The Real Math of Facial Alignment

Mark has famously stated that he believes the odds of aligning 7 facial features on two random people is approximately 1 in 10 million. His math is very simple. He estimates that there is a 1 in 10 chance that one facial feature will align, thus multiplying 1/10 to the 7th power, you get 1 in 10 million.

I decided to put those numbers to the test. I went ahead and downloaded the 2d facial recognition set called “Aberdeen” that is found here.

It contains photos of 90 unique college students from Aberdeen sometime in the late 80’s or early 90’s. What I did was take one photo of a gentleman named Adrian (seen below) and match him up to each of the 58 other white males in the data set.

In planning this experiment I made 7 checkpoints on Adrian’s face where I would compare alignment by aligning the pupils and resizing the eyeballs to match in order to incorporate head size. If alignment was exact or very close, I marked that checkpoint with a “Yes” on a spreadsheet (which I will share upon request). The checkpoints were the eyebrows, the tip of the nose, the subnasale, the crista philtri (top of the lips), the labiale interious (bottom of the lip), the gnathion (chin) and the bottom ear lobe.

Continue reading “The Real Math of Facial Alignment” →

Bill Graham Presents…

(Here is a portion of an e-mail I sent to Miles Mathis in response to his recent Karen Carpenter paper)

 “I have this theory, sketched in very light pencil, that the powerful men of powerful families have had a breeding program underway for a very long time- (Strength in numbers, of course) The public figures that appear to steer pop culture are blood relations of the elites but illegitimate- And not accidental pregnancies but IVF donations implanted in female bastards of the same intermarried lines- This is what makes the Leo DiCaprios and Jack Nicholsons cousins and blood loyal even if born off the main power lines- In this fashion, the elite’s interests are protected by public figures they control as family members which allows these power brokers to remain hidden behind the curtain- Real power is never seen…”

I got a “maybe” from Miles in response, which is the best response this theory deserves at the moment given the dearth of hard evidence-

Continue reading “Bill Graham Presents…” →

The Dreyfus Affair on Trial

Miles Mathis posted a paper I wrote showing that the famous Dreyfus Affair was a manufactured hoax. For those of you coming here from that paper, welcome! Below I have a brief clarification about the goals of the Dreyfus affair plus a bonus outing of another French spook. But first a few preliminaries:

I am a new addition to the blog here along with several regulars who have until now only contributed to the comments section. Mark Tokarski is the captain who prefers to stay out of the limelight. He welcomes thoughtful comments and constructive criticism. But he runs a tight ship, so please be thoughtful and respectful when commenting or you might have to walk the shill plank. (-;

Mark, along with another contributor who goes by straightfromthedevilsmouth (or ‘straight’ for short), has discovered a shocking number of celebrities who we know as a single persona but are actually ‘played’ by identical twins. If you’ve read Miles’s work, you know that Intelligence loves twins, like Paul & Mike McCartney and Elvis & Aron Presley. Well it turns out those ones are just a drop in the bucket. You can find all of the twins uncovered so far in The Honor Roll of Twins on the right sidebar under the Blogroll. We have a working hypothesis that twins can be ‘engineered’ by artificial embryo splitting, but that’s for another day.

Continue reading “The Dreyfus Affair on Trial” →

Hey, Their Heads Are At Different Angles!

We’ve been hearing a whole lot of this lately, both from real people and from disinfo. I admit, I have been a little curious myself as to what effect angles can affect ear alignment. I decided to try a little experiment using photos of Mark, and photos I found on the internet to help us measure as close as possible what percentages we should expect.

The concept is this: I will have a picture of the subject at a level position. I will measure the pixel distance from the person’s trichion (hairline) to the bottom of the chin. Then I will align that image with the same person angling their head up or down at a certain angle. I will measure the pixel distance of the top and bottom of the ears and divide that by their head size to get a percentage. That is the ballpark percentage we should then expect the same person’s ears to be misaligned at that angle degree. If they are misaligned to a much larger degree, it is likely not the same person (not considering all other variables, which I will get into).

Continue reading “Hey, Their Heads Are At Different Angles!” →

Final Jeopardy

img_1304

The answer to this Jeopardy clue is ex-Illinois governor Rod Blagojevich. But there is possibly more being communicated here … I offer a prize to any reader who can spot it.

The prize? I haven’t figured that part out yet. I’ll do some quick shopping when someone gets it.

Adaptation of the fittest-

I want to thank Mark for letting me bloviate on his dime, so to speak- I often explain myself as worshipping in the temple of the imagination and his twin sister, intuition- These are my sturdy twin towers and as such I’m not too helpful with the hard core forensics- I trust my Spidey-sense and toss around concepts more than time and place specifics- I never read instructions or ask for directions- Solving problems by thinking in the abstract, or just using my hand/eye coordination to find things out works best for me- I have often half-joked that I only think when I speak- Same with typing- Forced to communicate with the external plane, the hums and plinks of random brain activity have to be corralled, edited and translated into coherent language- For some reason pacing back and forth seems to facilitate this process, allowing a repetition of thought to coordinate with repetition of physical movement- Add a couple of cold pops to the mix and I can see why Homer calls beer “thinking juice”-

Continue reading “Adaptation of the fittest-“ →

Notes: New writer, Katy Perry, the davidcrosby effect, Freddie

I want to put down a couple of brief notes before I go on a search for Tyrone McCloskey’s piece, written to be published here. I want his article to assume top-of-page position, and cannot wait to read it.

Tyrone, author of the paper JFKTV*, has been adding to our efforts here in the comments, and always comes up with interesting stuff, often out of the blue. His family background is in the movie business, so you might guess that he knows a little bit about the people and forces behind it. But I will leave him to tell us what he wants to tell, and welcome him aboard.

I have to search for his piece because WordPress does not notify me when an article has been put up for “review.” He said it is in there, and I don’t know how to find it on my own blog! It is a kink, and we’ll get it worked out.

I am looking forward to being one of a stable of writers here. It being me, myself and I over the years has been many times fun and not, as my mistakes are ‘out there,’ while my successes got very little traffic. I am not much of a promoter.

_________________

Continue reading “Notes: New writer, Katy Perry, the davidcrosby effect, Freddie” →

Nothing is real…

…and nothing to get hung about.

Living is easy with eyes closed.

Misunderstanding all you see.

Do you think maybe they were trying to tell us something? Well, my eyes are open. And I’ve accepted Mark’s generous invitation to blog here to try to share what I see from my perspective. I told him I wouldn’t have time to contribute for awhile, but dagnabbit it’s just too compelling. I was previously commenting here under the pseudyonym ‘daddie_o’ but that username is already taken, so now I’m ‘daddieuhoh.’

A little bit about me: I’m a disenchanted academic. My field is in the social sciences. About the 1st of this year, I happened to start watching a documentary called “9-11: The New Pearl Harbor.” The scales fell from my eyes, and I was thrust into a couple of months of intense reading up on many different conspiracy theories, trying to sort fact from fiction. I’m still at it. I’ve come to the conclusion, mainly thanks to others’ research, that much of what we see on TV or read in the newspapers is fake and phony. We’re being manipulated and duped on a grand, almost unimaginable scale. Our thoughts and passions are being molded and orchestrated. So much of the world we think we live in is a sham, a conjob. And so many of the conspiracies we read about are false leads and misdirection. Waking up to this realization was psychologically difficult at first. A bona fide ontological rupture. But I would not trade my newfound perspective for anything. I’m wide awake inside the Matrix, and I’m not going back to sleep.

Continue reading “Nothing is real…” →

Housekeeping notes

There are several matters to discuss concerning this blog before we move into uncharted waters.

Off to the right here are two new menus, the Honor Roll of Twins, and the Honor Roll of Zombies. We have done a lot of work here on  that subject, but it has never been indexed for easy access. Now every discovery we have made is but a link away. We invite scrutiny, and want mistakes pointed out. We accept challenges from honest citizens. (I have deleted many comments here, but not to be censorious. Spooks lurk all about on the Internet, paid agents who search the blogs looking for leaks of guarded information. They then attack those sources, but usually in a subtle way, trying to undermine confidence, create doubt, but never really saying anything of value. We have gotten good at spotting them, and get rid of them.

But if you, honest citizen, see something here you think far afield and wrong, do your own analysis, bring your information here in the comments. As I like to say, we only learn from mistakes (which is why the SAT exams are such a huge joke, smothering critical thinking skills in the crib), and if we make mistakes, we can always fix them. If we think you are wrong, but that your challenge is honest, you’ll find us polite and welcoming.

But we never thought that this blog would become what it is, an honor roll of exposure of spooks. Straight and I, months ago, were sitting on top of a list of dead musicians and actors gathered from McGowan’s Weird Scenes Inside the Canyon, and began work. I remember the early work, as Straight is a great organizer – he put together a database of all the relevant facts about each death, and I went through the Social Security Death Index looking for real deaths.* I remember various conversations, one of which where we agreed that we did not know where this information would take us, but that we should push forward. “Follow the truth no matter where it leads,” said Edward Abbey and many others. A lot of people say that, claim to follow truth. Few do. Fear of having a “conspiracy theory” stops them in their tracks, as I discovered with Joelle Steele.

Anyway, that is how we got here. That is why there are the two lists off to the right. We’ve been following truth, and are as surprised by where it has led us as any reader. Be warned, surprises ahead, bizarre in nature. But we are following truth, no matter where it leads. Answering the question “Why?” must necessarily follow “What?”

_____________

I want to pass on what Straight and I have learned thus far:

  • Any time there is a death of a celebrity, athlete or musician, be skeptical. If the person died at an older age, say age 53 (5+3=8) as with Jerry Garcia, John Denver, Jim Henson, Vladimir Lennon, Philip K. Dick, they probably retired with a gold watch, job well done. If they died young, say at age 27 (3 raised to the 3rd power, or another way to say 33), as with Kurt Cobain, Janis Joplin, Jimi Hendrix, Pigpen McKernan or Jim Morrison, they probably faked their death and will reappear in another form. Same with age 33, as with Karen Carpenter, Sam Cooke and Ray Gillen, same deal. Reassignment.
  • Any time there is a major event that has the mainstream (and alternative) media stumbling over itself to cover it, be skeptical. Since so many of our Zombies ended up as newscasters of some form, I conclude that the entire news media is a fake enterprise.
  • There is not nearly as much death and mayhem going on as we are led to believe by media. There is no “occult” to be taken seriously. There are no “suicide bombers,” and the mass shootings are all fake. Police shootings are currently being used to stir up black-on-white distrust, like Charlotte. It was faked. The Boston bombing was fake, as were the Paris and Brussels “terrorist attacks.” (Such events require a fake media to be believed.) This has led me to believe that we are not dealing with cold-blooded killers, just hoaxers who are managing public opinion to nudge us down the road they want us on. I don’t know if they are psychopaths who simply avoid killing due to annoying blowback effects, but I do know they are restrained in actual deaths. So far. (This includes 9/11.)

In other words, relax, people! Walk alone in your neighborhood at night, leave your house unlocked, trust other people to do the right thing. (I left my IPad at Costco yesterday. I called them – someone turned it in. I expected no less.) Bad things happen, and those bad things are usually the result of careless accidents, alcohol, drugs, love affairs, people in desperation … but there is no one outside the military and the medical cartel plotting real mass death events. If our search for truth has taught us anything, it is that people are good.

Also, just for fun, keep your eye out in the news for spook signalling. 33 Chilean miners trapped – a fake event. 33 people hospitalized in New York after smoking synthetic marijuana – fake. The Ku Klux Klan – an Intelligence front. (“K” is the 11th letter of the alphabet, x 3 = 33. Just learned this last week.) Zika virus discovered in 1947 … a hoax. Pete Ham died at age 27 .. nah, he didn’t. He faked his death.

Isn’t the search for truth fun? Isn’t life great? Isn’t it nice to live on a planet where most people are good?

_____________

All that said, I have exciting news, beneath the fold:

Continue reading “Housekeeping notes” →

More McCartney stuff

page-118

[Note: I have added a face split of Mike McCartney, 1957 alongside Mike McCartney, 2007, to show that even after 50 years, facial features still line up precisely. See the last photo towards the end.]

The photo above is page 118 of the book Face to Face: Analysis and Comparison of Facial Features to Authenticate Identities of People in Photographs, by Joelle Steele. She studied the “Paul is Dead” psy-op and concluded that all twelve of these photos are various morphs of the same man.

She is wrong on that matter, but easily forgiven. She committed a mistake I make so often that I easily understand. She answered the wrong questions – did he die? Was he replaced by a body double?

Of course not. He is twins.

I will put the rest of this post beneath the fold to allow readers to study the photos without my input. See what you come up with – I ain’t the final word on this stuff. I’m still a student.

Continue reading “More McCartney stuff” →