American Alzheimer’s

Jim Rockford and Rocky
My favorite TV program of all time was called “The Rockford Files.” James Garner, as an actor, carried with him just the right amount of disdain to get through life and stay sane. It is because of Jim Rockford that I have forgiven James Garner for The Notebook. He probably just needed the money.

There are many memorable scenes from that series, but one that stands out for me has Jim and his Dad, Rocky, in the California desert investigating a real estate scam. Rocky is patiently listening to one of the men explaining to him how there is going to be a lake and marina, and that he might want to get his name on a list of people that are going to be first in line. Rocky smiled as he listened.

Later, talking to his son he said “You know, Jimmy, there we were, standing right in the middle of the desert, and that man tried to sell me a boat.”

This comes to mind this morning because we often get sucked into things by slick salespeople. We need to stand back, like Rocky, and cast a disdainful eye. This link is to a website that chronicles acts of terrorism against Americans from 1975 up to and including 9/11. Counting Oklahoma City (168), which was committed by a Christian terrorist, the number comes to about 4,100.

Since 9/11, according to the FBI, there have been 125 terrorist plots or attacks in the United States. Of these, 45 were by Muslims, and 63 by American right wingers. This includes 36 by the anti-gubbmint anti-tax crowd, 27 by the KKK and white supremacists, and 3 by right-to-lifers.

I would guess that correlation between these right wing terrorists and ownership of Atlas Shrugged would be about 1.0. John Stuart Mill did not say that conservatives were stupid people, but did say that most stupid people were conservative. Not all who believe in Ayn Rand are crazy, but right-wing nuts are drawn to her like a magnet.

Then there’s the number of deaths that the American military has caused – I could go back to 1980, when Reagan first claimed that we were being victimized by Muslim terrorists, but instead go only to 1991 – the first Gulf War. Keep in mind that these figures are always disputed. The US does not count, and those who do count are often ridiculed or threatened to back down or back off. Studying these numbers is not a good career move.

Here’s the grisly toll:

First Gulf War, 1991: 158,000 (Source, Beth Daponte, Carnegie Mellon University – note, she has since backed off);

Iraq Sanction Regime: 500,000 (Source, Richard Garfield, a Columbia University nursing professor). Note – UNICEF put this number at 500,000 in 1995, while Garfield’s number covers the entire period 1991 to 2002. As always, it’s hard to know what’s real.

Afghanistan/Pakistan, 1991-present: ??? – 10,000? 100,000? Who knows? It seems that as little as we care about Iraqis, we care even less about Afghans and Pakistanis. There just aren’t any credible numbers out there right now, and may never be.

Iraq Invasion 2003 forward: Low: Iraq Body Count, 104,605 (midpoint); Middle: 655,000 (midpoint) (Johns Hopkins, 2006); High: Opinion Research Bureau, 2007 1,200,000 (midpoint).

OK, let’s add them up. Nah, let’s not. Also consider this – in 2008 Amnesty International estimated that 4.7 million Iraqis were displaced by the war, including 2 million refugee’s.

So, as I review this information for the umpteenth time, I am most interested in the dull thud it makes when it lands. There’s a mental block working here, one so powerful that American crimes of Stalinesque stature do not register. It’s the mindset known as “American exceptionalism.” It blocks out information, minimizes it, denies it, ignores it, or in rare cases, justifies it. People who do not like this information will read this, and it will not register, and the next time they come across the information, it will be brand new to them. That’s why I think of American exceptionalism as “American Alzheimer’s.”

So, like Rocky, I look out over this desert, and address my comments to the one or two who read this who actually embrace reality: “You know, Jimmy, there we were standing right in the middle of a massacre, and those men tried to tell me that Muslims did it.”
___________________
PS: Number of people killed on 9/11: 2,977. Not 2,976. Not 2,978. 2,977. When people who matter die, we do indeed know how to count.

The astonishing simplicity of some economic realities, Part One

Generally, politicians don't like to mess with wealthy peopleI can’t write worth a damn today – everything comes out misspelled and mushy. This in contrast to the well-worded mush I usually put out. So I intended to merely re-post an article by Larry Beinhart called “The Astonishing Stupidity of Not Raising Taxes on the Rich When Budgets are Tight.” Then I thought maybe I shouldn’t be doing that, as I don’t have permission or anything, and instead I am just linking to it over at Alternet.

I’m more than willing to debate the moral ramifications of high taxes on wealth, but that is not what is at issue here. The article merely goes through some of our history to show that high taxes on wealth do not hurt the economy. There’s a reason, and I’ll write about that some day when I can write.

Voting versus flexing muscle

There was never a serious attmept to find Frank Little's murderers
Anti-union rhetoric is at a high point, with Fox leading the way. The other networks allow unchallenged remarks about union activities – Fox only differs in that it is the hosts, and not the guests, that participate in the disinformation as they show pictures of palm trees in Wisconsin. I don’t suppose this is anything new – the United States is a fake republic/democracy ruled by an oligarchy, and unions have been one of the most effective counterbalances to that rule in our history. The history books have been sanitized of the strikes, violence and deaths, like that of Frank Little, strung from a railroad trestle in Butte Montana in 1917. (Little was also opposed to U.S. entry into World War I – all things remain constant). The Pinkerton’s were an early version of Blackwater, a private paramilitary force used to break up strikes.

Freedom is never given anyone – it is always won. Union strength was behind FDR – he could never have accomplished the things he did without movement politics. Unions constitute one of the most powerful grassroots organization forces in our history. Union organizing is a basic human right – even the Catholic Church, itself a top-down hierarchy, supports the right of humans to form labor unions. Unions are strong all over the democratic world, and with them goes a strong middle class, relative equality of income, basic human dignity, and education.

Do you know where your polling place is? (Image courtesy of the League of Women Voters)
That’s why we hate them so here in the land of the free.

Pundits all over our talking screens who say they love our freedom so much that they hate unions are quick to point out that unions dues are mandatory, and are used to finance political activity.

This is true, to a minor degree. First, unions are not hierarchies, but rather democratic organizations. I don’t mean “democratic” in the cosmetic sense that the members are occasionally allowed to choose between two preselected candidates for high office. Union leaders come from the membership. So there is some sense of fulfillment of common purpose when a union engages in political activity.

Unions usually support Democrats. We only have two choices, and Democrats are slightly less repugnant, so that makes some sense.

Unions engage in issue-oriented activities. This is the type of activity permitted all tax-exempt organizations, including churches, charities, and fraternal organizations. Planned Parenthood engages in education activities regarding birth control, and Focus on the Family supports anti-abortion/birth control campaigns. Unions advocate workplace freedoms, worker benefits, and organizational activities. They support specific legislation, like the Employee Free Choice Act, which was dead-on-arrival in Washington in January of 2009. So much for supporting Democrats.

All of this is legal and healthy activity, part of our civil discourse.

"Ludlow" is emblematic of anti-union violence
Unions do not give money to individual candidates. This activity is done via PAC’s, or Political Action Committees. Contributions to PAC’s by union members are voluntary. Because of the voluntary nature of PAC contributions, they are free to use the money in any way seen feasible, including direct contributions to candidates. People who don’t like what a PAC is doing are free to give money to other candidates. PAC’s, by the way, must disclose all contributions in a timely manner. Contrast this with Citizens United-empowered corporations who are now allowed to engage in political activity in secret. Most of the Koch Brother support fro Governor Scott Walker was secret, and not the paltry $45,000 that was disclosed.

No doubt there is pressure among union member’s to behave in proscribed manners, including PAC contributions. That goes with the territory, just as a corporate executive cannot expect to advance far unless he engages in bundling with others for the right candidate. And crowd behavior is hard to manage, so that there is often violence during strikes, especially when scabs cross the picket line. And, of course, as Governor Walker talked about doing, there is the agent provocateur, an activity so common that it even has a name. This is the enemy-in-our-camp, the guy planted in a crowd to foment violence. I don’t wish to paint too-rosy a picture here. People are as people do, and unions use coercion in many forms to keep their members in line. I am not a Pollyanna.

Real democracy
Democracy – real democracy, and not mere sheep-like voting – is unruly, angry, even violent at times. Power – real power, and not mere fake ballot-box choices – is best attained by organizational activities. Since unions represent real power, even if mostly unrealized here in the land of the free, unions are scorned, and people are grilled and educated in the power of the individual. They are taught that joining a union is a sign of personal weakness. Real men don’t join unions, union workers are lazy, job benefits are welfare, and of course, the most recent, that public employees don’t perform real work, and are really on welfare.

The United States lags far behind other industrial democracies in many ways, with our oligarchy pulling virtually all the strings, hidden in plain sight. Anti-union indoctrination has been standard fare since the 1930’s. It should come as no surprise in the 21st century that unions are still scorned, and that the most basic of facts about unions are hard to find among the obfuscatory clutter that we call news, or in our Texas-spawned history textbooks.

I almost got to meet a celebrity!

Ring ringgggg!

Good morning, Evergreen Dental. How may I help you?

Me: Hi – say I got a letter from you last November offering to clean my teeth and give me a full set of xrays for $149. Is that offer still good?

Evergreen: Yes it, is. Would you like to make an appointment?

Me: Yes, I would.

Evergreen: Great. We need for you to set aside a couple of hours for this. Would you like morning or afternoon?

Me: Why so long?

Evergreen: Well, the first hour is to go over our services with you, tell you what everything we can do to improve your appearance.

[How do they know about my appearance? Am I on Skype? Creepy!]

Me: Oh – I don’t want all of that. I just want my teeth cleaned.

Evergreen: Well, we really need for you to spend that time with us. You might even get to meet one of our dentists.

Me: Oooh! [Schwing!]Really, I just want my teeth cleaned.

Evergreen: I’m going to transfer you over to our scheduler.

Scheduler: May I help you?

Me: Yeah – I have a letter here offering to clean my teeth for $149.00.

Scheduler: Did you receive a letter from us in the mail? Are you new to the area?

Me: Yes – we just moved here.

Scheduler: We need to spend some time with you on the first appointment, and show you all of the things we can do to help improve your appearance. Are you willing to spend a couple of hours?

Me: Look – I don’t want to pick out curtains with you. I just want my teeth cleaned.

Scheduler: [getting testy, she is.] We’re not picking out curtains! Have you had a bitewing xray recently?

Me: Yeah – that was a few years ago. I just need the regular set.

Scheduler: Let’s see now … OK. The appointment with a bitewing xray starts at $271.

Me: Yeah, well, I have a letter here from you that says you’ll do a cleaning and xray for $149.

Silence ….

Click.