Discussion on my Chromosome 8 clarification post was very interesting and left me with a few big takeaways.
First, PCR might be a red herring in all of this. I pointed to the elevated seasonal coronavirus signal coming from the PCR tests, and this was mostly not discussed directly in comments. That is fair enough, but it is something that I hope everyone understands. Basically, it goes like this: In places where people are feeling unwell with cold-like illness, the PCR machines begin to detect an elevated percentage of positives.
You might think this is me taking a mainstream position. In fact, I know several of you are thinking that. However, this could not be further from the truth. I am simply saying that PCR truly does accurately detect an elevated population-wide signal in a population with colds.
This says nothing about whether that cold is deadly, or whether that cold is caused by a “novel virus”, whether SARS-CoV-2 is the cause of that cold, or whether we should all be locking ourselves away and wearing a mask as a result. It is simply detecting a particle that seems to be correlated to colds, although by no means exclusively. A correlation. Do not think I am saying anything beyond that.
The detection of an elevated PCR signal is stressed again here because when we theorize about underlying causes for all of this, we need to do so by addressing the available evidence head-on. To dodge widespread evidence is to create bad theory. Whatever you think about this whole situation, it is nearly irrefutable that the percentage of PCR positives moves in coordination with cold-like illness. Ignore or deny this at your own risk.
What does that leave us with? More questions than answers.
One question, still unanswered for me, is how those doing SARS-CoV-2 sequencing know that they are specifically sequencing SARS-CoV-2? That would be one for Mr. Tic, if he is still out there.
We must remember that the human virome is home to TRILLIONS of viruses. Estimates go as high as 380 trillion viruses, all living within you right now. Just like the trillions of symbiotic microbial cells living in our bodies, we are also home to an unfathomable number of viruses at all times. How could the scientists doing the sequencing possibly know that they are dealing with SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV-2 alone? I am still very fuzzy on that question. The viruses are too small to be seen, and too similar to all other viruses to be distinguished. Especially if you are claiming that this is a NEW, unknown virus.
The only way they could be so positive about its nature is if they created it, or have been familiar with it for quite some time.
Furthermore, it is known that the human body is home to harmful bacteria which does not inherently make you sick. This is important. It implies that there are unknown balances of health and bacteria at play. We should also consider that similar balances are at work with viruses. Harmful viruses are likely to exist within you right now, doing you no harm until your body reaches a certain favorable point where it activates.
This raises the key question: What if this cold that we are all suddenly feeling more heavily in the fall is simply a virus that was introduced into the human virome at any previous point?
My theory is that the propaganda target for all of this was the 2020 Presidental Election. The narrative had to be controlled. Propaganda had to be rampant. Fear had to be ubiquitous. The timing is simply too perfect.
The virus is but one item in the toolbox for this goal of controlling the narrative behind a major political and economic shift. To ensure that this specific virus would be rampant in the 2020 sickness season, it had to first be released in the 2019 sickness season. Think of last year like a practice run for them, and a way to make sure that they had effectively contaminated the entire human virome with this SARS-CoV-2 particle.
I have no specific theory on how this contamination occurred, apart from saying that there are about a million ways it could have happened. And it did not necessarily even need to happen during cold season. I posit that introducing SARS-CoV-2 into the human virome was all that they needed to do. There would have likely top level secret laboratory testing behind this, and it would have been understood that SARS-CoV-2 would crowd out the rest and rise to the top, like an invasive species plant.
So when were we contaminated? Throughout 2019 seems about right, and it is possible that there have been further contaminations afterwards simply to ensure adequate widespread contamination of the human virome.
Whether or not this virus is actually contagious is still an open question for me. The evolution of different strains of the virus do seem to indicate some kind of regional nature, but this could also simply be different world governments putting their own stamp on the virus. This could also be at least partially related to sequencing errors. The regional differences may also be small tweaks to better cater the virus to their own purposes.
It may also be that this virus is indeed contagious. If so, I would add serious weight to the contamination theory. If the virus is able to spread on its own, then it would not be difficult at all to contaminate the population, or even the whole world. Hit a few hot spots…airports, large gatherings, etc., and the rest would play out on its own. I am still uncertain about contagiousness and welcome evidence or counter-evidence on that front.
If we were all contaminated in 2019 or before, then SARS-CoV-2 may be present in nearly all human beings already. It is simply a matter of that human becoming prone to seasonal illness in order for that particular virus to become active within them. This theory of contamination would still explain the elevated seasonal PCR signal during cold season, yet still support this was all planned from the beginning.
If the virus is already present in all human beings, the masks sure are silly!
We do not need to aggressively attack PCR as though PCR not working is key to our case of fraudulence and criminal propaganda. I disagree that “the test is the virus”. People are getting a minor cold with some serious prevalence, and the machine is detecting a signal. This does not mean nearly as much as the propaganda wants you to think it means. My saying would be “fear is the virus”.
As I said, PCR may be a red herring. Yes, it is bad at giving individual diagnoses, but we have to keep in mind that this is not really the scientific use of rt-PCR. It is showing us a population-wide signal. You should be mad if your individual positive PCR result has kept you out of work. It may have been a false positive, and it may have been detecting a dormant particle that is already present in everybody.
SARS-CoV-2 might not even be the actual cause of the illness!
On wilder possibilities, it is also possible that SARS-CoV-2 only plays some kind of contributing role in normal seasonal cold, and that is what the PCR is detecting. Regular seasonal cold. There are myriad possibilities. This is why I strongly urge everyone to back away from all of this excessive certainty that I have been seeing around here. People who are positive that it is this, or that, or the other thing. Do not have such hubris as to be certain about what is happening here…
It is a complex global propaganda campaign surrounded with misinformation, obfuscation, and cutting edge science. If you think you understand exactly what is going on here, I suggest you tone down your self-confidence. Apart from being a key planner of all of this, you cannot possibly know exactly what is going on. I know I certainly don’t. You literally can’t know, by design.
What we really ought to do is pool resources, buy our own PCR machine, and start doing our own testing Tanzania-style. We should be able to find samples isolated by time and test them for SARS-CoV-2. It is critical that we determine whether the signal being detected by the PCR machine existed prior to 2019. This is absolutely inherently critical to our theorizing, and it is something that scientists should be able to verify. They are not going to do so, because this kind of test would not fit with their theories, but we must find this information.
If a sample totally isolated by time tests positive for SARS-CoV-2, then we know that this situation is totally fraudulent and that particle has always been with us. There are so many other tests that we could do if we simply had access to a PCR machine and a scientist to run tests.
I can dream…