Courson/Barbara Walters worked the female daytime TV set, filling their heads with nonsense about party squabbles and fake issues. We have learned to look among the lightweights of journalism for our zombies.

Where does Maury fit in? He has had a platform on daytime TV at his disposal. Daytime TV is a low information mecca. What we have learned is that these actors, these CIA plants, are there to cajole and entertain those who think less and need mere distraction. It’s a full time job to keep people in that low information state, and yet have them imagine they know stuff.

There are others, more serious citizens and academics, who often read and think harder and look a little deeper than the O’Reilly/Walters/Hartmann/Povich set. In a full spectrum thought control environment, CIA is there too, providing the analysts, experts … the Chomsky’s, the Krugman’s, Drudge’s and yes, even Moyers and Sagan’s and Hawking’s** … no matter where we turn, spooks are there to greet us. It appears that the lower-level spooks who worked Laurel Canyon in the 60s were reassigned to mind the mindless TV masses. It’s low-level work, but pays well.

But it goes much deeper. Maury Povich moved to the Flathead Valley in Montana, Kalispell the nearest city. It is a beautiful area, mostly a vacation mecca but swarming as well with California immigrants. It could be just a place for Hinman/Povich to live out his days, but in 2007 he founded the Flathead Beacon, a local newspaper. It is disturbing to realize how deep down into the bowels of society CIA control of news goes, even to a lowly rag in a backwater area of Montana. Nothing is exempt.

William Colby, former head of the CIA, was quoted by Dave McGowan as saying that “The CIA owns everyone of significance in the major media.” Since that statement has been formally “debunked,”there is a good chance it is accurate. I never knew  what the word “owns” meant. I assumed it was some sort of contractual arrangement where someone like Anderson Cooper, a known CIA mole*, is told what to cover and what to emphasize. I never realized, as with O’Reilly, Hartmann, Beck, Walters, Jones, and as we will cover in the near future, Tom Brokaw, that CIA doesn’t just “own” these people. It gives them their name, personality, bio, platform, and marching orders. They are not just working for intelligence, they are its creations.

It is one thing to know that news lies to us all day every day. It is another to realize that the liars are not even real people. They are zombies.

_________________
*If he is known, is he really a mole? It is public knowledge that Cooper, son of Gloria Vanderbilt, underwent CIA training while attending Yale. I would simply call him a CIA “employee.”
** Stephen Hawking, a fake, the real man long since dead, is a product of British Intelligence, but the overlap among intelligence agencies world wide is so encompassing that I regard them all as the same agency.

22 thoughts on “Maury Povich: Another Zombie

  1. Maury is famous for his “Are You The Father?” segment of his show where low income, “white trash” or black families come on with their fake drama and collectively embarrass themselves. I’m not completely sure of the purpose for this Springer-type of entertainment, so I’d love to hear if anybody has insight into it.

    I assume it’s to suggest to low income families how they should act, meanwhile have the middle class shaking their heads at the poverty class.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. True … I watched him on the Jeopardy week they do with journalists. Honestly, the questions were so dumbed down for that set! Cooper came off as, well, kind of thick and dull. If he was chosen for the part rather than born into it, they did not use intelligence as a criteria.

      Liked by 1 person

  2. My initial thought is that Povich has always been Povich but that he was ordered to pose for the one photograph to have some visual to go with this completely fictional side bar of the Manson fairy tale- Maury’s father was a well connected DC reporter, hiding behind the sports desk, but as a baseball hall of fame writer you can go all in that he was a top level Mason- His son has been vetted to do what he does: Make the idea of coupling a farce and that these fake illegitimate offspring only prove that men are animals and women defenseless victims- Therefore, ladies stay away from men- This is another front on the war against procreation and the family- The soft genocide-
    The farce marriage with the Frigidaire unit just furthers the agenda of infertility being a noble cause-

    Liked by 1 person

    1. I tend to trust a photo match-up like this as accurate. If so, it would mean, if you are right, that young Povich served time in the trenches and returned as himself. The farcical account of the Manson/Beausoleil killing of Hinman stretches all credulity to the breaking point. McGowan references it five times, never once questioning it. I have scribbled “FAKE!” in the margins on reading the book again months ago.

      However, Hinman did not seem to have much of a role in Laurel Canyon. He was said to be a musician, music teacher, and part-time chemist. He was part of no group. He led no movement, appeared on no stage, took no drugs, appeared in no movies. His fake killing merely sent him back to be with his family in DC. Maybe he just didn’t work out, had no real use, and was reassigned.

      So Maury Povich is real, Gary Hinman fake, when I thought both were fake.

      Like

          1. Off the top of my head and with no pic comparison, Richard Branson- I’ll try the two out today unless someone beats me to it-

            Like

          2. Forgot, but I flipped Branson to match the head angle- I could be missing the barn by three counties but I’ll get better at this-

            Like

          3. They look like a dead-on match to me. Do you want to see, or is this just practice? And who is this guy? I jut read up on Parent/Branson. I think you are on to something. What on earth led you from one to the other?

            Like

          4. If you can splice the two together, I’d rather the master do it- Parent was listed as 18 years old when he was killed and I started with celebs born in 1950 and kept an eye out for red/blondish hair- Parent’s smile looked like his deception smile, like he knew he was involved in a con- Years later, the actor has it etched on his face like the Joker’s scars-

            Like

          5. That is some really impressive power of observation on your part. The two line up precisely. With your permission I’d like to run with them, giving you due credit, another Zombie uncovered. I never paid attention to the Parent murder, but the Wiki summary is as whacked as all the others.

            As long as you are at it, Gram Parsons is out there, fake death 1973 as I recall. I look at that face and smile and think he has to be in media somewhere. Lots of personality. We’ve gone through Blitzer, Brokaw, and some not even close like Dr. Phil and Mr. Rogers. Can you give it a look? This guy, Parsons, fits .. almost … but not quite, and I need to solve the puzzle. (Or to have you do it.)

            Like

  3. Mark, post the Parent/Branson, please- I’ll look at Parsons tomorrow, a very rare day off, though packed with errands and chores-

    Like

  4. Check out Richard Branson as David Icke. This is obvious. MM claims they are “related” in his genealogy “research” which can be easily scrubbed or “fixed” at data input.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s