The next two “Get out of jail free” card holders were the central focus of two of the most traumatic events of our time, the supposed deaths of Robert F. Kennedy, Nicole Brown-Simpson, and Ron Goldman. It does no good for me to sit here and taunt the reader, saying “Look again how you’ve been fooled!” I’ve been fooled often enough myself, and know that awkward feeling of coming to grips with reality. I do not imagine I possess some greater wisdom, and hope as you read this that you are not insulted by my “superior” knowledge. I too merely want to understand things. Once we break free of the grip of “news,” fraud is easy to spot. But before breaking free, it is quite difficult.
The “public hoax” is in large part due to the hypnotic nature of the medium to television (though it has been going on since the advent of mass communication of all types). Such is the power of television that anything seen on the screen and said to be news is automatically assumed true. Given this power over us, our leaders have elected to use it to distract us, shock us, and keep us under the thumb of their control. The Robert F. Kennedy assassination is useful to study in this regard, as it contained a good deal of “predictive programming.”
The OJ Simpson affair is far more difficult to understand. In that instance they took a man of seemingly good nature and destroyed his image, making him into a monster. What is more difficult to understand is why he let it happen. I suspect he was told “We gave you your fame, we are taking it back now,” but one cannot know such insider details.
I will try to understand the Simpson matter. Wish me luck.
OJ Simpson
The heavy lifting regarding Orenthal James Simpson was done here, and I am not going to attempt to redo any of it or critique the work, as each reader has those abilities. I will only say that I went through the phase of enlightenment known as the “face palm” when I read it, coming to grips with being deeply fooled.
OJ Simpson has had his name dragged through the mud unlike any other save perhaps Toronto Mayor Rob Ford. It is an interesting spectacle to watch. He did not kill anyone. He is supposedly in jail in Nevada for burglary in which a weapon was used. His sentence was 33 years. Not likely.
The Simpson affair is long and complex, beginning with the entry into our consciousness known as the Ford Bronco low-speed chase, seen by all of us via helicopter. It was staged, and appears to be intended as a dramatic opening to a long saga. Our senses were shocked to learn that two people had been brutally knifed to death, and that the man we knew as the talented football player and gifted comedic actor was actually a monster in disguise.
We were then given a show trial, complete with apparently real attorneys acting their part, a fake judge once known as “Bruce Lee,” the fateful scene of the glove that did not fit, and acquittal (complete with racial overtones). I used to ask people quite frankly if they thought it possible that OJ was innocent, given that the glove did not fit. No possibility, I was told, and yet I had my doubts. I was, of course, asking the wrong question – not about his guilt or innocence, but whether indeed a crime had been committed.
The assault on our senses was not over by any means. OJ had to endure yet another fake trial, this a supposed civil suit where he was stripped of all his wealth by the two families of the fake victims. Since the victims were fake, this lawsuit too was fake. But OJ was further humiliated. The verdict: He was to pay $33.5 million to his fake victims. It was a fake trial – here’s how I know, Wikipedia making it obvious:
“Following Simpson’s acquittal of criminal charges, Ron Goldman’s family filed a civil lawsuit against Simpson. Daniel Petrocelli represented plaintiff Fred Goldman (Ronald Goldman’s father), while Robert Baker represented Simpson.[63] Superior Court Judge Hiroshi Fujisaki presided,[63] and he barred television and still cameras, radio equipment, and courtroom sketch artists from the courtroom.[64] On October 23, 1996, opening statements were made, and on January 16, 1997, both sides rested their cases.[65]”
While the original OJ trial was a TV show that violated every standard of courtroom procedure, for this one we have not a shred of evidence it even happened. The script was presented to our fake news media, and they presented it as real. Since it was on TV and called news, we believed it.
For the closing act, I suspect that OJ was tired, and could not appear in public without stares, even harassment, and asked his handlers for a way out of his predicament. He had played his part faithfully, done everything asked of him, but wanted some privacy, some solace. He was offered a way to disappear from the public eye via a fake jail sentence. A fake burglary was staged in Nevada, and OJ was subjected to yet another show trial. This verdict was appealed all the way to the Nevada Supreme Court. (If that is even true, it illustrates the depths of our corruption.)
He was found guilty, given a 33 year sentence, and removed from view. Where he lives now is anyone’s guess, but I would place him in Brazil, Asia, or an island somewhere, relaxing on a beach, and wondering why such public shaming was part of his fate.
This is all well-known, of course, except the murders and jail sentence being fake. The part above was easy to write. The question of “Why?” is a little more difficult. I have to ask some basic questions – what is the purpose of “news,” and what is the nature of “television?”
News is fake. Television makes the fake seem real by its somewhat hypnotic transmission wave length. It is comprised of “reporters,” most of whom are useful idiots. But as we make our way up the ladder of fame, we will find active participation in hoaxes. Someone like “Brian Williams,” for instance, knows he is but an actor and revels in the part. ABC’s “David Muir” (none of them use their real names) strikes me as a pompous ass. Their job is simple: Sell it.
Saying that “news is fake” is a blanket statement, I realize. We all know that when a building burns and we see it on TV, that there probably is a building burning somewhere. Far more important would be questions like “Was it deliberately set on fire?”, “Was it staged for effect?,” and “What else is going on while the building burns?” Those questions are never asked, of course. Most of news is controlled distraction, focusing our attention on unimportant people and events (like “Winter Storm Stella”), fake controversies, the object being to keep us distracted and misinformed, and out of their way.
So the television networks willingly participated in the OJ Simpson public hoax. That is the hardest thing for people to grasp – willingness by media to deceive us. It is a hurdle. We want to trust those TV images. That’s why they were hired – they look trustworthy.
Brian Williams is a good example. He was demoted from lead anchor on NBC, we are told, for making up his facts while reporting on Iraq. That cannot possibly be true, as all those “facts” are made up. It had to be more basic than that. Williams was appearing in shows like 30 Rock and The Daily Show and Saturday Night Live, showing off his comedic chops and appearing less than serious. It is all about gravitas. Selling lies with a straight face requires believability. Williams was winking behind the mask. He was replaced by Lester Holt, a far better liar.
So coming full circle, the OJ Simpson affair was meant to shock us, distract us, and keep us focused on something entirely unimportant while the real business of running the planet goes on elsewhere. Television “news” was the vehicle used to sell the hoax. You might ask what news we missed while we were so distracted, and the answer is easy: I don’t know.
That is the whole point of fake news, which is everything you see on TV or hear on radio or read in newspapers. It keeps us from knowing anything real.
I will stop here, as I’ve written far more than I set out to write. I will deal with Sirhan Sirhan in another post, as he too illustrates the extreme abilities of our news media to swamp us with lies using “lifetime actors*.” Sirhan is not in jail. I am going to have to satisfy myself that this Sirhan we see on occasion is the kid we met in 1968. It is going to be work. Stay tuned.
_____________
*Lifetime actors are people like Sirhan, Charles Manson, Amy Goodman, Thom Hartmann, Alex Jones, who assume a name and personality in perpetuity as part of a public hoax. I thank the guys over at Gnostic Media for the term, though I don’t know they originated it.
Piece of Mindful 
David Hawkins, as the mavin of muscle testing for truth and falsehood, see Power vs Force, has revealed a key concept relevant to why the DOODs promulgate lies. (Dept. of Organized Deception surrogates=DOODs).
Believing a lie makes us weaker. The lie machine is cranking all the time. Keep people weak.
LikeLiked by 1 person
The OJ Simpson character is also part of the racial conflict psy op. In the 90’s we also had Rodney King. Is the Rodney King case suspicious (if anybody looked closer)?
Funny that OJ Simpson was in the “Capricorn One” movie. In that movie the hoax is exposed in the end. We also have the astronauts unwilling to participate. Also the movie has a whistle blower scientist (I forgot if the movie has an investigative journalist that tries to do everything to find the truth). So you see, the movie proves that nothing can be staged because there is always a great soul that will step in to expose the lies.
LikeLike
I’ve seen that movie. It is suggestive, but like you say, it self-remedies at the end as one astronaut survives and tells his story – to a vigilant news media we are left to assume.
Rodney King, I have read but not checked it out on my own, is not beaten up by cops. It was staged.
LikeLike
The Rodney King charade also allowed them to push “double jeopardy” as Bush 1 and the Feds came after the cops after they were acquited locally. I guess we can at least appreciate them trying to stretch our stolen money further by pushing multiple agendas with one event…
LikeLike
I heard a story from a guy with a relative fairly high up in the LAPD that the reason King was being chased in the first place was that a video store near there had been robbed, and the elderly woman who ran it had been shot. He also told me this cop demonstrated how easy it was to take someone down with a nightstick when you hit them at a specific point on the knee. He said he dropped like a rock, and his wife ran out of the house screaming, but it was painless.
He was also prone to tall tales every now and then so I take it with a grain of salt.
LikeLike
Since both the OJ murder/bronco chase and Rodney King beating occurred in LA, it might be worth taking a close look at another famous LA event from the same period, known as the North Hollywood Bank Robbery Shoot-Out. The shoot-out was televised live by news helicopter and can be seen on YouBoob. The shoot-out allegedly lasted 44 minutes (8 for numerology fans) and the bank that was robbed, a Bank of America branch, was located on……wait for it…….Laurel Canyon Blvd, home of the famous Lookout Mountain spook film studio.
LikeLike
It was obvious to me at the time that the Bronco getaway was staged. It was ridiculous in that “he” was driving at about 40 mph so it was an attention getting stunt. But the main thing was that it was timed to happen during one of the NBA finals games, so they would get maximum exposure, specifically to the black sports fan.
Of course, I had no idea how things worked, and assumed his lawyers planned it out to create a shitestorm of publicity and try to prejudice as many potential black jurors as possible. That implied to me they thought he was guilty. Not long before the chase began, his original lawyer, Robert Shapiro, (if memory serves) was telling us on TV, “OJ is at my house, getting his head together and will turn himself in soon.”
This opens another rabbit trail in my mind worth a look. The Duke lacrosse scandal. And the related controversy around Don Imus, who got “fired” for a fairly mild (for him) racial faux pas right as the verdict came out in the Duke case, and at the time seemed to be a smokescreen to cover up what happened there. The association sticks because his sidekick Bernard McGuirk once asked the question, “who was the first Jew awarded the Heisman trophy?” (Answer: Ronald Goldman’s father). They really do weave these webs of deception…
LikeLike
I would guess that the Bronco chase was filmed at some other time, as so many things would have had to come together just right for it to happen in real time.
LikeLike
The interlude… ” Flight of the Bumblebee” Used on the radio show, was linked to the Green Hornet series by the public and so was used for the television series. And I think that our friend OJ would agree that this can happen at times when bumbling flights are concerned. I’m glad to see all the 33 1’3 references are coming to light. Not sure where the 33 1/2 one came from. The Hornet ( Van Johnson ) was also a crime fighter who posed as a criminal and who’s true identity was known to only a few people. Though it lasted only for one season, I would like to think that our heroes are still working on low brow cases, as well as using a secret entrance. Not sure if the 2 part billboard still advertises ” Kissin Candy Mints” though. I’m thinking of a folding shot of KK’s backside. Cheers!
LikeLike
Van Williams- Sorry, but you accidentally hit my geek response button- Also, though credit for this goes to one of the other writers here, Green Hornet’s sidekick, Kato, was played by Bruce Lee/Lance Ito while OJ’s house guest was Kato Kaelin- As Cesar Romero’s Joker would say while eagerly rubbing his gloved hands together: “Oooooo, Deeeliscioussss…”
LikeLike
Thanks, yes it was Williams. Kaelin was supposedly nicknamed Kato from the series. So it would seem to be a backstory i guess. Perhaps ushering in the new meme of the white guy being the sidekick and mooch. While I’m not sure if Star Treck was really showed in Japan as ” Sulu, Master of Navigation ” ( SNL Joke ). The Hornet was ‘ The Kato Show ” in Hong Kong. Perhaps Batman said it best in ” The Impractical Joker ” episode 55, Part 1,Aired on November 16, 1966 ( sigh ). While watching tv together with Dick and Alfred, Batman says ” It’s time to watch the Green Hornet “.. Plausible deniability, at least they warned us. Slapping my forehead again.
LikeLike
The war in Bosnia was going on during that time frame. The Clintons amping up their shenanigans over there and other places needed a distraction. Unless that was a fake war?
LikeLike
The Clinton’s had as much to do with uprisings in old Yugoslavia as you and I do with seals washing ashore in Florida. That he happened to be president as these events took place is not causation.
LikeLike
Much of the focus of Clinton’s foreign policy during his first term was the war in Bosnia and Herzegovina. There would need to be a distraction. Most people have no clue about the Bosnia conflict, however they can converse somewhat about the OJ Simpson trial.
LikeLike
Fair point.
LikeLike
You have a good point about it possibly being a distraction. If so, It didn’t seem to work very well. But Eastern Europe was behind the curtain for a long time.So I’m not surprised that few Americans responded to it very well. ( Well meaning showing interest ). All conflicts were spun relentlessly however. Propaganda was never left to chance. No governments that I’m aware of have ever really helped the researchers. Knowing at least some of the truth as well as the behavior of the parties involved, it’s not surprising that there is so much controversy now concerning wars in general. I have always assumed that getting to the truth would be pretty much a solo adventure.
LikeLike
Whether or not the war was real is yet to be seen. The better question should be “where was all that war funding going, anyway?” Certainly not to helping anyone (besides the oligarchs) there.
LikeLike
Patty hearst is one also, do you knkw how many television stations are owned by hearst productions? I thought that money was donated to homeless. I recently made a trip to California to find my missing mother of 23 years on new years eve. How many people’s regular news station channell was automatically cut off. I can name some.
LikeLike
My question is where is peter Jennings son and daughter? Does anyone know??? Does anyone know that Charles Manson real last name was not manson? I do because I know whose son he was.
LikeLike
Ahh, the Hearsts. We cannot forget them. I guess that’s where much of their homeless “donations” went to.
LikeLike
You’ll love this one. It gets more unbelievable the deeper you go:
https://www.businessinsider.com/if-i-did-it-how-oj-simpson-2016-2
So a man who was acquitted of murdering his wife and her lover goes on to write a book that hypothesizes on what he would’ve done “if” he killed them. Why would an innocent man, or even a criminal trying to cover-up his tracks, basically incriminate himself in this manner? Wouldn’t he have taken an opposite approach instead if he wanted to defend his innocence?
“After arriving back in LA, he agreed to go talk to the cops with no lawyers present.”
Why wouldn’t O.J. bring lawyers with him to represent his side? He didn’t even summon a public attorney, much less the best lawyers that his millions could buy, until much later in the proceedings. He was basically setting himself up for failure at that stage, which made no sense if he was so inclined to prove he wasn’t guilty. Nothing adds up, as usual.
LikeLike
And, of course, O.J. wearing the “blood-stained” black gloves made no sense, either. For one thing, this shouldn’t have happened as it would be considered evidence tampering. If this case was real, the investigators should’ve kept the gloves under lock-and-key for further investigation, not hand them to their prime suspect for him to wear in court. It’s completely unheard of, even in the other fake cases we’ve seen.
LikeLike
And speaking of unbelievable stories, here’s one about a girl who was reportedly stabbed 19 times by her ‘friends’ and, somehow, miraculously survived her lethal injuries in a forest. It’s also connected to Slenderman. If that doesn’t sound nonsensical to you, I don’t know does. The chances of surviving so many wounds in a wooded area are highly slim, to say the least. The heavy blood loss from that many wounds alone would’ve been enough to cause death, even without direct damage to internal organs like the heart or lungs. The whole thing smells fake to me.
LikeLike
Also, the girl claims she didn’t feel anything due to bodily shock from the stabbings, which contradicts other stories that she suffered agonizing pain from the wounds.
And if you look at the clothing of one of the juvenile killers, you’ll notice that she has little blood on her white shirt, despite stabbing her victim dozens of times, which should’ve drenched her clothes in blood. It’s reminiscent of the lack of blood-stains on Jackie Kennedy’s pink suit, which naturally should’ve had more blood from her husband’s corpse.
LikeLike
Also, I love how the partners-in-crime didn’t even bother to change their clothes prior to going to the police for interrogation. It’s like they didn’t bother to get rid of any evidence connected to the atrocity that happened hours earlier.
LikeLike
And although normally filming isn’t done in courtrooms across the country, it is allowed in Wisconsin, the state where this crime allegedly happened. This has been so since 1979, decades before the attempted murder reportedly took place. Convenient, don’t you think?
“(1) Except as otherwise provided in sub. (2), 3 television cameras, each operated by one person, and 3 still photographers, each using not more than 2 cameras, are authorized in any court proceeding. Priority consideration shall be extended to one of the 3 cameras to televise an entire proceeding from beginning to end.”
https://wisfoic.org/cameras-in-the-courtroom/
LikeLike
Furthermore, there’s a reason why the number 19 is heavily referenced in this story. In the occult, it represents the lunar or Metonic cycle, which are the revolutions the moon takes in our so-called solar system. It’s no coincidence, therefore, why this event was staged at night in a secluded, forested area, where you’re much more likely to have a clear view of the moon above (provided the trees aren’t covering it).
This cycle is named after Meto, who lived around 433 B.C. 33, of course, is one of their favorite occult numbers, along with 18. It was subsequently corrected by Callipus in 330 B.C. with his Callipic period. More Masonic/occult numbers, again.
“The number 19 is famous as being the number of years in the Metonic Cycle; the cycle of the revolutions of the moon, after which she returns to have her changes on the same day of the solar year. Meto lived 433 B.C.; he was an Athenian; he published his discovery at the Olympic Games in the above year. The exact period is, however, 18 years and to days. The Calippic period of four cycles, or seventy-six years, was invented by Calippus, B.C. 330, to correct Meto. John Heydon says that the number 19 facilitates births and menses.”
https://sacred-texts.com/eso/nop/nop22.htm
LikeLike
And if you’re curious about how the moon appeared on May 31, 2014 (the day of the attempted killing), you can read more about that below.
https://www.moongiant.com/phase/05/31/2014/#:~:text=Moon%20Phase%3A%20May%2031%2C%202014%20On%20this%20day,to%20see%20the%20features%20of%20the%20moon%27s%20surface.
LikeLike
And, of course, the number 31 is a reversed reflection of the number 13, and both of them carry significant occult symbology. Many other hoaxes were staged on both dates, such as Lady Di’s car crash and the burning of the Knights Templar.
LikeLike
And here’s the cherry on top of the BS cake: one of the pictures showing ‘victim’ Payton Leutner with her family. This photo is an obvious fake, primarily due to the fact that Payton’s left arm (to our righ) looks strange, as it appears to be a bad past-up. The outlines of entire family also looks strange to me, almost as though they’re side effects of green screening or photo manipulation. Unless I’ve gotten something wrong, I stand by my stance here.
LikeLike
Additionally, she doesn’t appear in places like WhitePages or Spokeo (or at least not under her famous name), which is especially odd for someone that notable. Either she doesn’t exist or they paid off the sites to not include her in their lists for some reason. Otherwise, if they can keep records of random people on their databases, why not her?
https://www.whitepages.com/name/Payton-Leutner?fs=1&searchedName=Payton%20Leutner
https://www.spokeo.com/Payton-Leutner
LikeLike
And why, you might ask? Why would they fake this? The same reason they fake many other stories like this one: to generate fear and division amongst the masses. It results in people being less social and becoming more isolated, thus more depressed and easier to control and profit off of. Certainly, in this case, it convinced many gullible parents to restrict or prohibit their children attending slumber parties with their peers.
LikeLike