Riddle: A virologist, a fetal bovine, and an African green monkey walk into a lab . . .
I am confident readers can detail and complete this riddle more creatively and humorously than I can. Have at it!
In October 2020, I posted a short essay, “The Defense is Rwaawwng.” Therein, I described how Tom Cowan demonstrated that the SARS-CoV-2 virus could only be grown in poisoned monkey kidney cells — unable to be cultured in human tissue cells. So even if there was a virus, it seems it lacked the capability to infect any human. The entire virus story should have been squashed at that point.
15 months later, Tom Cowan hammers yet another nail into the virology coffin. I will, once again, keep this succinct.
It may be time for a brief primer on FBS. No, FBS is not a syndrome involving irritable bowels (that is IBS!). FBS refers to Fetal Bovine Serum, which is used ubiquitously for in vitro R&D, including the culturing of viruses (inaptly termed isolation) and the manufacturing of vaccines. See this four-minute video depicting how FBS is produced. Essentially (as characterized in the linked video), FBS is a clotted blood growth supplement harvested from pregnant slaughterhouse cows, and subsequently used in cell cultures — so as to provide a cultivation medium (due to its inherent growth factors). Fortunately, the brief aforementioned video describing this heinous process is animated.
Watch Tom Cowan in his January 28, 2022 webinar destroy any notion that an actual virus has been genuinely identified. At best, it has been udderly cow-culated, as most (if not all) reported findings of SARS-CoV-2 have been developed in vitro in a mathematical compound containing fetal bovine serum (FBS). At worst, the only intact SARS-CoV-2 virus has been a computed AI construct — a fictitious virus solely existing as a computer-generated simulation (which I first posited in April 2020).
In a nutshell, the illusive SARS-CoV-2 genome is contaminated! Given the confounding process that is utilized to create the genetic soupy mess (supernatant mixed with Vero cells producing dead tissue and cellular debris), the genome will nearly always be tainted. Thus, it is extremely unlikely that any genomic data exists representative of this purported virus that can be trusted.
To elaborate, based on “borrowed material” from Mike Stone at ViroLIEgy.com, Cowan explained that nearly every viral culture is comprised of FBS, which contains a “diverse repertoire of RNA species” (see Reference #3 below). Even after ultra-centrifugation, some FBS-derived RNA remains, thereby interfering with the “downstream RNA analysis” (see Reference #3 below). Accordingly, once FBS is added to a cell culture, it will invalidate any RNA analysis “forevermore” (as per Cowan).
FBS-derived RNA contamination invariably leads to misinterpretations of the source of the RNA. Do virologists account for this?
It is crucial to understand that any reported “sequencing” of the SARS-CoV-2 “virus” can be (and most likely is) befuddled by the presence of fetal calf serum artifacts.
Given the potential contamination of SARS-CoV-2 “discoveries” by FBS-derived RNA (reminding readers this has only been done in vitro), it must be acknowledged that the genetic material may have been sourced from the host material (FBS in the culture).
Do you see why any genomic sequencing of a virus culture may be utterly erroneous?
As I also implied in my October 2020 post, if this virus had its day in court, the judge would immediately dismiss the virus on the grounds it was corrupted. It does not exist in any pure, unadulterated form; hence, all data tracing back to its spurious discovery is compromised, ergo suggestive of nullification.
Summarily expressed in the comprehensive January 1, 2022 article posted at ViroLIEgy.com, “What You Need to Know About ‘Covid-19’ in 2022,”
The “SARS-COV-2” hoax should have ended before it ever began if the scientific community had been honest about the lack of a purified/isolated “virus.” Without this evidence, there can be no genome. Without the genome, there can be no PCR test. Without the PCR test, there can be no cases. Without the cases, there can be no lockdowns, quarantines, social distancing, masks, and restrictions. Without these measures, there will be no reminder of fear and no need for vaccines. Without this evidence, there can be no mandates and thus no control.
Perhaps, now, Tom can joyously go back to organic gardening, and I can resume sticking to humble homesteading. Unfortunately, my gut tells me we have a much longer way to go. In fact, as Tom asserted in his most recent presentation — “we are just getting started.”
There is still much more to unlearn.
Addendum (February 1, 2022): As per Sally Fallon Morell (via email today, in response to my post), “FBS is removed from the still-living fetus pulled from its mother just before birth. The calf is bled dry while still living. FBS is used in the production of lab meat and as a culture in many biological processes. As it is high in iron, it would be expected to be a good culture for pathogens, and most pathogens are iron-loving. The whole thing is disgusting–witch craft.” I concur with Sally. This is disgusting witch craft. Absolutely horrifying.
1) “The End Of Virology: The 3rd Phase Of Control Experiments For SARS-COV-2”
Anyone claiming that the existence of a genome is proof of a purified/isolated “virus” is completely mistaken. The contamination of genomes is admittedly a widespread problem and one that is only getting worse. While it is a well-known issue, contamination of the database has not been properly assessed nor corrected. The use of inaccurate and incomplete reference sequences has only further propagated the problem into a vicious perpetual cycle of erroneous genomes built upon erroneous genome.
Here, using RNA sequencing, we demonstrate that FBS contains a diverse repertoire of protein-coding and regulatory RNA species, including mRNA, miRNA, rRNA, and snoRNA. The majority of them (>70%) are retained even after extended ultracentrifugation in the preparations of vesicle-depleted FBS (vdFBS) commonly utilized in the studies of extracellular vesicles (EV) and intercellular communication. FBS-associated RNA is co-isolated with cell-culture derived extracellular RNA (exRNA) and interferes with the downstream RNA analysis.
4) “Fetal bovine serum—a cell culture dilemma” (abstract)
In a recently published study, Anna Krichevsky and colleagues raise the important question of whether results of in vitro extracellular RNA (exRNA) studies, including extracellular vesicle (EV) investigations, are confounded by the presence of RNA in cell culture medium components such as foetal bovine serum (FBS). The answer, according to their data, is a resounding “yes”. Even after lengthy ultracentrifugation to remove bovine EVs from FBS, the majority of exRNA in FBS remained. Although technical factors may affect the degree of depletion, residual EVs and exRNA in FBS could influence the conclusions of in vitro studies: certainly, for secreted RNA, and possibly also for cell-associated RNA.
6) “Gibco FBS – Process”
After extensive review of this subject, it is obvious there are serious flaws with the entire foundational premise and methodologies utilized in the field of virology. In fact, the core problems are so blatant and profound, it is amazing these issues have been so successfully obfuscated from public awareness and scrutiny until now.
Our researchers fully understand it will be nearly unfathomable for many to believe an entire field of science, so central to 20th & 21st century ‘modern’ medicine, is based on pseudo-science and fraudulent isolation standards and methods.
However, the evidence must be faced on the merits.
Refutations such as ‘too many people couldn’t be this wrong’ or ‘Sars CoV2 must be real, what about all the people who died’, do not actually address the evidence on the merits.
Throughout history, there have been many examples when group think and consensus opinion turned out to be completely wrong.
It is time to get over the belief in truth by consensus opinion as a legitimate barometer of what is real.