In a post below, A Treasure Trove, I linked to a website that contains English translations of the work of Dr. Stefan Lanka, a German
virologist doctor.** These are, it appears, reprints of articles from the magazine Wissenshafftplus, which translates to Science Plus Knowledge Creates More. I have been deeply immersed in the work, and feel at this time that I finally have a handle on virology, that is, the supposed science as it is done in the post-Enders era. More about that later.
Pasteur and science fraud
I think back now to Louis Pasteur, and maybe I am being too conspiratorial, but he appears to me to have been a front for others, mostly likely people in the pharmaceutical business. What does it tell us when he keeps two sets of notes, a dishonest set for the public, and honest ones to be kept private. Pasteur told his family that his private notes were never to be published, but his grandson, Louis Pasteur Vallery-Radot, donated his notebooks to the French National Library, which published them. In 2014, Prof. Gerard Geison of Princeton University published them for English readers in a book titled The Private Science of Louis Pasteur. At $71 for the paperback, I balked. Here’s a review that tempts me, however:
“Geison has discovered that Pasteur’s two most famous experiments were tainted by lies and scientific, if not moral, misconduct. The author’s deconstruction of the Pasteur myth is not an attempt to discredit the man or his works but to present the unadorned truth. Well written and scholarly, with extensive notes and bibliography, this book is highly recommended.” ― Library Journal
All that aside, what does this say? What does it mean when we know he was deliberately duplicitous? For me, it says that Pasteur was a hire, and knew he would not be found out because behind him was power. Germ theory as given us from Pasteur down has spawned a multi-billion dollar industry, made us all less healthy with vaccines, and has turned doctors into natural born killers.
So I read in Lanka’s work that
“… the idea of the virus as a poison was elegantly and scientifically disproved and abandoned in 1951 and that since 1952 another idea had to be invented: The idea that viruses are a collection of dangerous genes. Here again, it is concealed that there is still no solid scientific proof for the assumption of such gene accumulations, which could be called viruses.”
The event that kept viruses alive was the 1954 Nobel Prize given to Prof. John Franklin Enders for his speculation that viruses are dangerous protein toxins.
Enders and his colleagues, with their only publication from June 1, 1954, developed the idea that cells that die in the test tube after supposedly infected material is added would turn into viruses. This dying is simultaneously issued as isolation of the virus -because supposedly something is brought into the laboratory from outside -, and the reproduction of the suspected virus and the dying cell mass is used as a vaccine. Enders, his colleagues and all virologists overlooked – because of the Nobel Prize‘s blindness – that the death of the cells in the laboratory is not caused by a virus, but because the cells are unintentionally and unnoticed but systematically killed in the laboratory. [Emphasis added.]
That’s again looking like fraud. From that time forward virologists have been “isolating” viruses by these methods, and without benefit of negative control. Says Lanka, if they did such control as part of their work, they would discover that the cells that die from viruses actually die from virologists and their methods. Since 1954, 66 years, they have never truly isolated any virus, much less shown that viruses are involved in disease.
Virologists and science fraud
I have struggled with this since February of last year, trying to understand the concept of “isolation” by means of centrifuge, repeated filtration and purification, resulting in a “gold standard.” I have argued that there is no gold standard for SARS-CoV-2, and that the genome of the supposed virus therefore cannot be identified, so that there is nothing to test for. Why does this argument always fall on deaf ears? It is because virology has been gutted of any real science, and by means of subterfuge the word “isolate” has been co-opted to mean its opposite. That, in my view, is fraud, and as with Louis Pasteur, it is fraud that has saved the multi-billion dollar pharmaceutical industry.
Lanka is forgiving of all of this, where I am not. Says Lanka,
Contrary to what most people believe, pathogenic viruses do not exist. The claims about the existence of viruses and viral diseases are based on historic misinterpretations and not, as I thought in the past – on fraud or deliberate deception. We now have new, better, and in the positive meaning of the word “scientific” discoveries and explanations for the origin, therapy and prevention of many diseases, some of which are still called “viral” today.
In other words, Enders was wrong, but there was not enough known for him to be called dishonest. Maybe so, but that was 66 years ago! Can anyone in the field of virology speak up and now set us straight? If they do, they are out of work. Lanka views it all as subject to inevitable change, but I see modern virology as written in stone, never doubting or reflecting on itself. Of course, we are dealing with human failings, virologists who never became smarter than their teachers, but still, I look at virus hunters as engaged in deliberate fraud, the purpose of which is to protect industries from financial ruin. Most probably do not realize this, but a few surely must, and those few are involved in science fraud.
Zika and microcephaly
Just one example, the ZIKA “virus.” It is said to have been the cause of infants born with microcephaly (small heads) in Brazil and Argentina, and was used to scare pregnant mothers, leading to many (offshore) abortions. Some years back, pre-Covid, I stumbled on this piece by Jon Rappoport, In 1993 Noam Chomsky delivered the Zika secret. Here’s JR quoting Chomsky:
“Brazil … is a sharply two-tiered society. Much of the population live at a level reminiscent of Central Africa…the UN Report on Human Development ranked this rich and privileged country in 80th place, alongside of Albania and Paraguay. In the northeast, Brazilian medical researchers describe a new subspecies: ‘pygmies,’ with 40% [actually 60%] the brain capacity of humans, thanks to severe malnutrition in a region with fertile lands, owned by large plantations that produce export crops in accord with the doctrines preached by their expert advisers. Hundreds of thousands of children die of starvation every year in this success story, which also wins world prizes for child slavery and murder of street children — in some cases for export of organs for transplant, according to respected Brazilian sources.”
The source Chomsky is using for his medical assessment of children’s brain capacity is Isabel Vincent (Life a struggle for Pygmy family, Globe & Mail Toronto, December 17, 1991, p. A15.)
There it is – the purpose of viruses, to protect entrenched power. (I’ve also read that there is a Monsanto connection here – see footnote.*)
The following is taken from the article by Lanka called The causes of the corona crisis are clearly identified: Virologists:
Virologists have never isolated a complete genetic strand of a virus and displayed it directly, in its entire length. They always use very short pieces of nucleic acids, whose sequence consists of four molecules to determine them and call them sequences. From a multitude of millions of such specific, very short sequences, virologists mentally assemble a fictitious long genome strand with the help of complex computational and statistical methods. This process is called alignment.
The result of this complex alignment, the fictitious and very long genetic strand, is presented by virologists as the core of a virus and they claim to have thus proven the existence of a virus. However, such a complete strand never appears in reality and in scientific literature as a whole, although the simplest standard techniques have long been available to determine the length and composition of nucleic acids simply and directly. By the fact of the alignment, instead of presenting a nucleic acid of the appropriate length directly, the virologists have disproved themselves.
In other words, all of the virologists and lab technicians all over the world who think that they are working with the complete genetic strand for SARS-CoV-2 have been fooled. No such thing exists. Instead, what they have is a computer construct of what such a genome might look like if the virus had ever been truly isolated. The level of corruption and incompetency here is simply astonishing. The field of virology is pseudoscience, even quackery.
This process called alignment also explains another phenomenon that is being mentioned often as we are told that “new strains” of a virus never proven to exist are even more infectious than the old (!). The word they give it is …
Imagine that virologists in laboratories all over the world are performing isolation that doesn’t isolate anything, and then alignment to elongate the genetic strand into a full, formal and fictitious complete virus genome. Each of them will randomly assign various computer data to the genome, and for that reason each genome will be different. To cover their backsides on this nonsense, they claim that viruses constantly mutate.
This means that the practice of vaccination cannot possibly be about viruses, but might have other objectives, like causing autism in kids to make them more functional as low-level workers. But it has nothing to do with a virus, as we now know that viruses do not exist. The current vaccinations for Covid-19 cannot be about a virus, and therefore must be something else. I have read speculation on what that something else might be, but it all sounds like fearmongering, so I will stop here.
Last February, when I first entertained the notion that germ theory was bogus, I had miles to go to obtain a complete (even if layman) understanding of the game. I believe now, thanks to Dr. Lanka, that I am there.
*Read here for a group of Argentine doctors, Physicians in the Crop-Sprayed Towns (PCST), who claim that “…pyriproxyfen—a larvicide added to drinking water to stop the development of mosquito larvae in drinking water tanks—has caused the birth defects,” the defect being microcephaly. This would trace back to Sumitomo Chemical, a Japanese subsidiary of Monsanto. So Zika, in essence, was invented to protect Monsanto from a massive lawsuit?
**I learned listening to a podcast with Dawn Lester and David Parker, authors of What Really Makes Us Ill, that Lanka does not want to be called a “virologist” anymore, as he thinks the field is bankrupt.