“This anti-Russian card is being played in the interests of some political forces inside the United States with an aim to strengthen and consolidate their position.” (Vladimir Putin)
Putin is, of course, saying something that is true. But he is in the awkward position of being an official “enemy” in our domestic propaganda system, so his words are automatically disbelieved.
The Russian hacking story won’t die, which means it is being kept alive with a purpose. It is nonsense, but set that aside. For what purpose?
Tyrone in his JFKTV paper, which I know now predated the Mathis paper on the JFK assassination, had an interesting line that caught my eye. It was to the effect that JFK would not lower himself to press the flesh as he did for cameras at Love Field on 11/22/63 and before the charade kicked in. He did not need to. Even in 1960, votes were not counted. Election outcomes are not left to chance.***
I have long assumed that our 1948 election was stolen for Truman, and 1960 for Kennedy. But that assumption rested on the notion that otherwise election outcomes are a reflection of votes cast even as choices are controlled. Look at 1992 and 1996, for instance – in those years Ross Perot entered the contest as a third-party candidate to ensure that Bill Clinton won as a minority candidate. That tells me that voters were manipulated, but also that in those days votes were largely counted. Otherwise, as with Trump in 2016, they could merely have announced that Clinton won.
I saw the spectacle in Florida in 2000 but did not grasp its purpose. When I saw 2004 stolen for Bush I briefly thought some dastardly deed had taken place. But I suffered cognitive dissonance as I knew that our alternative, John Kerry, was as empty a bag of flesh as had ever occupied a podium.
Fair or foul, the 2004 outcome did not matter. But they went to great lengths using the new phenomenon of electronic voting machines to hack the outcome. Exit polls, still somewhat useful at that time, verified tremendous artificial shifts in not just Ohio, but all across the nation where paperless voting had taken hold. They must have been testing the new system. (Montana, my home state at that time, had an apparently clean outcome, but also had real paper ballots. It too has since succumbed to the new regime, so election outcomes there too can be assumed to be fake.)
Green Party candidate Jill Stein forced “recounts” in Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania, and it was quite telling. Stein is controlled opposition, I assume, and her role was to verify the illusion that Trump had won the election. The recounts were a farce, merely reaffirming machine tallies in Wisconsin. Judges halted the proceedings in the other two states.
If that does not tell you that vote counts are fake, nothing will. We cannot have “recounts” if there is no count. In fact, recounts are essentially illegal.
My only question now is how far down the ballot the election fraud goes. Obviously major puppet office holders are secure knowing they are safe from voter anger. They have always served at the pleasure of oligarchs, but now installing them and casting the illusion they are there by voter choice is an easy task. Just tell the news readers to announce they won. (I look around me in amazement that so few question the Trump victory. Maybe, just maybe he carried Utah.**)
What about County Commissioner? Judges? School bond issues? Are there issues too small to matter and where we are allowed true vote counts? I only know this: with electronic voting, with no recounts, there is no need to count votes. If they don’t have to count votes on any issue, why would they? So yes, I think it safe to assume that all vote outcomes are fake.
Back to the Russian hacking story. Knowing that our elections are fake, it is a no-brainer to know that this story is fake too, serving some other purpose. It appears now that counter forces are at work, and the Susan Rice disclosures over the weekend are meant to kill the story before it mushrooms. There is indeed fighting behind the scenes – both sides are lying, all the “disclosures” are fake. But the stakes are apparently real.*
I always learn as I go as I write these things down, but also learn from comments what else I am missing. Please do chime in. I am at a loss to know the true purpose of the fake Russian hacking story.
*Some time if you have a chance, watch the movie Wag the Dog. It is as close as Hollywood ever comes to portraying actual reality.
** Again, what is the alternative? Good lord, they have so little regard for our intelligence that they openly flog us with incompetent actors.
*** This is true in Britain as well, so that we can assume that the Brexit vote was done with purpose and that we have no clue what the true vote count was.