Hunter Biden Deepfake Somehow Worse Than Kamala Harris Deepfake

Hunter
Left: Hunter Biden, Right: Not Hunter Biden

This is not going to be a full post. Or at least it doesn’t need to be. That is how bad the fakery involved here is.

Previously, I postulated that the scary Kamala Harris lookalike with the black eyes from MSNBC last month was most likely a Deepfake. Well, it turns out the Democratic Party is not finished using Deepfakes…

We are told that “Hunter Biden” “spoke” at the Democratic Party’s “Virtual” Convention last week. My comical overuse of quotes there is not actually so comical.

Immediately, the few remaining social media users who are not asleep picked up on the fact that this was clearly not Hunter Biden and called shenanigans. Anyone remotely familiar with Hunter Biden knows that this does not resemble him in the slightest.

The video of the speech, linked below, is the pièce de résistance. I have never seen a more obvious fake. What stands out most is the unnatural facial muscle movement (or lack thereof) as “Hunter” speaks. It is as though the lips are being fed through on a different layer. This is a simple kind of Deepfake that we have seen many times before.

Take a look for yourself. The video is thankfully short. This is “Hunter Biden” introducing Joe Biden at the 2020 Democratic National Convention. Whoever did this “Hunter Biden” video ought to be fired. Then shot from a cannon into the sun.

The top comments point out that this is not Hunter Biden. Rightfully so!

The Deepfake technology that we are seeing on Hunter here reminds me very much of the technology seen in the video below. It is actually rudimentary. This method results in the exact same awkward lack of facial muscle involvement as the person “speaks” that we can plainly see in the Hunter Biden video.

The main question we must ask ourselves is: Why are they doing this?! The most obvious answer is that the real Hunter Biden was probably too drunk and/or too much of a train-wreck to actually get to sit down and film the segment. Why bother with the real Hunter Biden (a drugged out elitist jerk) when you have the technology to just fake it?

The whole sequence creeps me out, as it also is attempting to subconsciously send us positive messages about Joe Biden. (Good luck with that one!)

They are getting so bad with these fakes that they don’t even bother to make the fakes resemble the real person! They make them all look like Ken dolls. Why make a perfect match when you can make them look better, I guess…? We have the technology! Better than he was before. Better, stronger, faster.

As I suggested before, the use of this kind of technology is accelerating. Perhaps as part of the whole coronavirus con, as people are indoors and separated from each other and living in a virtual world, they are using the opportunity to further blur the lines between reality and the virtual world. It was a virtual convention, after all. Odds are, it will be a virtual Presidency.

Why do I feel that this rabbit hole goes deeper? Stay tuned.

25 thoughts on “Hunter Biden Deepfake Somehow Worse Than Kamala Harris Deepfake

  1. Biden Biden

    The above is a facial comparison of the two “Hunter Biden’s”. Your own eyes told you they were two different men, and just the nose gives it away. But I wanted to play with it anyway. I used MS Paint to resize the heads and set the eye pupils at identical distance. If these are the same men, that should allow both sides of the face to align perfectly. As you can see from the above link, it is not even close.

    I’ve done a lot of this kind of work over time, hundreds of hours, and notice these days that they are just sloppy about things, thinking they can get away with anything. And they can. I would bet if you showed your two photos to any Democrat, and told them they were different men, they would laugh at you. People do not think with their own brains, and do not see with their own eyes. And if an authority figure tells them to wear a mask and stand six feet apart, they obey. Has it always been like this? Well, yeah. I think it has.

    Liked by 3 people

  2. This is a great post, Fauxlex! It is such an obvious deception: it is useful to have this in one’s back pocket to pull out and show to people who are on the fence about media duplicity.

    I cannot find any set of Google search terms that will bring up a site discussing this matter. The Memory Hole algorithms must be in operation day and night.

    Like

  3. Ashley Biden looks different too. I guess we can remind ourselves all these political people including their spouses and children are actors/actresses, or at least prepped and thoroughly educated on how to appear and respond in public.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. I wonder if the whole family is a bunch of Potemkin people.

      I am old enough to remember the Joe Biden of the ’70s and ’80s, who as a Senator was seen as heir to the mantle of JFL, but as a presidential candidate became a laughing-stock for his persistent plagiarism. (His much-vaunted oratorical prowess proved to be largely borrowed.)

      He looked different then, as we all do after forty years. But it is hard for me to believe that the current Joe B. is an appropriately aged version of the original Delaware shyster.

      The Biden of 1972 …
      Biden 1972 (NBC News archive)

      Of 2007 …
      Biden 2007 (NBC News archive)

      Of 2008 …
      Biden 2008 (NBC News archive)

      I don’t know what year this is, but this is the Biden of yesteryear in my mind’s-eye …
      '80s Biden (uncredited)

      A long way from the silver fox of 2020 …
      Biden 2020 (uncredited)

      (Don’t misunderstand … Maarten is all boy …)

      More here

      Like

      1. In the old Joe photo where he has his two hands up, and the young Joe photo below, the ears to me appear to be identical. Young Joe was already balding, but the hair plugs seem to have taken. Like Alex Trebek, who is 80 now, I get the sense that Joe is heavily made up for TV appearances, that he leaves a pancake odor in his waft.

        Like

        1. Having recently studied a few pairs of what I’m convinced are body doubles in a different case, I am convinced that one of the first things they do with a body double is grow and attach identical ears to the original person. This is actually not very difficult technology, and something it makes too much sense for them to do in the case of a double.

          Like

            1. Ha! Ears are all cartilage. What I’ve been trying to match up on my doubles are the teeny tiny marks like moles, freckles, and scars. Even then, who knows? I also have contemplated palm lines and whether they could be altered. It’s a weird world. But the ear thing…I have stopped considering matching ears to be solely conclusive because cartilage is so easy to manipulate.

              In the case of rapper Eminem (long considered a possible “replacement”), his ears match in shape but do not show consistency with markings like freckles. It’s almost like the new guy had perfectly matching Eminem ears surgically attached!

              Like

      2. Potemkin people, good one. I’m too young to remember his early career, but the stories of his plagiarism and other episodes, sound a bit like contrived storylines. His speeches often sound ultra phony to me, like the stereotype of a pol who just says what the audience wants to hear.. But in an over the top way, as if his whole persona is a sendup of the idea of democratic politics. I could imagine him just being given the role as an assignment, including all the family tragedy stuff being a soap opera script for public interest etc.

        How can real people compete with cartoon characters, who are also promoted and given constant media coverage.

        Like

        1. I agree WHOLEHEARTEDLY about the family soap opera thing. Would love to someday investigate the death of Beau Biden for fakery.

          Like

    1. Closer than close. We are there!

      These characters could be LLCs (limited liability corporations) and about as real as Betty Crocker and Colonel Sanders. If this is so then they cannot be sued or held responsible in any way. Perfect, huh?

      This particular one, “Hunter Biden”, looks like the template might be Brian Williams.
      I think the “Joe Biden” clown is one of these also. Notice how he only gets wheeled out for featured slapstick scenarios and then fades back into the woodwork- after accomplishing zero of a any value.

      I’m no photo analyst but maybe Greg Bradford is on to something. He is an insider/whistleblower type who points out actors who play one or more fictional characters who are family owned money making corporations. These “cut outs” are one or a combination of : CGI, doubles, twins, clones, altered photos, etc.

      Perhaps some here who are better with photo/video analysis would have a look:

      Like

    2. BoP, I had meant to thank you for this movie recommendation. Being a film nerd, I am always excited to hear of interesting films that I had never heard of before.

      I am watching this film right now. Seems like it could be a kind of Wag The Dog “revelation of the method” sort of thing. Thanks again.

      Like

  4. Since we know American politics is just a dog-and-pony show to distract and divide the masses, I assume all of the candidates, politicians, family members, etc. are characters with each being some combination of actors and various technology like CGI or deep fakes.

    I remember many years ago, before I ever questioned anything about our reality, thinking how amazing it was that the candidates could travel and speak so much while rarely seeming tired or sick.

    Like

  5. Absolutely correct, Haley! I figured this out about 12 years ago and have not voted since..or let’s say NOT voting for a fake character IS my vote. It was a lot to give up. I formerly wallowed gloriously in politics. As we find more and more truth we give up cherished beliefs bit by bit. Facing the truth is not for the faint of heart.

    But either we want the truth or we want to keep identifying with our phony idols, phony government, and phony history.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. “SOVIET!”. That’s the word that first springs–actually screams–to mind when I viewed Melania’s jacket. My intuition is telling me that THEY are showing us/U.S. our future as a technofascist dictatorship. Now that Trump–the Trojan Horse–declared a National Emergency, he is POTUS in name only (aren’t they all?), the Legislative branch is impotent (pretty much was already), and the Constitution is null and void. The U.S. is now under the authority of FEMA, at least according to this video. Known as the “Shadow Government”, they will implement the COG/Continuity of Government, which has been planned and set up since the Reagan years to officially replace the “government”(sic) in Washington DC in the event of governmental breakdown due to “national disaster”. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NXX2ZFNBUdc&t=386s

      THEY have been planning this for decades, at least, with each president adding yet another Executive Order to enhance and solidify FEMA’s power. “This government organization has more power than the President of the United States or the Congress, it has the power to suspend laws, move entire populations, arrest and detain citizens without a warrant and hold them without trial, it can seize property, food supplies, transportation systems, and can suspend the Constitution.” Here’s a link that explains what FEMA is all about, though it’s from 1995 and doesn’t include more recent EO’s. https://educate-yourself.org/nwo/FEMAsecretgovt1995.shtml

      Here are all the Executive Orders that created it. http://www.disastercenter.com/laworder/laworder.htm

      Mark, I hope you find this info important and interesting enough for yourself or someone on your team to do some digging and write a post about it. I’m telling you, this doesn’t bode well for our future, to say the least. ITEOTWAWKI.

      Like

  6. The Opie video is teetering on the edge of Goldbuggery but its pretty amusing in a way that Gold Bug isn’t. Still, I err these days on the side of caution and consider first that Opie and this orange man are cousins. Clearly the orange man is heavily made up with a rug and/or plugs, but these two could be part of a batch of bastards rather than a single person. That said, one person controlling multiple personas is as old as the hills. My research into ancient Rome et al, has turned up compelling evidence that this was common practice among the royals. To dare the modern photographic age with such a blatant display of hubris as Opie/Orange Man being one person is not out of the question, though, as monitoring the limits of the public’s stupidity appears to be an ongoing priority.

    Like

  7. Sorry to hijack your comments section but I believe we have much more evidence of the CONVIDRONA1984 scam in that we have identified all the primers now the IP-4 primer and E gene data originate from a fully sequenced Bat RaGT13 virus and there is also a scientific study that shows the virus named covid-19 is genetically altered as partly described here : “Has SARS-CoV-2 been subjected to in vitro manipulation?
    We present three lines of evidence to support our contention that laboratory manipulation is part of the
    history of SARS-CoV-2:
    i. The genomic sequence of SARS-CoV-2 is suspiciously similar to that of a bat coronavirus discovered by military laboratories in the Third Military Medical University (Chongqing, China) and the Research Institute for Medicine of Nanjing Command (Nanjing, China).
    ii. The receptor-binding motif (RBM) within the Spike protein of SARS-CoV-2, which determines the host specificity of the virus, resembles that of SARS-CoV from the 2003 epidemic in a suspicious manner. Genomic evidence suggests that the RBM has been genetically manipulated.
    iii. SARS-CoV-2 contains a unique furin-cleavage site in its Spike protein, which is known to greatly enhance viral infectivity and cell tropism. Yet, this cleavage site is completely absent in this particular class of coronaviruses found in nature. In addition, rare codons associated with this additional sequence suggest the strong possibility that this furin-cleavage site is not the product of natural evolution and could have been inserted into the SARS-CoV-2 genome artificially by techniques other than simple serial passage or multi-strain recombination events inside co-infected tissue cultures or animals.
    If you need to know more you have my details, Good day and health to you.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s