Dr. Kaufman at Trafalgar, 9/19

I suggest that you download this talk, as censorship these days is pervasive. It is a twelve minute talk given by Dr. Andrew Kaufman at Trafalgar on September 19. He covers it all, succinctly.


I am not techie enough to get it to play on screen here, so click on the link.


11 thoughts on “Dr. Kaufman at Trafalgar, 9/19

  1. I crafty blend of truth and extraordinary claims. This man claims to be an expert, but Fauxlex found him to be a fraud when the self claimed molecular genetic degree expert Kaufman regurgitated the incorrect claim that RT PCR test for SARS CoV detects humam chromosoem 8 as a positive COVID result. Its all over YT, where he said he spent a long time researching Fauxlex’s claim, and when interviewed by Icke he agreed, even though in the comments section Fauxlex backed down, and Fauxlex understands 2 primers are needed along with a working probe to get a positive result Be careful who you trust.


      1. For any new pathogen, there will be no gold standard. An absence of a gold standard, against which to compare, doesn’t make the RT PCR test completely useless. For countless other respiratory viruses RT PCR compares very well with the gold standard, why would you expect SARS CoV 2 to be so different? Please explain how you would do better.


        1. The “gold standard” is not dependent on whether a virus is new or old. The methodology would be the same for all viruses. As Stefan Lanka showed us, virologists are often sloppy, maybe even avoiding seeking to GS a supposedly “new” or “novel” virus because they know it doesn’t exist, and beyond that do not know how it causes disease.

          Dr. Kaufman outlines the sloppiness of the virologists in his talk.

          I regard the entire field of virology as pseudoscience, keyed in to follow the money, nothing more, and will hold that view until I see, in detail, those viruses that they have GS’d – I do not think they are many in number. Lanka did one found in sea water or kelp or something like that, and remarked the the role of the virus was actually positive.

          Liked by 2 people

  2. The definition of a ‘gold standard’ test = a test that has been established for a long time. So a test cannot be quickly gold standardised. The term gold standard is used in a context where the best test, i.e. the gold standard, is used to compare to a new test.

    So, you didn’t say how you would do better. I wish the plandemic movement would put their neck on the line and state publicly what their road map is to deal with the disease.

    Any way…. going back to Mr Kaufman… he unarguably got it wrong, on a level so huge that is exposes his deceit and bias. I.e. he will do and say anything to keep the ad revenue rolling in to his bank account. That means, keeping clicks and hits high, via, shock and awe headlines. That is actually matters to him. Not, civil liberty or public health. He hides from scrutiny.and should prove himself in light of his human chromosome 8 fiasco.


    1. You’re weasel wording. “Gold standard” is defined as isolating, filtering, purifying, a repetitive process thar leaves only the alleged virus at the end. Virologists do not do this. They quit doing it. You should ask them why. Not me.

      Regarding Kaufman’s integrity, we can each draw an assessment. I’ve been alive a long time, and while I can be fooled, have been fooled, I find him to be honest.

      How to “deal with the disease?” First step, gold standard so we know what we are dealing with. If the virus has never been isolated, how do we know it exists?

      Future comments from you will be judged for circularity. If so, adios.

      Liked by 2 people

    2. “I wish the plandemic movement would put their neck on the line and state publicly what their road map is to deal with the disease.”

      Disease? There is none to speak of. People deceased in Germany in the first six months of the years 2016 through 2020:

      461, 488, 501, 478, 483 – rounded to full thousands

      The 2020 figure of 483 is higher than 2016 and 2019, but lower than 2017 and 2018. There is no excess mortality. This is conclusive proof, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that nothing exraordinary is taking place in real (as opposed to virtual) reality.

      Usually, around 20,000 deaths a year are attributed to flue. In 2020, though, only 411 deaths are attributed to flu – in order to make room for Covid! The statistics are pathetic and pathological themselves.


      Sterbefälle – Fallzahlen 2016 bis 2020 – Statistisches Bundesamt

      Obviously, under lockdown conditions, people are more likely to die from negligence, isolation, loneliness, despair, depression, suicide, etc. Nothing to do with a virus – everything to do with the antihuman, antichristian and nonsensical bureaucratic lockdown regime.

      Liked by 2 people

  3. If it is not his honesty that is in question, it is his technical competency togethet with an honest mistake. He is simply wrong, anyone with an understanding of COVID PCR testing can plainly see it.

    Ask Fauxlex from this website, he is the author who started the human chromosome 8 story. Fauxlex concedes he got it wrong… why can’t Kaufman?


    1. You’re on the cusp here. You assert without evidence, and are dismissed without evidence. You also mis-understand the Faux Kaufman matter, but that doesn’t matter. Here’s Dr. Mullis himself on his own invention:

      “Quantitative PCR is an oxymoron. PCR is intended to identify substances qualitatively, but by its very nature is unsuited for estimating numbers. Although there is a common mis-impression that the viral-load tests actually count the number of viruses in the blood, these tests cannot detect free, infectious viruses at all; they can only detect proteins that are believed, in some cases wrongly, to be unique to HIV.
      “The tests can detect genetic sequences of viruses, but not viruses themselves.”

      There is so much blatant corruption in allopathic medicine that I find it a snake pit. Anyone with honesty and integrity is marginalized if not ostracized. A parallel here is the PSA test, not meant to be used to diagnose prostate cancers, not even approved for that purpose, but urologists jumped on it, as it was a cash cow. They use it now to herd patients to their operating tables so they can mutilate them.

      As with PSA, so too with PCR, a machine with many useful functions that was seized by charlatans for nefarious ends.

      Anyway, adios.

      Liked by 3 people

      1. ‘There is so much blatant corruption in allopathic medicine that I find it a snake pit.’
        You are not kidding, PSA, mammograms, colonoscopies, vaccines, statins…the list is endless and the damage from those alone should be enough to shut the whole thing down.
        A prominent oncologist once told me, with regard to follow up PT scans; ‘We don’t like to do them because we are not sure what we are looking at.’ HA, are you serious? So how did you know what you were looking at the first time around?????


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s