We have found with some performers that their family backgrounds appear to be made up. Jim Morrison, for instance, appears to be pasted in to his family photos as a youth, this one for instance. And here are Janis Joplin and John Denver, obvious paste-ups. Neither belongs.
The question is why? In Joplin’s case, since she was a twin, it could be that she was given a new family to conceal that fact. With Morrison and Denver, perhaps such musical talent is rare in spook families, so they adopted them, or Langley placed them in foster homes for minding. Admiral Morrison would then be “Jim’s” case manager, as would be Lt. Col. Deutschendorf for Denver.
Music is simply too important to be left to random talented people. It has to be controlled, and so spooks are brought in to manage talent, or even to pretend to be talented themselves, the davidcrosby effect. It does not take much to be a rock musician – some voice training, learning an instrument. Everything can be faked in the studio. Fans, when attending a concert, are hearing the recorded music in their heads as they tolerate the live music.
Here is something seemingly unrelated: The Pete Rose scandal, probably fake, was used to convince the public that baseball is a clean sport, policing its own. It is reverse psychology. We see the Hit King taken down, and assume that the sport is squeaky clean. This builds a wall behind which the corrupt enterprise functions on gambling and fixed games. Why would Rose participate? Wikipedia confesses that as a youth he was a member of the Order of DeMolay, a Knights Templar masonic group, and so pledged to secrecy. He could easily have been used in a psyop, sacrificing himself (for a hefty price) for the greater good.
I suspect the Milli Vanilli scandal served the same purpose for music – it served to convince the public that the voices we hear on recordings are actually the artists seen in public. The music industry polices its own and appears squeaky clean. Both happened around the same time.
But why spend so much effort on music? Just as television serves to put the viewer in an hypnotic trance, music has the same effect. The messages it bears is usually subtle, sometimes not, and influences our dress, attitudes and behaviors. Take just one song … the Beach Boys’ Help Me Rhonda, that has a boy asking a girl to have sex with him to get another girl out of his mind. That is tame by today’s standards, and that is the point. Music has shifted over the years, gotten less melodic, more resembling a tribal beat. Within that hypnotic atmosphere are implanted all the messages our rulers want us to have. It also carries with it our hair and dress style, and because our parents naturally cannot stand it, creates a generational divide.
Music pushes standards, erodes values. It is patient, constantly moving forward.Most groups are illusions, a bit of talent here and there but more about dress and outlandish style. Everything in music can be faked. Everything. And that is sad because there is real talent all around us, playing coffee shops and local gigs [and symphony halls] … never getting a break because a poseur like David Crosby cuts in line.
It doesn’t have to be that way, but our leadership, our rulers, want it to be that way. That is why music has so long been under watch of Intelligence, and why Intelligence has provided us with the artists and the songs. That’s why the biggest musical sensation of all time, the Beatles, was an Intelligence psyop.
Daddieuhoh recently came across a batch of John Lennon photos, and is too busy right now to be spending time with them, so offered them up. I will give it my best shot.
Just to get us up to speed, we are told that John was born in 1940 to Julia (nee Stanley) and Alfred Lennon. Alfred was basically a deadbeat dad, and when he returned home after the war found Julia pregnant by another man. He attempted to take John to New Zealand with him, but the boy chose instead to stay behind. He ended up living with his Aunt and Uncle, Mimi and George Smith. Julia was hit by a car and killed in 1958.
So the story goes. Now, the photos. First, I pulled Lennon head shots out of all the photos as there was some suspicion that they might have used different boys for the photos or a set of twins. While some do not match others, they match randomly in such a manner that I think they are all of him at various young ages. But I am not at all sure. It is very difficult to work with dark grainy eye sockets. It creates distortion.
If you start at the top left and number them 1- 7, 4 and 6 are not sure things. Due to poor quality, I don’t think it is safe to draw conclusions. There is a hint of twins in photo #5 (see down further on the page), and that could well be the dissembling factor among these images – two boys, not one. It is not certain.
Whether he or anyone else is pasted in to the photos – another matter entirely. Now the first photo:
This is a straightforward photo, no monkey business that I can see. I don’t know who David is, but both boys are wearing the same prep school uniforms. John’s hat emblem has perhaps been darkened to obscure it, even blot it out. Daddieuhoh thinks it is because of inconsistent lighting, that John has been pasted in. But why? The lighting does appear to be different on the boys, with John having a dark shadow on his right cheek, where David is lit from above. These jacket and hat emblems appear in many of the photos to follow. And the question … why?
Aunt Mimi, said to be Julia’s sister, looks like a relative. But in this photo John’s head does not look right to me, hair perfectly coiffed, skin airbrushed smooth, as if posed for a Beatles publicity shot. The black line around the bottom of Mimi’s chin looks unnatural and makes it appear that her head has been pasted on a body, but that’s not a sure thing. It could be a real shadow. With John the dark shadow under the chin falls the other way, so we have inconsistent lighting. He appears to be fake – that is, one or the other (or both) is a paste-up.
“Mendips” is an area of beauty in England, what we would call a national park here. But that does not look like a park setting. It could be a service building, like a lodge or administration building. Mendips is nowhere near Liverpool, so young John was on holiday. The photo looks OK to me, but there is that name again … “Stanley.” More later on that. They are a nicely dressed family in all photos to now, always properly attired, as are most upper class Brits. John was not a street kid. He was well-bred, apparent in these photos. [Daddieuhoh sees inconsistent lighting on the faces – I missed that.]
[Addendum] A reader below has set this house in its proper place. “Mendips” is said to be Lennon’s childhood home in Liverpool, and important clarification. [This would explain why the photo was staged. They are placing John in his “childhood home” as part of the backstory project, misdirection all the way.]
Here it gets interesting … who allows a boarder into a family photograph? Look at the placement of his hand. I wonder if this man in this photo is someone other than a “boarder.” He will appear again later. Her white is too white, sleeves too straight. She has been pasted in, it appears. She also appears in photos #5 and #6.
I take it that the woman in the plaid jacket in the middle is Mimi, so is that George? He appears closer in age to Mimi than the gal he has his are around, our friend from #4 and #6. John appears younger here while she appears older. However, if we are dealing with paste-ups, then relative age of the people in the photo can vary, right? The photo looks OK to me, and the kid on the left mugging for a family photo: I totally get that. It is one of the duties of young boys.
The two boys look identical in age, and look at the shoes they are wearing – the same. This might be the photo that created suspicion of twins. Again with the jacket emblems … now we are talking a near-high school boy and the two younger ones. And again, I cannot make them out. Why do the words “prep school” keep going through my head? Do all British boys attend schools with jackets and emblems? Or is that something for wealthier kids?
This appears to be the same girl cousin as up above, in #4 and #5 above. I don’t know who the guy cousin is on our left, but he looks like he should be holding a pipe, to the manor born. And again the boarder/”lodger”! He seems to have worked his way into the family.
That smile on John’s face looks natural, as if he is happy. They almost look to me to be father and son. It all has a good feel about it. Honestly, this appears to be a family photo, with the manor-born guy on the left pasted in – his head is way too big.
Why would they paste this guy in? As with #4 above, they are pasting something else out. What could it be? What are they hiding?
My guess: A twin brother.
John (or his twin) not so happy here, mugging, acting up. Mom is angled away from him – if it were a real photo, that would indicate discomfort being close to him. But it is not a real photo. It is a paste-up. Does that hand on his right shoulder look like it is attached to the arm behind? If so, it must be a foot longer than her other arm. Her apparel looks pasted in. The lighting appears off, directly above for him, and more like 2 o’clock for her. The black line under his right arm looks to be artificial, as does the right side of her dress. This photo is also the one that Wikipedia cropped as “Julia Lennon.”
This woman does not appear to be the Julia, seen in photo #7 above – I checked as best I am able doing a face split, and they do not line up. She might be Aunt Mimi, but that is hard to tell. She is not Aunt Harriet. That appears to be John, but it is the John in photo #4 and not the one in #7. It’s a real photo.
Miles Mathis is finding that John Lennon is not at all who he claims to be. The “Stanley” name (remember his mother was Julia Stanley) is prominent in British history. Miles has traced it back to John Stanley, “a landed magnate of immense power” who died in 1504. Oddly, Obama’s mother (if he is indeed her son) was a Stanley as well. Who was it said “Dr. Livingstone, I presume?” Oh yeah, – Henry Morton Stanley, 1871.
So it comes down to parentage, and scrubbing. I wonder if Julia ever existed. If John was from another family entirely, then Intel would have to invent his background, and so gave him Julia and Alfred, and “killed” her before we had a chance to meet her. Alfred then would have been a hired actor, Mike McGear-style. They made Alfred a deadbeat to justify sending John off to live with another family, but that family would not be Aunt Mimi and Uncle George, who were real, but props. Rather, John’s real family is the small group in photo #4, perhaps a sister or real mother and a dad … and a twin brother as seen in #5.
And if that is the case, I wonder if his name is really “Lennon.”I am thinking that is an invention. If his name is not Lennon, then what? What could it be? John Stanley, I presume?
It is all speculative at this point, and nothing can be firmed up until I locate the other Lennon twin. Straight wants me to check out Mark Staycer, and that is looking more like a solid lead all the time.
Remember, Paul and Mike McCartney were twins, and Tyrone tells me that there was more than one Ringo running around Liverpool. This group was assembled, trained, given its music, their appearance, its screaming fans. There is nothing spontaneous about them. Everything, from the long hair to John dissing Jesus to Paul pushing LSD was written out before it was acted out.
To be continued …