The website nodisinfo.com is not listed in the blogroll on the right, nor will it be any time soon. I do not know what to make of it. I first ran across it when I began looking into the Boston Marathon Bombing hoax. It was there I first encountered clear color photos of the actors in the Marathon bombing, such as the one below.
The red arrows point to the back of the head of “Jeff Bauman” as he is being assisted strapping on his prosthetic leg for later photo ops. He is seen below as he is heroically carted off, long after a wound like that should have killed him. (They had to wait for the camera to be in place.) “Bauman” (it appears there is more than one) was already an amputee prior to the event.
I am not concerned about that here, as it is old, old news. Later these same photos would be used by Dave McGowan in his series on the Boston Bombing. It is quite a comprehensive examination of the event, hours of reading.
McGowan, in my judgment, in his book Weird Scenes Inside the Canyon, was doing a “limited hangout:”
“Limited hangout” is intelligence jargon for a form of propaganda in which a selected portion of a scandal, criminal act, sensitive or classified information, etc. is revealed or leaked, without telling the whole story. The intention may be to establish credibility as a critic of something or somebody by engaging in criticism of them while in fact covering up for them by omitting many details; to distance oneself publicly from something using innocuous or vague criticism even when ones own sympathies are privately with them; or to divert public attention away from a more heinous act by leaking information about something less heinous.” (Rational Wiki)
What McGowan did in Laurel Canyon was to take us part way down the road. He described the military connections of rock stars of the 60s and 70s, and described their deaths. What he forgot to tell us was that the deaths were fake. To this day I hear McGowan referred to as some kind of hero for his work, and he is still taken at face value by most researchers, including Jan Irvin at Gnostic Media, to my disappointment.
I am wondering why the Boston Photos, so clear and revealing, were released. We are told that professional photographers happened to be on scene and captured them. That is possible, but if true, and if Intelligence did not want the photos released, they would have disappeared. The scene was covered, agents were looking around making sure only authorized photos were released. Even cell phone photos are oddly absent. Yet we get a full set of clear and polished photos that have enjoyed wide circulation, first with nodisinfo.com, and second with McGowan.
It cannot be an accident.
Since I suspect McGowan to be a still-living spook, it seems logical that he would have access to approved photographs. Working backwards, this would make nodisinfo spooky too. They are each receiving their material from a common source, which I judge to be Intelligence, the people behind the event.
So what is up with the Boston Marathon photos? If they are part of a limited hangout, we are meant to see them. If that is the case, it is done to reveal part of a hoax, but leave the important stuff hidden. It is meant to absorb our attention. We are supposed to publish and republish them, pointing out again and again how the blood is fake, the victims waiting around to be blooded up, the wounds mere moulage.
But we are missing something. The photos expose and hide at once. What could it be?
I don’t know, but also want to add that with limited hangouts, there is nothing wrong with going along with them. They don’t tell us everything by any means, but we should take what they do tell us, and use it as a starting post for more and better research. We should put limited hangouts to our own use, as Straight and I did with Weird Scenes.