
We always hear about the “one percent”—you know, THE ones at the top; you know, the ones who have orchestrated these most recent stage shows for the masses.
Continue reading “The other ‘one percent’”How easy it is to make people believe a lie, and how hard it is to undo that work again! (Mark Twain)

We always hear about the “one percent”—you know, THE ones at the top; you know, the ones who have orchestrated these most recent stage shows for the masses.
Continue reading “The other ‘one percent’”
In previous posts, I have postulated that the death of George Floyd was a fake media story. This is still my belief, and in this post I hope to demonstrate exactly how simple it would be for such a hoax to play out. Most people dramatically inflate the number of participants who would need to be involved for such a hoax to play out, and the complexity required to make it happen. Take the following scenario as evidence to the contrary, and my own personal theory of what we might be seeing. This theory explains the maximum number of real details with the minimum amount of complexity. Also, it explains how they are displaying the real body of the real George Floyd, among many other things.
Continue reading “George Floyd, The Stiff Who Came In From The Cold”

A “guest writer” on the Taos blog recently took up case for the George Floyd story being fake. While I agree with that conclusion, I find the paper as a whole to be an incoherent mess. That kind of thing does us more harm than good. With that said, the paper does make one solid argument and it is the same argument that stood out to me immediately upon first hearing the script behind the George Floyd event. This pertains to the counterfeit $20 bill, and its existence at the center of this narrative.
Continue reading “George Floyd & The Counterfeit Story of a Counterfeit $20 Bill”

The tinder is dry. The kindling has been laid. The match has been struck. All hell is going to break loose. Count on it. The Left will blame the Right; the Right will blame the Left. Police are instigating, Intel is coordinating. The Crowds are Mad. It is going to get Bad.
Turn off your television. Turn off the news media. Do not visit their websites. Do not listen to their broadcasts. The reality they present is not real. Turn it off. It is poison for your mind. Turn it off, now.
For more on this subject, check out my latest piece George Floyd, The Stiff Who Came in From the Cold
The following passages are excerpted from Dr. Kary Mullis’s 1998 book Dancing Naked in the Mind Field. I have probably violated fair use by citing so much, but as I transcribed it yesterday I thought it important to put on display how corrupt our system of medical research and treatment is. It is best summarized by this passage from below:
“They had been trained to obtain grants from the government, hire people to do research, and write papers that usually ended with the notion that further research should be done along the same lines – preferably by them and paid for by someone else.”
The current SARS-Cov-2 crisis is no different – there is no proof, only overpaid researchers and doctors who are not used to being questioned by an extremely gullible public – who have come to worship them as once they did priests and witch doctors. The whole of the “COVID-19 pandemic” is really just quackery, behind which is a political agenda.
Since this is a non-monetized blog, I feel safe in using this long citation, as I will simply be asked to take it down by the publisher. But I cite no links. I do recommend the book, as Mullis has stuff to say about not just AIDS, but climate change and the ozone layer as well. Good stuff.
I’ll have to work out the typos later today,as we are off on a hike.
Continue reading “AIDS: Still no proof that it is caused by HIV”
This is a brief essay about an often overlooked aspect of this whole “cooties” scenario.
At 42 min into this video, Sofia Smallstorm mentions her concern about the use of toxic disinfectants being used in public spaces. Dr. Kaufman describes how he has seen the use of these at his local supermarket. There is much more scintillating material covered in this video as well, so it is well worth your time to listen in full, in my opinion.
Stephers has been communicating with all the writers on this blog for a while now, and we’ve all gotten to know her a bit. This week I asked her to come aboard as a writer, as I was editing her work and putting it up as a guest piece under my name. It was much easier just to have her join the blog, as I have liked everything she has done so far.
I’ve stumbled over the words “isolation,” “purification,” and “filtration” regarding viruses, and even as I have come to believe that the medical profession has committed the correlation=causation fallacy writ large regarding viruses, wanted to share David Crowe’s work on this subject, from his chapter called Isolation Versus Purification. The work is copyrighted, so I am not going to reproduce it here, and instead ask that you follow the link to a one-page dissertation. I am also taking down yesterday’s post that quoted Crowe at length for the same reason. His work can be found at The Infectious Myth.
This is a brief excerpt from The Infectious Myth, a Book Project by David Crowe. A chapter of the book is titled Antibody Testing for COVID-19. That chapter is 23 pages including footnotes.
Crowe is a Canadian researcher, and I have found him, like Dr. Andy Kaufman, to be diligent in all his work, and modest in temperament. They each realize that being wrong is always a possibility. That makes their research a faithful pursuit of truth, that is, they do their work aware of their own shortcomings. It is refreshing.
This excerpt begins on page 3. It discusses the current testing that is going on for antibodies to SARS-Cov-2, a hard thing to do given that this virus, said to cause COVID-19, has never been isolated and purified. They are short a gold standard of certainty of what they are doing. They could as easily and unknowingly be testing for measles.
A large number of population surveys have been compiled by Dean Beeler and they reveal a wide range of percentages of populations antibody positive, from less than 1% in many cases to 32% in a poor part of Boston. This is generally seen as an indication of how far through the population that the virus has rampaged. One flaw of most of these surveys is that the population is chosen non-randomly, and does not represent the general population. The group may be a household survey, volunteers, high school students and staff, health care workers, blood donors, or people going for blood tests at a lab.