Meet the Graphene Industry’s Superhero, Mr. G: Friend or Foe?

Is Mr. G a superhero or a villain — or both, or somewhere in between? If he is a friend, then to whom? If he is a foe, then what could be his goals?

This is not a survey, nor a yay or nay poll. If readers would like to offer a response or take a specific stance, please do your best to substantiate your insights with evidence (preferably primary sources, such as scientific literature, industry white papers, or news releases from academia).

Whimsical and esoteric comments pertinent to the linked video (less than three minutes long) are welcome too. However, please be respectful to both me and Mr. G.

For brief context, the video above was produced by the Graphene Flagship (credited at the end of the animated production) nearly ten years ago. For added context (and further potential analysis) please watch this 7-minute presentation (from 2018) on the purported wonders of graphene.

————

P.S. To provide even greater context . . . See Alison McDowell’s Twitter and Facebook accounts featuring updates on graphene-related information (#AllEyesOnGraphene), in addition to a sneak preview she graciously provided of her upcoming presentation in Utica, NY with Drs. Cowan and Kaufman. Also, review the following link that fellow POM writer, Steve K, embedded in a comment on July 6, 2021 on my previous post:

Who makes this (graphene oxide) stuff, anyway? https://www.ventureradar.com/keyword/Graphene%20producers Bigger than I imagined.

Addendum (July 31, 2021):

Following are four webinars that Alison McDowell presented in the past couple weeks (as a follow-up to her Utica, NY presentation – see above). I have linked to two of her slide decks for those who prefer a written format to long-form audio-visual.

Pt. 1 – New York Nano: Maple Nation Transmutes Neurotech Empire” {Correlated slide deck – encompassing Parts 1-3}

Pt. 2 – New York Nano: Maple Nation Transmutes Neurotech Empire” 

Alison Hawver McDowell Mitre Presentation (Part 3 of 3)

Impromptu: What To Know About Internet of Bio Nano Things w/ Alison McDowell” {Correlated slide deck

179 thoughts on “Meet the Graphene Industry’s Superhero, Mr. G: Friend or Foe?

    1. Here’s the “old Dugan.”

      “We got to do a lot of epic shit when I was at DARPA,” Dugan said onstage at D11. But the stuff she is working on at Motorola is pretty cool (and totally creepy!) too:

      An electronic tattoo that can be used to authenticate a user instead of some flimsy password. It’s made by a company called MC10 that Motorola is partnering with, and Dugan is wearing it on her own arm.
      Another option in a similar vein: Vitamin authentication. Dugan shows a pill that can be ingested and then battery-powered with stomach acid to produce an 18-bit internal signal. After that, the swallower’s whole body becomes a password. http://allthingsd.com/20130529/electronic-tattoos-and-passwords-you-can-swallow-googles-regina-dugan-is-a-badass/

      This IS the context.

      Like

      1. This is “esoteric” but not off topic, something I read about years ago: Motorola (MSI) is a publicly traded stock, yet perhaps 95% of that stock has never changed hands, belonging to one family (whose name I forget). The stock traded publicly is only like 5% of the company, and this is not at all unusual.

        Trust me, I could be full of shit. Memories are not trustworthy.

        Liked by 1 person

          1. “Blackrock and Vanguard are both Rockefeller companies.”
            Can you document this statement? Inquiring minds want to know…

            Like

            1. OM –

              On the influence of Vanguard, you may find this story intriguing (for lack of a better word). This gets into some esoteric and “woo-woo” weeds; so, this information may not be for everyone. Nevertheless . . . . . .

              If you can be patient with my preface, I think you will eventually see where I am headed with this obscure information, and how it directly relates to Vanguard.

              On the very day that the “coronavirus” was declared (by the WHO) to be a pandemic (https://www.democracynow.org/2020/3/12/headlines), I read an article about the coronavirus in the Allentown Morning Call
              (https://www.mcall.com/coronavirus/mc-nws-whitehall-coplay-closed-20200312-etywrpyauff3fjpwsewxgp5i7a-story.html), which featured a woman named Jenn Hunsicker (https://www.mylife.com/jennifer-hunsicker/e391971000078). She was simply someone being interviewed. It would appear to most that she was random, but I looked into her and the name, Hunsicker.

              Jenn Hunsicker’s father-in-law is named Douglas Hunsicker (https://www.legacy.com/obituaries/mcall/obituary.aspx?n=diane-hunsicker&pid=167013160&fhid=9574).

              Interestingly, there was a fictional Douglas Hunsiker (note one letter off, missing the “c”). You can read the fandom page about him: https://villains.fandom.com/wiki/Douglas_Hunsiker. He was directly responsible for spreading a global pandemic.

              Of related, but more esoteric note, I found much more on this Hunsicker family in Allentown, Pa. — with regard to their involvement in law enforcement, prison corrections, Rotary, Masons and Royal Arcanum. They are considered nobility in the area, and have a building named for them. (I don’t have this information handy, but I could find it if of interest, or you can search it yourself).

              So, this is where it gets a little more interesting . . .

              There is a man named Andrew Hunsicker — also of Pennsylvania, but I did not see any direct familial connection to Jenn and/or Douglas (the real-life Douglas, that is). You can read an article (from 2018) about him: https://www.mcall.com/entertainment/mc-ent-scary-movies-20180910-story.html. Here is the imdb profile of Andrew Hunsicker:
              https://www.imdb.com/name/nm2404639/. Of particular note, he starred as “Rufus” in a low-budget 2018 film, Epidemic. As is asserted in the article above, the movie, Epidemic, was shot “in the Philadelphia and Lehigh Valley regions and featured *Douglassville {my note: notice the name of the town}, Berks County, resident Andrew Hunsicker.”*

              Here is a trailer of the 2018 film, Epidemic, featuring Andrew Hunsicker as the star: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uDX7Fk-5ggU.

              But here is the clincher . . . Andrew Hunsicker (the very same guy who starred in Epidemic) has a regular day job that he has held for 34 years. https://www.linkedin.com/in/andrew-hunsicker-4b5b5211/. He works for Vanguard.

              Manager
              Company Name
              The Vanguard Group
              Dates Employed
              May 1987 – Present
              Employment Duration
              34 yrs 3 mos
              I manage the Six Sigma, Contingency and Data Security programs for a large financial department.

              Like

              1. OM –

                As if not already seeming occult-ish . . . the actor, David Hewlett – who I may have to circle back on given his notable bio (https://stargate.fandom.com/wiki/David_Hewlett) – who portrayed Douglas Hunsiker in Rise of The Planet of the Apes, also played Dr. Rodney McKay in the Stargate series(s) (https://stargate.fandom.com/wiki/Meredith_Rodney_McKay): “Dr. Meredith Rodney McKay, better known as Rodney McKay, due to his dislike of his real first name (he is called ‘Meredith’ or ‘Mer’ by his sister and briefly ‘Rod’ by Dr. Daniel Jackson), is a brilliant astrophysicist, and one of the leading experts on not only the Stargate and wormhole physics, but also Ancient and nanite technology in both the Milky Way and Pegasus galaxies.” Yes, please note NANITE TECHNOLOGY.

                I could head further into this rabbit hole (or rather, wormhole), but I sense I may be the only one who may be interested in this intersection of fiction and non-fiction, and where the lines between them can often be blurred, so to speak.

                Like

              2. Stephers

                Very nice work. You’ve exposed a perfect little bubble, like one grape on a cluster of characters spawned by (or connected to) the Vanguard tentacle of the whole big octopus. And as often seen, we get some actual movie “characters” as a bonus. Kudos to you and your digging.

                Like

    2. what is a superhero? It is he or she who appears when there is a problem?
      What is the problem that Graphene (Mr G.)will solve?
      A superhero who arrives on the scene when he is not necessary is a villain.
      But because there is an unquestioningly blind assumption that more progress in the sciences will save us, Mr. G will appear as a superhero, and like all superheros, he is both feared and loved.
      The writer who can poses the question in such a way gives themselves away:
      they hate what Mr G will be used for, but they cannot shake free of the unquestioning assumption that Mr. G is necessary and useful.

      Further proof in this undying unquestioned belief in “more science will save us” is that the author wants responses that “substantiate your insights with evidence “, primary sources, scientific literature, industry white papers and so on showing once again an absolutely implicit belief in academia and the scientific process.
      By definition, an “insight” pertains to an intuitive understanding, so how one can” substantiate insights with evidence” is not clear. Nor is such an inaccurate choice of words a mere nitpicking detail, since how one uses words reveals so clearly how one really thinks. Note then that if the response is not to be scientific it can be “whimsical or esoteric”
      Are these then our only choices? Scientific silly or so far out there that they cannot be understood?f?

      Like

      1. those who wish to respond to my post should be willing to substantiate their claim that science as it is practiced today and that the technological fruits of such science practiced today is necessary for life. Desirable perhaps, unavoidable perhaps, but are they necessary to continue living? You need not be respectful of me but i suggest that before you write you question, from as many angles as possible, your unstated assumptions.

        Like

  1. Even if substances are toxic they can have their place, eg, botox has medical application not just cosmetic. I cannot vouch that its medical application is really warranted or doesn’t risk bad side effects but from what I’ve heard it seems OK.

    I think so much of it comes down to context and motive. What context and motive could be worse then injecting people for whatever reason by the use of deception so even if you’re being injected with a substance that won’t hurt you physically, it’s still appalling.

    Wherever the motive and context are wrong, why would be surprised to see toxicity? No doubt graphene has its place, possibly even in our bodies in a particular form for a particular reason (although, of course, very possibly not) but a priori not in injections that have absolutely no good reason to be given to us.

    I wonder what problems it presents in the simple graphene form as opposed to oxide or other combination forms?

    Like

    1. Petra –

      With regard to botox – for both cosmetic and medical applications, I am not well-informed. However, I will make an effort to learn more, as I sense there may be various deceptive practices being implemented. My guess is that given the suggested impact of botox on the brain (https://www.neurolifecenter.com/2019/04/26/studies-show-botox-injections-impact-the-brain/), it may be involved in brain-machine interface projects (which could potentially be weaponized). It seems evidence of this is scanty, but it is something I have considered.

      Interestingly, though, there may actually be a curious intersection between botox and graphene, aside from the studies indicating that graphene-based biosensors can be used to detect botulinum: https://www.melbhattan.com/pdf/graphene-based-electrical-biosensors-for-the-detection-of-biomolecules/.

      Accordingly, a very small hint may be implied by the work of a biomedical engineer named Chuan Zhang: https://www.linkedin.com/in/zcfrostseer/. I am not sure if you have access to read his Linked in profile. Just in case you do not have access to it – for the past 6 years, Zhang has been involved in the use of therapeutic botox (for pelvic dysfunction). Prior to this work, his profile asserts that he: “Developed and validated the first motor unit number estimation technique for pelvic muscles, serving as an important biomarker for the diagnosis and monitoring of neurodegenerative diseases.” I find that quite interesting, in light of the research on botox and the brain (as indicated above).

      Further, Zhang’s profile outlines some projects in which he has been involved: “Improving the therapeutic effectiveness in treating post-stroke spasticity using functional muscle imaging; Electrophysiological Evaluation of Pelvic Neuromuscular Function in Animal Models; Electromechanical Modeling Approach In Assessing Female SUI; ECG signal compression for wearable devices; Biometric human identification using ECG signals”.

      Most interesting, though, is a 2014 research paper on graphene oxide that he co-authored: “Graphene oxide doped conducting polymer nanocomposite film for electrode-tissue interface” https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0142961213014245.

      With regard to your question {“I wonder what problems it presents in the simple graphene form as opposed to oxide or other combination forms?”}, studies seem to indicate that graphene in its simple (or “pristine”) form does operate differently than graphene oxide (GO), or reduced graphene oxide (a further oxidized form of GO). Following is a March 2021 study comparing the difference in cardiotoxicity between GO and reduced GO: “Graphene Oxide and Reduced Graphene Oxide Exhibit Cardiotoxicity Through the Regulation of Lipid Peroxidation, Oxidative Stress, and Mitochondrial Dysfunction” https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8012771/. The March 2021 paper also includes toxicity data on graphene in its non-oxidized form. Hope this is helpful.

      Like

      1. Here is information from a comment that I left today on a previous post to commenter, Diego (it may be of interest to readers here):

        From my informed perspective, the key agenda involving graphene and other engineered nanomaterials (mainly carbon-based) is reflected in my post from April 5, 2021: “Part 7: The Endgame ~ One Web to Rule Them All” https://pieceofmindful.com/2021/04/05/part-7-the-endgame-one-web-to-rule-them-all/. Additionally, following is a pertinent and comprehensive slide presentation (in which La Quinta Columna is credited) that will be delivered today by my dear friend, Alison McDowell https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1ZDinpMvQ_iEKYwX9XRLGSqYQ5SgWUKAS55wt5CRfMh4/edit#slide=id.ge38f5e4f7c_0_89. Lastly, this April 2021 article from the Max Planck Institute for Polymer Research (involving collaborative research from the Catalan Institute of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology (ICN2) and the Institute of Photonic Sciences (ICFO) in Spain) is incredibly revealing ~ “Graphene: Everything under control: Research team demonstrates control mechanism for quantum material” https://www.mpip-mainz.mpg.de/609979/PM2021-04. See this August 2020 article highlighting the same researcher from the Max Planck Institute (https://www.turchinovich-lab.de), as it serves as background context, and links the significance of magnetism: https://www.mpip-mainz.mpg.de/en/press/pr-2020-09. Please feel free to pass this crucial information along to Sevillano and Delgado. Thank you, Diego!

        Like

        1. Thanks so much for all the links, Stephers. I cannot believe how much research they do on putting stuff into our bodies. And testing all those poor animals to do it. Also, thanks for the info on how to find your articles. I actually clicked on your name before but it seemed to me all your articles didn’t show but I see now they do so I’m not sure why I didn’t see them before. Now that I can see them all I’ll approach Off-Guardian. And pls never feel an obligation to respond – you obviously have so much on your plate – no idea how you manage it all.

          Liked by 1 person

  2. It must all be misdirection. A Nobel prize for picking atoms off a piece of carbon with scotch tape? Surely Duct Tape is the wonder material already…

    Or is AGW and CO2 hatred misdirection, after all? The elites need to choose sides – are they going to hate Carbon or love it once and for all? Maybe they always really hated the Oxygen atoms anyway.

    Like

  3. Are these similar to the carbon nanotubes which they will be using to build an elevator to outer space??

    LOL

    If matter exists in this world, it has 3 Dimensions. And no, I’m not talking about a film projected on a movie screen…I’m talking matter.

    Like

    1. Building steps from 2D crystals would be just as feasible, and healthier. Besides, think of the awkwardness of standing there in the space elevator avoiding eye contact for so long.

      Like

    2. Here is “Captain Graphene”, Adrian Nixon (Editor of the Nixene Journal), at the American Graphene Summit in Washington DC (May 2019) talking about the ‘killer application’ for graphene (spoiler alert: it’s the “space elevator”):

      Like

  4. Let me try to be a bit more specific. https://wellcomeleap.org/MCPsych

    The “frame,” “narrative,” and marketing of all new products, projects and programs sounds wonderful. A prime example: 17 U.N. Sustainable Development Goals. https://www.researchgate.net/figure/The-17-UN-Sustainable-Development-Goals_fig3_318575309 Now, select #3.

    Regina Dugan is CEO of Wellcome Leap. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regina_E._Dugan

    The “looks great,” sounds great” frame and narrative is seductive. However, what if the actual intention, motivation and context are hidden from the human herd? What do the powers that should never be care about the human herd?

    Back to the top; imagine for one moment — extrapolate if you will — the Psych research model described in the first link being used for the well-known surveillance and control of the human herd worldwide by simply reverse-engineering the data points, analysis and outcomes. Now, the whole exercise has been weaponized by the very powers that can’t seem to resist weaponizing every new technology that comes along. Too dark? Well, that’s just how the cookie has been crumbling for most of my lifetime. How about you? Do you trust DARPA, Regina Dugan and/or Wellcome Leap with your health? No way of knowing, for sure, but the track record stands in evidence.

    Like

    1. Steve, regarding your first link:

      Depression, like all pain, exists for a reason. Pain teaches us to avoid situations or actions that could permanently damage or kill us. The burn we get from getting too close to fire or putting a hand on a hot stove conditions us against that behavior for the rest of our lives. Depression is a direct result of cutting ourselves off from our true natures. Isolation, meaningless and unchallenging work, sedentary lifestyles spent filling our heads with pop culture garbage, eating crappy non-nutritious foods—all the conditions of modern life we’re expected to accept, or simply resign ourselves to—lead directly, and quite understandably, to depression. Depression isn’t an enemy, it is a messenger, meant to prompt healthy changes in behavior.

      That’s one way of looking at it. Or, you can accept the utterly absurd underlying assumptions of the pharmaceutical industry and medical cartel. Pain—sickness—discomfort of any kind is a terrifying enemy, and we must cower under the protection of Science and Medicine in order to avoid it all costs.Once you do that, articles like the one you link to are all too happy to lead you down various complicated scientific and intellectual paths that will keep you diverted for hours, days, years, an entire lifetime, searching for ways to fight an enemy that—in a sane world—wouldn’t be an enemy at all.

      Liked by 1 person

      1. Agree in total. As I define it, depression is merely our brains saying to us “Please, make changes.” There’s nothing genetic about it, entirely circumstantial. Consult, of you will, Tokarski, Mark, first marriage, circa 1973.

        Like

      2. I am not making my thoughts clear. I am suggesting that the Wellcome Leap program/model being designed to treat depression can easily, with full intention from square #1, be reverse-engineered to CREATE depression, whereby CREATING a massive emerging market for “the cure,” which will make somebody $multi- billions. Imagine taking depression from 30% of the population to, let’s say 50%. Goldman Sachs is probably already “on it.”

        Like the swab/test/ventilator/mask/”vaccine” program created/engineered/marketed, etc., making somebody $multi-billions. This, IMO, is how “they” roll –repeatedly.

        Like

        1. Steve, guess I wasn’t making my thoughts clear. I didn’t think for one second that you were promoting the Wellcome Leap. I think it’s pretty well understood around here that the Medical Nazis always create bigger and more insidious problems than the ones they claim they’re trying to solve for us.

          Like

          1. When was last time a Dr. recommended an apple or celery juice in lieu of Taco Hell or Burger Ream??

            Like

  5. Hey all (Steve, Petra, Michael, and Rastus) – I am unavailable most of the day today, so I cannot reply thoughtfully and in detail. Please know I appreciate your insights and collaborative efforts, and I will reply later today or tomorrow. Thank you for understanding.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. That’s an impressive group of slides that Alison has prepared. One of them, #15, touched me in a special way.

      Two contrasting pictures paired. “Sacred Mutualism”, depicting a sense of community grown from rooting into earth, and being in balance with nature and others. That image competes with “Engineered Isolation”, a machine-led world in which identity is achieved through connection to devices and programs, and “trust” is virtual.

      Liked by 1 person

      1. Petra –

        FYI – I am doing my best to catch up on comments from the past two days. Thank you so much for your patience. As a full-time mom and homesteader, family life with my children and animals is my priority, and has been occupying my time. In that respect, I have a lot going on at the moment. Some days I have no online access, or minimal access. That said, I just want to tell you that if you go to the home page of POM – in the left column (at least in the layout on my laptop, and in the browser I use), it lists the POM contributors. Under “Stephers” you will see all of my posts (about 30 or so). There are only two pieces missing (from April 2020), as I was a guest contributor, and they appear under Mark’s name. Hope this helps . . . Thank you so much for your continued interest!

        Like

  6. https://particleandfibretoxicology.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12989-016-0168-y

    Some highlights from the above 2016 article:

    ‘GFNs entry paths,
    GFNs reach various locations through blood circulation or biological barriers after entering the body, which results in varying degrees of retention in different organs. Due to their nanosize, GFNs can reach deeper organs by passing through the normal physiological barriers, such as the blood-air barrier, blood-testis barrier, blood-brain barrier and blood-placental barrier.

    Blood-air barrier
    The lungs are a potential entrance for graphene nanoparticles into the human body through airway. The inhaled GO nanosheets can destroy the ultrastructure and biophysical properties of pulmonary surfactant (PS) film, which is the first line of host defense, and emerge their potential toxicity [54]. The agglomerated or dispersed particles deposit on the inner alveolar surface within the alveoli and then be engulfed by alveolar macrophages (AMs) [55]. Clearance in the lungs is facilitated by the mucociliary escalator, AMs, or epithelial layer [56–58]. However, some small, inhaled nanoparticles infiltrate the intact lung epithelial barrier and can then transiently enter the alveolar epithelium or the interstitium [59, 60]. Intratracheally instilled graphene can redistribute to the liver and spleen by passing through the air-blood barrier [61]. The study of blood-air barrier may draw an intensive attention, since the researchers and workers occupational exposure of GFNs usually through inhalation. To make clear how the blood-air barrier plays a role in the toxicity of GFNs may become a research hot topic.

    Blood-brain barrier
    The intricate arrangement of the blood-brain barrier, consisting of numbers of membrane receptors and highly selective carriers, only exerts subtle influence on blood circulation and the brain microenvironment compared to the peripheral vascular endothelium [62]. The research on the mechanism of blood-brain barrier had made some progress involved in diseases and nanotoxicity. Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization (MALDI) mass spectrometry imaging (MSI) revealed that rGO, with an average diameter of 342 ± 23.5 nm, permeated through the paracellular pathway into the inter-endothelial cleft in a time-dependent manner by decreasing the blood-brain barrier paracellular tightness [63]. In addition, graphene quantum dots (GQDs), with a small size of less than 100 nm, can cross through the blood-brain barrier [64]. Studies on how graphene materials pass through the blood-brain barrier and cause neurotoxicity are very rare, and more data are needed to draw a conclusion.

    Blood-testis barrier
    The blood-testis and blood-epididymis barriers are well known for being some of the tightest blood-tissue barriers in the mammalian body [65]. GO particles with diameters of 54.9 ± 23.1 nm had difficulty penetrating the blood-testis and blood-epididymis barriers after intra-abdominal injection, and the sperm quality of the mice was not obviously affected even at 300 mg/kg dosage [66].

    Blood-placenta barrier
    The placental barrier is indispensable in maintaining pregnancy, as it mediates the exchange of nutrients and metabolic waste products, exerts vital metabolic functions and secretes hormones [67]. A recent review suggested that the placenta does not provide a tight barrier against the transfer of nanoparticles to foetuses, specifically against the distribution of carbonaceous nanoparticles to and in the foetus [42]. It was suggested that rGO and gold particles (diameter of 13 nm) are barely present or are absent in the placenta and foetus in late gestation after intravenous injection [44, 68]. However, other reports showed that transplacental transfer does occur in late gestational stages [69, 70]. Much attention had been paid to the developmental toxicity of nanomaterials, and reports showed that many nanoparticles did cross the placental barrier and strongly influenced the development of embryos [71–75]. But studies of the exposure to graphene materials through the placenta barrier are deficient, and how these particles transfer to embryos should be evaluated in detail in the future.

    These four barriers were the most frequently mentioned barriers in the literature, and other barriers have not been evaluated in recent studies, such as skin barriers, which have not been mentioned in any of the hundreds of GFNs toxicity studies searched. Moreover, the mechanism by which GFNs pass through these barriers is not well understood, and more systematic investigations are urgently needed.

    https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/cr300115g

    Liked by 1 person

    1. The scotch tape and pencil story on the origins of Mr. G is comical to say the least. The scheming parasite always wallpapers an unbelievable origin story over its malevolent intent.

      Liked by 1 person

      1. I’m not sure the origin story is fake. Graphene really is only carbon and perhaps in its pure carbon form it’s not dangerous although I have no idea. It might only be when it’s mixed with other elements (GFNs) that it becomes dangerous or perhaps even in its pure carbon form it’s dangerous too simply because of the molecular configuration and nano particle size, I don’t know.

        Like

      2. Seeing the word “parasite” in your comment on tape triggered a random memory in my mind. Somewhere as a parent I read that a test for pinworms when suspected is to apply scotch tape to the perianal area.

        Like

  7. Greg,

    Its not just energy…but all things.

    Local minimart wanted $26 for a 12 pack of Stella beer!!!

    Inflation (ie destruction of one’s purchasing power using “dollar”) affects, or will affect, everything.

    It’s criminal for sure. If ” virus” doesn’t fsk you, there are other means!!

    Like

  8. I put this together for a few friends, sorry it isn’t meticulous research but perhaps it may be of value for someone:

    (see https://www.orwell.city/ Newest entry is “Dr. Luis Marcelo Martínez: ‘The Spike protein is nothing more than graphene inside your body and spiking you’” )

    But I have gotten diverted into searching out info about glutathione and NAC, because of this, a quote from
    https://www.orwell.city/2021/07/NAC-glutathione.html
    …”What we have discovered is that glutathione reduces and oxidizes, that is, eliminates the graphene oxide. That’s why we are convinced that precisely the graphene oxide was the cause of the COVID-19 disease that was introduced, silently and stealthily in the 2019 anti-flu campaign globally. And they caused, with the subsequent electromagnetic bidding that everyone knows —with the famous 5G switch-on, the tests— the fashionable disease.” …

    I am storing the below info for myself and thought others might find it useful, too.

    First off, they say that taking glutathione supplements directly is useless because the stomach acids destroy it. So N-Acetylcysteine (NAC) works better because it’s a precursor that your body turns into glutathione.

    Below is a collection of quotes and links about diet, dosage, and some previous findings as to effects:

    https://www.glutathionediseasecure.com/glutathione-diet.html
    Glutathione Diet
    The Foods That Will Boost Your Glutathione
    The glutathione diet includes the foods and supplements needed to boost your bodies glutathione levels. These essentially work as immune boosting foods.
    The list includes sulfur rich foods. This makes up the flypaper component of glutathione. Being sticky, it will attract and hold on to the toxins and heavy metals in our bodies. It also holds the two cysteine molecules together making them cysteine. This is the hardest to get of the three building blocks of glutathione.
    These sulfur containing foods also to some extent contain cysteine. To benefit, they need to be eaten raw. Cysteine is a very fragile molecule and it is easily destroyed when heated.
    Note: One of the best ways to start with the raw food diet involves getting the best blender on the planet. Click on the pick just to the right to learn more.
    Why Eat Raw Foods
    Raw foods have enzymes that aid in digestion. Heating foods can destroy these enzymes. This results in a need for the body to produce enzymes to digest the cooked foods. This leads to toxicity, over eating, and excess consumption. (research citation needed)
    Common sense tells us that it takes less energy to digest white bread than whole grain. We know that ounce for ounce, raw grain has more dietary benefit than when it is processed into bread. It also takes more body energy to digest the grain than the bread.
    The result is more food value and less caloric value. Less by virtue of the energy required to digest it.
    Some foods can be heated to temperatures less than 300 degrees and not lose nutritional value (citation needed).
    The benefits, clear skin, increased energy and minimizing common illnesses.
    The Negatives
    Eating raw foods may eliminate the chemicals used as preservatives and the risk of additives that could be harmful like MSG. This benefit is replaces with another risk. Many foods from other countries may use pesticides that would be outlawed in your county.
    Thus, in order to improve your health you are potentially increasing your exposure to harmful chemicals.
    Also, many of the foods we eat are depleted from the vary minerals that are essential to our heath. This could be from over farming the land.
    Now on to the glutathione boosting foods.
    Glutathione Diet Basics
    multi-vitamin
    Water Cures Protocol Pure water and the electrolytes found in unprocessed salt on their own can increase your glutathione dramatically. This costs almost nothing. More importantly, GSH is dependent on hydration. The better hydrated you are, the easier the time your body will have making glutathione.
    Next in importance are the sulfur containing foods.
    Sulfur Containing Foods
    • garlic
    • kale
    • onions
    • broccoli
    • kale
    • water cress
    • cabbage
    • asparagus
    • brussel sprouts
    Dairy Products
    • unpasteurized milk (should be hormone and antibiotic free)
    • ricotta cheese
    • cottage cheese
    • yogurt
    • eggs
    • milk (decreased in pasteurized milk)
    • whey protein (undenatured bio active)
    Grains
    • wheat germ
    • granola
    • oats
    • oat flakes
    Meats
    • pork
    • sausage meat
    • chicken
    • turkey
    • duck
    Note: the heat used to prepare any of the above foods is usually sufficient to destroy the cysteine. Therefor, the benefits would be minimal.
    Fruits
    • Watermelon
    Foods / Supplements with Cysteine to Boost Glutathione
    • Raw Eggs (cooking and high speed blending can destroy the cysteine)
    • Fish Oil
    • Alpha lipolic acid
    • b12, folate, b6, critical for producing glutathione and great for helping manage stress. They also work as a mild diuretic.
    • Selenium We need two hundred mcg a day. Get from 2 Brazil Nuts
    Take to much and you can get sick. Best source, two Brazil Nuts a day. One theory is that for men, if you eat two Brazil Nuts a day you will die of something other than Prostate Cancer. A two nut maintenance diet is a whole lot more fun to take than a pill in the morning.
    • milk thistle There are a number of studies that show the benefit.
    • Exercise…regular start slowly and build up to thirty minutes a day.
    The Glutathione Diet will continue to grow as we do further research. Keep coming back.

    ———
    https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2017/12/18/n-acetylcysteine-supplement-benefits.aspx

    General Dosing and Safety Guidelines
    NAC is widely available as an oral dietary supplement and is relatively inexpensive. Unfortunately, it’s rather poorly absorbed when taken orally. According to some studies,26,27 oral bioavailability may range between 4 and 10 percent. Its half-life is also in the neighborhood of two hours, which is why most study subjects take it two or three times a day.
    Due to its poor bioavailability, the recommended dosage can go as high as 1,800 mg per day. No maximum safe dose has yet been determined, but as a general rule, it’s well-tolerated, although some do experience gastrointestinal side effects such as nausea, diarrhea or constipation. Should this occur, reduce your dosage. It’s also best taken in combination with food, to reduce the likelihood of gastrointestinal effects.
    Also keep in mind that since NAC boosts glutathione, which is a powerful detox agent, you may experience debilitating detox symptoms if you start with too high a dose. To avoid this, start low, with say 400 to 600 mg once a day, and work your way up. Also, if you are currently taking an antidepressant or undergoing cancer treatment, be sure to discuss the use of NAC with your physician, as it may interact with some antidepressants and chemotherapy.
    ————————
    http://www.superfoods-scientific-research.com/natural-remedies/n-acetylcysteine-benefits.html

    N-Acetylcysteine Benefits and Side Effects
    16 November 2012 By superfoods Leave a Comment
    The N-Acetylcysteine (NAC) molecule is a derivative of the sulfur-containing amino acid cysteine. It is a stable form of cysteine that works as an antioxidant that supports the immune system of the body that fights off toxins. Within the body, N-Acetylcysteine is converted to intracellular glutathione, the body’s premier antioxidant. Studies have demonstrated the NAC has a important role to play in the management of cancer, HIV, heart disease, heavy metal toxicity, and other diseases characterised by free radical, oxidant damage.
    N-Acetylcysteine Benefits
    N-Acetylcysteine (NAC) has been used successfully to treat glutathione deficiency in a wide range of infections, genetic defects and metabolic disorders, including HIV infection and COPD. Several studies have shown that NAC can help protect the lungs from carcinogens found in tobacco smoke, maintain the liver against the toxic effects of alcohol, and reduce toxic side effects of some medicines used to treat cancer. To treat drug-induced liver toxicity NAC is an effective therapy for acetaminophen poisoning.
    Glutathione
    Along with glycine and glutamic acid N-Acetylcysteine is a precursor to glutathione, which is the body’s most important cellular antioxidant. Glutathione is important antioxidant produced by the body to help protect against free radical damage, and is a critical factor in supporting a healthy immune system. The liver produces glutathione, an antioxidant, and also other enzymes that shield the body from disease causing toxins and other harmful foreign body that enters the body. NAC helps the liver produce the antioxidant glutathione, and it also produces enzymes that protect the body from disease. When taken internally, N-Acetylcysteine replenishes intracellular levels of the natural antioxidant glutathione, helping to restore cells’ capability to fight damage from reactive oxygen species. Without glutathione, your body’s immune system would be greatly compromised, and left with little defense against toxins and disease.
    Chronic Bronchitis
    Was first developed as a therapeutic for its ability to break up mucus in the lungs in conditions like bronchitis. A meta-analysis was performed on eight randomized controlled trials that have studied N-Acetylcysteine for preventing exacerbations of chronic bronchitis. Doses from 400 to 1200 mg/day were very effective in reducing the risk of bronchitis exacerbations. The mucolytic properties of NAC are due to its capability to liquefy disulfide bonds. By breaking up di-sulfur bonds, N-acetylcysteine shortens the chain-length of mucus proteins, thus thinning the mucus.
    Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)
    N-Acetylcysteine reduces the frequency and duration of attacks of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and may slow the clinical course of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. According to a study reported in the June 2006 edition of the International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, a 600 mg daily dose of N-Acetylcysteine can be effective in the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). In a 2010 study published in the European Respiratory Review, NAC was shown to be influential at reducing symptoms of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in patients not using inhaled medications.
    Liver
    N-Acetylcysteine is used as an antidote for liver toxicity caused by acetaminophen poisoning, which can be life-threatening. Also, shown to be helpful at treating liver failure from other causes. Paracetamol poisoning is induced primarily by depletion of glutathione stores in the liver. Oral n-acetylcysteine is transported to the liver where it counteracts the drop in glutathione levels caused by paracetamol administration. May also play a role in protecting the liver from heavy metal poisoning by copper, mercury, lead, and arsenic.
    HIV/AIDS
    Treating HIV patients for 8 weeks with NAC replenishes glutathione, making it a beneficial complementary treatment to boost the immune system, protect against oxidative stress and increase detoxification of medications. “The University of Hawaii” indicates N-Acetylcysteine as part of an antioxidant regimen, is a supplement used by patients afflicted with HIV/AIDS.
    Anticarcinogenic
    Animal-based studies suggests that NAC has anticarcinogenic and antimetastatic effects. Colon cancer, which has been associated with the growth of abnormal polyps cells, can be prevented with N-Acetylcysteine which discourages the growth of this anomalous tissue. A study reported in February 2002 in Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers and Prevention indicates that taking NAC when you smoke may help inhibit cancer biomarker development.
    N-Acetylcysteine Food Sources
    N-Acetylcysteine is not found naturally in nutrient sources; but cysteine is present in most high protein foods. (N-Acetylcysteine converts into cysteine.) Pork, chicken, sausage, turkey, fish, yogurt, cottage cheese, ricotta cheese contain cysteine. Oat flakes, broccoli, red pepper, soy beans, bananas, garlic, and onion are significant sources of cysteine.
    NAC Dosage
    Typical dosages range of 250-1500 mg a day. NAC can be taken orally in tablet form, or it can be administered intravenously. When taking NAC it is recommended that 2 to 3 times as much vitamin C be taken at the same time.
    N-Acetylcysteine Side Effects

    Overall, N-Acetylcysteine is well tolerated. high doses can cause gastrointestinal disturbances, nausea and vomiting. Although uncommon, important NAC side effects include anaphylaxis, asthma, and hypotension. When taken over a long period, N-Acetylcysteine mineral depletion may call for copper and zinc supplementation in the diet. Remember to talk with your doctor before starting a new supplement.

    Like

    1. I think this graphene oxide story released is a huge misdirection into the arms of weird supplements of big pharma. Everyone knows now so in the next few months you’ll start seeing a limited supply of glutathione or NAC precursor supplements. And possibly a giant recall only to be replaced with new proprietary blends.

      What do you guys think about this?

      Like

      1. NAC was removed from Amazon around a month ago. I was still able to get it at the local natural food store. A study quoted by Mercola (in an article announcing the Amazon ban) indicated it was beneficial against covid, which if that is actually graphene exposure symptoms, does hint that it is useful for that also.

        Like

        1. I’ll definitely be getting a bottle soon just in case.

          This graphene oxide thing sounds like a hoax within a hoax. I suspect a THIRD of the vials have high dosages and the rest either saline or a low dosage solution. Everyone on Facebook and Reddit are going nuts so I suspect it’s more fearmongering.

          I’ve known so many people that got the jab with zero reactions or side effects and others go ballistic. Could be different vial contents across manufacturers or could be immune system dependent.

          Like

      2. Miffyx –

        I left a long reply to your comment, but WordPress is not accepting it, and it is now lost. I will attempt to reply again when I have time. This is a test to see if this neutral reply is permitted.

        Like

        1. Miffyx –

          Since it seems WordPress accepted my “test” comment . . . I will continue briefly for now. Can you offer any evidence to support your opinion? To clarify . . . Do you think the misdirection is solely for the purpose of financial profit for big pharma? Or do you opine that newer supplements (i.e., NAC) brought to market will be more toxic with undeclared ingredients?

          Like

          1. Both. For profit and to sell NAC themselves. I could be wrong though.

            I’m mostly basing this on the whole hydrochloroquine and ivermectin debacle which was clearly a scam to begin with. I remember Patrick Jordan talking about some of the vials could contain a chimeric organic that could basically feed off the effects of this medicine.

            However I don’t know enough about NAC / glutathione to make any other conclusions.

            Like

            1. Miffyx –

              I can see how you may compare the two instances; however, HCQ and Ivermectin are allopathic pharmaceuticals, whereas NAC is a non-patentable natural supplement (already produced in the body as an amino acid). While the natural supplement industry is booming, and may frequently be “tainted” by deceptive practices on many levels, I make a clear distinction between the two industries. From my perspective, financial profit is a very low priority for industry in the gigantic scheme of things – although it may not appear as so on the surface. I think we need to dig deeper than profit motives.

              I think the most important thing to keep an eye on is who is not reporting on the graphene oxide information. This should be highly telling. I have previously referenced individuals whom I suspect are controlled opposition; and thus far, they are completely avoiding this topic. There is one healer, though, in particular, who is superficially covering it; yet, sadly, is offering another carbon nanomaterial as part of a “detox protocol.” I truly hope others can see the potential harm in this.

              Like

    2. Sarkzi –

      Thank you very much for this input. While I believe it is very safe to consume glutathione through food sources (asparagus being my personal favorite!); according to my preliminary research, I do not concur with the assertion being made by the Spanish researchers from Orwell City: ”What we have discovered is that glutathione reduces and oxidizes, that is, eliminates the graphene oxide.”

      From my lay understanding, when studies indicate that glutathione/glutathione precursors (such as NAC) reduce and oxidize GO, researchers mean it synthesizes another form/derivative called reduced GO. Reduced GO (rGO) is manufactured and utilized in various applications, including in the biomedical domain. It has been demonstrated in some studies that rGO is cardiotoxic (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8012771/), although toxicity studies on both GO and rGO in the human body are scarce.

      I believe the Spanish researchers are very well-intended, but this is new territory for them, and for most of us (including myself), and we need to be more informed. Sadly, we are left on our own, with very little guidance. I am doing my best, as a holistic healing practitioner, to do my due diligence; and therefore, at this time, I am NOT recommending NAC for un-jabbed individuals. I have experimented on myself (unjabbed, yet experiencing some mild COVID-like symptoms since a hospitalization for acute symptoms in February 2020) for the past week; and if anything, it has surfaced some negative effects. This is my own opinion, for what it’s worth. I have chosen to discontinue its use. I also experimented with glycine, and also felt unwell (experienced an increase in symptoms that had been mild, yet intensified). For the record, I have been taking what I believe are the “cleanest” sources of NAC and glycine. That said, I am not a scientist, and this is purely anecdotal, with very little “controls” being done.

      For jabbed individuals – who may be experiencing serious symptoms – I suggest NAC (for temporary use only) may be helpful in “reducing” the GO, in that it seems possible from studies that reduced GO may result in increased biocompatibility (therefore, less adverse effects). However, this does NOT necessarily mean that NAC will degrade or eliminate GO. I have seen NO evidence to affirm this statement, but I do leave room for the possibility; and perhaps someone can provide reference to some scientific studies on this.

      Like

  9. The “7-minute presentation” (https://www.youtube.com/watch?app=desktop&v=IesIsKMjB4Y) referenced by Steph is good graphene hype. After discussing its potential use in spaceships, we’re told (minute 5:20) of graphene ink, which can be printed on extremely flexible materials for use in wearable sensors, those necessary things which we all should have on our bodies (sarcasm), interacting with the already injected graphene, so we can be monitored for “health” (and other) reasons. Yeah!

    Like

    1. Like most humans, I think about humans, forgetting the obsession by many “scientists” with robotics with human-like qualities. What if “our bodies” are not the only targeted application? The flexible, wearable properties of graphene-based electro-magnetic applications seem perfect for those uninterested in merging humans and machines — preferring a radical leap directly into robotics, which leaves nature and humans as just more obsolete, broken “things” to discard and haul away the local landfill. https://phys.org/news/2015-06-breakthrough-graphene-production-trigger-revolution.html

      How about a little “energy harvesting” to move the program forward? Anyone? https://www.electronicdesign.com/power-management/whitepaper/21156426/electronic-design-graphene-another-option-for-energy-harvesting

      Like

  10. Did you know that, in 2013, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation funded research on graphene-doped condoms? (https://www.extremetech.com/extreme/171417-bill-gates-funds-creation-of-thin-light-impenetrable-graphene-condoms) Do you want Mr. G joining you while engaged in intimate encounters?

    I hope you will take the time to read the 2013 article linked above, and consider the far-reaching implications, particularly in light of jabbed individuals, and anyone who may be “spiked” with graphene (even placing its potential presence in COVID injections aside).

    I highly encourage readers to view (in its entirety) the linked TEDx talk (https://horizon-magazine.eu/article/kitchen-blender-graphene-could-enable-printable-circuits-and-sensors-prof-jonathan-coleman) by Jonathan Coleman (https://ec.europa.eu/programmes/horizon2020/en/news/building-graphene-based-future-europe), leading nanoscientist and professor from Trinity’s School of Physics (https://www.tcd.ie/Physics/). At the end of the 2014 presentation (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SZfBIQIKz9Q), Coleman (https://phys.org/news/2021-05-graphite-based-sensor-technology-wearable-medical.html) referenced the Gates-funded graphenated condoms, which provoked lots of laughter from his audience.

    Do NOT try the experiment demonstrated in Coleman’s TEDx talk! However, when watching, please consider the dual-use applications of nano-enabled products, and how ubiquitous graphenation may be an incredibly dangerous venture. At the very least, it seems the consequences of such experimentation is highly uncertain.

    I suggest the graphene agenda extends far beyond (see here https://pieceofmindful.com/2021/04/05/part-7-the-endgame-one-web-to-rule-them-all/) COVID injections (regardless of the proven presence of graphene oxide within them). Even if evidence were to point that graphene oxide is not an undeclared ingredient (intentional or accidental) in any purported vaccine — given the openly declared and intentional rapid and expansive emergence of graphene applications in nearly all industrial sectors (including biotech/medicine) — addressing the potential harms and questionable intentions is undoubtedly a pertinent and necessary conversation. Finally, I think the evidence shows (as told straight from the horses’ mouths), Mr. G is not going away anytime soon, and may even be in your bedroom, if you know what I mean.

    Like

  11. I apologize for the “messy” links in my comment above. WordPress is being highly twitchy with me and seems to be blocking some of my comments, and I am currently unable to “clean up” these comments directly in WordPress.

    Like

  12. Wow, and double wow to the Survey Report-out that Petra attached yesterday! I really cannot wait to see what Stephers et al. of our knowledgeable POM’rs have to say on that one…

    PS: To add to the group, thanks so much for all of the effort and subsequent knowledge you pass on to us Stephers! Frankly, and sorry Mark ;] love ya but, I think you have quietly become the cornerstone of this little corner of the internet.

    ~Brandon

    Like

  13. Finally . . . Nice to see Jon Rappoport echoing my stance – even if not proven to be in the injections, this graphene is becoming omnipresent: “Graphene face masks dangerous; and we’re living in a graphene world” https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2021/07/12/graphene-face-masks-dangerous-and-were-living-in-a-graphene-world/. Please pay special attention to the press release (noted by Rappoport) by Innervia, a subsidiary of INBRAIN Neuroelectronics (can view here https://www.inbrain-neuroelectronics.com/innervia.html). I highlighted INBRAIN in the “Speculative Footnotes” (#2) in “Free Wally: Tracing the Spike Protein Drama to a Llama”: https://pieceofmindful.com/2021/06/12/free-wally-tracing-the-spike-protein-drama-to-a-llama/.

    Like

  14. Rappoport’s caution is not altogether unwarranted. Facebook is blocking the report about Spain’s doctors who reported graphene oxide in the jab. Apparently, it violates “the code of principles of the International Fact-Checking Network at Poynter.” Of course, Poynter is busy keeping the “official narrative” about COVID from going off the rails. https://www.poynter.org/coronavirusfactsalliance/
    Check out their “partners” (scroll down).

    Censorship of the graphene oxide connection is curious to me, since, as Rappoport points out, this is not so hidden that vaccine makers won’t be found out. Maybe that’s just what’s supposed to happen, who knows?

    Back to Merck and its poodles. It’s all about NEW BUSINESSES!
    “It strives to unlock the untapped potential of Merck by leveraging assets and competencies across sectors, generating projects around these assets, and ultimately incubating these ideas into viable new businesses. With Bioelectronics as the latest addition, the Merck Innovation Center now pursues projects in two innovation fields. In the Cultured Meat innovation field – also referred to as cultivated or clean meat – Merck focuses on the biotechnology required to produce genuine meat and seafood grown in vitro and aims to become the technology enabler for this emerging industry. Other projects in the Innovation Center include OneZeroMed a 3D printing (laser sintering) solution that will simplify tablet production tremendously, leading to significant cost and time savings during clinical development.” Pulled from Stepers’ comment/link. https://www.inbrain-neuroelectronics.com/innervia.html

    “Clean meat,” indeed, grown in a stainless steel vat (in vetro) full of microbes — GMO microbes, no doubt.

    Liked by 1 person

  15. The “Poynter” link is awesome, and points the finger the right direction, ie back at them. Near the bottom of the page we learn that this group of “99” fact-checkers was assembled between Jan 2020 and April 2020, a nice fulfillment of Event 201 (Oct 2019) planning re “flooding the zone” with the “correct” message. Event 201 emphasized the need to control the internet narrative.

    Nice to see that we are able to donate to Poynter to help the cause.

    Like

  16. FYI,

    Drs. Cowan and Kaufman will be presenting on graphene this Saturday, July 17, 2021: https://covid-19-myths.com/?utm_source=Covid-19%20Myths%20Newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Fighting%20back%20for%20Truth%20and%20Freedom%21%20%28V2zXsq%29&_kx=mE18iPquC4VVUXA8VZDHxsOO8xivL18j7n_P8N2XtVNWbdlQ880y_Ck_PVv_fFyI.UpXyYd. If you are interested in this topic and plan to attend their webinar, I highly recommend viewing this detailed, comprehensive, and well-informed presentation beforehand: “From Graphene, Nano, Morgellons to Bionic Man” https://www.babylondecoded.com/en/video/490/From-Graphene%2C-Nano%2C-Morgellons-to-Bionic-Man. Consider watching this erudite presentation in the next day or two as a “pre-game,” if you will. Even if you are not planning to register for the Cowan/Kaufman webinar, the Babylon Decoded video will give you plenty of context (sans fear porn) with which to grasp the graphenation/transhumanism agenda. Critical resources and links are provided for further exploration.

    For additional context and potential “pre-gaming,” please read my April 2021 post, “Confessions of an Engineered Nanoparticle” (https://pieceofmindful.com/2021/04/23/confessions-of-an-engineered-nanoparticle/) – including the References and lengthy comments thread (that has been continually updated over the past few months with graphene-nanomaterial information) – and my June 2021 post, “Free Wally: Tracing the Spike Protein Drama to a Llama” (https://pieceofmindful.com/2021/06/12/free-wally-tracing-the-spike-protein-drama-to-a-llama/).

    Like

  17. One more crucial video to watch . . . Here is Delgado (of La Quinta Columna) being interviewed today (July 16, 2021) by Canadian economist and author Michel Chossudovsky, (Founder and Director of the Centre for Research on Globalization (CRG), Montreal): https://odysee.com/@laquintacolumna:8/INTERVIEWWITHTHEFIFTHCOLUMNFORMichelChossudovsky:1. In my opinion – and to echo my research and writing in this regard – Delgado did a wonderful job highlighting the main takeaways of their team’s research, including his final remarks on graphene oxide being applied to neuronal control. I was happy to see Chossudovsky giving Delgado the space to express openly; and perhaps this messaging will begin to spread to places that will inspire real change, and enable healing moving forward . . . I strongly urge viewing this 24-minute discussion, as they also both concur on the notion that no virus was ever properly purified and isolated; and thus, a virus could not have been the cause of COVID.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Agreed. This was one of the best videos on this subject, Delgado spoke clearly and tied it all together, and Chussodovsky was excellent on the other side. Why graphene oxide? Watch the video.

      Liked by 1 person

  18. At least when we killed for God music was permitted
    True outside in the forests and fields knight and monks hacked and diced
    each other to pieces
    but inside the cathedrals and temples there was sanctuary and music so beautiful that it could send you off of this earth.
    nuns chanted psalms, monks the sutras, and Muslims the Quran.

    Later when the blood and bones and flesh had enriched the soil
    poets rose up to sing of the savagery that man is inspired to
    as if it were a noble and holy thing.
    perhaps much, if not most of the greatest poetry written is about fighting and killing
    certainly horses, once harnessed, were quickly used for killing
    steam power, once invented, stormed indigenous holdouts and instantly was used for killing
    electricity, two years after being harnessed was used for killing
    flight, mans ancient dream finally fulfilled, instantly used for killing

    but wait. be patient. The best is yet to come
    Ask the monkeys and rats about medicine…and killing
    chemistry though will be our crowning achievement:
    perhaps a mere cannister, not unlike a cockroach spray bottle
    will be able to put 10 million in the correct uh…mood…for killing
    patience. it is all being hammered out as we speak.
    And your continued cooperation and support is deeply appreciated.
    And who knows, we might be allowed to sing again one day

    Like

  19. Graphene sensor arrays are ideally suited for neuroscience and biomedical engineering applications, as they can wirelessly and “chronically map wide frequency band epicortical brain dynamics in freely behaving animals”: “Graphene active sensor arrays for long-term and wireless mapping of wide frequency band epicortical brain activity” https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-020-20546-w. See an analysis (by Tom Foley, the Graphene Flagship) of the technology here: https://graphene-flagship.eu/graphene/news/graphene-sensors-read-low-frequency-neural-waves-associated-with-distinct-brain-states/.

    Like

  20. And you do not realize how you have just put your foot in your mouth?
    And have shown at what intellectual level you are operating on ?
    Let me decide whether i should now laugh or vomit….i will get back to you on that

    Like

    1. Dear Gadfly,

      Do you not realize that your foot has been in your mouth for the entirety of your visits to this blog?…with a couple of exceptions, how did you manage to curb your enthusiasm for ridiculing others during those exceptions, I wonder…

      But at least your commenting here does inspire wonder.

      Like

      1. OM,
        A good gadfly punctures arguments and underlying assumptions in a precise way that stings and makes you want to swat ’em away. Our resident gadfly seems to be distracted from this job by, I don’t know, a deep-seated psychological something-or-other when it comes to Stephers. He seems to think that by throwing out vague allusions to intellectual concepts and philosophers (which he assumes she’s too ignorant to know about and/or grasp as well as he does), she will not only come to realize she’s wrong about all this stuff he has no interest in looking into for himself, but that she’s wrong to suppose she possesses any intelligence at all. He’s a gadfly who keeps missing his target and swatting himself. Personally, I think it’s fun to watch.

        Liked by 1 person

  21. For those who may question the intention (of course, there are multiple and interconnected agendas) of COVID and the COVID injections, Alison McDowell “tweeted” today one sentence that distills my arguments (reflected in various posts of mine) into one coherent assertion: “All a grand experiment to tweak graphene dosing towards biocompatibility for the internet of bodies as they push us down the transhumanist road.”

    Accordingly, I have been meaning to complete my current series on bio-digital convergence and transhumanism, but life continues to get in the way. Ultimately, I aim to cinch together all the pieces that further support the notion asserted by Alison. Given the large number of likes and retweets, though, it seems many people already grasp the graphenation/transhumanism agenda and concur.

    To re-iterate, despite the increasing number of deaths reported from injections, I still maintain that these injections (potentially graphenated, but at the very least, laden with nanoparticles) are meant to accomplish meticulous bio-surveillance strategies, as well as full-spectrum (remote) control of the living body (from the nano to the macro), and are not intended to kill people en masse.

    Like

    1. Stephers,
      Just wanted to leave a note of gratitude and encouragement for your research, vigilance and heart. You and Alison are right on target with your revelation of this attack on manKIND.
      db

      Like

  22. For those interested . . . read here on James Corbett’s take on what is coming next (hint: it has to do with the climate change bogeyman and the Green New Deal) on the heels of COVID: https://www.minds.com/CorbettReport/blog/the-scamdemic-was-so-last-year-here-s-what-s-coming-next-1261152339732381696. I notice he left a key component (and potential link between COVID and purported climate change “mitigation”) out of his analysis. Any idea of what (or who?) the missing piece could be? Could it be Mr. G?

    Can you guess what is paving the road (literally and figuratively) to the “Green New Deal” and its lusted net zero production and consumption? Maybe graphene? If readers have time, please watch the closing keynote (“The Road to the Green New Deal in the age of Manufacturing 4.0”) by Giulio Cesareo (CEO of Italian company, Directa Plus) at the World Manufacturing Forum 2020: https://www.directa-plus.com. Cesareo’s company, Directa Plus, is “one of the largest producers and suppliers of graphene nanoplatelets-based products for use in consumer and industrial markets” (source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pg9eQCGe-qQ, and to view for further context). Also, take note of the “key people” at Directa Plus, including their additional involvements: https://www.directa-plus.com/key-people-1.

    Like

    1. And, great news, carbon-based waste plastic can be turned into graphene, and graphene itself can be a key ingredient in making plastics. A perfect circle of consumption and recycling…how green can you get?
      https://massivesci.com/articles/plastic-recycling-graphene-flash-joule-heating/

      More good news. “Shrinking the size of a graphene pore to less than one nanometer… opens the possibility of using graphene as a low-cost tool to sequence DNA.” And even better news, ““If we could sequence DNA cheaply, the possibilities for disease prevention, diagnosis and treatment would be limitless,” Kim said. “Controlling graphene puts us one step closer to making this happen.”
      https://news.utdallas.edu/science-technology/research-shows-graphene-nanopores-can-be-controlle/

      Good things are coming out of Texas these days. Rice U and Texas U keep leading the way to a graphene future. Or should I say, a present reality?

      Liked by 1 person

  23. Watch this video (less than 4 minutes), “Printing with Graphene to Create Electronics: (from 2017): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7AZf-yYb79o. The following 2017 paper (abstract only) is referenced at the end of the video (produced by the University of Manchester): “Water-based and Biocompatible 2D Crystal Inks: from Ink Formulation to All- Inkjet Printed Heterostructures” (https://arxiv.org/abs/1705.00936). From the abstract: “In this work we show a general formulation engineering approach to achieve highly concentrated, and inkjet printable water-based 2D crystal formulations, which also provides optimal film formation for multi-stack fabrication. We show examples of all-inkjet printed heterostructures, such as large area arrays of photosensors on plastic and paper and programmable logic memory devices, fully exploiting the design flexibility of inkjet printing. Finally, dose-escalation cytotoxicity assays in vitro also confirm the inks biocompatible character, revealing the possibility of extending use of such 2D crystal formulations to drug delivery and biomedical applications.” (Note the absence of in vivo cytotoxicity studies.)

    Like

  24. Has anyone seen this yet – graphene-enabled sanitary napkins: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o5qMsif06C4? See the owner (Demond Crump) of the company here demonstrating his product for women: “Demo of Graphene Technology inside of Reign (Jewel) Sanitary Napkins | What is Graphene | Jewel Pads” (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kQAcElVc-x4I). See here for background info on Demond Crump: https://www.businessforhome.org/2015/09/demond-qiana-crump-earn-50000-in-1st-month-at-youlab-global/. I can’t help but wonder if Demond Crump is any relation to attorney, Benjamin Crump (https://oneworldinformation.com/benjamin-crump)? If so, that would be an interesting connection.

    Like

  25. That “fast forwarded” emergency vaccine needed for the raging pandemic was actually patented in 1999. Granted for veterinary use but all vaccines are tested that way before use in humans. There is a long list of patents via the US Patent Office on sars-covid BS. The link below explains. At the bottom of the article there is a link to an overview of the charges being brought. In the early comments there is also a PDF in page by page written form. This had been in the planning stages since the last century and there is now reason to believe the CONvid manipulation was moved up five to ten years.

    https://www.sott.net/article/455466-The-Racketeering-And-Corruption-That-Led-to-Man-made-Covid-Virus-Being-Unleashed

    Like

  26. “How can an artificial material [graphene] instruct neurons and influence their behavior?” See the work of Laura Ballerini: http://phdneurobiology.sissa.it/eng/faculty/laura-ballerini.aspx “. . . graphene research has already emerged as the top research front in materials science. However, due to the unique structure of graphene, many of the possibilities it offers are still poorly understood. We will investigate the biological processes influenced by nanomaterials and nanomaterials interaction with biological membranes. Single and multiple electrophysiological measures will be used in the case of neurons and cardiomyocytes to assess the electrophysiological effects of conductive nanomaterials on electrically propagating complex tissues.”

    Like

  27. “The Future of Graphene and 5G”(https://grolltex.com/the-future-of-graphene-and-5g/):

    “Grolltex Manager, April 2nd, 2018”

    “At the February Mobile World Congress, held in Barcelona, Spain, the close connection between graphene and 5G technology was one of the main sources of attraction. Both have been featured prominently in the news recently as new-age wonders, so it’s only natural that the two would at some point combine forces to produce some truly remarkable capabilities. That time appears to be in the very near future, as considerable research has been underway on ways that the two could support each other for mutual benefit.”

    “Monolayer graphene has only been commercially available for about the last decade, but it has already made a powerful impact in the areas of high-speed photosensitivity, farming applications, flexible photodetectors, medical diagnostics, and water purification processes. 5G of course, has been hailed as the future of communications for several years, and is considered to be the enabling technology for both VR and AR. Some of the ongoing research has been related to finding ways that super-conductive, flexible monolayer graphene could be used to support the needs of 5G technology, to help finally achieve the breakthrough it needs.”

    “Graphene and 5G Technology Combined”

    “5G technology cannot simply be scaled up from previous technology to meet the demands of high-speed communications of the future – it needs an enabling technology. Enter monolayer graphene. By late 2017, a research team at Chalmers University in Sweden had developed a method of combining graphene flexibility with terahertz detection so as to make it possible to connect the Internet of Things (IoT), via high-bandwidth technologies available in 5G.”

    Like

  28. “Build back better” is the motto (more like the mantra) of the 4IR/Great Reset architects. I hope you will read the following articles to get a better sense (pun intended) of what they really mean when they propagate their build back better mission:

    1) From December 2020: “Graphene: The Building Block for Sustainable Cities”(https://statnano.com/news/68337/Graphene-The-Building-Block-for-Sustainable-Cities)

    2) From April 2021: “Building Better Cities, Thanks to Manchester’s Advanced Materials Expertise” (https://www.thegraphenecouncil.org/blogpost/1501180/369177/Building-better-cities-thanks-to-Manchester-s-advanced-materials-expertise)

    3) From May 2021: “First Graphene(ASX:FGR) Is the Real Catalyst to Build Back Better” (https://emerginggrowth.com/first-grapheneasxfgr-is-the-real-catalyst-to-build-back-better/).

    Like

    1. “Physiological Saline Containing Graphene”

      Patent description (click on “Description” and scroll down):
      https://worldwide.espacenet.com/patent/search/family/075143365/publication/KR20210028062A?q=pn%3DKR20210028062A

      Note the use of graphene “therapeutically” in e-cigarettes, as well as the application for “treatment” of Alzheimer’s, ALS, and Parkinson’s.

      [0107] First, the electronic cigarette will be described.

      [0108] Electronic cigarettes add additives (fragrances, nicotine) to liquid (glycerin) and absorb and hold the liquid in the cotton means, which is used for the core region, and constitutes a heating wire in the cotton means, and the heat generated by heating the heating wire with the battery means is used as a cotton means. It is an electronic cigarette that allows the liquid to vaporize into a form of mist, which sucks the mist from the exit passage through the mouth, sends it to the lungs, and then exhales it through the mouth.

      [0109] In the present invention, a liquid that can be used in electronic cigarettes

      [0110] Graphene can be used as a substitute for physiological saline containing dispersion.

      [0111] In the present invention, graphene powder is added to 1 liter (1,000 ml) of liquid glycerin used for electronic cigarettes in a selected ratio within 1 g and dispersed evenly before use.

      [0112] Alternatively, physiological saline containing graphene dispersion and glycerin can be mixed evenly at 5 to 5 and used as a liquid for electronic cigarettes.

      [0113] That is, graphene nano-powder is mixed in the mist generated by using the liquid phase containing graphene in the liquid phase of the electronic cigarette so that it can reach the lungs through the oral cavity through the respiratory tract, thereby achieving the therapeutic purpose.

      [0114] The physiological saline solution containing dispersed graphene of the present invention can be administered to the human body by injection or Ringer means for the treatment of dementia.

      [0115] The physiological saline solution containing dispersed graphene of the present invention can be administered to the human body by injection or Ringer means for the treatment of Alzheimer’s.

      [0116] The physiological saline solution containing dispersed graphene of the present invention can be administered to the human body by injection or Ringer means for the treatment of Lou Gehrig’s disease.

      [0117] The physiological saline solution containing dispersed graphene of the present invention can be administered to the human body by injection or Ringer means for the treatment of Parkin’s disease.

      Like

      1. Here is the translated abstract from this (written in) Chinese patent. I’m still searching for a date attached…found the date, 3/11/2021.

        A reading of the “description” and the abstract reveals this “invention” is good enough for just about anything. Not just neuro-degenerative diseases and e-cigarettes, but viruses too!

        “The present invention relates to an injection solution, physiological saline solution, glucose solution, and Ringer’s solution placed in a blood vessel and subcutaneous tissue of the human body for the purpose of curing a disease.

        “Physiological saline containing graphene dispersed in the present invention is intended to be used for each disease including dementia, Parkinson’s disease, Lou Gehrig’s disease, Huntington’s disease, and the like. Physiological saline containing graphene dispersion of the present invention is intended to be used as a therapeutic agent for viruses such as MERS, SARS, and Corona. It is used as a therapeutic agent by dispersing graphene powder with a size of 0.2 nm or less in a means used as an injection solution such as injection solution, Ringer’s solution, physiological saline solution, and glucose solution used in conventional hospitals. Ringer’s solution in which the graphene powder is dispersed is injected into the human body where the virus has penetrated, and when the virus and graphene powder meet, the graphene powder and the virus are attracted to each other by nano-cohesive force and stick to each other. When graphene powder adheres to the body and spikes of the virus, the virus cannot function properly, so it cannot multiply and eventually die.”

        Like

        1. I feel compelled to isolate and repeat the astounding good news re this “invention”.

          “the graphene powder is dispersed is injected into the human body where the virus has penetrated, and when the virus and graphene powder meet, the graphene powder and the virus are attracted to each other by nano-cohesive force and stick to each other. When graphene powder adheres to the body and spikes of the virus, the virus cannot function properly, so it cannot multiply and eventually die.”

          Like

  29. Graphene-enabled swimming pools (https://www.aquatechnics.com.au/graphene-nano-tech/) . . . “New technology never before used in the swimming pool industry”

    “Graphene Nano-Tech is a revolutionary process infusing graphene nano technology in every Aqua Technics pool. Aqua Technics has been working with First Graphene, Australia’s leading supplier of high-performing graphene products, to incorporate graphene into the structure of our pools, creating a totally new patent-pending construction process that is the next generation of fibreglass pool technology.”

    As Jon Rappoport suggested, “. . . we’re living in a graphene world.” https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2021/07/12/graphene-face-masks-dangerous-and-were-living-in-a-graphene-world/

    Like

    1. In 2019, Billabong claimed to be the “first surf brand to go to market with a suit that utilizes graphene.” The surfing apparel is called Furnace Graphene: https://www.graphene-info.com/billabong-launch-graphene-enhanced-surfing-apparel.

      Will we thrive in this graphene world? Will it modify us – both from the inside out, and the outside in? It seems it’s coming at us from all directions – not simply coerced injections – and at “warp speed.”

      Like

  30. “Steel Blue releases world’s first graphene enhanced safety boot,
    made in WA.”
    : https://steelblue.com/au/steel-blue-releases-worlds-first-graphene-enhanced-safety-boot-made-in-wa/.

    “The company also operates a joint venture factory in Indonesia – one of only 20 in the world to have FDRA Responsible Factory accreditation.”

    “The GraphTEC™ range however, is being made locally in Malaga, WA, using a new multimillion dollar state-of-the-art moulding machine – another first for a company renowned as industry innovators.”

    If readers recall, the 1st U.S. case of “coronavirus” was in Washington state: https://www.npr.org/2020/01/22/798392221/1st-u-s-case-of-coronavirus-confirmed-in-washington-state.

    Like

    1. It looks like Steel Blue is from the other WA (West Australia), so no relation to Washington State as far as i can tell:

      “FIND YOUR CLOSEST STEEL BLUE DISTRIBUTOR
      Buy Steel Blue Boots
      We are a premium safety footwear manufacturer and wholesaler, with our head office based in Perth, Western Australia.

      As a wholesaler, we sell our work boots direct to authorised Steel Blue Distributors, including PPE and work wear stores.”

      I live in Washington State – just about a 10 minute drive from the supposed ‘outbreak’ at the Kirkland Life Care Center – so my eyes always catch the “WA” when i’m reading articles. Strangely enough, even though i’m very, very close to the initial outbreak, i don’t know of a single person who actually got sick of a deadly new illness during the past year and a half. What are the odds?
      Thanks so much for sharing your research findings with us, Stephers (and everyone else)!

      Like

      1. Paul,

        Thank you so much for that important clarification! When I read here (https://www.graphene-info.com/first-graphenes-puregraph-incorporated-blue-steels-safety-boots) that Steel Blue’s factory was in Malaga, WA (and having read that Steel Blue had U.S. certifications and a couple associations with U.S. non-profits, despite being Australian-based), I much too quickly assumed Malaga, Washington, as there is a town of Malaga in Washington State (https://www.unitedstateszipcodes.org/98828/). Admittedly, I am unfamiliar with the geographical context of both Malaga West Australia (WA) and Malaga, Washington. Thank you also for sharing your personal observations living within close proximity to the Kirkland Life Care Center. I think your experience is quite telling.

        Liked by 1 person

        1. That’s so funny, i had no idea there was a Malaga, WA… but indeed there is. So you can certainly be ‘forgiven’ for making the connection.

          Liked by 1 person

  31. Read here about the emerging (and soon-to-be booming) quantum dot industry (https://www.zengraphene.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/ZEN-GQD-1-pager-March-2020.pdf.): “Through the work at UBC Okanagan (Prof. Arjmand) and the University of Guelph (Prof. Chen), ZEN is working toward commercial sales of GQDs. Once able to commercialize, ZEN plans to continue its collaboration with Prof. Kumacheva’s on heavy metal scavenging applications along with investigating other potential GQD markets including displays, photodetectors and conductors for solar cells, catalysts for the hydrogen economy, and medical uses.”

    Like

  32. “Multifunctional Graphene Hair Dye”” https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451929418300822.

    Guys, we are way past trying to determine if graphene is in current COVID injections, as open plans have been laid out for graphene/graphene oxide (GO) to be an adjuvant in forthcoming “vaccines.” Furthermore, “vaccines” (either injected or inhaled) would be only one way to administer this carbonaceous nanomaterial. They have plans to embed GO in nearly all medical PPE: https://www.news-medical.net/news/20201025/Graphene-enhanced-PPE-for-COVID-19.aspx and https://www.news-medical.net/news/20210520/Could-graphene-oxide-nanosheets-be-an-effective-SARS-CoV-2-antiviral-in-PPE.aspx (please note in the second linked article, it is asserted that GO has an affinity to ACE2 receptors, just as their purported “virus” does).

    As you may continue to see in marketing materials and scientific literature, researchers and companies may claim graphene-enhanced consumer products are “non-toxic” – as they (currently) define toxic as molecular toxins. As graphene is nanoscale, and technically not molecular, they can spin their definition of toxicity.

    Moving forward, I would suggest that companies who embed graphene/GO in their products, be required to label as such.

    I can imagine (unfortunately, 5-10 years down the road, when it is way too late) that there will be companies with a special label designating their products as “graphene-free.” I can visualize what a symbol of that would look like – a big G with an angled line crossed through it (?).

    In any case, it will be too late to say “NO to GO” or “GO is our Foe.” The time is NOW. Point being . . . they should have never let the graphene genie out of its bottle. The potential implications on natural life are beyond what I have already revealed here at POM. I am still uncovering the adverse consequences and hidden agendas. It’s a lot to absorb.

    That said, if one understands the nature of nano (which operates VERY differently than molecular atoms, of which we are inherently familiar), one can grasp that any product claiming to be “graphene-free” would be a paradox or misnomer in a graphenated world.

    Like

    1. For those who may not have seen these value-added analyses on graphene and its plethora of emerging applications, I hope readers will take the time to view them. Thanks guys!

      “From Graphene, Nano, Morgellons to Bionic Man”
      https://www.babylondecoded.com/en/video/490/From-Graphene%2C-Nano%2C-Morgellons-to-Bionic-Man (54 minutes long)

      and

      “The Rise of Graphene in our coatings – What’s in it, and how safe is it for you? Take precautions!” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R2zzSBKHGYs (only 5 minutes long, with an interesting comments thread)

      Liked by 1 person

    2. From the 2018 paper I referenced above (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451929418300822):
      “The Bigger Picture
      Replacing toxic molecular ingredients with graphene-based sheets can lead to safer hair dyes. Multifunctional hair dyes that leverage graphene’s high surface area, flexibility, electrical and thermal conductivity, and antibacterial and barrier properties can be created to render tunable hair color as well as enhanced human comfort, health, and aesthetics. The waste from graphene-coated hair can be recycled and repurposed for the creation of functional materials for other electronic or energy storage devices. Other than fashion and aesthetics, graphene-based hair dyes could also potentially benefit the development of electronics interfacing with the body, as well as livestock farming and the development of humanoid robots.”

      Commentary (all from 2018) on the 2018 paper (note that not one of the articles mentions the claim by the graphene researchers that graphene-based hair dyes can be used for electronics interfacing for the “development of humanoid robots.” I imagine it sounded a bit too sci-fi and outlandish for their taste):

      https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/graphene-works-hair-dye-doesnt-chemically-damage-hair-according-new-study-180968547/

      https://indianapublicmedia.org/amomentofscience/graphene-hair-dye.php
      “While this does all sound great, one important thing to realize is that there‘s a lot we don‘t know about graphene, and how it works as a nanoparticle like the ones needed to create a spray-on hair dye . . . There is still the potential for lung damage in a spray form. We also don‘t know the environmental impact of graphene in that form and what happens when some of it goes into the water supply.”

      https://www.chemistryworld.com/news/healthier-hair-in-just-10-minutes-with-graphene-dye/3008794.article

      Like

  33. While commercialized graphene-enabled hair dyes may not have (openly) hit the market, here is a company already selling graphene-enhanced hair brushes and combs, etc.: https://graphenehair.io.

    “Our solution…we’ve developed the most impactful technology to hit the hair tool market in decades and we are literally putting it in your hands. We’ve created the first hair tools ever made with the Nobel Prize winning material, graphene and its being delivered to your clients with your name on it. It is our industry’s first private label hair tool solution that allows finer salons, spas, and independent hair practitioners to sell undoubtably the world’s best hair tools at a retail price that is highly profitable.

    Take a few minutes to learn more about graphene, how it is going to shape our industry, and how you can become part of the revolution.”

    Like

  34. From April 2021 . . . “Companies respond to graphene masks ‘health hazard’ scare” (https://www.graphene-info.com/companies-respond-graphene-masks-health-hazard-scare):

    “From our point of view, it is important to note that this whole issue seems to have started following the use of a specific brand of graphene masks. Remember there are many types of graphene materials and processes, and not all graphene masks are the same. While Graphene-Info fully supports adhering to health guidelines and recommendations, we also know how easy it is to create a bad reputation for an entire industry. We feel that if it is indeed just a specific brand or product that is problematic – then it should not adversely affect the rest of the industry.

    It is not for us to declare other masks as safe or unsafe, but this is at least noteworthy.

    We feel that the panic may be a bit too general, and of course further inquiries are in order, but health concerns should be taken seriously – and we will continue to monitor this issue.”

    Does this sentiment re-assure you that potential harms from graphene-embedded materials are being monitored and that graphenated products are being regulated properly?

    Incidentally, it was reported on July 21, 2021 that sales of the graphene-enabled masks that were removed from the market (in Canada) have resumed: “Health Canada decides Shandong’s graphene face masks pose no health risk, still does not permit the sale of other graphene masks” https://www.graphene-info.com/health-canada-decides-shandongs-graphene-face-masks-pose-no-health-risk-still.

    Like

  35. From July 16, 2021: “Graphene Flagship partner Graphmatech raises €8.4M investment” https://ope-journal.com/news/graphene-flagship-partner-graphmatech-raises-8-4m-investment.

    To be clear, within the 4IR paradigm, a sustainable world is one that is 2D. To translate, for those who think that carbon means life (and three-dimensional life, for that matter – pun intended!), carbon NANOmaterials reflect a decomposition or regression of life. Imagine life being compressed into a zip hard drive.

    Graphene (a carbonaceous nanomaterial, and in this case, synthesized with technology) enables (or rather, disables) enriched physical life to be reverted back to a “Flatland” existence; and ultimately, compressed even further into a digital Singularity.

    Why are we allowing this to proceed? We need to get really clear on what these nanotinkerers mean when they say they are driving society via graphene electronics (and bioelectronics) into a sustainable future. The 2D revolution is NOT for humanity, and it is definitely NOT intended to support Mother Nature.

    Moving forward, when you see “graphene-enhanced”, think “life reduction”; when you see “graphene-enabled”, think “nature demotion.” The quickest and surefire way to degrade a human being or a physical object is to graphenate it. Is this what we want? #NatureNotNano

    Like

  36. GRAPHENE ELECTRIC TOILET SEAT WARMER by elefun: http://hielefun.com/graphene-electric-toilet-seat-warmer/.
    “elefun® is a registered brand since 2019 in US, we want to bring “electric” + “fun” to the people all over the world. And we go far beyond what we physically create. elefun is driven by an insatiable curiosity, a desire to explore and refine the space where digital technology and human sensation intersect. That’s what makes us unique, different, and uniquely different.
    “Graphene electric toilet seat warmer available at amazon.com

    Like

  37. Stephers, thank you. You are one of the very few voices of truth and sources of inspiration in this hell we have allowed ourselves to be led towards. I thank you with all my soul for your seemingly inexhaustible energy you expend to warn us of the imminent dangers we face. As I have a deep appreciation for the similarly courageous work of Whitney Webb and Alison McDowell, I have read your posts with the same great apprehension for the information conveyed as well as a genuine admiration for the obvious heroism you personify in dragging these deformed monsters and their subhuman aspirations to light for all to witness. I never have stood up and been counted in this way, but I want you to know your efforts are not in vain as your research has enlightened and inspired me, and so must have countless others. Please know the light you shine in our world is illuminating, indeed. Thank you.

    Liked by 1 person

  38. Have readers considered why there seems to have been a fierce promotional push for medical cannabis in the past couple years? Does anyone find it interesting that Adrian Nixon of Nixene Publishing (AKA Captain Graphene; Nixon+Graphene = Nixene) https://www.nixenepublishing.com/news/another-graphene-bond/ claims to be embedding graphene (as “invisible” bar-coding) in medical (aka “legal”) cannabis – purportedly to track and trace it through the supply chain and verify its “legality.”

    “Graphene, Quantum Dots and Cannabis (Short Version)”: https://youtu.be/5o5WqKIBS6M

    Here is a response from “Captain Graphene” to some concerned commenters: https://youtu.be/V4FcAAjWK4k. Do you feel reassured when you hear his replies. Why does he seem to think this is a laughing matter? Why does he seem so sure that graphene quantum dots are “non-toxic”?

    See here for more info on Adrian Nixon: https://www.nixor.co.uk. Following is Adrian Nixon’s LinkedIn profile:
    “Graphene and 2D Materials Scientist. Editor in Chief of the Nixene Journal. International Space Elevator Consortium Board Member. Changing the world one atomic layer at a time.”

    Does Captain Graphene remind you of the animated Mr. G? Inspiration, perhaps?

    Like

  39. From 2017: “Graphene electronic tattoos can be applied to the skin with water”
    https://phys.org/news/2017-08-graphene-electronic-tattoos-skin.html.
    “Graphene electronic tattoos are most promising for potential applications in mobile health care, assisted technologies, and human machine interfaces,” Kabiri Ameri said. “In the area of human machine interfaces, electrophysiological signals recorded from the brain and muscles can be classified and assigned for specific action in a machine. This area of research can have applications for the internet of things, smart houses and cities, human computer interaction, smart wheelchairs, speech assistance technology, monitoring of distracted driving, and human-robot control. Recently we have demonstrated the application of graphene tattoos for sensing human signals to wirelessly control flying objects. That demonstration will be reported in the near future.”

    Like

    1. Speaking of “human machine interfaces” how about the WHO’s latest on genome editing: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240030381

      It’s called “flooding the zone.” Zone-flooding seeks to disorient audiences with an avalanche of competing stories, which produces a certain nihilism in which people are so skeptical about the possibility of finding the truth that they give up the search — trusting nothing/no one.

      Liked by 1 person

  40. From 2013, research on graphene and carbon nanotubes at Imperial College London: “Scientists untangle nanotubes to release their ‘potential’ in the electronics industry” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qHcRK-CUMQo (less than 5 minutes). Here is a bio of Professor Milo Shaffer who is featured in the linked video: https://www.imperial.ac.uk/people/m.shaffer.

    If readers recall, following is the dire (and now infamous; and thus far, woefully inaccurate) “prediction” that Imperial College London proclaimed in March 2020: https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2020/03/18/covi-m18.html.

    Like

    1. Oh goody, “transparent conductors” (@timestamp 3:00) that could be used to fill in the “spaces” between concrete 5G transformers/transmitters, which currently have a very limited range. WE will be the antennae of the (near?) future. The jab and 5G are connected, working in tandem, IMO. Remote-control commands from the “back room” will pollute our brains the way tv and social media ads bombard us 24/7. Turn it off!

      Liked by 1 person

  41. Here is “Captain Graphene”, Adrian Nixon (Editor of the Nixene Journal), at the American Graphene Summit in Washington DC (May 2019) talking about the ‘killer application’ for graphene (spoiler alert: it’s the “space elevator”):

    Like

  42. From June 2015: “GRAPHENE AND GRAPHENE-RELATED MATERIALS FOR MANIPULATION OF CELL MEMBRANE POTENTIAL”
    https://patents.justia.com/patent/20170143762

    “Remote stimulation of cells via a G-biointerface can be combined with their subsequent genetic analysis, including but not limited to, PCR, RT-PCR, DNA sequencing, next generation sequencing, DNA microarrays, karyotyping, fluorescence in situ hybridization, calorimetric in situ hybridization, or combinations thereof.”

    “To control the membrane potential is to control the activation state of a cell. Changes in the membrane potential can lead to a variety of downstream effects, as they are tightly linked to such fundamental functions as cellular excitability, posttranslational modification of proteins by voltage-dependent phosphatases, hormone secretion, ion homeostasis, regulation of protein expression, and cell proliferation. A special situation exists in excitable cells (e.g., neurons or cardiomyocytes (CMs)), where relatively minor changes in the membrane potential can be amplified and result in chain-type activation of multiple ion channel types in a concerted manner, leading to generation of action potential. Even in non-excitable cells, changes in the membrane potential result in changes in electrochemical ion gradients and ion concentrations, which can trigger many seemingly voltage-independent processes.”

    “A general design strategy is based on the following chain of events shown in FIG. 1. 1) During the exposure to electromagnetic stimuli, a graphene-related material absorbs its energy, resulting in generation of excitons, which subsequently dissociate into electrons and holes. 2) Due to the capacitive coupling effect between the cell membrane and the surface of graphene-related materials, photogenerated free charge carriers (e.g., electrons) from the G-biointerface displace cations near the graphene/cell membrane interface. 3) Such re-distribution of charges right outside the cell membrane triggers changes in the cell membrane potential. Large interfacial capacitance of the G-biointerface offers an effective capacitive stimulation. Thus, the interaction of the external light-generated E-field near the G-biointerface and the transmembrane E-field gradient leads to non-invasive remote stimulation of cells.”

    “In order to be activated via G-biointerfaces, cells have to contact or to be positioned in the close proximity to the surface of graphene-related materials. To achieve such positioning, either cells can be added to G-biointerfaces, or G-biointerfaces can be added to cells.

    “After cells are properly positioned, G-biointerfaces have to be exposed to electromagnetic stimuli, including, but not limited to, the visible spectrum, the radio frequency spectrum, infrared, microwave, terahertz frequencies, or combinations thereof. For example, exposure of G-biointerfaces to electromagnetic waves of the visible spectrum (i.e., light) can be performed by essentially any illumination method, including, but not limited to, laser, mercury lamp, xenon lamp, halogen lamp illumination, or LED illumination.”

    “G-biointerfaces can be utilized for treating of an animal having a medical condition. Changes in the cell membrane potential triggered by electromagnetic radiation of G-biointerfaces that are positioned in the close proximity to the affected cells and regions can help to overcome the consequences of reduced or eliminated activity of cells during the disease progression. Examples of diseases that can be treated by G-biointerfaces include, but not limited to, heart arrhythmias, impairments after cardiac infraction, neurodegenerative/neurological disorders, various opthalmological disorders, and endocrine disorders.

    Could this same graphene-biointerface (stimulated by electromagnetic radiation – perhaps 5G, or even LED street lamps?) be reverse-engineered (AKA weaponized) to cause said disorders (see disorders listed above)??? Could RT-PCR be applied to analyzing the result of the remote stimulation of cells via a (Mr.) G-biointerface? Please read my highly relevant August 2020 paper on biohacking: https://pieceofmindful.com/2020/08/28/mass-zombification-via-remote-biohacking-the-farce-awakens/ and my April 2021 essay, “Confessions of an Engineered Nanoparticle”, (https://pieceofmindful.com/2021/04/23/confessions-of-an-engineered-nanoparticle/) wherein I assert: “Biomarkers indicating my presence can also be assessed via RT-PCR methods”.

    Like

  43. Reported today (July 31, 2021) . . . It seems there may be graphene (or graphene-like 2D nanomaterial) found in a rainwater sample (as well as a flu vaccine sample): https://www.orwell.city/2021/07/rainwater.html. This may support speculation that geoengineering initiatives work in tandem with bioengineering strategies; and that flu vaccines (potentially from 2019-2020) may already contain carbon nanomaterial that have not been openly labeled and revealed.

    Like

  44. Reported in March 2020, “Graphene Solar Thermal Film Could Be a New Way to Harvest Renewable Energy”: https://spectrum.ieee.org/graphene-solar-heating-film-potential-new-renewable-energy-source.

    “Researchers at the Center for Translational Atomaterials (CTAM) at Swinburne University of Technology in Melbourne, Australia, have developed a new graphene-based film that can absorb sunlight with an efficiency of over 90 percent, while simultaneously eliminating most IR thermal emission loss—the first time such a feat has been reported.”

    “The 3D SGM is composed of a 30-nanometer-thick film of alternating graphene and dielectric layers deposited on a trench-like nanostructure that does double duty as a copper substrate to enhance absorption. More importantly, the substrate is patterned in a matrix arrangement to enable flexible tunability of wavelength-selective absorption.”

    “We are working with a private company, Innofocus Photonics Technology, that has commercialized a coating machine to lay down the graphene and dielectric layers . . . “

    “Meanwhile, the researchers are continuing to fine-tune the nanostructure design and improve the SGM’s stability and absorption efficiency. “As for commercialization . . . we think that will be possible in one to two years.”

    Like

  45. From December 2016, “SILLY PUTTY AND GRAPHENE COMBINE TO MAKE AN ULTRA-SENSITIVE HEART MONITOR:
    IT CAN DETECT PULSES, BREATHS, AND SPIDER STEPS”: https://futurism.com/neoscope/ultra-sensitive-heart-monitor-made-from-graphene-and-silly-putty-senses-spiders-steps.
    “Not only will this novel material be used in health trackers someday, it could help save lives. “A small amount of nano can really turn the ordinary into something extraordinary…”

    Like

  46. From 2014, “Graphene for multi-functional synthetic biology: The last ‘zeitgeist’ in nanomedicine”: http://www.nanomedicinelab.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Servant-et-al-BioorgMedChem.pdf.
    As depicted in “Scheme 1”, it seems graphene pairs very nicely with gene therapy/RNAs in synthetic biology applications. In Figure 8 (a), it seems GO “functionalizes” aptly with PEG (and looks very similar to electron microscopy photos coming out of various La Quinta Columna’s reports).

    Like

  47. I first saw this Kickstarter initiative for the “Guardian G-Volt Graphene Breathing Mask” in July 2020. It seems shortly after, the funding project was “suspended”: https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/guardiangvolt/guardian-g-volt-mask/description.

    “We are an international team hailing from the US, Canada and Israel. A product of a cooperative venture between Rice University and Ben Gurion University, our team is a dedicated multi-national mix of talent and scientific expertise.”
    “This is the only mask in the world to incorporate laser-induced graphene filters.
    “The laser-induced graphene filter has been extensively tested . . . Research and development was initiated by Jian Lin, a former postdoctoral researcher in the Tour group at Rice University.”

    A co-inventor who developed this graphene breathing mask is Christopher J. Arnusch: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Christopher-Arnusch. Arnusch co-authored a February 2018 paper with James Tour, “Laser-Induced Graphene by Multiple Lasing: Toward Electronics on Cloth, Paper, and Food”: https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/acsnano.7b08539. *”This may be a generally applicable technique for forming graphene on diverse substrates in applications such as flexible or even biodegradable and edible electronics.“

    Like

  48. Interestingly, in the past few years, when shopping for clothing for myself and my family, I have instinctively avoided purchasing clothing with silver threading – not knowing that the silver threads could be coated with GO: “Graphene Oxide Coated Silver Yarns” (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=keEjRS2KzGo). Granted, this particular presentation is applicable only to commercial textile applications. Nevertheless, I can see how this GO coating technology could potentially be applied to consumer textile products.

    Like

  49. From October 2020: “Graphene-based memory resistors show promise for brain-based computing” https://news.psu.edu/story/637059/2020/10/29/research/graphene-based-memory-resistors-show-promise-brain-based-computing.
    “Like synapses connecting the neurons in the brain that can be reconfigured, the artificial neural networks the team is building can be reconfigured by applying a brief electric field to a sheet of graphene, the one-atomic-thick layer of carbon atoms. In this work they show at least 16 possible memory states, as opposed to the two in most oxide-based memristors, or memory resistors . . . What we have shown is that we can control a large number of memory states with precision using simple graphene field effect transistors . . .”

    Like

  50. From August 2018, “The first graphene jacket is here, and it’s magical
    And it only costs $695.” https://www.fastcompany.com/90205090/the-first-graphene-jacket-is-here-and-its-magical.

    Funny how it’s likened to a “batsuit”: https://futurism.com/the-byte/graphene-jacket-vollebak. “IT COULD FINALLY GET GRAPHENE OUT OF LABS AND INTO THE WORLD.”

    More on the graphene jacket: https://www.vollebak.com/the-story/ . . .
    “We use science and technology to make the future of clothing happen faster. In every industry there’s someone building the future, whether it’s technology, architecture, food, cars or space rockets. In clothing it’s us. Founded by twin brothers, designers and athletes Nick and Steve Tidball, we use science and technology to create clothing that no-one else can or will – clothes from the future.”
    “Over the next 10 to 100 years clothes are going to be used to enhance our strength and sensory perception. They will help us become faster, more intelligent, and live longer.”

    Like

  51. From June 2017, “The Graphene Gambit”
    “Mark Anderson’s Carbon Trifecta has a simple goal: saving the planet”” https://www.seattlebusinessmag.com/technology/graphene-gambit

    “Turn that substance into “ink” for a 3-D printer and use it to manufacture everything.”

    “. . . after learning more about graphene, what it looks like at the nano level and how it can connect to other nano carbons, Himes says, ‘I became convinced this could be the idea that could create a sustainable and flourishing future environment for human beings.'”

    ““It’s a wonderful idea, but a hard thing to do,” says James Tour, a professor of materials science and nanoengineering at Rice University in Houston. Tour holds more graphene patents than any other individual in the United States, and he says graphene research is still in a nascent stage, lacks funding and can’t be produced at a reasonable cost. “Graphene is very much a cottage industry,” says Tour.”

    “Tour’s patents are being used to produce nano particles that can be used in laundry detergents and upholstery for brighter colors as well as in LED displays and other electrical and medical applications. To the extent that research is being done at any extensive level, says Tour, it’s happening in places like South Korea and China, where government backs the research.”

    “Another participant, the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, has worked on ways to use 3-D printers and syringe barrels filled with graphene oxide ink, sometimes referred to as liquid smoke, to build structures that could lead to new electronics and energy storage devices.”

    “The support Anderson envisions encompasses universities, corporations and countries. “Without such widescale international cooperation,” he admits, “the plan won’t work. Rich countries and poor — China and the United States, the EU, UK, and Australia — companies in technology and finance, utilities and chemicals; universities, think tanks, governments, laboratories and individuals can all be productive parts of this new program.”

    Like

    1. In response to the Pingback to Reptile Dysfunction above . . . Here is the full audio version of Alison’s THC chat with Greg Carlwood: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_rg5wJoGZu8.

      I hope readers will also listen to this most recent podcast (posted yesterday on August 1, 2021) for much greater and very timely context on blockchain, transhumanism, and The Spatial Web: https://www.bitchute.com/video/qSHPec6QX9yz/.

      Here are two supporting documents (and a LinkedIn profile) that were referenced in the linked podcast that deserve review and careful consideration:
      https://information-professionals.org/the-darpa-social-media-in-strategic-communication-smisc-program/
      https://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/jul/08/darpa-social-networks-research-twitter-influence-studies
      https://www.linkedin.com/in/randwaltzman/

      It is not too late (for anyone) to potentially re-consider and re-form thoughts and actions surrounding blockchain and The Spatial Web. I urge some additional digging and searching . . . Ultimately, though, it is a personal decision how and where we devote our energy and attention. If the wind blows you in the direction of supporting crypto and blockchain, then so be it. I am not judging; I am simply informing as best I know with the information I currently have.

      Liked by 1 person

  52. Following is a partial list of hydrocolloids/gums commonly found in processed foods (even those labeled organic/non-GMO): https://www.ingredient-specialties.com/gums. I would add gellan gum to this list.

    Start here, and proceed with “Similar articles” if you are interested in learning how graphene oxide is combined with hydrocolloidal products (purportedly for the application of water purification): https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28821084/.

    Do you think these hybrid aerogels (comprised of GO) are being rolled out in the food industry, showing up in the products you eat? How do you think these hybrid aerogels could influence our (currently) water-based physical bodies? I think we need to be concerned about more than seemingly “magnetic” meats.

    Like

  53. How to ruin a perfectly natural product (I am a big fan of natural jute!) . . .
    From January 2021, “Sustainable and Multifunctional Composites of Graphene-Based Natural Jute Fibers” “https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/adsu.202000228.

    Liked by 1 person

  54. “The Graphene Flagship Technology and Innovation Roadmap:
    Biomedical Applications” https://graphene-flagship.eu/media/8d89609e22f78e7/biomedical-tir.pdf.

    “Biomedical applications”

    p. 495 (see Table 73): “Most frequent main-groups of Transnational Patents in the area of the use of Graphene in Biomedicine sorted by Frequency. [137]
    (the numbers represent frequency, listed in order)
    Investigating or analysing materials by specific methods
    139
    Measuring or testing processes involving enzymes or micro-organisms
    76
    Investigating or analysing materials by the use of optical means, i.e. using infra-red, visible or ultra-violet light
    45
    Medicinal preparations characterised by the non-active ingredients used,
    e.g. carriers, inert additives
    31”

    p. 499: “All in all, the procedure for obtaining marketing authorisation for medical devices differs from the respective procedures for medicinal products. The key steps are the following:
    1. Status of the product. It must be decided whether the product is a medical device and falls under the scope of the medical device regulation, and whether specific provisions apply (e.g. for in vitro diagnostics). Although the regulation provides definitions and guidance for clarifying the status (principal intended action by chemical or physical means; intended use specifically for diagnostic and/or therapeutic purposes), it may be necessary to consult the responsible regulatory authority or experts, especially if the product is a combination of medical devices and medicinal products.
    2. Classification. The medical device has to be classified according to type (e.g. in vitro di- agnostics; active implantable medical device; general medical device) and risk potential.”

    p. 520: “Deep brain stimulation and neural interfaces appear interesting from a technological perspective. The growth in the wearables sector as well as the trend to human enhancement create windows of opportunity for developments such as brain-computer-interfaces, retina implants, and similar. At the same time, further development of closed- loop-technologies improving operational conditions are to be expected.”

    p. 523: “Recent studies have demonstrated that graphene based electrodes could offer a dramatically improved performance in neural stimulation as well as in neural recording.”

    Like

  55. “The discovery of Graphene” (the actual discovery prior to Geim/Novoselov): https://www.riazimehr.com/the-discovery-of-graphene/

    “Since 1859, many scientists were looking for graphite and finally in 1916 the structure of graphite was clarified. While they were examining graphite, they found some unexpected behavior in extremely thin layers of graphite and then they wanted to make it thinner and thinner down to one atomic layer to study physical and electrical behavior these thin layers. The theory of one atomic layer graphite (Graphene) was laid out for the first time in 1947 by P. R. Wallace. The name Graphene was mentioned for the first time in 1987.”

    “The story and research continued, but no one could make one atomic layer of Graphene, even though very complicated experiments were carried out. It took until 2004, when two scientists who had emigrated from Russia, Andrei Geim and Kostya Novoselov, produced Graphene at the physics department of the University of Manchester.”

    So what really happened to graphene between 1947 and 1987, and 1987 and 2004 (could it have been tied up in classified projects?)

    Like

  56. “Graphene for 6G Communications”: https://networkseuropemagazine.com/2021/07/21/graphene-for-6g-communications-idtechex-explores/.

    “6G Communications needs graphene. 6G will initially launch at a few hundred GHz where several diode and transistor technologies are available in the laboratory but things get tough when second-generation 6G operates at around 1THz to get the ultimate response time, data capacity, data transfer and other promised advances.”

    “Due to unique band structure, the conductivity of graphene can be dynamically modulated optically or electrically creating reprogrammable electric and optoelectronic devices. A new type of optical transistor – a working THz amplifier – uses graphene and a high-temperature superconductor. Here graphene excels in transparency, insensitivity to light and massless electrons. Double graphene with a superconductor traps graphene electrons. THz radiation hits powered graphene making trapped particles inside attach to outgoing waves, amplifying them.”

    Like

  57. “Natural Human Enzyme Can Biodegrade Graphene, Scientists Report”
    Published on August 4, 2021
    Written by phys.org
    https://principia-scientific.com/natural-human-enzyme-can-biodegrade-graphene-scientists-report/

    “Prof. Maurizio Prato, leader of Work Package 4, said, ‘The enzymatic degradation of graphene is a very important topic, because in principle, graphene dispersed in the atmosphere could produce some harm. Instead, if there are microorganisms able to degrade graphene and related materials, the persistence of these materials in our environment will be strongly decreased. These types of studies are needed. What is also needed is to investigate the nature of degradation products. Once graphene is digested by enzymes, it could produce harmful derivatives. We need to know the structure of these derivatives and study their impact on health and environment.'”

    Read the comments section of the article linked above, and see Prof. Prato here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=msP9VQKjzp8.

    Like

  58. As of late 2019, all of Billabong’s wetsuits incorporate graphene: see here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n6EPe27anKI, here https://www.billabong.com/mens-wetsuit-guide/?camp=sm_bbm_us-en_e_instagram_2019-graphene-wetsuits-launch-social&utm_source=instagram&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=2019-graphene-wetsuits-launch-social, and here https://www.surfline.com/surf-news/best-billabong-wetsuits-2019/63180.

    Here is Deeply’s graphene-enhanced wetsuit: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k3GAvuq_cV4.

    See the graphenated wetsuits manufactured by ION: https://www.ion-products.com/graphene/?ght=&cHash=e6d7980bcc7d2a1da1dc50a9674d2320#full-collection. Watch their accompanying video.

    Then read this 2017 abstract: https://www.nature.com/articles/nnano.2017.21.

    “Graphene oxide membranes show exceptional molecular permeation properties, with promise for many applications1,2,3,4,5. However, their use in ion sieving and desalination technologies is limited by a permeation cutoff of ∼9 Å (ref. 4), which is larger than the diameters of hydrated ions of common salts4,6. The cutoff is determined by the interlayer spacing (d) of ∼13.5 Å, typical for graphene oxide laminates that swell in water2,4. Achieving smaller d for the laminates immersed in water has proved to be a challenge. Here, we describe how to control d by physical confinement and achieve accurate and tunable ion sieving. Membranes with d from ∼9.8 Å to 6.4 Å are demonstrated, providing a sieve size smaller than the diameters of hydrated ions. In this regime, ion permeation is found to be thermally activated with energy barriers of ∼10–100 kJ mol–1 depending on d. Importantly, permeation rates decrease exponentially with decreasing sieve size but water transport is weakly affected (by a factor of <2). The latter is attributed to a low barrier for the entry of water molecules and large slip lengths inside graphene capillaries. Building on these findings, we demonstrate a simple scalable method to obtain graphene-based membranes with limited swelling, which exhibit 97% rejection for NaCl.”

    Also read this 2021 paper, “Bioinspired Soft Robots Based on the Moisture-Responsive Graphene Oxide”: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8132057/.

    Is it a stretch (pun intended) to consider that a graphenated wetsuit – tightly adhering to one’s skin – could be akin to e-skin (as in soft robotics)? https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264127521004391.

    If individuals are wearing electronically-impregnated wearables, should they be advised accordingly? Even so, I imagine some (if not all) die-hard surfers would gladly oblige.

    Why do you think they really want to imbue wetsuits with graphene?

    Like

  59. It should be noted that long before Geim and Novoselov came along, Mildred Dresselhaus https://graphene.gatech.edu/publications/APS_08_Graphene_Tutorial_Dresselhaus.pdf was working with carbon nanomaterials (as early as 1960). She references graphene here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3dVHupKEFuI.

    Dresselhaus (of MIT) was known as the “Queen of Carbon Science”: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oPfh5nb09yY.

    Here are some of her carbon nano patents: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oPfh5nb09yY.

    Like

  60. Has anyone considered that the plexiglass that is now pervasive in nearly all indoor public areas could be coated with graphene?
    https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/engineering/polymethylmethacrylate
    https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780128145487000076

    Read here about an experiment involving pulses of ionizing radiation on graphene separated by plexiglass: https://www.mdpi.com/2079-4991/11/1/170/html.

    Then see the report posted today (August 10, 2021) from La Quinta Columna: https://www.orwell.city/2021/08/ionizing-radiation.html.

    Like

  61. Here is Dr. Andy Kaufman discussing graphene (from the 13 min to 28 min time stamp): https://www.bitchute.com/video/npKx46gWAEcI/. One issue I want to dispute, though . . . Geim and Novoselov were not the first to “discover” graphene – that is simply a cover story. P.R. Wallace (https://physicstoday.scitation.org/doi/10.1063/1.2364256) was the first – in 1947 (as stated in the literature https://graphene.gatech.edu/publications/APS_08_Graphene_Tutorial_Dresselhaus.pdf and https://uknowledge.uky.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1086&context=chemistry_etds) to discover graphene, and Mildred Dresselhaus was studying carbon nanoparticles (in the graphene family) as early as 1960 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3dVHupKEFuI). Additionally, attempts to synthesize single-layered graphene were carried out in the 1960s by two other researchers, Karu and Beer. Further, the discovery of graphene oxide (GO) pre-dates P.R. Wallace – going back to the late 1800s (which I previously referenced, and will have to locate that source).

    So why the story of graphene being first discovered in 2004? What could have been going on with graphene in the meantime, when it seems university researchers were not openly discussing it . . . tied up in black (pun intended) projects perhaps? It was only subsequent to 2004 that scientific papers on graphene family materials started to emerge more commonly on the scene.

    We need to tell not only a “better story” (https://www.thehighersidechats.com/alison-mcdowell-graphene-world-order-the-bio-surveillance-state-the-better-story/), but a more accurate one. Otherwise, we could be obfuscating (whether intentional or not) some hard truths.

    Like

  62. From July 2020, “Commercial Graphene Production // Allotropes and Applications” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IbKp2fSS2ew.

    “We’re entering the graphene age. This video will include a primer on graphene, methods of commercial and industrial graphene production, allotropes of graphene, applications for graphene, and when we’ll see it in products. “

    “I explain bottom up and top down graphene production methods, the different types of graphene, and when we can expect to see the different types of graphene in products.”

    “The types of graphene discussed are: Graphene Oxide (GO), Reduced Graphene Oxide (RGO), and Pristine Graphine. I also discuss Graphene films, Graphene Flakes (one layer graphene, two layer graphene, few layer graphene) and Nanoplatelets.”

    “Talga Resources and Beeasy Graphene Company are discussed to provide examples.”

    Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/thelimitingfa
    Teespring: teespring.com/stores/the-limiting-factor
    Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/TLFBatteries/
    Twitter: https://twitter.com/LimitingThe

    00:00 – Introduction
    00:36 – Carbon Chemistry
    03:47 – Bottom Up Graphene
    05:27 – MIT CVD Method (Parylene)
    06:38 – Top Down Graphene
    07:50 – Hummer’s Method
    09:44 – Talga & Electrochemical Exfoliation
    12:27 – Beeasy & ISO Standards
    13:54 – Graphene Flake
    15:22 – Recap
    16:11 – 2024 Forecast
    17:34 – The Graphene Age
    19:02 – Graphene Adoption Curve
    20:09 – Graphene Batteries
    21:34 – Wrap Up

    Like

  63. From August 2020, “Graphene, the Swiss Army Knife of Nanomaterials Science”
    https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsanm.0c02055
    “In conclusion, it is clear that graphene-based nanomaterials are pervading all domains of modern technology, from environmental remediation, sensing, and catalysis to functional materials, electronic devices, and energy-related technologies. Graphene will undoubtedly be intimately linked to the technological progresses of our era, making our lives more efficient and more sustainable. Yet, the famous philosopher Jankelevitch once said, “We can certainly live without philosophy, without music, without love and without art…but not that well.” So, could we live without graphene? “

    Like

  64. Please read this market report on graphene from Fortune Business Insights: https://www.fortunebusinessinsights.com/graphene-market-102930, paying particular attention to “COVID-19 Effect: High-Demand for Multi-Utility Graphene Products to Bolster Growth.” Graphene appeared seemingly out of nowhere in 2019, and see its projected growth. Note its global reach and penetration, while also noting the asserted “Restraining Factors”: “The use of GO is increasing but at the same time, it is considered to be toxic to humans as well.”

    Like

    1. So it seems possible that there was a known problem looming in 2019 with a growing trend of graphene toxicity. Were the 2019 reports of vaping injury related to graphene as a cause? Was there a perceived need to assign a fake cause to what would become a new set of symptoms becoming common?

      It reminds me how water fluoridation was started to cover up the liability of fluoride injury caused by uranium separation and a spreading pollution. By widespread fluoride use there was no longer any unexposed control group to allow proof by having a statistical comparison.

      Is NAC (N-Acetyl Cysteine) really of any use in detoxing from graphene exposure?

      Liked by 1 person

      1. Alan,

        Great insights here. I have some related thoughts, and will attempt to address your questions shortly. I am tied up with some family stuff for now. Thank you for your patience (and for your wise comparison with fluoridation).

        Like

      2. Alan,

        On the reporting of vaping injuries . . . I had asked myself the same questions. Accordingly, on July 25, I had dropped in this comments thread a patent I found involving graphene applied to e-cigarettes, and then shared the information via text (see below) with my best friend (her son occasionally vapes):

        “In my opinion, it may explain what was seen in young adults and kids who were vaping and having breathing difficulties, etc. The real truth is that it may have been graphene causing it: “Physiological Saline Containing Graphene”
        Patent description (click on “Description” and scroll down):
        https://worldwide.espacenet.com/patent/search/family/075143365/publication/KR20210028062A?q=pn%3DKR20210028062A
        Note the use of graphene “therapeutically” in e-cigarettes, as well as the application for “treatment” of Alzheimer’s, ALS, and Parkinson’s.
        [0107] First, the electronic cigarette will be described.
        [0108] Electronic cigarettes add additives (fragrances, nicotine) to liquid (glycerin) and absorb and hold the liquid in the cotton means, which is used for the core region, and constitutes a heating wire in the cotton means, and the heat generated by heating the heating wire with the battery means is used as a cotton means. It is an electronic cigarette that allows the liquid to vaporize into a form of mist, which sucks the mist from the exit passage through the mouth, sends it to the lungs, and then exhales it through the mouth.
        [0109] In the present invention, a liquid that can be used in electronic cigarettes
        [0110] Graphene can be used as a substitute for physiological saline containing dispersion.
        [0111] In the present invention, graphene powder is added to 1 liter (1,000 ml) of liquid glycerin used for electronic cigarettes in a selected ratio within 1 g and dispersed evenly before use.
        [0112] Alternatively, physiological saline containing graphene dispersion and glycerin can be mixed evenly at 5 to 5 and used as a liquid for electronic cigarettes.
        [0113] That is, graphene nano-powder is mixed in the mist generated by using the liquid phase containing graphene in the liquid phase of the electronic cigarette so that it can reach the lungs through the oral cavity through the respiratory tract, thereby achieving the therapeutic purpose.
        [0114] The physiological saline solution containing dispersed graphene of the present invention can be administered to the human body by injection or Ringer means for the treatment of dementia.
        [0115] The physiological saline solution containing dispersed graphene of the present invention can be administered to the human body by injection or Ringer means for the treatment of Alzheimer’s.
        [0116] The physiological saline solution containing dispersed graphene of the present invention can be administered to the human body by injection or Ringer means for the treatment of Lou Gehrig’s disease.
        [0117] The physiological saline solution containing dispersed graphene of the present invention can be administered to the human body by injection or Ringer means for the treatment of Parkin’s [sic] disease.”

        Subsequently, I found this patent, “A GRAPHENE BASED TOBACCO SMOKE FILTER AND A METHOD FOR SYNTHESIZING GRAPHENE COMPOSITION”: https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/85/dc/b3/e80aa2aed59e52/US20190161412A1.pdf

        See [0058] – on the use of a graphene based filter for use with tobacco products including e-cigarettes

        RE: Your question regarding NAC . . . Based on my research, there are distinctions between degrading graphene (thereby excreting it from the body via urine https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12274-020-3096-y.pdf and/or feces https://particleandfibretoxicology.biomedcentral.com/track/pdf/10.1186/s12989-016-0120-1.pdf), converting graphene (see link on autophagy below), and “reducing” graphene/graphene oxide once it is in the body. I suppose all three could be considered various means of detoxing. But there are potential issues involved with degrading graphene, such that, in the process, harmful derivatives can be produced, thereby possibly causing more damage to the cells/body (https://principia-scientific.com/natural-human-enzyme-can-biodegrade-graphene-scientists-report/). Conversely, if one were to seek methods to “reduce” graphene (oxide) – which is what NAC purports to do (see here https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlepdf/2020/ma/d0ma00456a ), it may lessen physical symptoms, but enable the graphene oxide to persist in the body (as it disperses the GO more evenly throughout the body, instead of aggregating – which may cause the micro blood clots being reported).

        Thus, “detoxing” from graphene seems to be one hot mess – one in which I am attempting to unravel. Personally speaking, while my aim is to safely remove it from my body (as I sense I have already been exposed), it may be safer, in the mean time, to allow it to “reduce” and disperse (or alternatively, convert the GO into a more biodegradable material), theoretically causing less physical damage. I cannot tell others what to do. However, I have experimented myself with NAC (and NAC + glycine), and each time, I have felt (physically) worse (ie – increased chest pain) – which may actually conflict with what has been reported/observed in the scientific literature. My tentative conclusion is that NAC may not be helpful in detoxing from GO (despite Delgado/Sevillano and others in the wellness field recommending it as such).

        While not addressing NAC, in particular, this 2015 paper, “Autophagy in RAW264.7 Cells Treated with Surface-Functionalized Graphene Oxides” https://www.hindawi.com/journals/jnm/2015/704789/, may offer some hints at potentially detoxing from graphene exposure:

        “Based on these observations, the effects of GO and its functionalized derivatives on autophagy in monocytes/macrophages can be explained as follows. Macrophages engulf graphene materials and convert them into biodegradable intracellular nanomaterials [11, 12]. Macrophages inhibit the endocytosis of polyethylene glycol- and bovine serum albumin-functionalized graphene but stimulate the endocytosis of polyetherimide-functionalized graphene [13, 14]. These results indicate that surface-functionalized graphene exerts diverse effects from biodegradation to nanotoxicity that may injure various organs [15].”

        “Graphene induces apoptosis, autophagy, and inflammation in macrophages through NFκB or p38 MAPK by increasing the expression of TNF-α [16, 17]. Autophagy is a type of programmed cell death, like apoptosis. Autophagy involves multiple processes such as phagocytosis or endocytosis, formation of the autophagosome, recycling of intracellular proteins, and degradation of extracellular antigens. At the cellular level, autophagy can determine cell fate, that is, survival or death. LC3 processing is a marker of autophagy because it is a major step in the formation of the autophagosome. Generally, conversion of LC3A/B-I to LC3A/B-II indicates the activation of autophagy because it involves ubiquitinase-like enzymes that cause the selective degradation of target molecules [18]. In the present study, the ratio of conversion of LC3A/B-I to LC3A/B-II decreased in a dose-dependent manner (Figure 4), suggesting that autophagy was one of the cell death processes in macrophages with the different degrees of contribution. PU.1 is one of the transcription factors in monocytes and plays pivotal roles in the expression of various genes [19, 20]. Expression of PU.1 indicates the involvement of apoptotic pathways [21, 22]. Interestingly, exposure of RAW246.7 cells to higher concentrations of GO types decreased the expression of PU.1 and conversion of LC3A/B-I to LC3A/B-II. These results suggest that PU.1 plays a regulatory role in inducing autophagy in RAW246.7 cells. Furthermore, GAPDH expression was not affected by the increase in the concentrations of GO types. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report on constant GAPDH expression in macrophages exposed to surface-functionalized GOs. Therefore, GAPDH may be used instead of p-Act to normalize gene expression in macrophages. These results highlight the need for further studies to determine mechanisms underlying immune response or cellular toxicity, including autophagy, to establish strategies for preventing or treating respiratory and immunological toxicities in humans. Furthermore, these results indicate that appropriate preparation of GOs is necessary in manufacturing plants and industrial environments”

        FYI ~ From the 2020 paper on NAC and reduced graphene oxide (linked above): “The distinct GO reduction mechanisms evidenced for the two green reductants strongly influence the biological response of the different m-rGO samples. In fact, we have demonstrated that, when NAC-reduced m-rGO samples are administered to eukaryotic cells, the ROS production levels are comparable to those related to GO. Therefore, reduction with NAC leads to rGO materials less cytotoxic than those obtained from H2A, which is in full accord with the already reported negligible oxidative capability exerted by NAC on glutathione.6 This opens up new routes in the possible applications of non-cytotoxic rGO materials for biomedical purposes.”

        You may find this 2018 article interesting https://www.imeche.org/news/news-article/feature-graphene-the-not-so-wonder-material, and this one sentence, in particular: “. . . an awareness of the material’s structure, characteristics and potential defects could give researchers and innovators a much-needed shot in the arm and the confidence to scale-up and bring products to market, says Oikonomou, who has co-founded Eksagon, a company exploring graphene-based energy generation, storage and conversion technologies.” Interesting choice of words, from my perspective . . .

        Like

        1. Thanks for the specific reply Stephers,

          That graphene has indeed been used in vaping cigarette filters, is, I think, conclusive, in answering that question.

          Regarding NAC degrading GO into other, possibly damaging by products, this seems likely since GO has been put into so many varying chemical configurations then chemically degrading it will undoubtedly produce some unexpected results. In a video inteview of Dr Stephanie Seneff by Dr Mercola a few weeks back, when the topic of detox came up they both went right away to triggering autophagy with keto diet.

          I find it curious that Amazon has erased NAC from my product search results.

          Like

        2. RE: Cancer, see thetruthaboutcancer dot com
          Figures that Ty Bollinger, who has compiled alternative cancer cures is on the list of 12 along with Mercola and Robert Kennedy Jr, to be censored and deleted from the web.

          Like

    2. “It’s totally safe. You know it’s totally safe because we’re totally researching the safety of it even as we force it on you. As long as we continue to research its safety, you can rest assured it’s safe.”

      This is a recurring theme, isn’t it? Check out the WHO’s handy-dandy fact sheet on 5G, which assures us that “no adverse health effect has been causally linked with exposure to wireless technologies” and “no consequences for public health are anticipated.” Then they go on to say:

      WHO is conducting a health risk assessment from exposure to radiofrequencies, covering the entire radiofrequency range, including 5G, to be published by 2022. WHO will review scientific evidence related to potential health risks from 5G exposure as the new technology is deployed, and as more public health-related data become available.

      In other words, you’re all a bunch of lab rats… but hey, don’t worry about it.

      (It’s also interesting that the WHO page I linked to doesn’t let you open all the FAQ answers at once, like every other FAQ page I’ve seen does. When you open one block of text, the other block closes. Perhaps this is an example of technology entraining our brains how to work. In this case, it helps us compartmentalize.)

      Liked by 1 person

  65. This was posted yesterday by Jon Rappoport: “Soothing symptoms of anxiety” with graphene oxide; it’s in millions of masks: This is not a joke; it’s real” https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2021/08/30/soothing-symptoms-of-anxiety-with-graphene-oxide-its-in-millions-of-masks/.

    If you recall, in this comments thread, I had linked a warning about this on July 18/19:

    STEPHERS
    July 18, 2021 at 6:51 pm
    “How can an artificial material [graphene] instruct neurons and influence their behavior?” See the work of Laura Ballerini: http://phdneurobiology.sissa.it/eng/faculty/laura-ballerini.aspx “. . . graphene research has already emerged as the top research front in materials science. However, due to the unique structure of graphene, many of the possibilities it offers are still poorly understood. We will investigate the biological processes influenced by nanomaterials and nanomaterials interaction with biological membranes. Single and multiple electrophysiological measures will be used in the case of neurons and cardiomyocytes to assess the electrophysiological effects of conductive nanomaterials on electrically propagating complex tissues.”

    STEPHERS
    July 19, 2021 at 6:53 am
    If interested in reading this paper, consider the potential weaponization of this procedure: “Study: Graphene nanoparticles interfere with the development of anxiety-related behaviors in vertebrates” https://www.news-medical.net/news/20210311/Study-Graphene-nanoparticles-interfere-with-the-development-of-anxiety-related-behaviors-in-vertebrates.aspx.

    Further, a year ago, on August 28, 2020, I posted an essay covering this very notion of zombification of the masses via nanomaterials (in tandem with EMFs, and myriad ways of penetrating the blood-brain barrier): https://pieceofmindful.com/2020/08/28/mass-zombification-via-remote-biohacking-the-farce-awakens/.

    Like

  66. A 7-minute video, “Transhumanism and Neurocontrol – Dr. Chinda Brandolino”: https://153news.net/watch_video.php?v=BNDWOY4W1R2H. Brandolino affirms the premise I have continually asserted – graphene being used in tandem with 5G (and eventually 6G and beyond) for neuronal control of the masses.

    This blog post from 2016 features a fairy sculpture, in which the fairy wings depict graphene, and she is “wrestling” with a dandelion puffball: https://susanrushton.net/2016/01/09/a-fairy-wrestles-with-a-dandelion-will-her-wish-come-true/. Is it curious that the author of the post stated: “Imagine thoughts weighed and wrapped up in graphene…”???

    On graphene and dandelion puffballs . . . “HRL Laboratories, owned jointly by Boeing and General Motors, has developed what it calls ‘the world’s lightest material’ by creating a tiny lattice structure made up of hollow, interwoven graphene tubes that are one-thousandth the thickness of a human hair. Boeing hopes the material will make airplanes lighter. A matchbox-size piece of the material can sit on a dandelion’s puffball. It can absorb a shock and return to its original shape.” https://www.seattlebusinessmag.com/technology/graphene-gambit (June 2017). For more information in this regard (and a photo depicting this): https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2015/10/13/boeing-unveils-worlds-lightest-material-a-metal-that-is-999-air_n_8284386.html (October 2015).

    Like

  67. From August 2017, “Graphene to make revolutionary changes in smart clothing technology” https://www.textiletoday.com.bd/graphene-make-revolutionary-changes-smart-clothing-technology/.

    “Graphene has already made a huge blast in the next step of wearable technology. Recently, researchers teamed up with a wearable technology company to unveil the world’s first Light Black Dress (LBD) containing graphene at the Trafford Centre in Manchester. The dress has changed color in sync with the wearer’s breathing, using tiny LED lights where graphene was used to power the LED lights and as a sensor to record the wearer’s breathing.”

    “From the time of the invention of graphene, it is magically changing the modern technology and researchers predict that it is going to make science fiction comes true. It has a wide range of applications in almost every sector and it will highly contribute in $22 billion technical textile market by 2027. After all, we have to keep in mind that graphene is made of carbon, which is everywhere in nature and in fact it’s a part of our body as well. The problem with graphene is the same that, this size nano material could be harmful. Therefore more research has already undertaken to determine if graphene is harmful to the body and this is very crucial for the commercialization and development of graphene based products.”

    Like

    1. This 2017 textiletoday.com press release reads as if written by a very basic propogandabot. I would hope the cutting edge bots of 2021 would reveal the method with less obvious enthusiasm.

      “The problem with graphene is the same that, this size nano material could be harmful. Therefore more research has already undertaken to determine if graphene is harmful to the body and this is very crucial for the commercialization and development of graphene based products.”

      Very crucial, indeed.

      Like

  68. Of course, the caption, “In the future you will own nothing and be happy” as personified in the grin of pure contentment that coalesces on the face of an anxiety-free smart-city slicker is perhaps even less obvious… But all snark aside, I do have serious reservations about this whole revelation of method clause that the evil-doers seem contractually obliged to provide.

    I will admit that aside from an enjoyable comparative religion class in high school I have actively avoided considering the spiritual dimension in general and any organized religion in particular these past 40 years. However, I have always allowed that there might be a significant, and practical relevance beyond the allegorical for myself and perhaps I might discover such, as I lay dying most likely. My mother, as she lay dying a few months ago, startled me as she struggled through the morphine and aphasia that had made communication all but impossible to suddenly and emphatically say the words, “Dark Forces”, which seemed to be spoken as in a dream. My mother faced the stroke and the subsequent discovery of various cancers coursing through her with a stoic bravery, and although she was persuaded by my brother to take last rites had never discussed any matters of a spiritual or religious nature with me, even at the end. This “revelation” of hers has stayed with me as I have considered these past 18 months of what seem to me to be the unmasking of some very dark forces, indeed.

    Of course, I have noticed that we humans have been living in an ever more precarious situation for quite some time; and have since high school paid attention to the ever accelerating pace of life, and the deteriorating affects on our society. By 9/11 I was fairly certain that the world had indeed changed and the prognosis that things would never being the same was a mild understatement. It felt as if we had been bundled into the trunk of a certain blue Thunderbird convertible and were pedal to the metal committed because there was no going back… cue sappy inspirational music… and freeze mid air.

    Here we are coming up on another 911 and we are indeed on that precipice, again. There is a difference this time around, though. I don’t know if it’s just that the propaganda is beyond absurd, or that we can so easily recognize it’s efficacy in those around us. There is something truly evil in how they have revealed their utter contempt for humanity, and all living things on this planet. And it is this revelation that also feels false, somehow. Of course, I would never trust any revelation from these psychopaths as being anything other than deception. Hence, the very notion of a revelation of method and somehow obtaining our tacit approval for our own damnation for their absolution seems a bit of a stretch. Clearly, their pants are on fire.

    So, what’s going on if we can’t even trust the satanists to play by their own rules?

    I keep considering what it would be like to be one of the chosen few who seem to be above the law and beyond the reach of morality, once they’ve managed to destroy the world as we know it. Sure, they’ve got the deep underground honeycomb hideouts with all the cool star wars techie gear, and they’ll have lots of robots to play with. But, it’s going to get awful boring after a while and pretty soon it’s going to be, “Here’s Johnny!” time – oh, the larks…. But seriously, are they that confident that they will transmute to gods once HAL gets the kinks out of the quantum theory?

    Open the pod bay doors, Hal…

    I’m sorry, Klaus. You know I can’t do that.

    Liked by 1 person

  69. Or… If they are not in league with Satan, then who? Or more to the point what? Ziggy Stardust and the Spiders from Mars seems to have a renewed relevance as I read about the imminent spatial web. Not to mention various nanobots and assorted biotech effluvia floating in the atmosphere. It’s all very hi-tech, all of a sudden. All the geo-engineering and the ionization of the atmosphere, in concert with the irradiation of the same. I just don’t see the slam dunk here for the people with all the money? Surely, they will suffer a horrible fate as well? Surely, they have not yet attained their goal of transhumanism or they wouldn’t be experimenting on us at such a fevered pitch.

    I just don’t know what to think, but it sure doesn’t seem like human nature we’re dealing with, no matter how grotesque that can be. Any help?

    Like

  70. I agree that the total destruction of the Earth’s ecology or of humanity cannot be a human agenda. So if that total destruction is not the agenda then it is just some big dramatic production, and the big destruction is just written into the script.

    Personally, I concluded when I understood the killing of the oceans to be real, that it seems to extend beyond the limits of mere stupidity.

    If total destruction IS the actual agenda, then it is spirits, demons or aliens but no one can reveal that truth for you here in a box full of noisy skeptics.

    You can either develop the skills to see for yourself (perhaps develop remote viewing skills) or find someone with visionary or clairvoyant skills that you trust to tell you the truth. Either way you are on your own, or you ride with the group you are in. Good Luck.

    Liked by 1 person

  71. Following is a powerful, resolute, and passionate message from a friend of my dear friend, Alison McDowell. Here, Ilana, speaks on all of our behalf. There is still much work to be done, and my resolve to continue this crucial engagement on behalf of all natural life is unwavering. I hope you will take time to listen (16 min): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HAKyx7Izqgs.

    Like

  72. “Self-Assembling Graphene Oxide Nanotech Now Found Also in Pfizer-BioNTech COMIRNATY Vaccine: German Video Reveals Self-Assembling Specks and Crystalline Networks Forming”: https://everydayconcerned.net/2021/08/15/self-assembling-graphene-oxide-nanotech-now-found-also-in-pfizer-vaccine-german-video-reveals-self-assembling-specks-and-crystalline-networks-forming/ (August 15, 2021).

    For an esoteric perspective on the Comirnaty jab . . .

    Since the shot can be considered a “clot shot” — in so far as the shot coagulates blood (resulting in blood clots, as I have written about) — it is quite telling (if you understand word “spelling”/sorcery) that the anagram of Comirnaty is literally, “Tiromancy”: https://anagram-solver.net/Tiromancy.

    See here on Tiromancy: https://futurescopes.com/divination/tiromancy/2322/tiromancy-predicting-future-cogulated-cheese.

    Yes, apparently, there is a form of “divination” (going back to the Middle Ages) — divining (revealing hidden knowledge) via COAGULATED cheese. I kid you not. This operation is not only militarized at its core, it is highly occult.

    One other anagram of “Comirnaty” (which as you can see already is a strange choice of word, to say the least) is “Torcimany” — which also carries meaning and further sorcery implications, as it was the title of a magnum opus penned in the early 15th century by a Catalan politician/poet: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luys_d%27Averçó. Speaking of Catalan, I have traced the Catalan Institute (nanotech/graphene) to be one of the key players in this entire operation: https://icn2.cat/en/, and I mentioned it in a previous post.

    In one anagram of Comirnaty, if you add a “p” or “m” to -atronymic . . . https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patronymic. This would be relevant, in my opinion, to issues pertaining to ancestry and DNA lineage; and of course, we then circle back to issues concerning synthetic/modified RNA/DNA.

    It all connects, and they do love their Revelation of the Method — even when subtly concealed. In this case, nearly any permutation of the word seems to carry much occult meaning.

    There are three more prominent words (in this case, 8-letter words) embedded within (https://wordfind.com/unscramble/comirnaty#results) . . .

    “caryotin” = a readily stained substance in the nucleus of a cell made up of DNA, RNA and proteins, aka chromatin (https://www.absp.org.uk/words/biolcells.shtml); and
    “minatory” = having a menacing quality (https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/minatory); and
    “acrimony” = corrosiveness; virulence https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/acrimony

    One could keep breaking down the word into even smaller components, finding many more smaller words (ie – atom) within . . . This is not as substantial, and occurs often within words. However, I do find the coincidences with the precise 9-letter anagrams, and even the 8-letter anagrams, to be statistically significant, and some readers may find it of interest.

    Like

  73. “Ph.D. graduate puts graphene under the microscope”
    “Recently returned, Mohammed Al-Amer explores the remarkable potential of graphene at Aramco’s Research and Development Center”” (February 2021): https://www.aramcolife.com/en/publications/the-arabian-sun/articles/2021/week-10/graphene-doctor-student.
    “The son of a retired Aramcon, Al-Amer is excited to be back at the company where he can put his graphene expertise to good use in developing next generation materials . . ‘If you have the mindset and the capital,’ he says, ‘nothing can stop Saudi Arabia from participating in and leading the Fourth Industrial Revolution.'”

    “Alfaisal University THE Featured Article: Graphene Research that Breaks the Mould” (April 2020): https://news.alfaisal.edu/alfaisal-university-the-featured-article-graphene-research-that-breaks-the-mould/.
    “. . . there is no magic, but nanomaterials are perhaps as close to sorcery as contemporary chemistry gets.”
    “Besides its medical applications, Alfaisal has a patent with oil and gas giant Saudi Aramco on a graphene-based product that is in the process of commercialisation.”

    “The Kingdom puts a lot of resources in,” says Professor Alsharaeh. “From 2010, since I came to Saudi Arabia…there has been major funding for all scientists, which is a major plan for this energy sector.” With agriculture, medicine, energy and textiles sectors all set to reap the benefits of nanotechnology, the commercial potential of graphene nanocomposites is invaluable.”

    Like

  74. “Versarien delivers quality-assured graphene-enhanced polymers to product designers” (from late Sept 2019): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BBGSXZZlRjE.

    Incidentally, in 2018, it was reported that Versarien was already involved in providing graphene (via the University of Manchester and Technion) for Israeli aerospace and the Israeli arms trade for the application of military drones in Gaza: https://therealnews.com/manchester-university-develops-israeli-drone-technology-despite-growing-student-opposition (an important read). Also see here: “Versarien PLC Collaboration with Israel Aerospace Industries” (October 2017) https://uk.advfn.com/stock-market/london/versarien-VRS/share-news/Versarien-PLC-Collaboration-with-Israel-Aerospace/75972981.

    And here is Versarien’s “Nanene” graphene-enabled N95 face mask: http://www.versarien.com/files/3815/9619/6343/Versarien_KN95_Facemask_Datasheet.pdf.

    Versarien’s CEO actually speaks here (near the end of the 5 min discussion) about using graphene in “baby milk”: “Versarien ‘make process of getting graphene more efficient so we can use its fantastic properties'” (April 2021) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xh362GjsGIQ.

    Here is an astute commenter on another video featuring the graphene work of Versarien: “Much was said about the persistence of graphene, and that production was being scaled up to thousands of tons. From my brief investigation of the topic it does appear that nano particles of graphene my be dangerous and something that we may not want loose in the environment. Nothing was asked about safety or ultimate disposal. Will the world be gradually poisoned by graphene nano particles? There may be a good story about the end of life of graphene containing products and how it is to be managed. At the inception of the development of the new material it is the right time to develop/explore the end-of-life processing, unfortunately the opportunity to ask about this was missed. When you follow up please ask about the full life cycle of the material. Now is the opportunity to ensure that there are no future ‘microplastic pollution’ type downsides.” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=djTIBwiLM_Y (“Graphene and future materials with Versarien,” June 2020)

    Like

  75. From March 2, 2021, “New study proposes a low cost, high efficiency mask design”
    by Oxford University Press https://phys.org/news/2021-03-high-efficiency-mask.html.
    “Researchers here propose a low cost ($1), tri-layer mask design containing nylon, modified polypropylene, and non-woven cotton fabrics. While the polypropylene layer is available in N95 masks, this design includes a graphene oxide and polyvinylidene fluoride mixture which acts as an active filtration layer. Recent studies show that the graphene oxide mixture has a high anti-bacterial activity making it ideal for respiratory masks. This coating has also proven to be effective even after being disinfected with H2O2, a popular practice when reusing masks. The addition of these membranes results in an efficiency level of 95%, like that of an N95, while also simplifying the number of layers in the design for increased comfort.”

    Like

    1. So, this is a graphene loaded mask, tested at 95% efficient at 0.03 microns with equipment unable to detect a virus or a shed graphene particle. It is tested as germicidal, not as viricidal. It is real cheap so I’d be willing to bet the filter media is manufactured in China. It is pictured, in the cartoon picture, with the two elastic bands for the ears, so is designed to allow significant air bypass.

      Even were this mask available it will be stuck in a shipping container off Seattle or Long Beach for months, then sold with inadequate labels to people clueless as to what wearing it will really accomplish.

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s