JFKTV
The Kennedy
Assassination as
Television Programming

Compiled and Edited for Committee Referral by
Tyrone McCloskey

“Orthodoxy means not thinking- not needing to think. Orthodoxy is unconsciousness.”
― George Orwell, 1984

Read This First

This book can be read as a spoof of JFK research or as nonfiction, your choice. Because none of the radical content of this book is provable beyond a reasonable doubt, there is no reason to insist that what is offered is fact. There are some facts included, but the premise and conclusion herein may seem more like satire than reasoned speculation. I won’t hold a gun to your head and insist you believe anything in this volume.

That said, the fact that a half-century of research has not produced a definite answer to the JFK assassination, nor has it brought anyone to justice, it is long overdue to question whether or not the assassination took place at all. And it’s reasonable to ask that question in a country that still insists it operates under the rule of law.

With that in mind, divest yourself of all assumptions about how the world works and try to keep your critical faculties engaged at the expense of your emotions. Within this fascist construct we now find ourselves, it is obvious that the faith we have had in “official” history has been misplaced. If history is, in fact, written by the victors, and there have been an endless stream of victors, what has passed for history is very likely a series of revisions building upon previous revisions until all facts are completely buried and beyond recall. But this is the method of conquerors from time immemorial: Separate the conquered from their past and they become a nameless herd to corral. Continue reading “JFKTV” →

See post script below. And fir the recird, Faye and B Muller are two differnet people. I have seen proof, and anyway should not have said that. It’s the Internet. No one is who they claim to be. 

I have received confirmation from Maarten, Tyrone and Steve that they wish to continue to appear on the masthead here, and I am grateful for that as I respect them all. None of them write in such volume as I do, but that’s not a problem, as quality is key, not quantity. I like to keep fresh material coming. Annette is merely going to be removed from the sidebar as she has only one article and no others in the works. She is welcome here and retains all privileges, and she knows this. Kevin has opted out but knows he is welcome here. He is an interesting man, even predictably unpredictable.

Sometime, not today, I have to get into the programming behind the blog to make changes, so Gaia, Kevin and Annette will linger for a while. It’s a time-consuming thing to make the changes, and I don’t like that kind of stuff.

I felt I should not answer Gaia’s screed below, an unpleasant attack complete with scarecrows and false homage to the others here as a means of attacking me. I won’t. But last night I had an interesting, possibly false, insight. Gaia worked for a while over at Fakeologist but had a falling out and left in a huff. I don’t know if he was booted or left of his own accord, as he did here. What intrigued me most was that his reason for leaving had to do with a run-in with a German woman, Faye.

I had my own run-in with Faye, a long interview that was constantly interrupted by static interference, so much so that it was garbled and useless. I complained about that and was told I needed a better quality microphone, my fault, AB said. Uncertain but unconvinced, I let it go, and in fact even tentatively agreed to another interview, but backed away when Faye insinuated elsewhere that my meeting a certain character named Miles Mathis was a lie.  It may be that the man I met was an actor, but I bristled that she would impugn my character like that. We all have egos, even me it seems.

This is the Internet and crap like that goes on everywhere. Egos are monstrous, narcissism all about. I normally try to keep my own in check. So it wasn’t any great force of ME ME ME that made me decide to avoid Faye. It was just a rational decision. She’s got an agenda, and I want no part of it. I don’t know what the agenda is, but it is somehow affected by Miles Mathis. She either works for “him” as controlled opposition, or is a bit obsessed. In either case, enough of Faye.

Gaia went off on me and did his great storm out supposedly over a host of sins on my part, his own ego unhinged. The thing that struck me last night, however, was that it was triggered by a German woman, B.Müller. My face and palm sought each other out, and I had a good laugh. B.Müller = Faye.

I contacted B.Müller after the Gaia eruption, and as part of the communication asked her if she used other names in other venues. She wrote back that she is used to being attacked, but did not answer the question. That was odd. I have received considerable background pressure to evict her, as her manners upset people. One commenter even suggested that B Muller = MM. Another, Ryan T., suggested to her that her Germanic English is inconsistent, and that she wears a mask.

As my face met my palm, I realized that she was miffed that I refused a second interview, and so came at me from a new direction. She has never been straightforward.

That’s my take, subject as always to a dose of reality. This is just a blog. I am just a guy who likes to write and argue. Sometimes I get it right, sometimes not. I work hard to keep my opinions in the self-correcting mode, and will happily admit error here if that needs to be done. They will have to contact me privately, however, as they are now banned. (Feel the power!) The problem with Faye = B Muller is that Gaia would most likely be in on the scam, which would make Gaia a plant, sent here to disrupt. He would not be the first.

Here is an interesting few paragraphs from Gaia’s someone’s blog, Questioning Our Reality, brought to my attention by SVolpetti. It is titled Why Did Gaia Become Pagan … . It’s not proof, or even good evidence of anything. It is just an odd thing to write (see post script below):

This was written on December 9, well in advance of his run-in with Faye/Muller. He has no problem taking a shot at me even as he played nicey here. So while I don’t know what it all means, he is two-faced. For that reason alone, Gaia is gone by my wishes in addition to his own. So too is his work, which I didn’t care for anyway. So is B.Müller. I await their reincarnation, maybe next as two Jewish Ukrainians.

It’s the internet. I wish people would limit themselves to two faces. I never know when commenters appear out of the blue who they really are. I don’t know if their attitude is merely playful, drunk, or malicious. Most often, I don’t care. But this encounter I take personally. Fare thee well, Gaia, B.Müller and your many, many faces. None of them are to my liking.

PS: Gaia at one time wanted to take the blog down the Holocaust road, the kiss of death. I never edited a word,  but suggested to him that he should let readers draw their own inferences, but otherwise avoid making direct statements. I think it odd now that he did not know that the Holocaust is a third rail, and am wondering if that was deliberate. 

PS: The words quoted above, pardon my confusion, were written about Gaia, and not by him. The blog Questioning our Reality is apparently anomalous, and whoever writes it was taking a shot at Gaia. Gaia’s blog is Gaia’s Sphere.

Many years ago I read a book, at 881 pages a tome, called The Prize: The Epic Quest for Oil, Money and Power (1990), by Daniel Yergin, a high-powered author. I was very impressed by the book, which is why I have it sitting in front of me right now.

When I read The Prize, I was not aware that tracts like that are heavily censored – that is, it is the official history of the oil industry, not the real one, which is secret.  Another book I still have on hand, Tragedy and Hope by Carroll Quigley, is similar in that we are told it is an uncensored history of Europe and the U.S. It was heavily censored, but allowed to go on sale behind the illusion that powerful people objected to it. That way, people are more inclined to believe in it.

Continue reading “The rule of sevens” →