Tying Up Some Loose Ends: Virus Narrative Aiders, Abetters and Tricksters?

Writer’s Note: Frequently, I spend time writing entire posts that end up getting scrapped before seeing the light of the day — despite having poured significant sweat equity into them. Recently, I set out to compose a fictional piece, but for several reasons (some of which may become obvious to the reader), I nixed it. That said, I include herein a few saved snippets (italicized for easy recognition), and then feature some individuals who have remained obscure from purview in the past two years. As I have previously expressed (see here and here), I have often envisioned the elusive SARS-CoV-2 virus (along with its propagandists and defenders) being put on trial. Contrary to others who may also be holding mock trials (notably, and very intentionally, without highlighting the potential non-existence of said pathogenic antagonist), the primary premise of my vision of a trial would be to address the colossal elephant in the court room. Namely, is there an infectious agent on the loose wreaking havoc across the world?

What follows is a fictional trial scene. 

In this fully contrived scenario, various witnesses are called to the stand. The judge tells the jury that the defendant (in this instance, the SARS-CoV-2 virus) has the right not to testify, and that the jury cannot hold it against the defendant. Spoiler alert: It seems the defendant is NO WHERE TO BE FOUND; in fact, no witness, nor juror, nor any trial participant has ever seen the defendant in the flesh. Only digital representations of the defendant have been observed. Additional spoiler alert: The Court may have pinned this crime on the WRONG culprit. The real criminal may still be on the loose.

Superior Court of Stephers County, somewhere in the U.S.

Bailiff: All rise. Superior Court is now in session. Judge William Fakespear presiding. Please be seated.

Hon. Fakespear: Good morning, ladies and gentlemen. Calling the case of the People of Stephers County versus SARS-CoV-2. 

[Clerk swears in the jury; prosecutor and defense team present their opening statements]

Hon. Fakespear: The Prosecution may call its first witness. 

————

Ok, readers, enough frivolity for now . . . on with the regularly scheduled programming.

At the beginning of the Coronavirus hullabaloo in February 2020, many readers may actually recall watching various mainstream news segments featuring an American man named Frank Wucinski, with his young daughter (see here, here, here, and here). In interviews, Wucinski claimed he was in Wuhan— the reported epicenter of this alleged coronavirus — when the purported outbreak occurred, and that his father-in-law had recently passed from the coronavirus. It is unclear if he was visiting his wife’s family in Wuhan (as he mentioned in interviews), or living in Wuhan, as he also asserted he had been living there for the past 15 years. His LinkedIn profile reflects him working there for this period of time. It seems (as he stated in the aforementioned interviews) that he and his young daughter returned to the U.S. and were quarantined at an army base, while his wife stayed behind in Wuhan. Wucinski had set up a Go Fund Me account, raising nearly $18,000 for he and his family. 

Returning to his LinkedIn profile, it states Frank Wucinski is currently Language Assessment Project Manager at the Center for Applied Linguistics (CAL) in Crofton, Maryland, and that prior to working at CAL, he worked for the British Council (while stationed in China) as an Assessment Solutions Consultant. According to its Wikipedia listing, the British Council works in over 100 countries, “promoting a wider knowledge of the United Kingdom and the English language,” and “encouraging cultural, scientific, technological and educational co-operation with the United Kingdom.” Apparently, the organization has been called a soft power extension of UK foreign policy, and is patronized by both the Queen of England and the Prince of Wales (also see here and here) .

While at the British Council, Wucinski seems to have co-authored a paper with several individuals, including its lead presenter, Trevor Breakspear, focused on applying Artificial Intelligence (AI) and machine learning to language processing technologies and second language assessment.

As a member (see here and here) of the British Council’s East Asia Assessment Solutions Team (EAAST), Wucinski and his colleagues coordinated academic and stakeholder research with respect to AI-rated scoring assessment of language, and assisted in ostensibly leveraging the “best” of both humans and AI to develop innovative academic development of AI-rated scoring assessment tools. In February 2020, when I initially researched Wucinski, there were two links describing his work at the British Council. One of the links — which described the British Council as being an active partner with UK Aid — now indicates, “Access denied,” and the other link displays Wucinski in a group photo (bottom left), but his biography is no longer included on the page. 

Remarkably, Frank appears to have a twin brother (see here and here) named Jason Wucinski, who lives in Washington, D.C., and works for the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID). Of note, this is the same agency that contracts directly with the CDC, having invested in global health security, purportedly to enable countries to better handle infectious diseases. This document from the U.S. Government Accountability Office indicates that in the five years prior to COVID, USAID and the CDC jointly spent about $1 billion in over 30 countries to this end. 

As a software developer, according to his LinkedIn profile, Jason Wucinski is Senior Information Systems Advisor at USAID. In December 2018, at a cloud-computing conference sponsored by the American Malaysian Chamber of Commerce (AMCHAM), Jason Wucinski presented the Welcome Remarks. On AMCHAM’s site, it describes his role at USAID in more detail: “the Senior Information Systems Technical Advisor in the Global Health Bureau at the United States Agency For International Development. Jason helps lead the Global Health bureaus Information Technology strategy and policy, helps ensure the bureaus compliance with applicable IT laws and requirements and provides guidance and support to the Bureaus various health offices on matters related to data management, software development and procurements. Jason is an experienced software and database developers with 15 years of experience working in the public and private sector.”

More strikingly though, was a link I had discovered in February 2020 evidencing that Jason Wucinski was involved directly with an initiative called PIOET — Pandemic Influenza and Other Emerging Threats. He was designated as the “Contact” for the “Metadata” but access to the data was noted as “Restricted.” For those who may not be familiar, PIOET is the USAID unit that launched the global project called PREDICT — focusing on “detection and discovery of zoonotic diseases at the wildlife-human interface . . . Its specific activities include: strengthening surveillance and laboratory capacities in order to monitor wildlife and people in contact with wildlife for novel pathogens that may pose a significant public health threat; characterizing human and ecological drivers of disease spillover from animals to people; strengthening and optimizing models for predicting disease emergence and using this information to improve surveillance; and supporting outbreak response when requested.” 

At the time, I thought to myself, what are the chances that Jason’s presumed twin brother, Frank, would be one of the first (if not the first) Americans to be featured on mainstream news channels for not only being in Wuhan (the reported epicenter of this increasingly infamous zoonotic-based novel disease), but then having to be tested and quarantined when returning to the U.S. due to potentially posing a public health threat? Of course, since that time, much more has been expressed in both mainstream news and alternative media sources about the PREDICT project in relation to the Gain-of-Function (GOF) narrative, particularly with regard to EcoHealth Alliance and Peter Daszak.

What a tangled web . . . 

————

Hon. Fakespear: The Prosecution may call its next witness . . . 

————

Do any readers recall from May 2020 this video or this photo of an older gentleman demonstrating the use of an electronically-enabled face mask designed to be worn while eating? The prototype of the Pac-Man-esque mask was being modeled by Meir Gitelis, which his son, Asaf Gitelis, reportedly invented. 

Asaf Gitelis, V.P. of Avtipus Patents & Inventions Ltd. registered for a patent for several models of the mask, which is comprised of a slot-shaped opening that opens when the user places a utensil inside one’s mouth, but otherwise stays closed. The Israeli company’s website states that Avtipus is essentially a product development and patent registration company, specializing in 3-D printing and electronics, including circuit boards. Asaf (possibly also spelled Assaf) Gitelis and his father, Meir Gitelis (possibly also spelled Gitlis) ostensibly hold a joint patent (assigned to their previous company, Nachshol Electronics Ltd) for an outdoor intrusion detector (1998). 

Furthermore, Meir Gitelis seems to have invented a range of patented products that may be more tectonic in their applications — particularly in the fields of safety and security. Some of these inventions include an apparatus for determining the authenticity of currency (1982), a device for testing diamonds for genuineness (1984), a conductive earthquake sensor (1995), and a vibration sensor used in conjunction with perimeter security systems (2002). Significantly, these inventions tend to share numerous components involving conduction and transduction — as in voltage, vibration, piezoelectrics, integrated circuitry, and semiconductors. While not earth-shattering, it would seem to me that these inventions could potentially be of vital consequence. Accordingly, I suggest this seemingly random, older gentleman seen sporting a Pac-Man mask may be more influential than has been implied by his gauche food consumption antics. 

If readers have not yet considered any of this information to be meaningful in the larger scheme, there is one final connection that I found to be most pivotal in my digging — especially since it was so unexpected. Let’s just say that when I went further down the rabbit hole, I pulled a rabbit out of a hat — as in a magician’s trick — for it seems Meir Gitelis is a close friend and colleague with none other than Israeli-British illusionist and magician (and self-proclaimed psychic with alleged powers of telepathy and psychokinesis) Uri Geller. 

From Uri Geller’s personal website, it seems he takes credit in co-developing the aforementioned inventions:

Geller, with his friend Meir Gitlis who heads an electronics company, has developed a number of inventions that are already in production: the Moneytron (tells a fake banknote from a genuine one), the Diamontron (does the same for diamonds), the Gazgal gas leak detector, and a number of security devices including sensors for defense installations. Another invention is the Gold-Meter, a compact electronic device for examining solid and other precious metals by an electro-chemical process controlled by a micro computer.

Their latest invention is a small earthquake sensor, which is affordable enough for every home. They have also developed an earthquake shock absorber, which should go into the foundations of new buildings such as skyscrapers.

For users of hand held cellular telephones there is a shield, which prevents the harmful effects of long term exposure to the short waves penetrating the brain.

Sure enough, in 1996, Uri Geller did invent with Meir Gitelis a telephone radiation shield, for use with mobile hand-held devices. In terms of their earthquake warning system, it was reported in January 2005 that the sensor device was the size of a shoebox, and could sense waves that run through the ground, serving to alert as a pre-warning of imminent destruction.

As asserted by Gitelis in the January 2005 article: “Avtipus Patents & Inventions Ltd has 25 years experience in developing a variety of very successful products and new inventions ordered by clients all over the world. Avtipus takes ideas and develops them into products. We do a lot of inventing to order . . . We work with independent inventors as well as with universities, research institutes, army facilities, companies and corporations. We specialize in construction of prototypes and models, help and advice in finding applications for the invention. We’re an R&D center for inventions.” 

Given this added context, does Avtipus sound like a company that simply develops electronically-enabled Pac-Man-esque masks presumably for virus protection, while eating chicken and string beans?

Returning to the January 2005 article — specifically, with regard to the unique relationship between Meir Gitelis and mind-bender (?), spoon-bender (?) Uri Geller:

Gitlis said his lifelong interest in inventions has resulted in dozens of inventions over the last 25 years, some of them successful and some of them just for fun. “From the age of 10, I began inventing things and haven’t stopped. Maybe it’s genetic, because it runs in my family – my uncle was an inventor in Europe,” said Gitlis.

His prolific efforts flourished due to a friendship and partnership with world renowned Israeli psychic Uri Geller.

“In the late sixties, I met a young fellow named Meir Gitlis,” Geller wrote in his autobiography. “He had a small workshop in his back yard, and was apparently able to repair just about anything that had broken down. He was the electrical genius I needed, and we soon became good friends.”

Their first joint venture was in the field of security and alarm systems and fraud detection. Among successful patents include the Diamontron which determines the authenticity of diamonds, and the Moneytron which distinguishes at once between real and forged banknotes.

“Those were my first successful inventions,” said Gitlis.

On Geller’s website, there is an online autobiography titled The Geller Effect. In Chapter 7, he elaborated extensively (and quite revealingly) on his synergetic collaboration with Gitelis. I have pulled a few key excerpts, but I hope readers will review the chapter in its entirety:

He [Meir Gitelis] was as interested in my abilities as I was in his, and he was in fact the first person ever to make any kind of scientific study of me (emphasis added). One of the first things he asked me, the first time we met, was whether he could wire me up to an electro-encephalograph (EEG) so that he could have a look at my brain waves while I was doing a demonstration of telepathy. I do not remember what he discovered, if anything, for we both soon became more interested in all the gadgets and machines I was carrying around in my head but did not know how to put together . . . 

Our first joint ventures, naturally enough for a couple of Israelis, were in the field of security and alarm systems . . . My army service had given me plenty of first-hand experience of security of all kinds, from self-protection to the defence of the country, and I was able to feed Meir with enough ideas to keep him busy for years (emphasis added) . . . He and I have never had a written contract or a formal agreement of any kind. We have just become firm friends, who seem to share a mind . . . 

Geller further maintained in his personal account that Gitelis had manufactured a device, called the GS Inertial Sensor, that responded to sound. He noted that he was not permitted to provide any details on the invention, but that it had been sold to numerous countries, including Sweden. Geller expounded that he and his comrade, Meir, did not inquire as to how their device would be utilized, as that is on a need-to-know basis in the field of security.

Geller continued:

In May 1985, Meir was staying in my London apartment on a visit, and on 26 May I invited a dozen of my friends round for dinner . . . The subject of chemical warfare came up and somebody . . . suggested that there should be a form of chemical ‘peacefare’ involving the use of pheromones, or biologically active chemical substances. There had been a radio programme a few days previously on possible uses of airborne pheromones, and the speaker, a scientist named Dr Bill Fletcher, had suggested they might be used to control potentially violent crowds . . . He [Meir] and I are now looking very closely into the biologically active human pheromones, and ways of temporarily suppressing them (emphasis added) . . . 

I never know which of the many ideas that tend to come to me during my daily run are going to work in practice. That is for Meir to decide. My job is to capture whatever comes into my mind and pass it on to him (emphasis added). . . 

As far as COVID and its suspected origin goes, Uri Geller had this to say in March 2020:

“I wrote this to a group of scientists in the US:

Hi all, 

Inside information: 

Covid-19 (Corona) was created and manufactured by China’s MSS, while delivering the virus to Iran for bacteriological warfare reasons the virus accidentally was transmitted to a human. This is the real story behind the pandemic. There is still controversy among American scientists whether the actual virus is derived from bats, snakes or created in a lab. Wash your hands, don’t shake hands avoid large gatherings. And pray that it will ebb away and a vaccine will be found to destroy it.”

Do readers get the sense that we may have been hoodwinked on levels we may not have already imagined? Is it merely coincidental that the Wucinski twins were plausibly (and respectively) employed by UK Aid and USAID? Is it conceivable that society has somehow been Geller-effected? Despite the public mocking and controverting, what if Uri Geller really does have mind-bending capabilities, which could have been intensely studied, and possibly even applied on a global scale? Do pheromones factor into the equation? Even though I previously wrote about pheromones, and how they adjacently play into COVID, does this aspect require further investigation? 

Regardless — even with potential signaling that mask mandates and vaccine mandates may be rolling back — what magic tricks (or should I say illusions?) do the virus-revering, germ-abetting COVID connivers have left up their sleeves? It may be time for a breather, but I suggest that we not become complacent. 

Final Note: Although presented in a less engaging manner than an ersatz trial (or simulated legal proceedings), I hope the information speaks for itself, and that readers can take next steps to lean into potential dot-connecting. There is still more to unravel, and some other peculiar (and seemingly inconsequential) “characters” whom I am tempted to unveil . . . 

Next witness?  

Readers are adjourned.