Nearly everyone knows the epic tale of the Trojan horse. As I grew up without a classical education, I did not learn about this tale of deception until I was an adult. In fact, I experienced and observed this phenomenon in my own life . . . LONG before I ever knew the literary reference.
Switching to more recent and relevant context, from malwarebytes.com, Trojans are defined as “programs that claim to perform one function but actually do another, typically malicious. Trojans can take the form of attachments, downloads and fake videos/programs.”
The Coronavirus paradigm reflects the iconic Trojan horse tale, but has been inverted. It’s a virus of paradox — a Trojan virus, if you will. So, whereas Trojan computer viruses are seemingly benign programs that hide more malicious intent, this novel virus has been portrayed as malicious, but may be more of an exaggeration, and potentially even a misrepresentation of a threat. Whether or not you believe that there is a manufactured pandemic, or subscribe to the notion, “Never let a crisis go to waste,” both perspectives are consistent with a Trojan virus, as it has hacked the minds of nearly the entire global population. It’s the epitome of malware, whether conceived in a computer lab, or as a thought-form, or otherwise. It has been brought to life, and has brought the world to its knees — at the behest of the “scientific” elite. It has even affected those of us who seem immune to its mind-altering impact.
Richard Brodie, in Virus of the Mind: The New Science of the Meme, discusses how the Trojan horse method of programming sneaks into our psyche and “pushes our buttons” through the use of memes and NLP techniques such as “embedding” and “anchoring.” As a certified NLP practitioner, I am sensitive to noticing when such techniques are being weaponized. In the instance of the COVID-19 scenario, I posit that the masses have been infected through highly effective meme-spreading techniques (AKA memetic software), designed to re-program their behaviors.
So what’s the real deal with this Trojan virus that is programmed with virions of fear and submission? What is hiding inside its outer spiked veneer? The Trojan virus serves as ideal cover to usher in the Fourth Industrial Revolution (4IR), including Society 5.0. This has been discussed by several researchers.
The foremost researcher on technocracy is Patrick Wood. As Wood profoundly states in Technocracy Rising: The Trojan Horse of Global Transformation, “The dark horse of the New World Order is not Communism, Socialism or Fascism. It is Technocracy.”
While those on the left see Fascism, and those on the right see Communism, what lies much deeper is what unites all elites — that of Technocracy. Technocracy unites nearly every country, and every leader of the modern world. It is the universal thread of oppression. I implore you (rarely do I insist) to watch Patrick Wood’s most recent interview, “The Global Elite & The Coronavirus Coup D’état.” As serendipity would have it, I had written most of this essay prior to watching this comprehensive discussion, so it came at an opportune moment. Wood also mentioned Parag Khanna (around the 23 minute mark), whose books I had recently purchased for research in this regard.
Parag Khanna, a leading global strategist and a Young Global Leader of the World Economic Forum, exemplifies the technocratic ideology. In his book, Connectography: Mapping the Future of Global Civilization, Khanna gleefully states, “With the rise of the global sensor network dubbed the ‘Internet of Everything’ (Internet of Things + Internet of People), our maps will perpetually update themselves, providing an animated view into our world as it really is — even the five thousand commercial aircraft in the sky and the more than ten thousand ships crossing the seas at any given moment. These are the arteries and veins, capillaries and cells, of a planetary economy underpinned by an infrastructural network that can eventually become as efficient as the human body.” Khanna added, “Eventually, we may not need satellites at all for positioning and navigation with the advent of lower-cost but extremely accurate Quantum-Assisted Sensing that determines location by measuring the impact of the earth’s magnetic field on atoms.”
In Khanna’s previous book, How to Run the World: Charting a Course to the Next Renaissance, he lays out his “cutting-edge manifesto for diplomacy in a borderless world.” When he wrote this book in 2011, he expressed, “Some now fear a breakdown of our global order, but isn’t it scarier to realize that the present order has already been broken for years? It’s the kind of moment the philosopher Karl Popper had in mind when he argued that tearing down our existing order and constructing a new one from scratch might lead to a more workable system.” Khanna continued, “Henry Kissinger said it best: ‘You do not design a new world order as an emergency measure. But you need an emergency to bring about a new world order.’ Finally, there is a global debate under way about how to redesign the way we run the world.”
One more highly relevant and timely point Khanna makes, “North and South, public and private, West and East: All the new power centers are present within the WEF’s [World Economic Forum] activities, making it the world’s only organization truly devoted to mega-diplomacy. Whereas the United Nations and World Bank speak of ‘reform’ as a code for strengthening themselves, the WEF creates the space for thinking about a genuine redesign of how we run the world — always partnering governments, businesses, and organizations . . . The WEF will never get any credit — but who cares?”
In Shaping the Future of the Fourth Industrial Revolution, Klaus Schwab (Founder and Executive Chairman of the World Economic Forum), stated “Finding solutions for the governance challenges of the Fourth Industrial Revolution will require governments, businesses and individuals to make the right strategic decisions about how to develop and deploy new technologies. But this will require taking a stance on societal values and getting better at creating mechanisms for collaborative action . . . multinational corporations and nation-states will have to become more effective at building formal and informal international agreements.”
What better way to create this initiative than a global pandemic? It would seem to check all the necessary boxes of inclusion on such a grand scale. One vital clarification is that this event, and the extensive planning that gave rise to this operation, goes far beyond any one political party, or any one governmental entity. The panoptic scope of this has been evidenced in the writing of both Khanna and Schwab, and needs to be acknowledged.
I could write an entire treatise on Schwab’s book alone. It is a detailed blueprint for what is to come — how the controllers plan to “reform the physical world” through blockchain, the Internet of Things, AI, robotics, biotechnology, neurotechnology, virtual and augmented realities, geoengineering and space technologies. As Schwab conveys with conviction, “Fourth Industrial Revolution technologies will not stop at becoming part of the physical world around us — they will become part of us . . . Today’s external devices . . . will . . . become implantable in our bodies and brains . . . We will become better able to manipulate our own genes, and those of our children.” Schwab’s entire work centers around the concept that this change in society cannot happen in an incremental fashion, but that it MUST be disruptive to the status quo, and it must be revolutionary.
What I found most disturbing in the book was how casually Schwab discussed “altering the human being.” In his own words, “The lines between technologies and beings are becoming blurred, and not just by the ability to create lifelike robots or synthetic organisms. Instead, it is about the ability of new technologies to literally become part of us . . . we may begin to integrate digital technologies into our bodies . . . the future may see curious mixes of digital and analog life that will redefine our very natures . . . These technologies will operate within our own biology and change how we interface with the world.”
Is anyone familiar with Neil Harbisson, the world’s “first cyborg?” Harbisson claims that it would be better for the environment and the planet, if we re-design humanity — as a new species. This seems to align perfectly with what the technocratic controllers want. Is this the type of life we want? For those who wish to dig deeper into their plans to re-engineer humans (including the eradication of viruses), read Regenesis: How Synthetic Biology Will Reinvent Nature and Ourselves by George Church.
Both Harbisson and Church embody the doctrine of transhumanism, which seems to be married alchemically to Technocracy. While I won’t delineate the creed of transhumanism in this essay, I suggest that its roots trace much further back than Technocracy. David Livingstone, in his prolific and well-resourced book, Transhumanism: The History of a Dangerous Idea, provides much evidence to support the notion that science has achieved an almost cult-like status — rooted in mysticism and the occult. Livingstone expounds on the influence of the occult and the Age of Enlightenment, and in particular, the role of the Rosicrucian-based “Invisible College,” and its impact on scientism that is propped up by faith — no different than any other religion. Suffice to say, after reading Transhumanism, I wonder if the notion of Technocracy may itself be another Trojan placed in our consciousness to further deceive and encrypt the ulterior motives of its architects.
Additional Trojan horses packaged within Technocracy, for example, include cashless and coinless currency (cryptocurrency), and purportedly “safer” vaccines embedded with nanotechnology. These advanced technologies will support the transhumanist agenda, with one potential end goal being the creation of the artificially connected “Global Brain.” Listen to this recent discussion with Ben Goertzel (CEO and founder of SingularityNET) with respect to their intentions.
This New World Order agenda is no longer an amorphous theory. It has been laid out transparently in immense detail by the controllers. Their plans are proceeding at an exponential rate.
BEWARE of Trojan horses. They are EVERYWHERE.
Addendum (added 7/23): I neglected to include this short presentation, “Looking Forward to the End of Humanity” (only 20 minutes long), by James Corbett. It is essential viewing, in my opinion.
References for further reading/listening:
Technocracy: The Hard Road to World Order by Patrick Wood
“How The ‘Great Reset’ Is Targeting Our Children & Plans To ‘Reimagine’ Humanity”
“A Disturbing Glimpse Into The Future: Bill Gates, Elon Musk & The 4th Industrial Revolution”