The scamdemic appears now to be in phase two, the stampede to be vaccinated. Two matters came to light yesterday. First, from Ab at Fakeologist, a short paper from the journal Microbiology & Infectious Diseases by J. Bart Classen, MD, titled COVID-19 RNA Based Vaccines and the Risk of Prion Disease. I don’t find it at Fakeologist anymore, so maybe Ab decided, like us, that the article is a softball designed to be hit out of the park.
In the article, Dr. Classen maintains that the Covid-19 vaccine contains prions, defined as misfolded proteins that can lead to all kinds of diseases including, says Classen, ALS and Alzheimer’s. It’s not terribly complicated, as even a layman like me can get the gist of it, that the vaccine is poison.
The planners behind the scamdemic appear to have covered all bases. No one speaks out against the science in public. The internet, including YouTube, Reddit, Twitter and Facebook, are heavily censored. It reminds me of standing in the middle of a crowd of 500 people, all of them facing me, all of them yelling at me, all of them lying. There are occasional calm voices calling BS on all that has transpired, but understand that unless a person is curious and able to search for deviant voices and able to read and comprehend long tracts, that person will never be reached.
An honest scientific paper calling out the shortcomings of COVID-19 research and testing, if even published, will drift to the ground like soft snow falling among cedars, making no sound, generating no interest.
So why did Politifact choose to attack this paper? Politifact is in the “debunking” business, another aspect of the scamdemic. Readers here will know that Snopes is a professional debunking outfit, and as such is treated as a hands-off source, no criticism allowed. People do not understand the true role of Snopes will say things like “Yes, that is true. I know. I Snoped it.” Snopes is an intelligence front playing a confidence came, or a con game.
Politifact’s debunking of the Classen paper was, frankly, too easy. Politifact reminds me of Snopes, a confidence game. There are no science-based (given the state of “science” in our time) claims that prions cause either ALS or Alzheimers. Instead, they are said to lead to dementia (as distinguished from Alzheimer’s), Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease, and in animals, chronic wasting disease. The Classen paper does not go near those topics, and so even from my perspective as a non-scientist, is not credible. It finishes with the following:
Many have raised the warning that the current epidemic of COVID-19 is actually the result of an bioweapons attack released in part by individuals in the United States government [10,11]. Such a theory is not far fetched given that the 2001 anthrax attack in the US originated at Fort Detrick, a US army bioweapon facility. Because the FBI’s anthrax investigation was closed against the advice of the lead FBI agent in the case, there are likely conspirators still working in the US government. In such a scenario the primary focus of stopping a bioweapons attack must be to apprehend the conspirators or the attacks will never cease. Approving a vaccine, utilizing novel RNA technology without extensive testing is extremely dangerous. The vaccine could be a bioweapon and even more dangerous than the original infection.
He might as well be saying “Please, hit this pitch out of the park!”
The people behind the scamdemic knew to control every source of information so that the public sees nothing but lies, lies, and lying liars who tell them. They are also clever enough to misdirect us by baiting us bad science in hopes that we will latch on to it, so that we too can be discredited. That is, in my view, the purpose of the Classen paper. As such, I agree with the closing words of Politifact’s debunking: “Classen’s claim is inaccurate and ridiculous. We rate it Pants on Fire!”
We must always be on guard.
Far more serious is a discussion held in Germany, the chief participant Dr. Vanessa Schmidt-Kruger. I read it yesterday, and warn you that it is a serious time commitment. At 29 printed pages, it took me between 90 minutes and two hours, including the time needed to look up various scientific terms. I don’t mind being in over my head, as with this conference. These are well-versed and credible people. I have an idea of what they are talking about, but much of it is difficult reading with unfamiliar concepts and terms. Still, it never hurts to immerse in this fashion. We come out the other side better off.
Please note, the original panel discussion was in German and included five participants, including Dr. Reiner Fuellmich, who has for months now been working on lawsuits including class action in the United States, and individual targets in Germany, which does not allow class action lawsuits. (It was professionally translated by Gilian Crowther of the Federal Association of Interpreters and Translators.)
My major takes are as follow:
- In Germany, as in the United States, the vaccine has not gone through rigorous testing, and so is not known to be either safe or effective. (I maintain there is no virus, so that efficacy is not relevant. Panelists are not of that mindset.)
- The manufacturer of the vaccine, BioNTech, was given several requirements to fulfill before marketing the vaccine, and until July to do so. Instead, according to Schmidt-Kruger, due to political pressure, they went full speed ahead anyway. This, according to panelist Dr. Holzeisen, is “…criminal, unbelievable. Terrifying.”
- Despite all of this, there is huge pressure in the EU towards mandatory vaccination.
- The dosage is controversial. According to Schmidt-Kruger (I gather), a dose 10 micrograms is adequate to do the job (!), and 30 micrograms is no more or less effective, yet BioNTech is doing 30. No one on the panel seems to understand why.
- Testing on this vaccine amounted to a small one on animals, and a modestly larger one on humans. There is no attempt to measure long-term effects. Those now taking the vaccine are not being tracked. Says Dr. Holzeisen, “People are simply being vaccinated, and if they die it’s counted as a Covid death.”
For me, the following paragraphs are a money shot:
So there is a preclinical study. Let’s look at the basics to start with. The technology of the nanoparticles. I don’t want to completely malign it. It’s a superb technology really. But the problem is that it is still much too early for use in human beings. The toxicity is still too high, that first needs to be eliminated, then it would really be a brilliant technology. There are many scientists working on getting rid of this toxicity, research has been conducted on that for years. [Trans: for 20 years she says at the end]
It is actually used for cancer patients, but there the risk/benefit ratio is very different, I’ll come back to that. In a healthy person such as with a vaccine, I consider it disproportionate to apply this technology at the moment while this toxicity exists. Nanoparticles, these are very small particles and always damaging to cells, because the smaller the particle, the more interaction they can have with cell components, i.e., with the proteins, with other lipids, or with the DNA etc. But one needs a nanoparticle lipid envelope because one can’t just inject the RNA into people, it is broken down within 10 minutes by the nucleases that are swimming around. The cells won’t take up the RNA/DNA if it is not nicely presented via a lipid nanoparticle for example. [Original emphasis.]
Nanoparticles are an important component in the vaccine. In people with other illnesses, they could be deadly. In healthy people, they are unhealthy.
This took me back to the AIDS epidemic, also fake, but also a means of murdering people. There was with that epidemic, as with Covid, a fake virus, in the case of AIDS, HIV, and the PCR machine, used against the advice and warnings of its inventor to test people for it. Those who tested positive were often treated, sometimes even if asymptomatic. The drugs given them as a “cure” included AZT, a type of chemotherapy that destroyed cells, including healthy cells, often enough itself the cause of death of an AIDS patient. That was the scandal, going on to this day, a fake virus leading to real death. (Please understand that AIDS is a real and deadly syndrome, usually a result of self-abusive lifestyles, malnutrition, or hemophilia. [Add to this radiation and chemotherapy.])
Influenza, tuberculosis, heart conditions, pneumonia and other illnesses are all common causes of death around the world. With AIDS, people so suffering were labeled AIDS victims if they also tested positive for HIV. Similarly now anyone dying of those conditions who also test positive for SARS-CoV-2 are labeled victims of COVID-19. Thus has CDC and WHO and other health agencies around the world been able to run up the score of COVID-19 deaths, currently showing in excess of 500,000 on death certificates. As with the number of people who have died of HIV (zero), so too have that number died of Covid-19.
We live in a time of corruption so widespread that it appears that nothing matters anymore, no voice can be trusted, no public or medical official credible. It is as if they decided to add Mentos to our public Coca Cola, causing an eruption of madness, fear, instability, and most importantly, a stampede to a vaccine that might indeed kill us. It’s Billyville.
Stephers recommends that we pick up at 1:30:00 in this podcast with Dr. Larry Palevsky. I concur … well worth your time.